Are you doing this in TSO like HRECALL type commands or is it through the F
HSM,RECALL type commands?
Maybe if you are testing under TSO you need to add a STEPLIB to your LOGON
PROC? That is just a guess.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi
This are the standard HSM exits as (ARCMMEXT, ARCMDEXT ARCRDEXT) they
are called by the HSM address space,
Seems to me here the DFSMSHSM STEPLIB is ignored, and the DFSMS exits
book have a mysterious sentence:
Link-edit the replacement exit code into the proper library in the LNKLST
I managed to break it. :-(
Whenever someone tries to ftp into our 1.13 adcd system, we get (after typing
in the password):
ICH422I THE ENVIRONMENT CANNOT BECOME UNCONTROLLED.
BPXP014I ENVIRONMENT MUST REMAIN CONTROLLED FOR DAEMON (BPX.DAEMON)
PROCESSING.
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Seems to me here the DFSMSHSM STEPLIB is ignored, and the DFSMS exits book
have a mysterious sentence:
Link-edit the replacement exit code into the proper library in the LNKLST
concatenation (job or step libraries).
Not mysterious. It is WAD.
Did you do ALL these
Hi
I tried all I think, the intention would be to take from STEPLIB, but
EXITOFF EXITON has no effect, it takes from the LNKLST
On 12.12.2012 12:10, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
Miklos Szigetvari wrote:
Seems to me here the DFSMSHSM STEPLIB is ignored, and the DFSMS exits book
have a
What happens if you define DFSMRCL0 as program controlled although it is not
loadable at all? I had the same problem in another ADCD system from a
customer and solved this issue with a RACF definition as far as I can remember.
Gruß
Uwe
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: IBM Mainframe
Gadi, planning considerations for HiperDispatch mode white paper is a good
start... www.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/WP101229
Oz
Evren Ozan Baran
IBM LCST/e zPET Base Team Leader
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Note that IBM suggests there are circumstances where you should consider
disabling it:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/TD105930
Bart
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Peter Relson
Sent:
And now I have managed to make it work again: I deleted the BPX.DAEMON profile,
which makes the need for a program controlled environment go away. I think. Did
I mention that I hate USS?
Now, if anyone has any insight what I missed defining while still having the
bpx.daemon profile - I would
What is the DSN containing DFSMRCL0? We don't have IMS, so I don't know. But
you basically do:
RALTER PROGRAM * ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)
Pretty much any time you see that message, find the load library containing the
module (usually on the LNKLST), and do the above. Or simply do the
What is the DSN containing DFSMRCL0?
IMS1110.SDFSRESL or something.
RALTER PROGRAM * ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)
I did. I also refreshed PROGRAM. Same error. Besides, that IMS library is not
anywhere in LPA or linklist. As far as I can see, the usermod that puts it into
ieavtrml does not
Barbara,
What version of IMS are you running? AFAIK DFSMRCL0 is not used by IMS
Version 9 or later.
Second, this might be better posted on the RACF or IMS Newsgroups.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
Of
Ah, you don't refresh the PROGRAM class by doing a refresh of the PROGRAM
class. You do it with
SETROPTS WHEN(PROGRAM) REFRESH
What? You wanted consistency?
Everything must be loaded from a library. If none is specified, then it is
implicitly on the LNKLST or in the LPALST. If it is in the
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:26:08 +0100, nitz-...@gmx.net nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
What is the DSN containing DFSMRCL0?
IMS1110.SDFSRESL or something.
RALTER PROGRAM * ADDMEM('ims-loadlib'//NOPADCHK)
I did. I also refreshed PROGRAM. Same error. Besides, that IMS library is not
anywhere in LPA or
Lizette,
What version of IMS are you running? AFAIK DFSMRCL0 is not used by IMS
Version 9 or later.
Well, then someone should have told that to the people who deliver the ADCD
system. We are NOT running any IMS version, and that module name most probably
comes from IEAVTRML, that the ADCD
I am sorry but I just don't understand why the Extended Addressability Guide
does not discuss the usage of IARST64. This looks to be what I want to use but
do I need to issue IARV64 first to get the memory object or the IARV64
SHAREMEMOBJ to access these cells from other address spaces?
Read the prologue, the comments prefixed to the IARST64 macro
definition itself. Doing so will, I suspect, answer most or all of
your questions.
Try to get into the habit of reading these prologues. They treat
topics in a more advanced fashion and they assume more
knowledgeability than do some
What ICKDSF command can overwrite an entire volume. We want to make sure that
disks that are being replaced are wiped.
Thanks,
Tim Brown
Supervisor Computer Operations
Central Hudson Gas Electric
284 South Ave
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
Email: tbr...@cenhud.commailto:tbr...@cenhud.com
The following is suitable for a 3390 MOD-3.
TRKFMT UNIT(10FF) VFY(OL10FF) ERASE CYL(11,3339) CYCLES(1)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Brown [mailto:tbr...@cenhud.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:47 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: dsf to write over entire volume
What
APAR OA32369 fixed our issue, and we were able to apply our co-existence
maintenance.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Meehan, Cheryl
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 8:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
I would expect this problem to be APARable. Open an SR.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com
To:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:14:14 -0800, Skip Robinson wrote:
I would expect this problem to be APARable. Open an SR.
.
Thanks for your concurrence. But SMP/E nowadays is extremely
permissive about what characters may appear in a CSECT()
parameter of a ++MOD MCS. Some of these may reasonably
be
I'm assisting in developing a PTF which for a certain load module
(LMOD) replaces 45 MOD elements and adds one. One of the
replacing MODs contains a new external reference to the added
MOD. The PTF appears to APPLY fine and generate the LMOD
with RC=0. (I haven't tried a power-on test; that's
Those of us who received unlabeled tapes in the good old days lived by
this technique. The only down side was when there were one or more blocks
not a multiple of the override LRECL. Then things got interesting.
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
12/11/2012
Lizette is correct. The module affectionately known as Mr. Clean, is no longer
needed after V9.
MA
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/eiic/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.ims9.doc.iiv%2Fip0i13901003254.htm
Uninstalling DFSMRCL0
When you have completely migrated to IMS™ Version 9 or
TRKFMT ERASEDATA HEADRANGE(0,15) CYCLES(1) UNIT(380F) VERIFY(*NONE*)
Works for any 3390.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 11:03 AM, O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
obrie...@mail.nih.gov wrote:
The following is suitable for a 3390 MOD-3.
TRKFMT UNIT(10FF) VFY(OL10FF) ERASE CYL(11,3339) CYCLES(1)
--
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:41:19 -0600, Mary Anne Matyaz maryanne4...@gmail.com
wrote:
Lizette is correct. The module affectionately known as Mr. Clean, is no longer
needed after V9.
(nit pick at V9, not after V9 or after migration to V9)
MA
W dniu 2012-12-12 18:04, Don Williams pisze:
ICKDSF is not intended to erase volumes.
But it can erase the volumes, can't it?
Now days, DASD volumes tend to be virtual.
Virtual volume still contain real data. Excluding passing away
structured log file technology (RVA, SVA), when you erase
I am going batsh*t crazy trying to add tapes to the RMM scratch tape list. I
use the panel to add a scratch tape and it shows in INIT status.
I can't change it to scratch status cause the panels work against me. Is there
a STRAIGHFORWARD way to just add VOLSERS that are immediately ready to be
On 12/12/2012 7:52 PM, Mike Wojtukiewicz wrote:
I am going batsh*t crazy trying to add tapes to the RMM scratch tape list. I
use the panel to add a scratch tape and it shows in INIT status.
I can't change it to scratch status cause the panels work against me. Is there
a STRAIGHFORWARD way to
If I turn on Capacity on Demand (i.e. make our 507 look like a 509 say)
will our software that looks at CPU model recognise the change?
I seem to recall that in a past life it didn't, unless you IPL while CoD
is turned on.
Thanks
Alan Field
Technical Engineer Principal
BCBS Minnesota
Phone:
I mostly agree. I've been in shops with 10+ year old DASD, so they might still
customers using structured log file DASD. You need to how your DASD works, in
order to develop a reliable erasure plan.
However, I had a teammate delete the virtual volumes on old shark prior to
erasing the data.
Yes, ICKDSF can erase volumes, but I don't think IBM guarantees that it is a
secure erase function. There might be situation where residual data is still
readable.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent:
I think what is being overlooked in this discussion is what is the corporate
policy regarding the erasing of disk media.
In planning to erase disk media it's important to seek the advice of the
corporate IT Security advisor or IT auditor and get sign-off as to what is the
approved methodology
On 12/12/2012 5:58 PM, Alan Field wrote:
If I turn on Capacity on Demand (i.e. make our 507 look like a 509 say)
will our software that looks at CPU model recognise the change?
Software will obtain the configuration information on its own schedule. Some
will get your configuration at startup.
35 matches
Mail list logo
