Hi again,
is there anybody who can answer my last (and maybe not least) question ?
Thank you in advance.
Massimo
2013/5/6 Massimo Biancucci mad4...@gmail.com
Hi everybody,
I want to thank you for your valuable support anyway I hope you'll have a
little more patience and give me the final
Staff of the forum,
Recently we had problems after cancel the TCPIP Trace, which was
necessary to IPL the partition of the z / OS 1.11 and consulting a
specialist product, it informed us that the TCPIP does not clean up
memory when it is canceled and ... when it makes a start of another
then this
Starting from z10 an LPAR in zVM mode supports mix of IFLs ad CPs and,
of course, IFL cannot be used for z/OS guests.
What about Coupling Facility?
Does such LPAR mode support ICF processors?
What processors can be used for CF guest? CPs and ICFs?
Just curious.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz,
open can of worms
When someone writes about excessive amount of CPU time, I'm always left
wondering.
A lot of CPU time, I understand. More than it used to, I understand.
But excessive -- compared to what?
If you ask for something to be done, whether explicitly or implicitly, it
will take
Radoslaw,
The PR/SM planning guide is your friend here (SB10-7153 for z10 et al):
Chapter 3 Processor considerations for z/VM mode LPs:
In a z/VM mode partition, z/VM will:
snip
Operate coupling facility virtual machines in support of a Parallel Sysplex test
environment on ICFs and optionally
What about Coupling Facility?
Does such LPAR mode support ICF processors?
What processors can be used for CF guest? CPs and ICFs?
We use an ICF for MVS guests under VM. A CP can be used instead of an ICF, but
when we stated to run out of capacity we saw severe Virtual Coupling Facility
When you say consulting a specialist product: what is that?
Did you contact IBM for assistance?
Why are you cancelling TCPIP? Is there a reason you cannot stop it normally?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
I have a friend who used to work for Microsoft in the area of performance
monitoring of the operating system itself. He was laid off three years ago.
Microsoft is more interested in new whiz-bang features and components than in
performance improvement. I guess their thinking is that the
Roger,
The FOTS1373 message is being emitted from Ported Tools OpenSSH. Are you
able to connect a basic SSH session to the target system with that z/OS
user?
Because the Ported Tools SSH client can't be run under OMVS, The best way
to test this is to use a generic ssh client to connect to z/OS
The cancellation was inadvertent action of an analyst, the question is
why this happens and if anyone has had this problem ... but if this is
not the list for which I may have answers to requests, I will go to
another group, then I apologize.
The expert consulted an analyst is representative of
Sounds like many of our users. Gotta have the fancy bling. If it needs
rebooting , that's just part of the cost. Same in the food industry. Tasty
is better than healthy.
On May 13, 2013 7:57 AM, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote:
I have a friend who used to work for Microsoft in the area of
For the current ML1 data, you can issue the commands directly (hsend migrate
dsn(x) ML2).
There is a variation of the HSM LIST command that will show only the datasets
on ML1.
You will still need (at least) 1 ML1 volume if you are using the AUTODUMP
feature. This is where HSM stores the VTOC
BTW: Co:Z SFTP uses IBM Ported Tools OpenSSH for the underlying ssh layer -
that is where authentication occurs.
You might want to take a look at the slides/recordings of the following
webinars on our site:
IBM Ported Tools for z/OS: OpenSSH - Key Authentication (Part 1)
IBM Ported Tools for
This is a good group for this type of questions. Quite often we ask the
why? sort of questions, and want to make sure that you've remembered to
get official support from the vendor. We have occasionally had people come
here thinking this was an official IBM support site. And get upset when
nobody
Dear All
I could never thought that DFSORT should help to produce percentages of the
records...
Thank you for your (more or less tricky) help
Kind regards
Kostas
On 10 May 2013 20:10, Norbert Friemel nf.ibmm...@web.de wrote:
On Fri, 10 May 2013 08:53:40 -0500, K wrote:
Two steps:
//*
Allan,
I think you mean set ML1 days equal to Primary days as there is no ML2 days
parameter.
Once that is done, data currently on ML1 should become eligible for migration
to ML2 thus eliminating the need to issue the HLIST and subsequent HMIG / ML2
commands.
Mark,
What is the threshold
Agreed. You are correct. I was just about to post an update. To my reponse..
Al Staller | Z Systems Programmer | KBM Group | (Tel) 972 664-3565 |
allan.stal...@kbmg.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of O'Brien, David
Activate debug on both ends of connection.
Here is my jcl to do that on the client side:
//STEPNAME EXEC PGM=COZBATCH,REGION=0M,
// PARM='ru=userid8 rh=host1.xyz.com'
//STEPLIB DD DISP=SHR,DSN=UTIL.TCP.COZ.LOADLIB
//STDOUT DD SYSOUT=*
//STDERR
In 20130511.154412.1327...@webmail03.dca.untd.com, on 05/11/2013
at 07:44 PM, esst...@juno.com esst...@juno.com said:
My question is How Do I properly Test and SET the Return Code in the
EDIT MACRO
LASTCC and MAXCC to test.
EXIT CODE(foo) to set.
Any examples would be appreciated.
My apologies if I was not clear or if I offended you.
Exessive for me was when ANTMAIN with a service class of SYSTEM took ninety
percent CPU for about two minutes while the flash copies were running.
Anyway the problem is solved thanks to Graham Harris.
Best Regards
Sheldon Davis
The Comm Server stack used to manage its CTRACE storage in a data space. In
V1R13, this was moved to 64-bit common (HVCOMMON) storage. The data space
would have been deleted when the stack address space ended, but common storage
has to be explicitly freed. I have not seen this happen, but if
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
This is a pervasive mainframe problem too.
I have not heard the term used recently, but for obvious reasons IBM
marketing people used to prize what they called 'hardware hawks' very
highly.
A hardware hawk was a customer executive whose unvarying
The word excessive is sometimes, I think, legitimate shorthand for
unexpectedly large in comparison with what has been the case.
It is important is to remember that excess is symptomatic. It
identifies something unfortunate that has happened. The question who
is be blamed for that thing, when
They reflect the assumption that most of their users will be benign, with
only a few being preternaturally stupid
I think most systems have been written with the assumption that most users
were folks like us. (Trusted, professional, benign, reasonably
knowledgeable.)
Now nearly every system
On Mon, 13 May 2013 10:46:45 -0400, John Gilmore wrote:
The work of Rufus Isaacs on aircraft-collision avoidance, which I have
mentioned here before, is highly instructive. He found that the only
safe collision-avoidance strategies for aircraft A in an air space
also occupied by aircrafts B, C,
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
begin extract
Plus those that would occur only to someone who was proficient in it.
(Or is that what you meant to say?)
/end extract
I said what I meant to say. At least some of the developers of a
compiler for language L are usually proficient in it. In my
experienced
I understand the root cause of this issue (which is essentially repetitive
parallel execution of large numbers of SRBs within ANTMAIN when
flashcopy eligibility/pairing checking is applied against very large
numbers of volumes) is recognised, and is intended to be addressed in a
future version of
Since no one has asked yet, I will.
Is SYSTEM the appropriate level of priority for this task?
I don't have any flashcopy here, so I have no experience or even knowledge of
all that ANTMAIN does.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original
A large cognac please.
En réponse à Grillo Paul arue...@gmail.com :
-- Début du message d'origine
Thank Steven for his explanations. I'am not TCPIP team, I get
better
information about the problem that led us to having to IPL the
LPAR,
which was
ANTMAIN is one of the tasks IBM automatically assigns to SYSTEM, iirc.
So, if this is (still) true, the answer is YES.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-Original Message-
From: Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Agreed - it would be nice if TSO OMVS had a solution for masking passwords,
but it doesn't.
In the mean time, it is silly to completely disable the ssh client under
TSO OMVS - it would suffice to simply disable password-interactive mode
under the Ported Tools ssh client if a tty that doesn't
I'm pretty sure I know the answer (no), but I just want to make sure. Is there
any method other than loading the original key parts that one can load the
current production keys into a cryptocard at another (DR) site?
No TKE available, if that makes a difference.
W dniu 2013-05-13 23:18, Frank Swarbrick pisze:
I'm pretty sure I know the answer (no), but I just want to make sure.
Is there any method other than loading the original key parts that
one can load the current production keys into a cryptocard at another
(DR) site?
For master key, NO.
No TKE
Hi
Using the catalog interface program IGGCSI00
And say I am looking for all SYS1.*. Datasets then CSIRESNM. = CL44'SYS1.*' ?
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
I believe you should use CSIFILTK instead of CSIRESNM. Look at the
complete documentation of Catalog Search Interface User's Guide. Check
section 11.3 which explains Selection Criteria Fields along with examples.
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/DGT2C191/11.0
On Mon, 13 May 2013 15:15:06 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
Agreed - it would be nice if TSO OMVS had a solution for masking passwords,
but it doesn't.
Long ago, before SSL was available, I went to PMR with this. I even used
the magic word, security. I reported it as a problem with stty -echo,
and
Since no one has asked yet, I will.
Is SYSTEM the appropriate level of priority for this task?
I don't have any flashcopy here, so I have no experience or even knowledge of
all that ANTMAIN does.
Regardless if you use flashcopy or not, you'll have an ANTMAIN address space
automatically
Steve,
Thank you for the info - the problem was related to permission
settings on the users directory...
Thanks, Roger
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
38 matches
Mail list logo
