W dniu 2014-06-16 20:43, Skip Robinson pisze:
I can think of several scenarios, but how about one that we can all relate
to--and I'm the electric company: a data center power failure. Sure, what
are the odds of a power failure requiring an enterprise-wide IPL *and*
missing your one and only IODF
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:45:55 -0700, Skip Robinson wrote:
Both of our data centers went down after UPS was exhausted. We
had no generators at the time because--scout's honor--some crazy executive
believed that alternative power would cast aspersions on our product; he
had blocked all efforts to
First off, thank you to W. Kevin Kelley for your response dated Thursday,
June 12, 2014. I am guessing that based on your response,
It is up to automation to inspect the Message Flood Indicator(s) in the WQE.
I am curious exactly what indicates a message is to be suppressed.
There is the
Robert A. Rosenberg has rehearsed the obvious, focusing on the details
of inventory management.
My point was a different one. It was to illustrate in a homely way
that serialization requirements are ineluctable.
It is of course possible to avoid the explicit use of the word
'serialization', say
In
ofb798b28b.5d3e7d0e-on85257cf8.007ed65c-85257cf8.007ff...@us.ibm.com,
on 06/15/2014
at 07:16 PM, Peter Relson rel...@us.ibm.com said:
I disagree a bit. It does not hurt to add indicators of things that
are subsets. A refreshable module, if treated as reentrant, will
work
Not if the
A large zFS data set was allocated w/o a dataclass. Now the data set is not
extended format, so it cannot grow larger than 4GiB. I was looking into DFDSS
COPYing or DUMP/RESTORE into a new extended format zFS data set.
I tried various ways, but it seems DFDSS is not willing to copy or restore
I can't answer your question. Especially since I don't know what various
ways that you tried. But I did have a possible thought you might want to
try. I assume the zFS container is not mounted at some UNIX mount point.
So, how about doing trying this:
1) Rename zFS data set (CLUSTER DATA) to a
W dniu 2014-06-17 13:35, Peter Hunkeler pisze:
A large zFS data set was allocated w/o a dataclass. Now the data set is not
extended format, so it cannot grow larger than 4GiB. I was looking into DFDSS
COPYing or DUMP/RESTORE into a new extended format zFS data set.
I tried various ways, but
On 06/17/14 07:35, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
A large zFS data set was allocated w/o a dataclass. Now the data set is not
extended format, so it cannot grow larger than 4GiB. I was looking into DFDSS
COPYing or DUMP/RESTORE into a new extended format zFS data set.
I tried various ways, but it
This was a VSAM file with multiple record layouts. One record for
most screen information. One record per line of comment text, about 8
per screen. It would read the records and display the screen. When
the user said update, it would read the record, update the
information, and update, add, or
Hi,
I am trying to determine why our data set dump job (ADRDSSU) runs longer on
some days. Here is the type of dump being performed:
DUMP DATASET(INCLUDE(**) -
EXCLUDE( -
SYS1.VVDS.** -
SYS1.VTOCIX.** ) -
BY((DSCHA,EQ,YES))) -
STORGRP(PRDBAT) -
I can't answer your question. Especially since I don't know what various
ways that you tried.
My intent really only was to make sure I'm not missing a DFDSS option that
would do this. I didn't find anything the like in the manual. That's why I
didn't post details.
So, how about doing trying
I hope the updated JZOS Cookbook would have some samples exploiting these
features. Are there any samples available anywhere as of now ?
Mohammad
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 11:48:38 -0500, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
There has for some time been a package in JZOS (in the SDK) named
Thanks. I understand. DFDSS is certainly a more efficient data copier than
IDCAMS REPRO!
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Peter Hunkeler p...@gmx.ch wrote:
I can't answer your question. Especially since I don't know what various
ways that you tried.
My intent really only was to make sure
The 1st and most likely cause is varying amounts of data being dumped.
The 2nd most likely cause is competition for resources.
To resolve the first case, use the restore command with PARM='TYPRUN=NORUN' to
determine the contents of the various tape(s). This will produce a simulated
restore.
http://unicode-inc.blogspot.com/2014/06/announcing-unicode-standard-version-70.html
quote
Version 7.0 of the Unicode Standard is now available, adding 2,834 new
characters. This latest version adds the new currency symbols for the
Russian ruble and Azerbaijani manat, approximately 250 emoji
John McKown wrote:
begin extract
Some of the new characters seem reasonable. But Webdings and Wingdings? Why
not a Unicode character for the Mona Lisa? Or for specific corporate
logos. Hey, might be a money maker!?
/end extract
Unicode does make private code points available, with one of their
I set PLOTMIN(0) so we can see all the wait reasons (below). Is all the ECB
WAIT time attributable to waiting on I/O to post complete? I still don't
understand why this would be such a large amount of the elapsed time. I would
think disk and tape active would be the larger part.
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:20:33 -0500, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
It certainly doesn't make sense to go to the overhead of creating a new
USERCAT rather than a new alias to an existing USERCAT for each new TSO
user -- unless perhaps you have a very small, fairly static number of
TSO users.
There are RACF
There is an old presentation (I forget whom to attribute to) that shows
relative response times from CPU cache to memory to device cache to physical io
in terms of seconds.
This scale ranges from a few seconds to many years on this scale.
Your *MINIMUM* response time is to device cache for
And test your S-A IPL and your Disaster Recovery plan every so often.
Bill Fairchild, Senior Software Engineer
ASG Software Solutions
1333 Third Avenue South
Naples, FL 34102-6400
USA
- Original Message -
From: Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hello list!
We are planning to improve our existing dataclass used for extended
(format/addressability) datasets by changing the following options:
1. Add'l Volume Amount to S.
2. Space Constraint Relief to Y
3. Reduce Space Up to (%) to 50
4. RLS Above the 2-GB Bar to
I know there are some on this list that aren't big fans of Cringley, but you
can't dispute many of his points in the ebook. Friends that I have still at
IBM report things are continuing to get worse not better.
http://www.cringely.com/2014/06/04/decline-fall-ibm/
I sincerely hope they can
I just tried IDCAMS REPRO for exactly the same purpose. The job shows it
worked, but a directory list of the new ZFS showed nothing in it.
So I then used the following PAX command:
/usr/sbin/mount -t ZFS -f PLEX.OLD.AGGR002.LDS0002 /service2
/usr/sbin/mount -t ZFS -f PLEX.NEW.AGGR002.LDS0002
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:51:42 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
I can't answer your question. Especially since I don't know what various
ways that you tried.
My intent really only was to make sure I'm not missing a DFDSS option that
would do this.
I didn't find anything the like in the manual.
I know there are some on this list that aren't big fans of Cringley, but you
can't dispute many of his points in the ebook
Most people wait until the subject has died before publishing an obituary.
About twenty five years ago IBM was dying. Low and behold there was a
turnaround and the
W dniu 2014-06-17 21:18, Tom Marchant pisze:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 14:51:42 +0200, Peter Hunkeler wrote:
I can't answer your question. Especially since I don't know what various
ways that you tried.
My intent really only was to make sure I'm not missing a DFDSS option that
would do this.
I
I agree with your curiosity. I have never tried to clone a zFS using
REPRO, but have copied other VSAM LINEAR data sets (SMS ACDS, SCDS) with no
problems. But I didn't change them from non-EF to EF at the same time.
Perhaps an EF LINEAR data sets is not identical to a non-EF LINEAR data set
in
Ron: if you're only requesting a single row response (Fetch Only), why are you
using = for VENDOR_NBR or VENDOR_DEPT_NBR. If anything they should be
strictly equal. It would greatly reduce the number of index rows retrieved.
signature = 6 lines follows
Neil Duffee, Joe
We routinely use DSS dump/restore to clone/migrate ZFS around the
enterprise, but always to similar architecture. The only humongous (EF)
ZFS I've created was for ServerPac work space, and I started with an empty
volume. I agree with what's been said about radically different internals
in EF.
On Jun 17, 2014, at 2:34 PM, R.S. wrote:
---SNIP--
Regarding original problem- I see two interesting issues:
1. What's magic inside zFS which makes the CI-level copy unusable?
Extended format adds some suffix to physical blocks, but Control
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:49:06 -0700, Skip Robinson jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
wrote:
. The only humongous (EF)
ZFS I've created was for ServerPac work space, and I started with an empty
volume.
My largest zFS is a single SMPNTS data set in one of my sysplexes shared
by all the tech teams. It is
W dniu 2014-06-17 22:49, Skip Robinson pisze:
We routinely use DSS dump/restore to clone/migrate ZFS around the
enterprise, but always to similar architecture. The only humongous (EF)
ZFS I've created was for ServerPac work space, and I started with an empty
volume. I agree with what's been said
In
cae1xxdhwercapn56phdyvwxt1pgh_jjx5n82cafmaitjbnv...@mail.gmail.com,
on 06/16/2014
at 07:45 PM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com said:
Programmed serialization---It can be done, adequately if
longwindedly, with just a TS instruction
Disabled spin locks could be done with a TS;
We are trying to set up encryption on our TS7700 backend stacked tapes (we
don't have any native tape drives) and I have a few questions with doing
encryption setup.
We created a test pool (Pool 2), what I'm not sure of is the current tapes
with this pool that have been used in the past have a
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:33:19 +, Bob Shannon wrote:
I predict that in twenty years another pundit will publish yet another
prediction of IBM's imminent demise.
I'm somewhat less sanguine than Bob.
I think I'll buy the epub and have a read while I'm lounging on the beach with
the mutt -
Shmuel and I---What's new?---may disagree; or again we may not.
Serialization is best accomplished in layered fashion with supervisor
assistance; and for this reason Dijkstra's unlayered semaphores are,
at best, misbegotten.
That said, serialization can be implemented in ugly, resource-hogging
At 07:07 -0500 on 06/17/2014, Mike Schwab wrote about Re: RENT, REFR
and key=0 storage - A correction:
This was a VSAM file with multiple record layouts. One record for
most screen information. One record per line of comment text, about 8
per screen. It would read the records and display
38 matches
Mail list logo
