I think there is a tendency for folks to use the term JCL (yes, incorrectly of
course) to mean some sort of batch control statements, hence FTP JCL,
IDCAMS JCL, etc. I assumed that was the OP's usage.
Yes, the longer LRECL may imply getting the FTP control statements
(sub-commands IIRC) out of
Hi,
How do I rename a dataset in batch if it will need to be cataloged in a
different catalog?
For example, I would like to rename SYS1.FOOBAR to SYSV.FOOBAR.
Datasets with an HLQ of SYSV are cataloged in a different catalog the datasets
with an HLQ of SYS1.
This is very simple in ISPF, but
If the dataset is non-VSAM and the target catalog is the one that the new
DSN belongs in under normal catalog search rules, then renaming the dataset
using the TSO rename command handles the catalog details with no other
action required.
If you want the new DSN in a non-normal catalog and the
Gadi wrote:
How do I rename a dataset in batch if it will need to be cataloged in a
different catalog?
For example, I would like to rename SYS1.FOOBAR to SYSV.FOOBAR.
Datasets with an HLQ of SYSV are cataloged in a different catalog the datasets
with an HLQ of SYS1.
This is very simple in ISPF,
This is where you need to do some elimination of certain factors :
(1) Does your ESTAE actually work?
Test it by doing a link to a dummy program and forcing that dummy program to
abend
(2) Is it related to the TSO command environment?
Test this by using TSO dummy and re-test using the dummy
It is declared as authorized in IKJTSOxx what is the significance of that
I'll research it thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:25 AM, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
This is where you need to do some elimination of certain factors :
(1) Does your ESTAE actually
Hint : parallel TMP
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:50 AM, Rob Scott rsc...@rocketsoftware.com wrote:
Hint : parallel TMP
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web:
Are the datasets all NON VSAM that you want to rename? Are then on SMS or
NONSMS volumes?
Could you explain more of what this rename is for? Why you need to do this?
If it is because of version changes in software, look at SYMBOLICRELATE
function.
I use this a lot for datasets that I ship out
Actually, the TSO Rename commands works just fine, so does the rename command
in FTP.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 2:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
YASI - Yet Another Strange Idea.
This idea is the illegitimate offspring from learning the R language
and thinking about z/OS UNIX. And, like many others from this source,
may well be really stupid. But I don't know the meaning of the word
fear! And many other words too for that matter.
A legacy
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:55:07 +0200, Charles Mills wrote:
Yes, the longer LRECL may imply getting the FTP control statements
(sub-commands IIRC) out of //INPUT DD * and into //INPUT DD DSN=
It does not imply that; one may use a longer LRECL in //INPUT DD *.
-- gil
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:54 AM, גדי בן אבי gad...@malam.com wrote:
Actually, the TSO Rename commands works just fine, so does the rename
command in FTP.
Gadi
as does the ALTER ... NEWNAME(...) command in IDCAMS. Using ISPF has
crippled the OP. Much like using Windows.
--
There is
Certainly sounds theoretically useful. FTP struck me as the more useful
initially, but any of the forms might be useful. You would need the ability to
specify FTP options like binary and RDW -- and space SITE options for output.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
So my submitted dataset would be (for example) LRECL=1024 with embedded DD *
FTP subcommands. JCL would process columns 1-72 and ignore 73 to 1023. FTP
would process columns 1 to 1023. Is that right? Would I even have to specify DD
*,LRECL=1024 or would QSAM pick it up from the fact that the
John McKown wrote:
YASI - Yet Another Strange Idea.
Ah, YASA (Yet Another Strange Acronym!) ;-D
A legacy program can read or write a z/OS UNIX file via QSAM via a normal DD
statement by using the PATH= instead of DSN=.
Define 'legacy'. That is a dirty word for me. I don't really like it
You could use HSM. Do a hbackds and then a hrecover with newname.
If your SMS routines are set up properly the SYSV (rename) would go into the
catalog you want.
On Wed, 8/27/14, גדי בן אבי gad...@malam.com wrote:
Subject: Rename dataset and
Is there an SMP/E utility that will compare the DDDEFs to the actual
libararies and make sure that they all exist?
z/OSMF's software management application will cross-check DDDEFs, data
set residency on volumes, and catalog entries for you.
In the z/OSMF Software Management task, its called
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:23:04 +0200, Charles Mills wrote:
So my submitted dataset would be (for example) LRECL=1024 with embedded DD *
FTP subcommands. JCL would process columns 1-72 and ignore 73 to 1023. FTP
would process columns 1 to 1023. Is that right? Would I even have to specify
DD
To Rob Scott's (as usual) wise response, I will add this: Is your ESTAE(X)
routine even getting control? Put a WTO at the very beginning of your recovery
routine to tell you that your routine got control. And beware that WTO may
alter some registers that your recovery routine may need, such
Thanks. Mostly idle curiosity on my part.
Yeah, I know submit LRECL is a bugaboo of yours. Can't say I disagree.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:40 PM
To:
Hi Shane,
I for one would be interested in hearing what Timothy had to say, and now I'm
afraid that I won't. If you want our take on the pricing announcement, you can
find it here in item #4 - http://www.watsonwalker.com/clist177.html.
Best regards,
Cheryl
==
Cheryl Watson
Hi all,
I'd like to thank everyone who responded to our request below. We've expanded
and uploaded our SMF Reference Summary that shows the record types that we know
about. You can see our announcement in item #8 -
http://www.watsonwalker.com/clist177.html.
I'm still working on the second
I have a working SUBSYS interface. My code processes a few of the interfaces
(OPEN, ALLOC,... etc.) and previously resided below the line. I am trying to
move the code above the line. Everything works fine except one item. In my
OPEN routine, I put my input/output routine's address into the
Hi,
I am working on zos 2.1 JES3.
can any one will summarize what is new on JES3 on zOS2.1?
does any one tell me about JES exits, if it is effected by these changes?
Is the converter\interpreter process had been changed?
is there any blocks that have been transfered or changed for the converter
http://www.thegrumpyprogrammer.com/2014/08/oh-unicode-why-are-you-so-frustrating.html
I found it quite interesting. And explains some of the decisions about
why Unicode is so complicated. Basically, it tried to be compatible
will all existing encodings, in some way or another.
--
There is
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:27:49 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
John McKown wrote:
A legacy program can read or write a z/OS UNIX file via QSAM via a normal DD
statement by using the PATH= instead of DSN=.
Define 'legacy'. That is a dirty word for me. I don't really like it 'they'
say
Yes it is I had a 306 abend in that the concatenation wasn't authorized my
esatex intercepted it and gave the use a chance to enter a valid dsn which I do
a SVC 99.
Later on however one of the progs goes XMEM via AR sac 256 and its in that prog
that I get a S0C4 Its all under the same TCB/RB
If you have not done so, I would review the z/OS Migration Guide that Marna
Walle puts out. It has a lot of that information in it
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/e0z3m100.pdf
There is a section called: JES3 migration actions
Second, if you have not done so, you might want to join
On 27 August 2014 09:52, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
Define 'legacy'. That is a dirty word for me. I don't really like it 'they'
say mainframe is 'legacy'. :-[
What is a good word for like we did it on OS/360. I.e. something
which is designed to run in z/OS batch using
On 27 August 2014 08:01, John McKown john.archie.mck...@gmail.com wrote:
I really wonder if this would be of any use in a z/OS environment.
//INPUT DD URL='file:///etc/resolv.conf'
or
//INPUT DD URL='http://some.web.site/download/filedata.txt'
or
//INPUT DD
Very vanilla TSO command processor executed from within ISPF
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ron Graham
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Recovery routines
After you
Did something change or is it broken for anonymous FTP access to
testcase? It's asking me for a userid and password. Neither FTP nor
anonymous as the userid seems to work.
--
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service
Tampa, FL
The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.
Lt. Gen. David
On 27 August 2014 10:30, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Harold Gray
harold.g...@mantissa.com wrote:
I have a working SUBSYS interface. My code processes a few of the interfaces
(OPEN, ALLOC,... etc.) and previously resided below the line. I am trying to
move the code above the line. Everything works
Thank you, Cheryl, from all of us!
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Cheryl Walker
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 10:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SMF Usage - Request to z/OS ISVs
Hi all,
I'd
Thanks for the interesting link. He and I share a lot of grumps about
Unicode. And unfortunately, it does make a lot of sense when you do the
research and reading, and like him I doubt that I could have done any better.
Did I imagine that I heard (or read somewhere?) that the Perl developers
I did several FTPs to testcase yesterday using PUTDOC. Site accepted user
anonymous with password representing my full email address. Same process
I've used for years. Haven't tried today.
.
.
J.O.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program
And now it's working. Must have been a glitch.
On 08/27/14 11:42, Skip Robinson wrote:
I did several FTPs to testcase yesterday using PUTDOC. Site accepted user
anonymous with password representing my full email address. Same process
I've used for years. Haven't tried today.
.
.
J.O.Skip
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:30 AM, SUBSCRIBE IBM-MAIN Harold Gray
harold.g...@mantissa.com wrote:
I have a working SUBSYS interface. My code processes a few of the interfaces
(OPEN, ALLOC,... etc.) and previously resided below the line. I am trying to
move the code above the line. Everything
Does the ACBINRTN address have the high order bit on? Sometimes, IBM will use
it to determine an exits AMODE.
If that doesn't work, then binder allows MODE RMODE(SPLIT) so that you still
only need a single load module. You create a small module that is RMODE(24)
that simply changes to amode
Thanks, Tony and John. I have considered the stub idea and didn't like it as
all my code is loaded at the subsystem initialization and I didn't want to have
a new user selectable program to keep up with. But, looking at John's
solution, I can do my initialization and then generate the stub
Hi Ron,
I agree with everything that you say about cu tiering, except for the fact that
a migration tier is no longer necessary. CU tiering is an exciting new storage
opportunity for ILM. I'd like to discuss this topic with you the next time
that you attend SHARE or the Technical University.
Yes, Jon, the high order bit was set to 1 in the address. This is how I got
the SUBSYS interface to work with my other exits (OPEN, CLOSE etc). I am
looking at the SPLIT option now.
Thanks, Harold
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
If you have not done so, you could join the MQ LIST for a more focused forum.
If you Google. IBM MQ lisrserver. It should pop up
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: adarsh khanna 003cb6e11258-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu
Sent: Aug 27, 2014 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject:
I have a working SUBSYS interface. My code processes a few of the
interfaces (OPEN, ALLOC,... etc.) and previously resided below the
line. I am trying to move the code above the line. Everything works
fine except one item. In my OPEN routine, I put my input/output
routine's address into
I need to get some benchmark describing performance of JAVA code, in
comparison to Intel/AMD processors.
Any clue?
Some URLs?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
---
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego adresata.
Rob
I have question I understand that an authorized command run under a different
tmp
Is that always meaning the same program while in problem state runs
Under one tmp and when I switch to
Supervisor under another
If so I established my estae(x) In Problems state and I abended in supervisor
I remember your concatenation issue. Just because a piece of code works under
one condition does not mean it is guaranteed to run under all other possible
conditions.
Bill Fairchild
- Original Message -
From: MichealButz michealb...@comcast.net
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent:
On 27 August 2014 16:48, Micheal Butz michealb...@comcast.net wrote:
I have question I understand that an authorized command run under a different
tmp
Well, a different task structure.
Is that always meaning the same program while in problem state runs Under one
tmp and when I switch to
I was in problem state at the time
Going back to the original question
Do I run under different TMP's in problem and supervisor state
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:52 PM, DASDBILL2 dasdbi...@comcast.net wrote:
I remember your concatenation issue. Just because a piece of code
I want to accomplish to have complete coverage for my program
By that I mean anytime I get an abend in any state I want my recovery routine
to get control
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
On 27 August 2014 16:48, Micheal Butz
On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:12:41 -0400, Cheryl Walker wrote:
Hi Shane,
I for one would be interested in hearing what Timothy had to say, and now I'm
afraid that I won't. If you want our take on the pricing announcement, you can
find it here in item #4 - http://www.watsonwalker.com/clist177.html.
On 27 Aug 2014 09:30:27 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Hi Ron,
I agree with everything that you say about cu tiering, except for the fact
that a migration tier is no longer necessary. CU tiering is an exciting new
storage opportunity for ILM. I'd like to discuss this topic with
Thanks Lizette.
I have subscribed to the listserv and have posted my query to the forum.
On Thursday, 28 August 2014 12:06 AM, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
If you have not done so, you could join the MQ LIST for a more focused forum.
If you Google. IBM MQ lisrserver. It
TSO CMDPGM is how your program was invoked from the ISPF display. How did your
program call the next program? Was it thru ISPEXEC SELECT PGM or assembler LINK
or ??? If it was ISPEXEC, then your problem is that ISPF is setting an ESTAE.
If it's thru LINK then maybe ISPF is intercepting the SVC.
55 matches
Mail list logo
