W dniu 2012-06-19 06:41, R Hey pisze:
Hi,
1-
Heard hat IBM won't provide HMC switch in future.
True/F ?
I have never heard about it, but I wouldn't care. This is 30$ worth
issue. There's nothing magic in the IBM-supplied switch.
2-
Have you done, or know it can be done:
to remove IBM HMC
On 6/18/2012 8:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Doesn't this depend on one's data? Wouldn't it be better if
the utility provided a protocol for quoting/escaping any pattern
that mimics a control sequence rather than placing the burden
on the programmer to guess an "extremely unlikely" pattern
and ho
Someone wrote:
> Boolean logic was stressed, little lab simulators with
> NAND gates were wired together. Think the tic-tac-toe solution
> required something like 7 Lab logic 100's to implement,
> but was a big hit at honors day. I moved into simulation
> early on ECAP/PCAP/SCEPTRE and picked
Check this :
http://www-304.ibm.com/jct03001c/services/learning/ites.wss/in/en?pageType=course_description&courseCode=ES42IN
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Roger Lowe wrote:
> Found this website (
> http://www.protechtraining.com/parallel-sysplex-setup-and-operation-pt6103)
> but I know no
Found this website
(http://www.protechtraining.com/parallel-sysplex-setup-and-operation-pt6103)
but I know nothing about them.
Roger
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@list
Hello,
Thanks for reply. Still not getting right place for this
training. Please suggest, if you have any more detail available.
Regards
Saurabh
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:37 PM, saurabh khandelwal <
sourabhkhandelwal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>Thanks for reply. I alre
Hi,
1-
Heard hat IBM won't provide HMC switch in future.
True/F ?
2-
Have you done, or know it can be done:
to remove IBM HMC SWITCH,
hook HMC & SE's to CISCO End of Row switch
?
TIA,
Rez
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
In one of his now all too familiar diatribes Paul Gilmartin wrote
JCL is about 40 years old. The art has advanced much since then, yet
IBM provides no alternative with similar capability but greater ease
of use.
Opinions differ. I find JCL very easy to use. It is powerful and
flexible, a muc
Found out the problem it's not supported on Z/OS 1.7
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 5:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEF352I ADDRESS SPACE UNAVAILABLE
A few other
Well, it's about as clear as mud. If you look further in the z/OS Unix
System Services
planning manual under "Making changes to /etc" , it mentions BPXISETD / BPXISETS
for "installing service or products that must write to /etc". It also mentions
again
says "IBM products create directories
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:45:43 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
>
>You have to be really trying to force a collision. A character
>such as right bracket would be extremely unlikely in data, ...
>
Doesn't this depend on one's data? Wouldn't it be better if
the utility provided a protocol for quotin
I've forgotten most of the milestones, but in the mid sixties 85% of
Computer Science was taught or offered from the EE(Electrical Engineering)
departments.
Boolean logic was stressed, little lab simulators with NAND gates were
wired together. Think the tic-tac-toe solution required something
THE CBT Utility has a parm that says create/do not create iebupdte
cars as well.
Ed
On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Richard Peurifoy wrote:
On 6/18/2012 1:47 PM, John P Kalinich wrote:
You can use the OFFLOAD program from CBT file 093 (http://
www.cbttape.org)
to create a sequential file (fla
On 6/18/2012 6:52 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
How does this work if my input data contain an IEBUPDTD control
sequence ("./", IIRC). I can imagine keeping all my IEBUPDTE
control files in a PDS. Does IEBUPDTE even have a construct to
unload and reload such an entity?
The PDSLOAD, and similar, p
Paul:
Ofcourse it does. The ./ (add/repl)cards are treated as a delimeter
for each member ...to end the utility either a ./ endup or a /* which
really the OS saw and treated as a EOF (almost the same thing
I used the CBT utility quite a bit in transporting pds's (FB anyway).
Somewhere alon
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:59:30 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
>
>There is also a utility on the CBT Tape that will create a IEBUPDTE
>stream. Very handy (at least for me) .
>
How does this work if my input data contain an IEBUPDTD control
sequence ("./", IIRC). I can imagine keeping all my IEBUPDTE
control
In article <5581573438612873.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu> you write:
>On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:34:27 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>>
>>[1] MFT eventually got ATTACH, but that came later.
>>
>??? How could that possibly work?
>
>Doesn't "MFT" stand for "Multiprogramming with a Fi
If I may share my experience on this issue of who we are (in terms of a title).
I started in Civil Engineering and was bored to death with the courses and the
fact that I was starting to be good at using formulas to solve problems (I
completed all the 300 level courses).
I liked business and math
You can add a DFSORT step to remove the ASA character and create a FB
recfm file. ex:
//STEP0100 EXEC PGM=IEBPTPCH
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSUT1 DD DSN=Your Input PDS,
//DISP=SHR
//SYSUT2 DD DSN=&&TEMP,
//DISP=(,PASS),UNIT=SYSDA,
//SPACE=(CYL,(60,30
On 18 June 2012 09:34, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
> In , on 06/16/2012
> at 02:07 PM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler said:
>
>>note that CICS was originally to avoid having to use as few
>>os/360 resources as possible ... because os/360 processing was
>>horrendously heavy weight and bloated.
>
> Was
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:34:27 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>
>[1] MFT eventually got ATTACH, but that came later.
>
??? How could that possibly work?
Doesn't "MFT" stand for "Multiprogramming with a Fixed number of Tasks"?
The instant one does an ATTACH, doesn't the number of tasks chan
Thanks everyone.
The ASA code "V" = "stacker 1" thing is a new one for me. Not sure how
much I'll use that information though :-)
I'll tried the FIELD=(80) thing, but no difference. The manual would lead
you to believe that you always get some kind of control character (ASA or
M), so that's p
shmuel+...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
> Was that the reason, or was it because PCP and MFT[1] did not have
> ATTACH?
>
> [1] MFT eventually got ATTACH, but that came later.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012h.html#78 Familiar
possibly before I saw it, don't really know.
be
Thanks for finding that Mark - We probably don't need to convert backwards and
forwards as we build running systems, but now we've had this in place for so
long I think we'll stay there. Also look forward to John and Marne's comments.
Jerry Whitteridge
Lead Systems Programmer
Safeway Inc.
925 95
We have the following doc in our build jobs - it's been part of our process
for years. The relevant script is called BPXISETS and is part of the build
of the version root setup. (Note we have a version root per LPAR currently (
but that is changing) and we have /etc and /var mounted with a separate
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 13:13:10 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:49:04 -0600, Jerry Whitteridge
> wrote:
>
>>In service mode the /etc and /var directories are supposed to be true
>>directories so maintenance can be applied. When you clone them to become the
>>running versions the
Richard:
There is also a utility on the CBT Tape that will create a IEBUPDTE
stream. Very handy (at least for me) .
Ed
On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:10 PM, Richard Peurifoy wrote:
On 6/18/2012 1:47 PM, John P Kalinich wrote:
You can use the OFFLOAD program from CBT file 093 (http://
www.cbttape.o
In , on 06/16/2012
at 02:07 PM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler said:
>note that CICS was originally to avoid having to use as few
>os/360 resources as possible ... because os/360 processing was
>horrendously heavy weight and bloated.
Was that the reason, or was it because PCP and MFT[1] did not have
A
In , on 06/17/2012
at 12:06 AM, Tom Ross said:
>The issue of COBOL compiler messages was discussed here, and most
>agreed it would not be that helpful, since it would mostly say
>'please see the COBOL Language Reference Manual'.
Those calling for a messages manual were asking IBM for a real m
In <0579478167430063.wa.jonboy644gmail@listserv.ua.edu>, on
06/17/2012
at 06:29 PM, John Chase said:
>We just rolled out z/OS 1.13 (from 1.11) on our TEST/DEV lpar, and I
>noticed something "strange": In the 1.13 root filesystem,
Which root filesystem? The /service directory or the file
In
,
on 06/18/2012
at 12:16 PM, "Anstey, Gerry" said:
>Hi, I'm trying to get SHOWZOS working, when I assemble it I get a
>clean Assembly
ITYM you don't get a clean assembly.
>but the actual assembler output claims it is clean,
What happens if you add a SYSTERM? Was the an assembler message
In <6269116833776387.wa.ibmmaintpg.com...@listserv.ua.edu>, on
06/16/2012
at 05:13 AM, Shane Ginnane said:
>Dry and pithy - all too rare on this list.
Possibly because there is a coterie of posters on the list that
consistently whines about dry and pithy responses.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J
scott_j_f...@yahoo.com (Scott Ford) writes:
> To me engineer fits. But this my person view based on what I have done
> over the years.
> Then there's the degreed engineers vs the hard school of knock ones,
> which I am the later
engineers know how to build stuff ... some states they are also
licen
Larry,
To me engineer fits. But this my person view based on what I have done over the
years.
Then there's the degreed engineers vs the hard school of knock ones, which I am
the later
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:15 PM, "Martin, Larry D" wrote:
> I see no need for e
Scott, that looks like a REALLY useful piece of JCL to add to our cloning jobs,
thanks.
Looks like there is a "-verifyonly" switch too which could also be worthwhile:
// PARM=('-aggregate .OMVS.SA1.ROOT -recoveronly -verifyonly')
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?t
On 6/18/2012 1:47 PM, John P Kalinich wrote:
You can use the OFFLOAD program from CBT file 093 (http://www.cbttape.org)
to create a sequential file (flat PDS) of all members.
This is a good solution, but to answer your question, I
think this will do it:
PRINT TYPORG=PO,MAXFLDS=1
RECORD FIE
This doesn't apply to HFS filesystems, but here is a post from a slightly
different topic which may have some bearing on the problem you found:
"Just found this information related to the ZFS delay I'd had, which I'd filed
away. It's copied from a redpiece. I chopped bits out here and there I t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:57 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
> Subject: IEBPTPCH questions
>
> I haven't used this beast since last century I can't
> quite f
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:57 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
> Subject: IEBPTPCH questions
>
> I haven't used this beast since last century I can't
> quite f
If the other job outputs or compresses with DISP=SHR then the answer is YES.
If the other job uses DISP=OLD, then the batch initiators will insure that
one of the jobs (or job steps) completes before the other is allowed to
execute.
:>: -Original Message-
:>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussio
You can use the OFFLOAD program from CBT file 093 (http://www.cbttape.org)
to create a sequential file (flat PDS) of all members.
Regards,
John K
ANSI (ASA) Control Characters (RECFM=FBA)
Code Action before printing Code Stacker
blank Space 1 line
_BBC News - Alan Turing: why the tech world's hero should be a household
name_ (http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-17662585)
Some of the related links to Bletchley Park are also interesting.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sign
I see no need for engineer or architect, we are programmers. I do not
personally like "coder" since to me that implies language restriction.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 2:09
I believe program IOEAGSLV with option recoveronly perform the "break in" you
speak of.
If you cannot unmount the filesystem(s) before your cloning maybe you can add a
step to run against your restored "cloned" filesystem(s) to take care of the
delay caused by not having a clean unomunt before t
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:49:04 -0600, Jerry Whitteridge
wrote:
>In service mode the /etc and /var directories are supposed to be true
>directories so maintenance can be applied. When you clone them to become the
>running versions there is a script to run to switch to a symlink. Look in the
>doc
John,
Yes, depends on your role, I do coding, manuals,design and QA, support
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Jun 18, 2012, at 2:06 PM, "McKown, John"
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Uriel Carras
John,
Totally in agreement, outstanding explanation
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:31 PM, "McKown, John"
wrote:
> http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2012/06/12/the-care-and-feeding-of-software-engineers-or-why-engineers-are-grumpy/
>
>
> And here's the real crux of the p
Uriel Carrasquilla said:
And here's the real crux of the problem: software engineers aren't
builders. Software engineers are creators.
This may beg the question: why call them software engineers and not
software architects?
If this link still works, this may shed some light on your questio
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Uriel Carrasquilla
> Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:49 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Good article. Friday discussion type.
>
>
> And here's the real crux of the
I haven't used this beast since last century I can't quite figure out a
couple of things:
1) is there a way to PUNCH all members of an FB/80 source PDS and NOT
prepend each record with an ASA or M control characters?I'm seeing the
output as FBA/81 with the character "V" as the ASA control
And here's the real crux of the problem: software engineers aren't builders.
Software engineers are creators.
This may beg the question: why call them software engineers and not software
architects?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
We have noticed this behavior on our 1.12 systems too. My cloning process
copies the base file systems that match the maintenance zones, that we NEVER
IPL from directly. As long as the /Service file systems are unmounted cleanly
before my cloning process everything works fine.
We noticed th
This is interesting. Normally, when we copy a sysres, we mount all the new
file systems on an alternate mount point, so we can run compares and insure
the new copies are good. That way, the IPL is not the first time a new file
system is mounted.
We tried an experiment: set up a job just to mount
In service mode the /etc and /var directories are supposed to be true
directories so maintenance can be applied. When you clone them to become the
running versions there is a script to run to switch to a symlink. Look in the
doc for the Installation of the serverpac and at the server pac jobs.
In article <3482274314602490.wa.gerry.ansteyjpmorgan@listserv.ua.edu> you
wrote:
> ok thanks, that's the library I cannot seem to find anywhere on our system!
Try: /usr/lpp/tcpip/IBM/
--
Don Poitras - SAS Development - SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive
sas...@sas.com (919) 5
Query your SMPE target zone for DDDEF SEZANMAC . That will show you the
name in your shop.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
SCE Infrastructure Technology Services
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin...@sce.com
From: Gerry Anst
http://www.nczonline.net/blog/2012/06/12/the-care-and-feeding-of-software-engineers-or-why-engineers-are-grumpy/
And here's the real crux of the problem: software engineers aren't builders.
Software engineers are creators. Building is what you do when you buy a piece
of furniture from Ikea and
ok thanks, that's the library I cannot seem to find anywhere on our system!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
I see thanks
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
The assembly uses the BATCH option. There are multiple assembly steps and
the RETURN CODE you are quoting is from the LAST batched assemble.
If you search through the listing you'll find the non-zero return code.
I am in the process of installing SHOWZOS myself right now.
Alan
From: Ger
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 07:41:37 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
>On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:29:26 -0500, John Chase wrote:
>
>>
>>We just rolled out z/OS 1.13 (from 1.11) on our TEST/DEV lpar, and I noticed
>>something "strange": In the 1.13 root filesystem, the /etc and /var
>>directories show as directo
TCPIP.SEZANMAC
On 18.06.2012 15:50, Gerry Anstey wrote:
Thanks, I have GOFF coded but I did manage to find that it's missing a macro:
D5E6D4E2 145373+NWMStgStatsIdentifier
EQU C'NWMS'
145374 EZBZMON
Thanks, I have GOFF coded but I did manage to find that it's missing a macro:
D5E6D4E2 145373+NWMStgStatsIdentifier
EQU C'NWMS'
145374 EZBZMONP
*
>SPKA TCBPKF
You ought to read the principles of operation regarding the operand of the
SPKA instruction.
Setting the key to bits 24-27 of the address of TCBPKF is unlikely to
produce the desired result.
If you don't have access to the PoOp, then get access but in the meantime
use the macros, s
We are running production now for three months on 1.13 and Yes, I have seen a
'delayed reaction' to the HFS filesystem to complete all the mounts, after an
IPL.
Ensure that you first gets this message:
BPXI004I OMVS INITIALIZATION COMPLETE
Before you continue...
What we have found, to lead
Hi
I would check the error messages and the /etc/rc file if it is proper
or not
Not exactly the same , we forgot to copy the auto.master and *.mnt files.
The z/OS 1.13 worked till it has not been IPL'd as first to the SYSPLEX .
On 18.06.2012 15:22, Mary Elwood wrote:
Hi All,
On Sunday,
20yrs later
IBM wins top spot on supercomputer list
http://www.tgdaily.com/hardware-features/64103-ibm-wins-top-spot-on-supercomputer-list
from above:
The IBM BlueGene/Q system, named Sequoia, is installed at the Department of
Energy's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and hit 16.32 petafl
>If the operating systems reuses WEBs
>systematically, the rest of us should leave them strictly alone.
I don't understand what "reuse" has to do with the conclusion. What am I
missing? Whether or not the operating system reuses WEBs, you must not
change them. The WEB is not a programming interf
Hi All,
On Sunday, 6/17, our z/OS TEST system was upgraded from 1.11 to 1.13. We
are having an issue at IPL time. The system IPLs, OMVS initializes and the
filesystems are mounted. OPS/MVS then starts bringing up the started
tasks.
When started tasks try to access the filesystems, we are seei
You need GOFF assembler option, without this I got also RC=12
000 +
ASMA068S Length error - 20CL(L'LINE
On 18.06.2012 14:16, Anstey, Gerry wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to get SHOWZOS working, when I assemble it I get a clean
Assembly but the actual assembler output c
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:29:26 -0500, John Chase wrote:
>
>We just rolled out z/OS 1.13 (from 1.11) on our TEST/DEV lpar, and I noticed
>something "strange": In the 1.13 root filesystem, the /etc and /var
>directories show as directories, whereas on 1.11 (and earlier) they showed as
>symlinks t
Gerry,
You are getting RC=12 on the assembly which is an error condition, plus you
must not be pulling in the correct SHOWZOS source code (1137 Primary Input
Records Read). SHOWZOS version 7.21 input source is 38008 lines.
Regards,
John K
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on
06/18/2012 07:16
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:16:41 +, Anstey, Gerry wrote:
>Hi, I'm trying to get SHOWZOS working, when I assemble it I get a clean
>Assembly but the actual assembler output claims it is clean, see below, I
>cannot find anything in the listing that may be causing this but It is over
>200l lines l
thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Sam Siegel
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 1:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Storage key explanation
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Micheal Butz
wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
>
Hi, I'm trying to get SHOWZOS working, when I assemble it I get a clean
Assembly but the actual assembler output claims it is clean, see below, I
cannot find anything in the listing that may be causing this but It is over
200l lines long so I guess I may have missed it but I donlt really know wh
The you probably did not set the DIAG option.
Try
D DIAG
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 05:38:10 -0400 Micheal Butz
wrote:
:>Yes
:>
:>-Original Message-
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On
:>Behalf Of Rob Scott
:>Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 4:55 AM
:>To:
A few other things to check :
Does your hardware support ASN and LX reuse ? (CVTALR bit in CVTFLAG2)
Did the server address space actually come from the reusable address space
pool? (You can check the ASCBREUS bit in ASCBFLG3 when the server is up to
verify).
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket
Yes
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob Scott
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 4:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEF352I ADDRESS SPACE UNAVAILABLE
Did you remember to use REUSASID=YES on the start command for
Thought If successfully free the LX the ASID would be re-usable
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 3:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IEF352I ADDRESS SPACE UNAVAIL
Did you remember to use REUSASID=YES on the start command for the STC that owns
the system-LX ?
Rob Scott
Lead Developer
Rocket Software
77 Fourth Avenue . Suite 100 . Waltham . MA 02451-1468 . USA
Tel: +1.781.684.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
F
Why did you expect different results?
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 22:26:26 -0400 Micheal Butz
wrote:
:>HI,
:>
:>
:>
:> I have a PC rtn for which I reserve a system entry
:>
:>
:>
:>
:>
:> LXRES ELXLIST=EX_LIST,
:>
:> SYSTEM=YES,
:>
:> REUSABLE=YES,
:>
:> MF=(E,LXRES_D
81 matches
Mail list logo
