OK, this is what happened. The dump analyser is a trusty clist written for
IPCS by me over 20 years ago. It (almost always) works by using the chain: ASXB
- abending TCB - RTWA, from where it gets the PSW and registers. In this case
it got caught out because there was a preceding TCB with a
This is getting pretty ridiculous now, in my view.
So let's say that IBM increases a particular price for sake of argument.
What does that mean? Well, in effect it means you may be slightly off the
financial part of your forecast for the remainder of your ELA. Which means
you may be closer or
Just a brief editorial comment. A file transfer link inherently means the
application interactions will be batch-oriented. That is, Application A
(and probably others) won't know the same information as new Application B.
New Application B will always have untimely information.
Does that
Has anyone heard about intrusion to Swedish mainframe-based system?
I just read:
A lawsuit against Gottfrid Svartholm, co-founder of Pirate Bay is just
started. He's accused of a break in and data theft form the mainframe
system containing government data (tax, social security, company
Radoslaw Skorupka pisze:
Has anyone heard about intrusion to Swedish mainframe-based system?
Nein, Njet, Nee and No (Hmmm, what is No in Polish? ;-D )
A lawsuit against Gottfrid Svartholm, co-founder of Pirate Bay is just
started. He's accused of a break in and data theft form the mainframe
Thanks for clarifying. Could you select / re-select the Address space (other
TCB?) to be used in your dump analysis?
Yes, I set a symbol to the desired TCB address and then the analysis proceeds
correctly.
Could you get any info from Logrec?
It's a client's system, so I look at what I am
On Wed, 22 May 2013 10:07:57 +0100, Martin Packer wrote:
Wonder what happens if you manage region to goals of BOTH. Anyone using
that yet? Note: SMF30PF2 has a new(ish) bit for it.
Any region being managed to transaction goals has *always* been managed to both
- startup and shutdown use the
Any region being managed to transaction goals has *always* been managed to
both - startup and shutdown use the region goal.
I don't understand why this option was introduced - and why it is only
recommended for TORs. Guess I'd better go find some doco (pointers
gratefully accepted).
From: Horst Sinram sin...@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: why does WLM Server status change from YES to NO
Mananage to Both is intended to combine the region management of the TORs
(allowing to favor the TORs over the AORs)
Horst,
we have a single OLTP region, which is TOR and AOR together.
On Thu, 23 May 2013 06:05:59 -0500, Horst Sinram wrote:
you could refer to
ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/eserver/zseries/zos/wlm/WLM2012Share.pdf
Excellent !.
Thanks Horst, more than I could have wished for, and in no time at all. If
you're re-presenting this in Boston, I'll be there seeking
It took quite a while but I was glad to see someone finally noticed that
the PSW is not a PSW, and that the OP noticed this too.
My first thought was that it was perhaps displaying just the 8-byte PSW
address (not the whole PSW) and that the program had landed above the bar
in AMODE 64 (in
Hi, maybe I'm over-semplifying:
0. why SFTP an not FTPS?
1. yes you can, what about surrogate
userhttp://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/zos/v1r12/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.zos.r12.icha700%2Fsurru.htm
s?
2. do you really need this monitor if you can start and control a trigger?
3. I don't know
All,
(warning, long post)
Getting ready to take the plunge and implement Unix Shared filesystems with
SYSPLEX Root, etc. Part of this effort is going to have to include some file
system cleanup. We have the typical Serverpac supplied SYSRES filesystems,
no problem there. But we also have
The suggested solutions presented here wasn't appropriate to solve the problem.
(Unless an extreme overallocation can be seen as a solution.)
Nothing seems like a solution to those who don't listen.
There were many suggestions supplied.
NOT were over allocations.
Since nobody supplied a one
http://www.finextra.com/News/FullStory.aspx?newsitemid=24852
Interesting. Raises lots of questions for us geeks, of course...
--
...phsiii
Phil Smith III
p...@voltage.commailto:p...@voltage.com
Voltage Security, Inc.
www.voltage.comhttp://www.voltage.com/
(703) 476-4511 (home office)
(703)
Is SocGen the last known user of ISAM for production files? How are they
really accessing their ISAM files?
Bill Fairchild
Franklin, TN
- Original Message -
From: Phil Smith p...@voltage.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 8:57:12 AM
Subject: SocGen
. 1. Is it possible for a z/OS UNIX Shell Script to SUBMIT an MVS JOB?
I know I can do plain FTP with FILETYPE=JES. But is there a more direct way
that doesn't involve putting plain text passwords on the wire?
If you are running a z/OS UNIX shell, you can submit a job using /bin/submit.
W dniu 2013-05-23 16:09, DASDBILL2 pisze:
Is SocGen the last known user of ISAM for production files? How are they
really accessing their ISAM files?
Possible explanations:
1. Are they really users of ISAM?
Hint: it could be VSAM or anything else, mismatched by the journalist.
2. AFAIK it
On 5/22/2013 11:38 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
By the way, when IBM announced the Mainframe Charter 10 years ago, it
promised to deliver on a few important principles. One of the most
important was to improve the value of zSeries (now zEnterprise). Very
importantly, IBM did not specify exactly
We use TN3270 USSTCP entry in the BEGINVTAM section to display the
equivalent of the old VTAM USS message 10 screen.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Jim McAlpine jim.mcalp...@gmail.com wrote:
For those of you who do not use a session manager to connect to TN3270, do
any of you use the Telnet
Gee, thanks, Ed. You mentioned the link below and I get a 404 error. You told
IBM it was there so they scrubbed it too! grin
Seriously, I got a 404 not found error using the link. I found it here:
http://www-07.ibm.com/servers/eserver/includes/download/mainframe_charter_faq.pdf
Rex
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:44:55 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote:
The system should allocate/reallocate according to what is
needed in the actual/immediate need for the dataset without
dumping the problem to the user! (Of course limited by
appropriate resource constraints.)
For situations like that, I
On 05/23/2013 09:44 AM, Thomas Berg wrote:
To clarify.
I wrote:
What is REALLY needed is to get rid of the absurd requirement to specify the
amount of storage to allocate for datasets!
The system should allocate/reallocate according to what is needed in the
actual/immediate need for the
Do you have a firewall issue? I was able to use this link to get to the
document.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 8:33 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Just a bit of clarification. I got the 404 error using the link Ed had
provided. When I changed the www. to www-07. I was able to get the PDF.
The firewall question Liz asked was the first thing that popped into my mind as
well (along with blocked sites, etc) so I sent ED's e-mail to my home
That is a concept that DB2 uses. It can start at 1 cylinder and increase the
secondary by 1 on each extend.
If you changed the SPACE parameter to accept:
SPACE=(unit,(n,+m,...
Where unit = TRK/CYL/etc and n=Primary allocation and +m is the initial
secondary amount and increment
That way if
In 9433992692961071.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu, on
05/22/2013
at 03:42 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
On Wed, 22 May 2013 14:25:46 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
at 07:36 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
SYSCALL for the UNIX files;
In
a90e503c23f97441b05ee302853b0e628f2b31b...@fspas01ev010.fspa.myntet.se,
on 05/23/2013
at 11:53 AM, Thomas Berg thomas.b...@swedbank.se said:
There is a problem that is solved by a simple solution, the one that
I proposed IBM should do.
To every question there is an answer that is obvious,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 5:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: B37 för FTINCL in ISPF for userid.ISPn.SPFTEMPn.WORK
datasets
In
Hello,
My question is about finding a solution to:
DFHAC2001 05/22/2013 21:09:19 CICSTS42 Transaction 'QKVA' is not
recognized.
Check that the transaction name is correct.
Long technical post, very sorry, not a sysprog, at Dallas VIC, z/OS,
CICSTS42 and struggling to make my first CICS
On Thu, 23 May 2013 11:44:58 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In your ADDRESS SYSCALL read, what length do you specify? In your
ADDRESS TSO EXECIO, what do you specify for lines?
Minimal, in order to let the ALLOCATE/OPEN/CLOSE overhead
dominate.
Using minimal lengths drives up the other
Hi
Have you installed the GROUP1 ?
CEDA INST G(GROUP1)
If you had you can see with CEMT INQ TRANS(QKVA)
If you don't see check the MSGLOG for any errors
On 23.05.2013 18:37, Graham Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
My question is about finding a solution to:
DFHAC2001 05/22/2013 21:09:19 CICSTS42
Would suggest to go to the LINUX-390 list:
linux-...@vm.marist.edu
On 23.05.2013 18:16, de Wet, Albertus H wrote:
Trying to setup a Redhat 7.1 image on an IFL.
Get it to boot from the HMC's CDROM.
Reply to enter the network device, as eth0 and also tried qeth
For the address I enter:
z/TSM has been obsolete, is going out of support, and may or may not
work on z/OS 2.1.
We backup the root system on the IPL volumes with ADRDSSU.
The system HFS/zFS are backed up with ADRDSSU Logical, and is OK since
they don't have running applications.
Application HFS/zFS are backed up with
On 5/23/2013 9:57 AM, Mike Schwab wrote:
z/TSM is being used, has been obsolete, is going out of support, and
may not work on z/OS 2.1.
Does anyone have a comparison of the backup and restore alternatives
that work while the application is running?
TSM on AIX,
FDR Upstream Unix,
CA Disk Backup
We had a similar dilemma (although never used TSM). The ADRDSSU backups were
disruptive to our applications.
We've considered using Flashcopy for the backups, but as far as I can tell we
can't do a logical backup that way, and the reality is that we typically need 1
or more files from a
On 5/23/2013 at 12:16 PM, de Wet, Albertus H dewe...@ghc.org wrote:
Trying to setup a Redhat 7.1 image on an IFL.
Get it to boot from the HMC's CDROM.
Reply to enter the network device, as eth0 and also tried qeth
For the address I enter:
qeth,0x3F00
When I reply to the eth0 / qeth
On 5/23/2013 at 01:17 PM, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com wrote:
After IBM stabilized TSM for z/OS at the 5.5 level, we deployed a
hipersocket-connected RHEL Linux for z image where we currently run TSM
6.2. What's nice is that we can still use TSM clients on z/OS for both
backup
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Mark Jacobs mark.jac...@custserv.com wrote:
We backup all of our zFS file systems with ADRDSSU logical backups and have
never had any problems. Can you post a sample DFDSS job step (with control
cards) for people to look at?
--
Mark Jacobs
-SPRX054 STEP02
I suspect the LOGON clist is different between the 2 images. Check the parm
field of the logon proc.
In particular, the logon clist on LPAR1 is different than LPAR2 (content, not
name).
The LPAR1 clist probably creates a dataset if not present. The LPAR2 clist
does not.
This may also be due
On 5/23/2013 10:43 AM, Mark Post wrote:
After IBM stabilized TSM for z/OS at the 5.5 level, we deployed a
hipersocket-connected RHEL Linux for z image where we currently run TSM
6.2. What's nice is that we can still use TSM clients on z/OS for both
backup and administrative purposes and TSM
Your inconsistent use of terminology makes it difficult to fully understand
the problem.
Is the new scratch tape requested when performing the backup of
datasets that happen to be on a volume associated with some dump class? Or
does the situation occur when performing a full volume dump of
we have a single OLTP region, which is TOR and AOR together.
Would you suggest managing the region using goal of transaction or both ?
Walter, in that scenario you would probably stick to TRANSACTION if you're
satisfied with the way that region is currently managed by the transactions
running
I am out of the office until 05/28/2013.
Vacation. If an emergency, call 845-901-2328.
Note: This is an automated response to your message Re: why does WLM
Server status change from YES to NO sent on 05/23/2013 14:46:43.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is
On Thu, 23 May 2013 12:40:18 -0500, Dana Mitchell mitchd...@gmail.com wrote:
We have 2 systems in a basic sysplex, sharing everything: RACFDB, JES2, Master
catalog, Parmlibs etc. The only differences between the sytems is that they
are each on a different CEC, and one system has a few
One thing worth considering - and having read the relevant bits in the
manual and not seeing it there - is the suggestion I've heard that
sometimes the IMS Control Region would benefit from Both.
Horst, care to elaborate on that?
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems
Thanks Mark for the tips. I'm going back and re-double checking everything on
your list. but see below
2) CTPROC listing + logon clist listing
Thats puzzling me, where it's getting that from. CTPROC is not specified as a
logon proc, it's not even a logon proc and has nothing remotely
That way if you specified SPACE=(CYL,(10,+5)) and got the primary and 10
extents, the file size would be 285 cylinders and a primary with 15 extents
would be 610 cylinders as opposed to 60 and 75 cylinders respectively.
I don't remember that in any JCL doc I've ever seen.
Where is this
DO you SYNC UADS and RACF before the new user logs on? Or do you only do the
sync on one system and not the other?
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Dana Mitchell mitchd...@gmail.com
Sent: May 23, 2013 10:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: TSO Logon looking for UADS on wrong
We never sync anymore, either system. We use all userid log datasets.
On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:09:21 -0700, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
DO you SYNC UADS and RACF before the new user logs on? Or do you only do the
sync on one system and not the other?
Lizette
As an
On Thu, 23 May 2013 14:53:37 -0500, Dana Mitchell mitchd...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Mark for the tips. I'm going back and re-double checking everything on
your list. but see below
2) CTPROC listing + logon clist listing
Thats puzzling me, where it's getting that from. CTPROC is not
I think it was a pie in the sky suggestion.
=
=
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 20:07:25 +
From: eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Subject: Re: B37 för FTINCL in ISPF for userid.ISPn.SPFTEMPn.WORK datasets
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
That way if you specified SPACE=(CYL,(10,+5)) and got the primary
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Mark Post mp...@suse.com wrote:
On 5/23/2013 at 12:16 PM, de Wet, Albertus H dewe...@ghc.org wrote:
Trying to setup a Redhat 7.1 image on an IFL.
Get it to boot from the HMC's CDROM.
Reply to enter the network device, as eth0 and also tried qeth
For the
CTPROC is most likey executed by the logon CLIST
Is ' DMITCHE.TCPIP.PKTRACE' defined correctly on LPAR2?
HTH,
snip
2) CTPROC listing + logon clist listing
Thats puzzling me, where it's getting that from. CTPROC is not specified as a
logon proc, it's not even a logon proc and has nothing
OK, I had never heard of this either, so I bit...
1 //RRPBR14 JOB ,TECHSUPT-RRP,MSGCLASS=X,CLASS=A,REGION=8M
2 //STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
3 //D DD DSN=MVS.RRP.JUNK,DISP=(,CATLG),
// UNIT=3390,SPACE=(CYL,(2,+1)),VOL=SER=WSC001,
//
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Pommier, Rex R.
rex.pomm...@cnasurety.com wrote:
OK, I had never heard of this either, so I bit...
1 //RRPBR14 JOB ,TECHSUPT-RRP,MSGCLASS=X,CLASS=A,REGION=8M
2 //STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
3 //D DD DSN=MVS.RRP.JUNK,DISP=(,CATLG),
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:44:55 +0200, Thomas Berg wrote:
deleted
For situations like that, I like to use an allocation like CYL,(1,100).
Allocate a small primary and a much larger secondary. Maybe
also allowing
Yes, pie in the sky suggestion. Notice it said, If you changed the SPACE
parameter to accept.
Chris Blaicher
Principal Software Engineer, Software Development
Syncsort Incorporated
50 Tice Boulevard, Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07677
P: 201-930-8260 | M: 512-627-3803
E: cblaic...@syncsort.com
Nope. Nothing in the JCL reference manual mentions anything like this either.
1 //RRPBR14 JOB ,TECHSUPT-RRP,MSGCLASS=X,CLASS=A,REGION=8M
2 //STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
3 //D DD DSN=MVS.RRP.JUNK,DISP=(,CATLG),
// UNIT=3390,SPACE=(CYL,(2,1+1)),VOL=SER=WSC001,
On 5/23/2013 10:46 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
IBM has a stripped down version of TSM that executes on zOS that does
the actual tape I/O. TSM on another platform connects to the TSM
running on zOS.
Order number?
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
831 Parkview Drive North
El
[5698-Z01] TSM for z/OS or
[5698-Z02] TSM EE for z/OS
Mark Jacobs
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] on behalf of Ed
Jaffe [edja...@phoenixsoftware.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:08 PM
To:
At least they had the nous to use a private cloud.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
Install GROUP1 (CEDA INSTALL GROUP(GROUP1).
Check that the transaction is now available. No need to bounce CICS.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Miklos Szigetvari
miklos.szigetv...@isis-papyrus.com wrote:
Hi
Have you installed the GROUP1 ?
CEDA INST G(GROUP1)
If you had you can see with
Hello,
1) HSM request for scratch tape, when performing a full volume dump of the
volumes
associated with some dump class. We have setup like below
ADDVOL MIGL00
UNIT(3390)
MIGRATION
(MIGRATIONLEVEL1
AUTODUMP(MIGDMP)
NOSMALLDATASETPACKING)
64 matches
Mail list logo
