Hi
Searching for some kind of health checkfor datasets , which could
understand the
IEBPDSE messages or IDCAMS lists (CA/CI split , allocation , reorg etc
etc) or a SEQ dataset allocation, blocking etc.
--
Kind regards, / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Miklos Szigetvari
Research
In 5354420b.8020...@phoenixsoftware.com, on 04/20/2014
at 02:54 PM, Ed Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com said:
I was unaware that such a restriction existed.
Both the 3180 and the 3192 had one set of terminal type
configuration options for a fixed screen geometry and a separate set
of options
In
of35d04e20.c5643349-on48257cc1.0019cee7-48257cc1.001d0...@sg.ibm.com,
on 04/21/2014
at 01:14 PM, Timothy Sipples sipp...@sg.ibm.com said:
IBM first introduced VSAM (in a more basic form of course) back in
the 1970s for DOS/VS, OS/VS1, and OS/VS2 (Access Method Services).
IDCAMS is just a
A reminder that the Hillgang meets at the Herdon offices of CA in Northern
Virginia.
- IT Economics of the Mainframe - Christopher T
von Koschembahr, IBM
- Running x86 Binaries on Linux for System z- Jim
Porell, Mantissa
- Cloud Storage for System z - Mike Melillo, CA
- 50 years of System
I'm pretty sure the original motivation behind VSAM was to provide a
more efficient keyed-access alternative to an earlier ISAM (Indexed
Sequential Access Method) keyed-access method --ISAM had abysmal
performance when the number of inserts became large. But, just as a
clarification, while it is
On Apr 21, 2014, at 7:37 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
---SNIP
IDCAMS is just a utility that was included with VSAM. IBM initially
offered VSAM as an Incremental Change Release (ICR), but the ICF came
in with the program product DF/EF.
On 4/21/2014 7:59 AM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
DB2 required greater flexibility and control to achieve its performance
and data consistency goals than was possible with VSAM keyed-access
support. A very cursory look at Experiences Installing Oracle
Database 10g on z/OS would suggest Oracle on z/OS
For whatever reason, such as insanity?, I have always viewed a VSAM LDS as
a private, permanent paging space. Similar in concept to using the UNIX
shmat() series of functions on a UNIX file to do I/O basically just using
paging operations. At times, I wish that using DIV windowing services were
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:01:50 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:07:29 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Are there separate pools of real storage for above the bar and below the bar?
Pools? No. Pools are a software concept.
Real storage with real addresses 2 GiB are below the bar.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:09:37 -0700, Ed Jaffe wrote:
On 4/21/2014 7:59 AM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
DB2 required greater flexibility and control to achieve its performance
and data consistency goals than was possible with VSAM keyed-access
support. A very cursory look at Experiences Installing
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:44:01 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:01:50 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
Real storage with real addresses 2 GiB are below the bar.
Real storage with real addresses 2 GiB are above the bar.
ITYM = 2 GiB
Right.
But what do you call real storage with a
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:44:01 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:01:50 -0500, Tom Marchant wrote:
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:07:29 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Are there separate pools of real storage for above the bar and below the bar?
Pools? No. Pools are a
I learned via PMR that Rational Developer for System z (RDz) v9.x (latest
greatest) does not officially support
Enterprise COBOL v5.1. The workaround suggested by RDz Support was to specify
COBOL v4.2 and XMLPARSE(XMLSS) in the RDz
wizard, because COBOL v5.1 does not support XMLPARSE(COMPAT).
That's the problem with us now ...we don't see significant difference
from
the logs .
When one device is varied offline , it gets processed instantly
When vary is issued against a set of devices (may be 10 ) , we see a
delay
of 15 to 20 seconds . But our storage person keeps
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 11:52:01 +0200, Bernd Oppolzer wrote:
The German Telefunken mainframe TR440's operating system BS3 also
had keyed file access services (different types) and a common run time
environment
Like LE is supposed to be?
for all languages (ALGOL, FORTRAN, PASCAL, PL/1, COBOL, BCPL,
We had this issue back in early 2000's. Ended up being something with GRS
across 4 LPARs.
We ended up writing a small rexx to delay next step for xxx seconds.
/* REXX */
/* SLEEPS FOR THE SPECIFIED NUMBER OF SECONDS.
I think the term pointer compression is relevant here - to java heap
just above 2GB.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator,
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
I know that DB2 does not use VSAM KSDS - only for very limited purposes,
IIRC - some logfile directories or boot strap data sets, don't recall
the details.
The tablespace data sets are VSAM LDS - linear data sets.
Anyway: there are some improvements done to VSAM for DB2, AFAIK ...
I believe
VSAM Media Manager
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Bernd Oppolzer
bernd.oppol...@t-online.dewrote:
I know that DB2 does not use VSAM KSDS - only for very limited purposes,
IIRC - some logfile directories or boot strap data sets, don't recall the
details.
The tablespace data sets are VSAM
I wonder if it would be possible to have an XMLPARSE(RUNTIME) compiler
option that defers the decision about which XML to use to runtime,
preferably with a choice of automatic decision (if zIIP then...) or
explicit operator specification at program invocation.
Yes, the two XML choices are
On Apr 22, 2014, at 12:00 AM, IBM-MAIN automatic digest system
lists...@listserv.ua.edu wrote:
IBM first introduced VSAM (in a more basic form of course) back in the
1970s for DOS/VS, OS/VS1, and OS/VS2 (Access Method Services). I don't
think VSAM was ever separately licensed, but someone
I should have done more research before opening my mouth...RDz does in fact
support
generating COBOL programs with XML PARSE in 2 different flavors. You can
specify
'generate for XMLPARSE(COMPAT)' or 'generate for XMLPARSE(XMLSS)'. Generating
for XMLPARSE(XMLSS) should have worked for COBOL V5.
22 matches
Mail list logo
