Accident
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mitch Mccluhan
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 7:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: leaving early
...why did this go out to this group?
-Original Message-
From: Nai, Dean
To:
...why did this go out to this group?
-Original Message-
From: Nai, Dean
To: IBM-MAIN
Sent: Wed, Oct 16, 2019 3:16 pm
Subject: leaving early
1 hour comp.
Dean Nai
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
Technical Services Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New Hampshire
27
Yes, I understand the risks, and I'm willing to take them. Once read access is
given to the proper facility class resource the onus is on the person doing the
rename.
It's my system, my foot.
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
Isn't DIAGNOSE the first path against the VOL and the VTOCIX.
In a message dated 10/16/2019 4:06:17 PM Central Standard Time,
01a0403c5dc1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu writes:
Is it possible it is on that volume, but not cataloged?
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 20:17:40 +, Mark Jacobs wrote:
>The dataset is allocated by the SDSF address space that's executing
>on the system where I'm attempting the rename.
>
>I thought the rationale behind the facility class profile was to give
>authorized users the ability to bypass the
The dataset is allocated by the SDSF address space that's executing on the
system where I'm attempting the rename.
I thought the rationale behind the facility class profile was to give
authorized users the ability to bypass the enqueue, while recognizing the
potential risks in renaming an
What happens if you hit PFK1?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Mark Jacobs <0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:35 PM
To:
I was informed via a private communication that IDCAMS (or IEHPROGM) doesn't
take advantage of this facility class resource, just ISPF/PDF.
When I tried to rename it in 3.4, it's telling me that the data set is in use,
and it's not giving me the option to bypass the enq and rename the data set.
I think it is cataloged to that volume. Uncatalog no scratch that dataset.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:16 AM Mark Jacobs
<0224d287a4b1-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
>
> I'm attempting to rename an inuse non-vsam dataset, even with read access to
> the STGADMIN.DPDSRN.SYS1.* profile,
I executed an IEHLIST LISTVTOC on that volume, not there.
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 12:39 PM, Jousma, David
No zIIP here either. I guess, it doesn't matter. I expect 1 more migration, 2.1
to 2.2. Then mothballing
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On
> Behalf Of Mark Charles
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 7:44 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: [EXT]
Ya just gave me a great idea !
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Dean Nai"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 11:36:04 AM
Subject: Re: leaving early
Ouch,
Wrong IBM group. How embarrassing.
Dean Nai
>
Are you talking LOGR and WLM CDS's in the couplexx member?
if so as long as they are defined in the DR's COUPLExx member
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Elaine Beal"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 11:52:43 AM
Subject: Re: DR Sysplex
So, both systems down
IPL LPAR1 with new XCF and CFRM, use existing LOG and WLM files
Will that cause an issue falling back?
by using the same LOG and WLM files?
Thanks,
Elaine
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Is it possible it is on that volume, but not cataloged?
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
Ouch,
Wrong IBM group. How embarrassing.
Dean Nai
>
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
1 hour comp.
Dean Nai
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
Technical Services Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New Hampshire
27 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301
work: 603-271-1529
Statement of Confidentiality: The contents of this message are
confidential.
Any unauthorized
1) Increase the number of buffers on OUTDD1
2) Investigate the Large Blocksize Interface (LBI)
3) opt(4) On the dump command
The real question is what is the limiting factor, TAPE or DISK?
Items 1 and 2 address the TAPE side
Item 3 addresses the DISK side
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Hi,
I'm just reaching here because it's probably a hardware limitation but I'll
ask anyway. Our current backup solution is to flashcopy our volumes and then go
back and dump them to tape using DSS. Now we started backing up some of the
huge E3 volumes and it's been taking 50 minutes per
listc ent('SYS1.PROD.PARMLIB.NEW.ORIG')
IDC3012I ENTRY SYS1.PROD.PARMLIB.NEW.ORIG NOT FOUND+
IDC1566I ** SYS1.PROD.PARMLIB.NEW.ORIG NOT LISTED
IDC0014I LASTCC=4
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
Does it exist somewhere else and the system is trying to catalog it?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 9:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] STGADMIN.DPDSRN Confusion
The dataset
I do now, we use the configuration assistant for TCP Policy agent, on a test
LPAR I has the same issues, on a z13s 3 CP 2 zIIP's it runs...ok.
my biggest issue is the lack of clear documentation.
I have my software defined, LPARS and PLEX defined, getting the notification
via email is an open
I thought my situation was bad - it only takes 30 minutes at 100% CPU on my
test system to bring up z/OSMF.
Does anyone run this on a production system?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Does IBM plan to hand out zIIP engines for free to allow sites without access
to them to run z/OSMF with reasonable performance? We have zIIPs, but just for
the heck of it I tried starting z/OSMF on a non-zIIP LPAR. It took 8 hours to
initialize, driving the (admittedly very small) LPAR at 100%
The dataset that I'm renaming it to does not exist on that volume.
DSLIST - Data Sets on volume Z22C02 Row 1 of 2
Command ===> Scroll ===> CSR
Command - Enter "/" to select action Message
Trying to rename to a duplicate dataset name?
DUPLICATE DATA SET NAME ON VOLUME Z22C02 DATA SET IS SYS1.PROD.PARMLIB.NEW.ORIG
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Manager, Systems Engineering
Fifth Third Bank
A curios message here is IGD17056I. Can this not be the real problem for RENAME?
Kees.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Mark Jacobs
> Sent: 16 October, 2019 16:16
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject:
Mark,
Am I missing something here? The way I'm reading this error is that you're
trying to rename your SYS1.PROD.PARMLIB.NEW dataset to
SYS1.PROD.PARMLIB.NEW.ORIG and SYS1.PROD.PARMLIB.NEW.ORIG already exists on
volume Z22C02. Aren't you just getting a "duplicate name" error?
Rex
+1 for what Tom says. I didn’t reply to the earlier email from Peter this
morning, but did you drill down into the "restarted forcibly" message that you
presumably saw on the HMC? I'd also go look for hardware messages at the CEC
level, there should be events there, that you can also drill
I'm attempting to rename an inuse non-vsam dataset, even with read access to
the STGADMIN.DPDSRN.SYS1.* profile, it's failing with these error messages.
IGD17060I DELETE/RENAME FAILED BECAUSE DATA SET IS OPEN
ON VOLUME Z22C02
DATA SET IS SYS1.PROD.PARMLIB.NEW
IEC614I RENAME FAILED - RC 008,
According to the z/OS V2.4 Preview Announcemet:
CICS TS will soon be orderable in either existing CustomPac or z/OSMF
portable software instance format.
This is the first of many offerings that are planned to be delivered in the PSI
format.
You do the math...
Dana
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:51:34 +0400, Peter wrote:
>I looked into audit and log messages during those time frames.
>
>I just see a message as system was restarted forcibly. It doesn't say what
>caused it.
If power was lost abruptly, there may have been no opportunity to log anything.
>Does IBM
Not coming to Perth?
On 2019-10-16 5:51 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
If you'd like to find out more about the new z/OS Container Extensions,
there are some upcoming Meetups in late November and early December, 2019,
across 9 cities in Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Details and signup
links are
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Timothy Sipples
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 5:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Z Development and Test Environment (zD)
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links
If you'd like to find out more about the new z/OS Container Extensions,
there are some upcoming Meetups in late November and early December, 2019,
across 9 cities in Asia, Australia, and New Zealand. Details and signup
links are available here:
Steve Smith wrote:
>That said, I'm pretty sure that does not apply to Dave Jousma, as I've
>worked with him before, and he does want to innovate.
Agreed, which is why I mentioned "management," which (I can now reveal) is
shorthand for "a bureaucracy that doesn't count Dave Jousma among its
Apology for not looking at readme.txt file.
I see the exported file in ibm knowledge centre at the bottom.
On Wed, 16 Oct, 2019, 12:43 PM Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM, <
kees.verno...@klm.com> wrote:
> It looks as if you can't escape z/OSMF anymore. From what I read in the
> past, this and
It looks as if you can't escape z/OSMF anymore. From what I read in the past,
this and many more functions will run (only) under z/OSMF. So this might be the
time to start running it.
Kees
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
>
IBM also offers many choices, notably IBM DS8880 and DS8900 Transparent
Cloud Tiering with z/OS DFSMShsm and IBM Cloud Tape Connector for z/OS.
Here are a couple Web links for further reading:
https://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg248381.html
OK; I'll bite: Why not run z/OSMF?
But if you prefer to exercise your XSLT skills... :-)
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer
zChampion, Systems Investigator & Performance Troubleshooter, IBM
+44-7802-245-584
email: martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
Hi
I understand starting from 2.4 there won't be any migration guide. We will
have to look in GitHub to get XML file into zosmf to look into migration
steps .
We don't run zOSMF and how do i view the migration steps for zOS 2.4 from
2.2 ?
Jake
41 matches
Mail list logo
