Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-11 Thread Charles Mills
5:26 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size When is this area obtained and freed? I.e. is this area unique for each invocation of IEFU86, or unique for each individual record, or "global". I'm wondering if I can put something in it on one i

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-11 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 07:30:42 -0500, John McKown wrote: >OK, I'll remember that. "That which is not specifically allowed is >forbidden." More like "That which is not documented as working in a particular way cannot be assumed to work in that way, even if testing seems to show that it works that

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-11 Thread John McKown
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 7:26 AM Peter Relson wrote: > > When is this area obtained and freed? I.e. is this area unique for each > invocation of IEFU86, or unique for each individual record, or "global". > I'm wondering if I can put something in it on one invocation of IEFU86 and > access it in

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-11 Thread Peter Relson
When is this area obtained and freed? I.e. is this area unique for each invocation of IEFU86, or unique for each individual record, or "global". I'm wondering if I can put something in it on one invocation of IEFU86 and access it in a different invocation. Standard response, which applies here

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-10 Thread Charles Mills
ERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:04 AM Peter Relson wrote: > > I can't find any documentation in KC on how to customize the size of the > workarea in SMPRMxx or what the minimum size of the area is. > > > The size is not cu

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-10 Thread John McKown
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:04 AM Peter Relson wrote: > > I can't find any documentation in KC on how to customize the size of the > workarea in SMPRMxx or what the minimum size of the area is. > > > The size is not customizable. 1024 is the size. The commentary on > SMXP_WORKAREA_LENGTH ought

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-10 Thread Peter Relson
I can't find any documentation in KC on how to customize the size of the workarea in SMPRMxx or what the minimum size of the area is. The size is not customizable. 1024 is the size. The commentary on SMXP_WORKAREA_LENGTH ought to say so (but doesn't, currently -- it will in the future). If

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread Charles Mills
: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size On 2019-10-09 9:55 AM, Charles Mills wrote: > No, I retired from the SMF exit business on March 31. Of course, you have a wealth of expertise in this area from your Correlog days. I might ping you off list if I have any questions if that's alright? ;) > If

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread David Crayford
o 0? My bad :) Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 6:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size Hi Charles, Yes, it is! SMXP_WORKAREA_

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread Charles Mills
Should have written > 255, of course. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 6:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size No

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread Charles Mills
gt; From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On > Behalf Of David Crayford > Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 5:52 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size > > z/OS 2.3 introduced the new IEFU086 SMF exit which is passe

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread David Crayford
] On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 5:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size z/OS 2.3 introduced the new IEFU086 SMF exit which is passed a work area which is great. I can't find any documentation in KC on how to customize the size

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread Charles Mills
It's not defined in IFAEXITP? Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 5:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size z/OS 2.3 introduced

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread David Crayford
Thank you Larre! This looks definitive :) On 2019-10-08 9:42 PM, Larre Shiller wrote: David - Based on some ESP notes that I have from our z/OS 2.3 install, it looks like the work area size is 1024 bytes. The parameter list is mapped by MACLIB(IFAEXITP). I see no evidence to indicate that

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread Larre Shiller
David - Based on some ESP notes that I have from our z/OS 2.3 install, it looks like the work area size is 1024 bytes. The parameter list is mapped by MACLIB(IFAEXITP). I see no evidence to indicate that the length can be set/modified by the installation. Larre US Social Security

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] SMF exit IEFU086 work area size Thank you Lennie, You make some very good observations. I think the salient point of the work area is so the exit routine doesn't need to allocate any storage for obvious reasons (performance). I'm leery of using

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread David Crayford
Thank you Lennie, You make some very good observations. I think the salient point of the work area is so the exit routine doesn't need to allocate any storage for obvious reasons (performance). I'm leery of using an exit with a work area without knowing it's length! On 2019-10-08 9:13 PM,

Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread Lennie Dymoke-Bradshaw
:  www.rsmpartners.com ‘Dance like no one is watching. Encrypt like everyone is.’ -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: 08 October 2019 13:52 To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [IBM-MAIN] SMF exit IEFU086 work area size z/OS 2.3

SMF exit IEFU086 work area size

2019-10-08 Thread David Crayford
z/OS 2.3 introduced the new IEFU086 SMF exit which is passed a work area which is great. I can't find any documentation in KC on how to customize the size of the workarea in SMPRMxx or what the minimum size of the area is. Can anybody shed any light on this?