Sounds like this module is a good candidate for using MODE RMODE(SPLIT) in the
binder and coding RMODE ANY in modules that can exist above the line. They can
easily identify some above the line candidates because the will getmain above
the line. Maybe someone should tell CICS about it and they
The private area size can be displayed by this TSO TEST command:
L 224.%+30?+40
7FF16E50. 007FA000
The result, hex 007FA000, varies of course from system to system.
This is the same field, LDASIZA, shown by the IPLINFO exec.
I assembled variations of a 24-bit program with different sizes and
Hello,
Cross posted to CICS as well
I am running a CICS load module scanner job where it fails with the below
message
10.53.23 JOB02673 IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 502
502 SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=106 REASON CODE=000C
502 TIME=10.53.23 SEQ=00242 CPU=
Date: 20/02/2014 09:10
Subject:Below the Line Storage Allocation
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Hello,
Cross posted to CICS as well
I am running a CICS load module scanner job where it fails with the below
message
10.53.23 JOB02673 IEA995I
The PDS directory entry in field PDS2STOR has the size needed for a classic
module.
There are various tools that will show you how much you have available below
the line.
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:40:29 +0530 Jake anderson justmainfra...@gmail.com
wrote:
:Hello,
:
:Cross posted to CICS as well
:
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Below the Line Storage Allocation
Hello,
Cross posted to CICS as well
I am running a CICS load module scanner job where it fails with the below
message
10.53.23 JOB02673 IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 502
502 SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE
Jake anderson wrote:
I am running a CICS load module scanner job where it fails with the below
message
Homegrown or vendor module?
10.53.23 JOB02673 IEA995I SYMPTOM DUMP OUTPUT 502
502 SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=106 REASON CODE=000C
Please post other messages (IEW* or CSV*)
Of Jake anderson
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Below the Line Storage Allocation
Hello,
Cross posted to CICS as well
I am running a CICS load module scanner job where it fails with the below
message
10.53.23 JOB02673 IEA995I SYMPTOM
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
On
Behalf Of Jake anderson
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Below the Line Storage Allocation
Hello,
Cross posted to CICS as well
I am running a CICS load module
: Re: Below the Line Storage Allocation
Hello,
I am pasting the Job log
10.53.23 JOB02673 IEW4000I FETCH FOR MODULE DFHEISUP FROM
DDNAME STEPLIB FAILED BECAUSE INSUFFICIENT STORAGE WAS
AVAILABLE.
10.53.23 JOB02673 CSV031I LIBRARY ACCESS FAILED FOR MODULE
DFHEISUP, RETURN CODE 24, REASON
:Re: Below the Line Storage Allocation
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Using RMF, I see unalloc common area : 6796K, So looks like I have storage
close to 6MB.
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Jake anderson
justmainfra...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello,
I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Martin Packer
Worried about your terminology here. Please show us the report.
In most interpretations of what you said about the 6796K number it looks like
a very small 24-Bit
Private is available to you.
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 03:36:43 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
According to the CICS manual you should not use REGION=0M. So rerun the job
with REGION=8M or REGION=10M or REGION=5M or any other number until it does
not abend.
How about REGION=16385K?
(By experiment, I discover that REGION=0K has
On 2/20/2014 2:10 AM, Jake anderson wrote:
10.53.23 JOB02673 IEW4000I FETCH FOR MODULE DFHEISUP FROM DDNAME STEPLIB
FAILED BECAUSE INSUFFICIENT STORAGE WAS AVAILABLE.
10.53.23 JOB02673 CSV031I LIBRARY ACCESS FAILED FOR MODULE DFHEISUP,
RETURN CODE 24, REASON CODE 26080021, DDNAME STEPLIB
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 03:36:43 -0700, Lizette Koehler wrote:
According to the CICS manual you should not use REGION=0M. So rerun the job
with REGION=8M or REGION=10M or REGION=5M or any other number until it does
not abend.
How about REGION=16385K?
(By experiment, I discover that REGION=0K has
Some find ploughing through dumps intimidating - a little Diagnosis 101 first
might shed some light:
- has this task run successfully previously ?. If so, what changed. (no,
nothing should not be accepted)
- what size *private* area is available (search for Mark Zelden IPLINFO exec)
- what's
Ran this utility extensively on our system, 3000+ load modules. Had
REGION=128M coded.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Shane Ginnane ibm-m...@tpg.com.au wrote:
Some find ploughing through dumps intimidating - a little Diagnosis 101
first might shed some light:
- has this task run
17 matches
Mail list logo
