W dniu 2016-01-08 o 08:54, Elardus Engelbrecht pisze:
[...]
I also want that cables to be self-documented or rather self-labelled at BOTH
ends ...
There are such cables. Most of UTP cables we use are factory-labelled .
BTW: I don not allow any unlabelled cable to be connected to mainframe.
And
.com
Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
Blog:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: "R.S." <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/01/2016 08:08
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
Sent by:
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>BTW2: I wish I would put cable number into IODF, Brocade webtools, etc.
Good luck on that. If one could get a standard in place to place all those
numbers everywhere (cables, paper or software), life would be simpler.
It would a
W dniu 2016-01-08 o 13:30, Martin Packer pisze:
Well, I think links COULD be self documenting and largely are (at some
level of abstraction).
SMF 74-4 has a new Path Data Section. Everyone should check it out. I've
blogged about this data several times in the past couple of years.
SMF! Now I
Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM wrote:
>I meant both inside and outside. So cable 1234567890 will report where it is
>plugged, which can be seen in HCD, SMF etc. And you can check that you have
>cable 1234567890 and not 1234576890 in your hands to plug it.
Agreed.
First we draw up a table on a
IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/01/2016 14:34
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:14:09 +, Martin Packer wrote:
>And that's a wholly manual laborious process. :-(
Until some
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
W dniu 2016-01-08 o 13:30, Martin Packer pisze:
> Well, I think links COULD be self documenting and largely are (at some
> level of abstraction).
>
> SMF 74-4 has a new Path Data Section. Everyone should check it out. I've
> blogged about this dat
W dniu 2016-01-08 o 15:34, Tom Marchant pisze:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 14:14:09 +, Martin Packer wrote:
And that's a wholly manual laborious process. :-(
Until someone invents a cable with displays at both ends that are
synchronized
Display is not a problem, you can have factory-labelled
W dniu 2016-01-08 o 11:49, Martin Packer pisze:
What is the source of your connection documentation? Human? Or - as with
the new 74-4 Path Data Section - machine-generated?
Since only human entities plug and unplug the cables, also they are
responsible for the documentation.
BTW: What is 74-4
gt;
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/01/2016 12:27
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
W dniu 2016-01-08 o 11:49, Martin Packer pisze:
> What is the source of your connection documentation? Human? Or - as
Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
>BTW2: I wish I would put cable number into IODF, Brocade webtools, etc.
Good luck on that. If one could get a standard in place to place all those
numbers everywhere (cables, paper or software), life would be simpler.
It would also be easier if there is a standard way
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of R.S.
Sent: 08 January, 2016 14:02
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
W dniu 2016-01-08 o 13:46, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM pisze:
> Cables should identify themselves to the infrastructure they connect to.
> Lots of other ha
Martin Packer wrote:
>SMF 74-4 has a new Path Data Section. Everyone should check it out. I've
>blogged about this data several times in the past couple of years.
Thanks for reminding us about SMF 74, subtype 4 (and OA37826 too). I remember
your post in this:
W dniu 2016-01-08 o 13:46, Vernooij, CP (ITOPT1) - KLM pisze:
Cables should identify themselves to the infrastructure they connect to.
Lots of other hardware does this too.
I don't understand.
I have yellow FICON cable plugged to some port in my DASD box. Since
there are no "chpid numbers" I
orks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Elardus Engelbrecht <elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/01/2016 14:01
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
Vern
jo.skip.robin...@att.net
jo.skip.robin...@gmail.com
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of R.S.
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 11:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [Bulk] Re: Change CPC
Typically a CPC object in HMC is named P0012345 (serial number).
It is unique, but not very convenient for multi-CPC display.
Q: can I rename it? I would like to use names like FRANK or JENNY.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie
; Twitter / Facebook IDs: MartinPacker
> Blog:
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
>
>
>
> From: "R.S." <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl>
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Date: 07/01/2016 10:33
> S
I have done such a change on two z10s with good results. The third time
did not go so well. For some reason, the secondary cpc did not change.
Everything looked ok until we did a POR, then it would not come up. We
had to restore the CPC.
I don't know what went wrong, but after that, we no
W dniu 2016-01-07 o 13:19, Tony Thigpen pisze:
I have done such a change on two z10s with good results. The third
time did not go so well. For some reason, the secondary cpc did not
change. Everything looked ok until we did a POR, then it would not
come up. We had to restore the CPC.
I don't
mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Martin Packer
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 10:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
What SMF records contain the CPC name?
Thanks, Martin
Martin Packer,
zChampion, Principal Systems Investigator, Worldwide Cloud
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [Bulk] Re: Change CPC name in HMC
We 'had' to do this, once.
IBM originally recommended that LPAR names be independent of the 'name'
of the image name running within it.
Then, with GDPS, they recommended the reverse. The implementation went
without a hitch.
All our
inPacker
From: "R.S." <r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/01/2016 07:33
Subject:Re: Change CPC name in HMC
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
I think, grouping doesn't help me.
Why
Martin Packer wrote:
>General rant: "Machines should be self-documenting".
In what Galaxy? ;-D
I also want that cables to be self-documented or rather self-labelled at BOTH
ends ...
>Reality: "Largely they are".
Yep. Very true in *this* Galaxy...
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
Skip Robinson wrote:
>2. Create a new group for the CEC.
This it is! That step alone should ensure there are no ill consequences.
This what I (and others) did during creating+preparing of LPARs during Y2K
testing... I have been advised by IBM to create brand new things so no live
LPARs are
orks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Skip Robinson <jo.skip.robin...@att.net>
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 07/01/2016 15:49
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU>
First off, you can name a
From: Skip Robinson
Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 10:59
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Change CPC name in HMC
First off, you can name a CPC anything you want within the syntax rules.
Ideally you should pick a good name at initial install
IL
> Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 10:47 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: [Bulk] Re: Change CPC name in HMC
>
> We 'had' to do this, once.
> IBM originally recommended that LPAR names be independent of the 'name'
> of the image name running within it.
>
&g
28 matches
Mail list logo
