m: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Chris Hoelscher
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:03 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT workers to be
> ‘on call’ for 2 years of tech supp
o be ‘on call’ for 2 years of tech support — without pay
> >
> > I am ignorant: is a severance package legally required? Depends and it
> > is NEGOCIABLE
> >
> > Otherwise its Pay-to-Stay
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Disc
And here's another good idea, from the reader-comments at The Register:
"If you read the full text of the clause it entirely hinges on the
definition of the word 'assist'. You can make a pretty strong
argument that responses like: 'Yes, I agree, that IS a pretty nasty
problem.' consti
o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of michelbutz
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: (External):Re: Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT
workers to be ‘on call’ for 2 years of tech support — without pay
What about the tax issue
ssage-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Chris Hoelscher
> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:03 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT workers to be ‘on
> call’ fo
scher
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:03 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT workers to be ‘on
call’ for 2 years of tech support — without pay
Wow - a bank lets staff go - and then expects on-call answers? And the bank
expects "tru
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT workers to be ‘on
call’ for 2 years of tech support — without pay
Wow - a bank lets staff go - and then expects on-call answers? And the bank
expects "truthful" answers? And even if the "answers"
scussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 1:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT workers
to be ‘on call’ for 2 years of tech support — without pay
I certainly dislik
>>"Gee, I don't recall how that worked".
"Just push the big red button - that should fix your issues!".
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: I
riginal Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 1:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT workers to be ‘on
call’ for 2 years of tech support —
o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 10:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT workers to be ‘on
call’ for 2 years of tech support — without pay
I wonder how much $$ the severance package provides. Tha
.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/MartinPacker
From: Tony Thigpen
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 22/10/2015 18:50
Subject:Re: Fwd: Bank’s severance deal indebts laid off IT workers
to be ‘on call’ for 2 years of tech support — without pay
Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discus
I certainly dislike what the bank did. I am ignorant: is a severance
package legally required? Hum, that probably varies. If the employment
contract does not require that a severance be paid, then the company can
require anything (legal) in order to qualify for it. IIRC, at one time our
company had
I wonder how much $$ the severance package provides. That could be
considered a 'Retainer' for 2 years. So, they are not providing the
support 'without pay'.
And, if an employee decides to quit talking to the bank after 10 or 20
hours, what can the bank do? Any judge would consider that the
e
Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/10/banks-severance-deal-indebts-laid-off-it-workers-to-be-on-call-for-2-years-of-tech-support-without-pay/
WTF! G! Those crappies are too cheap to support their employees! That bank
wants to have its bread buttered on both sides.
If you drop me,
On Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:14:15 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
>>
>> http://www.rawstory.com/2015/10/banks-severance-deal-indebts-laid-
>> off-it-workers-to-be-on-call-for-2-years-of-tech-support-without-pay/
>>
Y'know, sometimes you have really bad broken URLs. Repaired (I think):
http://www.rawstory.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/10/banks-severance-deal-indebts-laid-
off-it-workers-to-be-on-call-for-2-years-of-tech-support-without-pay/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to list
17 matches
Mail list logo
