Thanks to everyone responded.
The question was posted on behalf of our AS400 team so I don't know the
specifics and will follow up as soon as I get them.
[Although RPG has been mentioned as one of the development languages]
Thanks again!
-Victor-
---
Victor Gil writes:
>We may need to enable batch jobs running on AS400 to SYNCHRONOUSLY
>access data residing on the mainframe [say, on DB2 or on a VSAM
>file].
We might need a bit more information here. What is the runtime for these
batch jobs? (There's more than one choice on IBM i.) Are these RP
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 14:21:08 -0500, Victor Gil
wrote:
>We may need to enable batch jobs running on AS400 to SYNCHRONOUSLY access data
>residing on the mainframe [say, on DB2 or on a VSAM file].
For DB2, I would use DDF. On iSeries, you can use three-part-names in SQL, no
problem. Did
W dniu 2014-03-19 20:21, Victor Gil pisze:
Gents,
We may need to enable batch jobs running on AS400 to SYNCHRONOUSLY access data
residing on the mainframe [say, on DB2 or on a VSAM file].
DB2 - DB2 connect, odbc, itp.
VSAM - maybe NFS?
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej wia
Check out IBM's Websphere MQ series.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Victor Gil wrote:
> Gents,
>
> We may need to enable batch jobs running on AS400 to SYNCHRONOUSLY access
> data residing on the mainframe [say, on DB2 or on a VSAM file].
>
> Is anyone doing this and if yes what would be the r
Gents,
We may need to enable batch jobs running on AS400 to SYNCHRONOUSLY access data
residing on the mainframe [say, on DB2 or on a VSAM file].
Is anyone doing this and if yes what would be the recommended methods?
TIA!
-Victor-
My memory may be rusty on the details, but I recall:
McDonald's either sued or was preparing to sue Clan McDonald over the
use of the name "McDonald".
McDonald's prevailed in court over the use of "McCoffee" (IIRC) by a
firm or restaurant. The decision, as reported in the media, forbade
p
-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: iSeries
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> A line in the sand was drawn here:
>
> Amstar Corp. v. Domino's Pizza Inc., 615 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 04/08/1980)
> [1] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT
> [2]
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> A line in the sand was drawn here:
>
> Amstar Corp. v. Domino's Pizza Inc., 615 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 04/08/1980)
> [1] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT
> [2] No. 79-3650
> [3] 1980.C05.41966
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:19:57 -0700, Charles Mills wrote:
>Two identical tradenames do not necessarily infringe on each other. The test
>is the likelihood of customer confusion. Would a mattress buyer be likely to
>think IBM was behind a Serta iSeries? Would a computer buyer imput
>
> On Sep 3, 2012 12:21 PM, "Charles Mills" wrote:
> > Two identical tradenames do not necessarily infringe on each other. The
> > test is the likelihood of customer confusion. Would a mattress buyer be
>
> likely to think IBM was behind a Serta iSeries?
What about an ad which would say "For a restful night's sleep, get an IBM
iSeries ." Meaning that companies can depend on an iSeries to run reliably
at all times' vice a Wintel solution. OK , not likely.
On Sep 3, 2012 12:21 PM, "Charles Mills" wrote:
>
Two identical tradenames do not necessarily infringe on each other. The test
is the likelihood of customer confusion. Would a mattress buyer be likely to
think IBM was behind a Serta iSeries? Would a computer buyer impute Serta's
reputation to an IBM iSeries?
The question has gotten tough
Does IBM know about this:
http://www.goodbed.com/mattress-line/serta-iseries/
Surely iSeries was trademarked?! Of course, Monster Cable has/had a
"zseries" at the same time that IBM did. They owned the domain zseries.com,
although they never used it (it seems to be owned but not i
14 matches
Mail list logo