Hi Anatol,
On 04.08.2015 at 11:24, Anatol Belski wrote:
Hi Christoph,
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 2:35 AM
To: Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net; 'Christoph Becker'
cmbecke...@gmx.de; 'Pierre Joye'
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 August 2015 at 13:56, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
It's not really a made-up string format, in the sense that it has a
precedent (PDO).
True, and that format sucks royally. It trips
Hello,
I reported this bug one year ago (https://bugs.php.net/67220) and it is now
closed as not a bug. I'd like this to be reconsidered.
The documentation of realpath() says:
realpath() expands all symbolic links and resolves references to '/./',
'/../' and extra '/' characters in the input
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to make it easier for PHP developers to implement
cryptography features in their applications. I intend to work on some
of these ideas and submit them for inclusion in PHP 7.1.
Some of these
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Jakub Zelenka bu...@php.net wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to make it easier for PHP developers
Hi Anthony,
Am 04.08.2015 um 15:25 schrieb Anthony Ferrara:
Lauri,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Lauri Kenttä lauri.ken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-08-04 14:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
we do not allow secure modes
I hope that was a typo... ;)
Indeed, it was not.
If you want to
Results for project php-src-nightly, build date 2015-08-04 05:00:00+03:00
commit: e39c525df8de10d69a40177964128dc07ee94c5b
revision_date:2015-08-04 03:37:41+02:00
environment: Haswell-EP
cpu: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz 2x18 cores, stepping 2,
LLC 45 MB
Hi!
1. Pluggable Cryptography Frontend
Work is currently underway for a PHP prototype for this idea
originally suggested by ircmaxell, that will basically be like PDO for
cryptography. Our current project name, subject to change, is PHP
Crypto Objects (PCO).
It would be nice to see full
On 4 August 2015 at 10:13, Lauri Kenttä lauri.ken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-08-03 23:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
$AES = new \PCO\Symmetric('openssl:cipher=AES-128');
It would be great if you could just ask for cipher=AES-128 without
explicitly specifying the provider (openssl).
Hi Christoph,
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 2:35 AM
To: Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net; 'Christoph Becker'
cmbecke...@gmx.de; 'Pierre Joye' pierre@gmail.com
Cc: 'PHP internals' internals@lists.php.net
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
1. Pluggable Cryptography Frontend
Work is currently underway for a PHP prototype for this idea
originally suggested by ircmaxell, that will basically be like PDO for
cryptography. Our current project name,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Lauri Kenttä lauri.ken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-08-03 23:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
$AES = new \PCO\Symmetric('openssl:cipher=AES-128');
It would be great if you could just ask for cipher=AES-128 without
explicitly specifying the provider (openssl).
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Peter Lind peter.e.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 August 2015 at 10:13, Lauri Kenttä lauri.ken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-08-03 23:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
$AES = new \PCO\Symmetric('openssl:cipher=AES-128');
It would be great if you could just ask for
On 2015-08-03 23:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
$AES = new \PCO\Symmetric('openssl:cipher=AES-128');
It would be great if you could just ask for cipher=AES-128 without
explicitly specifying the provider (openssl).
--
Lauri Kenttä
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Lauri,
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Lauri Kenttä lauri.ken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2015-08-04 14:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
we do not allow secure modes
I hope that was a typo... ;)
Indeed, it was not.
The concept for this (I've been working with Scott on it) is that this
should be a
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:16 PM
To: Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net; 'Christoph Becker'
cmbecke...@gmx.de; 'Pierre Joye' pierre@gmail.com
Cc: 'PHP internals' internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Nicolas Grekas nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
I reported this bug one year ago (https://bugs.php.net/67220) and it is
now
closed as not a bug. I'd like this to be reconsidered.
The documentation of realpath() says:
realpath() expands all
On 2015-08-04 14:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
we do not allow secure modes
I hope that was a typo... ;)
On 2015-08-04 14:54, Scott Arciszewski wrote:
Version and configuration information (not what is passed, but what is
used) will be stored in the first few bytes of ciphertext output.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Jakub Zelenka bu...@php.net wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com
wrote:
Hi,
I would like to make it easier for PHP developers to implement
cryptography features in their applications. I intend to work on some
of
On 4 August 2015 at 13:56, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
It's not really a made-up string format, in the sense that it has a
precedent (PDO).
True, and that format sucks royally. It trips people up.
Combining several arguments into one string is bad design. If it
Hi Peter,
It's not really a made-up string format, in the sense that it has a
precedent (PDO).
True, and that format sucks royally. It trips people up.
Combining several arguments into one string is bad design. If it was good
design, you'd see userland code using it all over
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to make it easier for PHP developers to implement
cryptography features in their applications. I intend to work on some
of these ideas and submit them for inclusion in PHP 7.1.
Awesome and long due
Hi!
The idea here isn't too far removed from what PDO does versus mysql_*,
mssql_*, pgsql_*, etc. except it's probably more critical: Switch
crypto backends with almost zero refactoring; just change your
constructor.
So my question here is - how important task is switching crypto backends
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
The idea here isn't too far removed from what PDO does versus mysql_*,
mssql_*, pgsql_*, etc. except it's probably more critical: Switch
crypto backends with almost zero refactoring; just change your
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Bob Weinand bobw...@hotmail.com wrote:
Am 3.8.2015 um 22:54 schrieb Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com:
Hi,
I would like to make it easier for PHP developers to implement
cryptography features in their applications. I intend to work on some
of these ideas
Hi!
We're still discussing the DSN string for the constructor. These are
what the options look like, currently:
I think it's better to separate the arguments. I understand why PDO
makes such strings - there can be all kinds of options, and it's hard to
configure - i.e. in ini files - if it's
Hi Christoph,
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 7:40 PM
To: Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net; 'Christoph Becker'
cmbecke...@gmx.de; 'Pierre Joye' pierre@gmail.com
Cc: 'PHP internals' internals@lists.php.net
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Terry Cullen te...@terah.com.au wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 August 2015, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
On 04.08.2015 at 19:30, Stephen Coakley wrote:
On 08/04/2015 11:36 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
maybe it just me, but it seems to me, that every time this idea is
brought
up, not many people from the actual participants of the list speak up,
but
bunch of people who never before sent a mail to
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Terry Cullen te...@terah.com.au wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 August 2015, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
wrote:
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 17:15 -0500, Stephen Coakley wrote:
You have to admit, NNTP news is an aging technology, with fewer and
fewer readers
On 08/04/2015 11:36 AM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Terry Cullen te...@terah.com.au wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 August 2015, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
wrote:
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 17:15 -0500, Stephen Coakley wrote:
You have to admit, NNTP news is an aging
On Tuesday, 4 August 2015, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de wrote:
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 17:15 -0500, Stephen Coakley wrote:
You have to admit, NNTP news is an aging technology, with fewer and
fewer readers available as time goes on. Nowadays (for graphical
clients), there's Pan,
On 08/03/2015 12:22 AM, Stephen Coakley wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see the mailing list move to a forum-type
system. Lower barrier of entry, more visible archives, and more modern
medium that supports other kinds of attachments and whatnot.
I don't buy the lower barrier of entry
On 08/04/2015 12:28 PM, Florian Anderiasch wrote:
On 08/03/2015 12:22 AM, Stephen Coakley wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see the mailing list move to a forum-type
system. Lower barrier of entry, more visible archives, and more modern
medium that supports other kinds of attachments and whatnot.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Ferenc Kovacs tyr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Terry Cullen te...@terah.com.au wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 August 2015, Johannes Schlüter johan...@schlueters.de
wrote:
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 17:15 -0500, Stephen Coakley wrote:
You have to
On 04.08.2015 at 16:33, Anatol Belski wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Becker [mailto:cmbecke...@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 1:16 PM
To: Anatol Belski anatol@belski.net; 'Christoph Becker'
cmbecke...@gmx.de; 'Pierre Joye' pierre@gmail.com
Cc: 'PHP
On 04/08/15 17:12, Terry Cullen wrote:
Redmine would be a good option. http://www.redmine.org/
The feature list has most everything covered in this thread.
http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/Features
Feature list is nice, but is PHP really unable to provide a similar service?
--
Am 04.08.2015 um 19:47 schrieb Stephen Coakley m...@stephencoakley.com:
[...]
My thought is that no, a number of people don't know what a mailing list is
(obviously no one in here already), but everyone knows what a forum is. The
web is everywhere and is taking over the world, whereas
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 3:54 AM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to make it easier for PHP developers to implement
cryptography features in their applications. I intend to work on some
of
Am 3.8.2015 um 22:54 schrieb Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com:
Hi,
I would like to make it easier for PHP developers to implement
cryptography features in their applications. I intend to work on some
of these ideas and submit them for inclusion in PHP 7.1.
Some of these might be
On Aug 4, 2015, at 12:12 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
On 04/08/15 17:12, Terry Cullen wrote:
Redmine would be a good option. http://www.redmine.org/
The feature list has most everything covered in this thread.
http://www.redmine.org/projects/redmine/wiki/Features
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com wrote:
* Adding streaming encryption/decryption support to OpenSSL
Hm... Implementing streaming cyphers right is not trivial, and if we'd
be doing our own crypto (as opposed to providing API to existing
libraries) we need
So my question here is - how important task is switching crypto backends
easily? Moreover, what would be the reason for me, as an app developer,
to target more than one crypto backend? I can see why I may want to
target mysql and say, SQL server - these two platforms have different
Hi!
of the storage formats. Similar to the headers used by TLS and other
formats. That way anyone can build to the specification, which would
be maintained along side the implementation.
I'm not a big fan of the idea that to talk to the PHP script, I will
have now to have yet another set of
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Stanislav Malyshev smalys...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi!
The idea here isn't too far removed from what PDO does versus mysql_*,
mssql_*, pgsql_*, etc. except it's probably more critical:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Scott Arciszewski sc...@paragonie.com wrote:
This isn't a replacement, they're alternatives. - means related to in
this case, not becomes :)
Or do you mean to add a parameter to the existing functions to make
them constant time?
Yes, when it makes sense (for
46 matches
Mail list logo
