Hi!
in such case, the serialized data could be shared by 5.5 and 5.6...
This is true, but what you presented is not serialized data. Serialized
data will be fine. But the code you shown instead tries to use
serializer as a roundabout way of instantiating objects. This is not the
right
On 17 Jul 2014, at 04:23, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
Do we need a new operator for that? It feels un-php to me, and the
kind of problem bigint objects should be meant to solve. On the other
hand, having $a/$b != $a/$b (Off by more than 100 in this instance).
But back on the first
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Tjerk,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why should `password_verify()` work on a hash that wasn't generated with
`password_hash()`? The fact that it uses `crypt()`
On 17 Jul 2014, at 01:11, Bishop Bettini bis...@php.net wrote:
As another contender, how about:
$x = 242 %/ 7;
$x %/= 13;
The % reflects the relationship to modulus, while the / reflects the division
effect. I think %/ looks worse, but I think it seems more apropos.
I also quite
-Original Message-
From: Stas Malyshev [mailto:smalys...@sugarcrm.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 9:08 AM
To: Laruence; Remi Collet
Cc: PHP Internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] An BC issue in unserialize
Hi!
in such case, the serialized data could be shared by 5.5 and 5.6...
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Faulds [mailto:a...@ajf.me]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 6:15 PM
To: bis...@php.net
Cc: PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv()
The RFC has been updated to v0.2. It now proposes a %% operator for
integer
division (with corresponding
-Original Message-
From: Kris Craig [mailto:kris.cr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 6:02 AM
To: Andrea Faulds
Cc: Stas Malyshev; PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv()
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Perhaps the RFC could
Hi!
IMHO this isn't something we should change in a 2nd digit release, but on a
major version, even if it wasn't documented.
We don't have much option here. Keeping it leads to a remote triggerable
segfaults. We've discussed this here just recently. This is a hack that
does not work properly
On 17 Jul 2014, at 07:29, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
From debating whether it's worth it to add a new function for an
not-so-commonly-used-operation-to-say-the-least, we're now seriously
considering adding a new language level operator? Really?
Is it *really* not that common? I can
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
RFC for this is created.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/use-php_mt_rand
New rand() function name is TBD. I cannot think of good name, but
I like rand_system(). rand() may stay as it is now also.
I have mixed feelings about
Hi Andrea,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 07:29, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
From debating whether it's worth it to add a new function for an
not-so-commonly-used-operation-to-say-the-least, we're now seriously
considering adding a
On 17 Jul 2014, at 07:56, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
The rare cases where I had to do that, I relied on bcmath or gmp. Yes,
I needed some extra ops to actually achieve what this RFC proposes but
it is good enough. The new ops overloading for extension simplifies
that a lot as
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Faulds [mailto:a...@ajf.me]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 9:44 AM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: bis...@php.net; PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv()
On 17 Jul 2014, at 07:29, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
From debating whether it's
On 17 Jul 2014, at 08:02, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
I think it is, given I believe it's the first time people are asking for
this after PHP's been out for almost two decades...
As the RFC itself suggests, you can use the current division for most use
cases, including the ones
Hi!
* Time (actually pretty common in web apps, though we have a DateTime
class)
Admittedly, we're getting closer to the dreaded year 2038, but what does
it actually mean to divide current Unix timestamp by 3 and why one would
ever want to do this? We also have classes for real datetime
-Original Message-
From: Andrea Faulds [mailto:a...@ajf.me]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 10:09 AM
To: Zeev Suraski
Cc: bis...@php.net; PHP internals
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] intdiv()
On 17 Jul 2014, at 08:02, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
I think it is, given I believe
On 17/07/14 04:23, Sara Golemon wrote:
Wow. I just finally understood what your RFC was going for. I thought
you were trying to cover the case where ($a%$b)==0, but you're not,
you're trying to do truncated integer division regardless of
remainder. I also missed the fact that div_function
On 17 Jul 2014, at 08:19, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
PHP's not Perl. Let's keep it that way please…
I don't think it makes sense to add a
specialized integer division operator when we do have a different division
operator, and I don't think other dynamic languages have such an
On 17/07/14 08:02, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I think it is, given I believe it's the first time people are asking for
this after PHP's been out for almost two decades...
As the RFC itself suggests, you can use the current division for most use
cases, including the ones mentioned above - they'd work
On 17 Jul 2014, at 08:17, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com wrote:
Hi!
* Time (actually pretty common in web apps, though we have a DateTime
class)
Admittedly, we're getting closer to the dreaded year 2038, but what does
it actually mean to divide current Unix timestamp by 3 and why
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
IMHO this isn't something we should change in a 2nd digit release, but
on a
major version, even if it wasn't documented.
We don't have much option here. Keeping it leads to a remote triggerable
segfaults.
Hi!
As discussed in previous threads about this failure, we (doctrine) can
move away from the `unserialize()` hack if
`ReflectionClass#newInstanceWithoutConstructor()` provides support for
internal classes.
Could you explain why it is needed to instantiate internal classes
without calling
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Stas Malyshev smalys...@sugarcrm.com
wrote:
Hi!
As discussed in previous threads about this failure, we (doctrine) can
move away from the `unserialize()` hack if
`ReflectionClass#newInstanceWithoutConstructor()` provides support for
internal classes.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Sara Golemon poll...@php.net wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
Nikita Popov doesn’t seem to be a fan of the %% syntax, so it may be
subject to change, though I think it’s the best I’ve heard so far. ;)
Nor am I.
Hi,
On 07/16/2014 10:45 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
On 16 Jul 2014, at 21:43, Zeev Suraski z...@zend.com wrote:
anything this RFC permits will
be permitted by zpp, it's the reverse that isn't necessarily true.
Right, so it needs to be fixed. It makes no sense to force a new agenda
on the
Hi all,
https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/725
This is the fix for https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=66827
This kind of malformed data is an attack most likely, but
raising error is not an option.
Quick grep show no module nor core log error only.
i.e. There is no error logging only code. All of
Hi Tjerk,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Tjerk,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Tjerk Meesters
tjerk.meest...@gmail.com wrote:
Why should `password_verify()`
Hi Pierre,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Pierre Joye pierre@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
RFC for this is created.
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/use-php_mt_rand
New rand() function name is TBD. I cannot think of good name,
-Original Message-
From: Alain Williams [mailto:a...@phcomp.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:17 AM
To: internals@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Scalar Type Hinting With Casts (re-opening)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:31:46AM +0100, Rowan Collins wrote:
Now,
Thomas Nunninger wrote:
- scalar parameter casting should just be a convenience for coding:
function foo( (int) $i, (string) $s )
{
}
is the same as:
function foo( $i, $s )
{
$i = (int) $i;
$s = (string) $s;
}
or perhaps better::
Hi Dan,
On 07/17/2014 02:12 PM, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
Thomas Nunninger wrote:
- scalar parameter casting should just be a convenience for coding:
function foo( (int) $i, (string) $s )
{
}
is the same as:
function foo( $i, $s )
{
$i = (int) $i;
- I'd like to have E_CAST on all castings/type jugglings even if we do
not get scalar type hinting.
$var = 6.3;
$a = (int) $var;
Or $b = (bool) 1;
This is usual code and it could be wanted to losse information on casting.
Triggering errors for that would be extremely annoying.
- I
On 17 Jul 2014, at 10:24, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
This is already what is currently happening, see
http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_TRUNK/Zend/zend_operators.c#1067.
Andreas proposal is only useful in the case that the numbers don't divide
exactly and you need
On 16 July 2014 23:16, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net wrote:
Hi Tjerk,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why should `password_verify()` work on a hash that
Hi Thomas,
Perhaps I miss your point. But what is the difference to current behavior if
you do not know about the types?
Not to the current behaviour, to the behaviour that would be possible
with scalar type-hinting.
Or is your point about inspection of parameter type? Why shouldn't
Apologies, I pasted the wrong code, it should have read:
which makes the code:
function foo( $i, $s )
{
$i = (int) $i;
$s = (string) $s;
}
Not be equivalent to:
function foo( (int) $i, (string) $s )
{
}
As the type-hint information is not
All,
Look at the issue, there's a line in there that is the crux of the issue:
So problem isn't only in ROUNDS_MIN.
In fact, the overall algorithm changed.
Look at a quick example: http://3v4l.org/Eov3o
From 5.3.2+ (when we pulled in our own implementation of crypt-sha256
and crypt-sha512,
Hi
I want to help translating the PHP documentation.
For some time I have contributed in PHP translation projects for Symfony2
(https://github.com/andreia/symfony-docs-pt-BR/), DBAL
(https://github.com/royopa/dbal-documentation- en_US) and Silex Framework
Hi all,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 4:38 AM, Anthony Ferrara ircmax...@gmail.com
wrote:
We internalized the algorithms in 5.3.2 at least partially because the
system provided libraries were inconsistent at best (hence why many
but not all 5.2 systems don't support bcrypt, it depended on the build
Yasuo
Anthony, do you have suggestion for removing 72 char restriction of
PASSWORD_BCRYPT?
My suggestion is to leave it there (it's no longer bcrypt if you do
something to remove it). Here's a deeper explanation:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/16597402/338665
Once scrypt (or yescrypt, or whatever
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 10:24, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
This is already what is currently happening, see
http://lxr.php.net/xref/PHP_TRUNK/Zend/zend_operators.c#1067.
Andreas proposal is only useful in the
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 10:24, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
This is already what is currently happening, see
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me wrote:
On 17 Jul 2014, at 10:24, Nikita Popov nikita@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:31 AM, Andrea Faulds a...@ajf.me
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 9:18 PM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Kris Craig kris.cr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Tjerk Meesters tjerk.meest...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Kris Craig
Since I am very much in favour of scalar type hints, I've updated the
patch to master and made some minor improvements, and I am re-opening
the RFC with the intent to try and get it into PHP 5.7.
First of all, this is my first reply on PHP Internals so I hope I am doing it
right. :)
Thank
46 matches
Mail list logo
