On 9/7/06, Dan Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/6/06, Matthew Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> I did a dump of the network settings on this new machine and an existing
> machine and the only difference I can see is this "Set in Progress" line
> is set to "Set In Progress" on the new mach
On 9/7/06, Dan Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/7/06, Matthew Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Alright, I set the mac address manually, still no luck.
Run tcpdump from another system. You have arp generation turned on so
you should see arps from the IP you configured.I recently came acr
On 9/7/06, Matthew Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alright, I set the mac address manually, still no luck.
Run tcpdump from another system. You have arp generation turned on so
you should see arps from the IP you configured.
If you don't see arps then I give up. Otherwise it's probably a use
On 9/7/06, Matthew Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why would the mac address not be set? Shouldn't it automatically get that
> off the card itself? Or don't I understand how IPMI works?
>
On my hardware it doesn't get it automatically off the card.
Also there are often to change the MAC us
Alright, I set the mac address manually, still no luck. What's really odd
is the fact the device gets set back to "Set in progress" again when I do
that and I have to issue the raw command for commit to have it become "Set
Complete"
I'm not sure what's different between this machine's settings
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On 9/7/06, Matthew Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, I just looked at the mail archive and tried those steps,
> > unfortunately I still can't access the machine remotely.
>
> ...
>
> > I'm wondering if it could be because those blank callback,
On 9/7/06, Matthew Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, I just looked at the mail archive and tried those steps,
> unfortunately I still can't access the machine remotely.
...
> I'm wondering if it could be because those blank callback, user, and
> operator auth type lines which aren't blank o
Hmm, I just looked at the mail archive and tried those steps,
unfortunately I still can't access the machine remotely.
rhodocuccus:/home/lairdm # /usr/local/bin/ipmitool -I open -A none lan
print 6
Set in Progress : Set Complete
Auth Type Support : NONE MD2 MD5 PASSWORD
Auth Type E
On 9/6/06, Matthew Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a dump of the network settings on this new machine and an existing
> machine and the only difference I can see is this "Set in Progress" line
> is set to "Set In Progress" on the new machine and "Set Complete" on the
> existing machine.
>
Oh, I almost forgot, I was also going to include the network settings
dump:
ipmitool -I open -A NONE lan print 6
Set in Progress : Set In Progress
Auth Type Support : NONE MD2 MD5 PASSWORD
Auth Type Enable: Callback :
: User :
ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Set in Progress
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Reset your BMC (ipmitool mc )
Reset works fine, thanks.
The lan access still does not work but this is another story. It may be
a newtork problem. Is the MAC address for de
Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Reset your BMC (ipmitool mc )
Reset works fine, thanks.
The lan access still does not work but this is another story. It may be a
newtork problem. Is the MAC address for default GW mandatory?
-
Daniel Toma wrote:
> I have a small question: how can I set the value for "Set in Progress" to
> "complete"? I tried all lan commands, but without any luck.
I'm a newbie at this and I'm not at work so I don't have a system to
test with, but you'll probably need to use raw commands to set the
flags
On Friday 01 September 2006 09:53, Daniel Toma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a small question: how can I set the value for "Set in Progress" to
> "complete"? I tried all lan commands, but without any luck.
>
> # ipmitool lan print 1
> Set in Progress : Set In Progress
>
> I understand from docs t
14 matches
Mail list logo
