Github user eminency commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1050
@hyunsik Thanks, I'll ship it soon.
---
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1050
TAJO-2159: Function document should be modified as removing INET4 type
Please review it.
This document is describing changes at
https://github.com/apache/tajo/commit
Github user eminency closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1038
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user eminency commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1038
Thanks, I'll ship it and close the PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user eminency commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1038
@jihoonson Thanks for good catches! I fixed them, please check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user eminency commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/986
Could you merge master branch?
If so, I'll review in this week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1038
TAJO-2176: Refining function documents
Done.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo TAJO-2176
Alternatively you can
Github user eminency closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1027
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user eminency commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1027
Thanks for the review.
I'll commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1027#issuecomment-222081661
Separated issues and refined code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user eminency closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1027#issuecomment-220504281
Good suggestion. I will separate it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#issuecomment-219938008
@hyunsik , it's done. Please check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1027#issuecomment-219928860
Oh, I got it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1027#issuecomment-219926775
Hi, @jinossy
Other geoip functions(old ones) have not had a test.
I think it is because of license problem - GeoIP library is set as
'provided' in pom.xml
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#discussion_r63645472
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/functions/hivefunc.rst ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+##
+Hive Functions
+##
+
+Tajo
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026#discussion_r63645666
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/functions/hivefunc.rst ---
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+##
+Hive Functions
+##
+
+Tajo
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1027
TAJO-2156: Create GeoIP functions taking various types instead of INET4
type
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1026
TAJO-2027: Writing Hive UDF integration document
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo hiveudf_doc
Alternatively you
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1007#issuecomment-219213140
@hyunsik , master branch is merged.
@jihoonson , I created the issued you mentioned, TAJO-2155 and TAJO-2156.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1014
TAJO-2145: Error codes based on errno.h need prefix
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo TAJO-2145
Alternatively you
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1007#discussion_r61223109
--- Diff:
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/function/geoip/GeoIPCountryInet4.java
---
@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-/*
- * Licensed to the Apache
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#issuecomment-214145976
@jihoonson
The problem you mentioned and null handling problem are fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/1007
TAJO-2130: Remove inet4 data type
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo TAJO-2130
Alternatively you can review
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#issuecomment-201157356
@jihoonson
I fixed some of what you suggested. Read my comments.
In addition, loading from HDFS might be separated to another issue. It
needs too large working
Github user eminency closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/974
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r56941559
--- Diff:
tajo-plan/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/plan/function/HiveFunctionInvoke.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r56941033
--- Diff:
tajo-plan/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/plan/function/HiveFunctionInvoke.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r56934161
--- Diff:
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/function/hiveudf/HiveFunctionLoader.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+/***
+ * Licensed
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r56449935
--- Diff:
tajo-core-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/tajo/client/TestTajoClient.java ---
@@ -175,10 +176,8 @@ public final void testSessionVariables() throws
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r56449210
--- Diff:
tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-server/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/catalog/store/XMLCatalogSchemaManager.java
---
@@ -644,30 +631,22 @@ protected void
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r56448985
--- Diff:
tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-server/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/catalog/store/XMLCatalogSchemaManager.java
---
@@ -602,18 +597,10 @@ protected void
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r56448401
--- Diff:
tajo-algebra/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/algebra/CreateTable.java ---
@@ -471,10 +469,7 @@ public Object clone() throws
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r56449510
--- Diff:
tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-server/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/catalog/store/XMLCatalogSchemaManager.java
---
@@ -675,40 +654,38 @@ protected void
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r56448372
--- Diff:
tajo-algebra/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/algebra/CreateTable.java ---
@@ -418,10 +419,7 @@ public Object clone() throws
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r56452167
--- Diff: tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/querymaster/Query.java ---
@@ -303,12 +304,7 @@ public QueryHistory getQueryHistory
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#issuecomment-197701836
Even though they may not exact, I left some comments.
Please check them out.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r56451584
--- Diff:
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/query/TaskRequestImpl.java ---
@@ -216,49 +217,42 @@ public Enforcer getEnforcer() {
return
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r55786236
--- Diff: tajo-common/pom.xml ---
@@ -245,6 +249,12 @@
powermock-api-mockito
test
+
+ org.apache.hive
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r55785562
--- Diff:
tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/catalog/FunctionDescBuilder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/***
+ * Licensed
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r55643624
--- Diff:
tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/catalog/FunctionDescBuilder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/***
+ * Licensed
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/974
TAJO-1929: Can't read ORC file on hive-meta
Creating table and reading ORC files are tested in Tajo with Hive catalog.
And, ORC files created from Tajo are read well on Hive.
You can merge
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/955#issuecomment-194071033
@blrunner
SQL keywords are fetched from SQLLexer now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#issuecomment-194070707
Time to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/973#issuecomment-194069841
+1.
I think it is absolutely clear :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/955#issuecomment-193579952
@blrunner
Ok, please check what you commented.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/955#discussion_r55304007
--- Diff:
tajo-cli/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/cli/tsql/commands/TajoGetConfCommand.java
---
@@ -55,4 +62,52 @@ public String getUsage() {
public
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/955#discussion_r55176131
--- Diff:
tajo-cli/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/cli/tsql/commands/TajoShellCommand.java
---
@@ -126,4 +136,56 @@ protected void print(char c, int count
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#issuecomment-188273376
@jihoonson
I applied most of your suggestions.
Could you check them again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r53128977
--- Diff: tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/worker/TajoWorker.java ---
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ public void serviceInit(Configuration conf) throws
Exception
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/955#issuecomment-183840136
Never mind.
It is not a critical patch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#discussion_r52709548
--- Diff:
tajo-plan/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/plan/function/HiveFunctionInvoke.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929#issuecomment-179781185
I missed many things... I will make the code handle them soon.
UDF call test also will be done ASAP.
Thanks @jihoonson .
---
If your project is set up
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/955
TAJO-2064: Supporting auto-completion in Tsql
Use tab in Tsql!
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo auto-completion
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/937#issuecomment-176605183
@blrunner
I fixed it. Please verify if it fits in your intention.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/937#issuecomment-175999530
@blrunner
It's already reported issue. Refer this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1929
I will fix it after this PR because it needs ORC
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/660#issuecomment-173832814
Hi, @charsyam
May I take this on to continue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/944#discussion_r50217032
--- Diff:
tajo-algebra/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/algebra/CreateTable.java ---
@@ -419,9 +420,7 @@ public Object clone() throws CloneNotSupportedException
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/945#issuecomment-172755772
@jihoonson
Thank you for the comment.
I'm working on it. I will keep you posted.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/896#discussion_r49963051
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/partitioning/column_partitioning.rst ---
@@ -44,9 +72,166 @@ during query planning phase.
* LIKE predicates
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/896#issuecomment-172441743
It looks good. +1, too.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/896#issuecomment-172430843
Hi, I leave some comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/896#discussion_r49962664
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/partitioning/column_partitioning.rst ---
@@ -11,22 +11,50 @@ How to Create a Column Partitioned Table
You can create
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/896#discussion_r49962595
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/partitioning/column_partitioning.rst ---
@@ -11,22 +11,50 @@ How to Create a Column Partitioned Table
You can create
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/945
TAJO-2059: Binary search in BST reader does compare too frequently
Some simple test based on unit test was done with 1M tuples and searching
1M times.
Two columns, which are long and double
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/943#issuecomment-171945025
+1
It looks so clear.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/937
TAJO-2052: Upgrading ORC reader version
Code is refined, and it is based on presto-orc-0.132.
* Base data structure is changed from Vector to Block.
* Some bugs are fixed
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/929
TAJO-1686: Allow Tajo to use Hive UDF
This patch consists of parts below.
Core Logic
1. **TajoMaster.java / HiveFunctionLoader.java** : in charge of finding
Hive UDFs
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/925#issuecomment-168949700
That's clear. My +1 here is.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/883#issuecomment-166204080
Hi, @jihoonson .
I applied what you suggested and rebased.
Could you verify them?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/916
TAJO-2028: Refining Hive Integration document including typo
RFR
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo TAJO-2028
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/883#discussion_r47590084
--- Diff:
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/function/FunctionLoader.java ---
@@ -299,4 +284,38 @@ private static StaticMethodInvocationDesc
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/883#discussion_r47589003
--- Diff:
tajo-catalog/tajo-catalog-common/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/catalog/FunctionDesc.java
---
@@ -167,6 +171,13 @@ public boolean equals(Object obj
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/883#discussion_r47589327
--- Diff:
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/function/FunctionLoader.java ---
@@ -299,4 +284,38 @@ private static StaticMethodInvocationDesc
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/883#discussion_r47589038
--- Diff:
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/function/FunctionLoader.java ---
@@ -299,4 +284,38 @@ private static StaticMethodInvocationDesc
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/883#issuecomment-164664621
@jihoonson
Thanks for the review.
I applied what you advised and left some answers.
Please check them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/911
TAJO-2021: Some refactoring and changing anonymous class to lambda
expression
It's some simplified code changes
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/873#issuecomment-160833947
Good advices.
Comments are applied, @jihoonson
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/870#issuecomment-160502247
Sure, I close this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user eminency closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/870
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/855#issuecomment-160504334
Could you merge latest master branch please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/858#issuecomment-160504248
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/890#discussion_r46111387
--- Diff:
tajo-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tajo/engine/query/TaskRequestImpl.java ---
@@ -258,9 +258,9 @@ private void mergeLocalToBuilder
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/870#issuecomment-160034320
@jihoonson I submitted new PR : https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/881
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/881
TAJO-1994: Some trivial modification is needed in compression document
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo TAJO-1994
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/883
TAJO-1997: Registering UDF, it needs to check duplication
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/eminency/tajo ambiguous_excpetion
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/883#issuecomment-160060793
Ready for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/848#issuecomment-159808526
I think it's very good.
+1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/878#issuecomment-159804277
Refined more simply, please check.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/878
TAJO-1856: Add a description about the relationship of tablespace, managed
table, and external table to Tablespace section of Table Management chapter
Hi @hyunsik , @jihoonson .
One more PR
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/873
TAJO-1855: Add document for tablespace configuration to the Configuration
chapter.
@hyunsik , @jihoonson
I added a document describing tablespace feature -exactly speaking, for
storage
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/870#issuecomment-159132318
@jihoonson ,
I updated what you mentioned and a bit further.
Please check it out.
Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
GitHub user eminency opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/870
TAJO-1857: Rename the section of 'File Formats' to 'Data Formats' and fill
compression section of the 'Table Management' chapter
Hi, @jihoonson.
I modified docs and wrote a compression doc newly
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/844#issuecomment-154697044
Thanks, it looks good. +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/848#issuecomment-154285736
I leave some comments.
Actually many items are related and duplicated with 'tajo-site.xml' doc.
I think you'd better consider to omit explanations for those
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/848#discussion_r44101925
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/tsql/variables.rst ---
@@ -28,35 +30,456 @@ Each client connection to TajoMaster creates a unique
session, and the client
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/844#discussion_r44100331
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/configuration/tajo-site-xml.rst ---
@@ -2,23 +2,455 @@
The tajo-site.xml File
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/848#discussion_r44101567
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/tsql/variables.rst ---
@@ -28,35 +30,456 @@ Each client connection to TajoMaster creates a unique
session, and the client
Github user eminency commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/848#discussion_r44102039
--- Diff: tajo-docs/src/main/sphinx/tsql/variables.rst ---
@@ -28,35 +30,456 @@ Each client connection to TajoMaster creates a unique
session, and the client
Github user eminency commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/tajo/pull/844#issuecomment-154274813
I leave some comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
1 - 100 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
