Re: [ivtv-devel] No success with PVR350 (tuner type=-1 ...)

2004-12-01 Thread Michael T. Dean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I bought a PVR 350 card a couple of weeks ago and I'm struggling to get it working in Linux. ... I have tried Ivtv driver 0.2.0 rc3 and now 0.3.1y, but the behaviour is identical. After compiling, installing and loading the driver, this is how dmesg looks: - - - - -

Re: [ivtv-devel] FC2 with PVR250 - No capture, only static

2004-12-03 Thread Michael T. Dean
Cameron Booth wrote: I've got a new FC2 install, and I'm following Jarrod's Guide (http://www.wilsonet.com/mythtv) to install MythTV on it. Everything was going fine, according to his steps, until it got time to test for capture of video: cat /dev/video0 /tmp/video.mpg mplayer /tmp/video.mpg I

Re: [ivtv-devel] No success with PVR350 (tuner type=-1 ...)

2004-12-03 Thread Michael T. Dean
Alan Gonzalez wrote: yeah delete the 0.1.9 one out of the /lib/modules directory Where by one, he means all of them. ;) From memory (I'm traveling, so I can't check, and this is probably not all of them): ivtv ivtv-fb msp3400 saa7127 saa7115 You can get a better list by doing a make -n

Re: [ivtv-devel] FC2 with PVR250 - No capture, only static

2004-12-04 Thread Michael T. Dean
Jarod Wilson wrote: On Friday 03 December 2004 05:33, Michael T. Dean wrote: BTW, the archives are at http://www.poptix.net/ivtv And now http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/ivtv/, which may be a little easier to search. Cool. I didn't realize they found an mbox archive. Mike

Re: [ivtv-devel] Tuning issue with new type 50 PVR-250 - help

2004-12-26 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 12/10/2004 05:03 AM, Hiroto Shibuya wrote: So Mike, do you currently have this tuner working? ? In this post you mentioned that you didn't have RF feed to test it. http://www.poptix.net/ivtv/Sep-2004/msg00261.html Exactly. Therefore, I have no first-hand knowledge. However, there have

Re: [ivtv-devel] Tuning issue with new type 50 PVR-250 - help

2004-12-26 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 12/14/2004 10:10 AM, Dan Ferris wrote: I did the same last night (but i didn't have a spare hard drive, but i had a few hours to kill). I installed windows, all the drivers, and i tried the wintv2000 application, it was perfect on the first try... I then installed media portal from

Re: [ivtv-devel] Tuning issue with new type 50 PVR-250 - help

2004-12-26 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 12/26/2004 06:31 PM, Dan Ferris wrote: I was going to get together with Jarod after the holidays, but it looks like you're online now. Do you want to try to ssh into my computer? fair warning, i currently do not have the right frequencies, and i have a good signal going into the cable tuner.

Re: [ivtv-devel] pvr350 video output problem

2004-12-26 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 12/13/2004 02:08 AM, Nicholas Gibson wrote: I'm having trouble with the video output using my PVR-350. Based on my cable I have channles above 125 so I think I need to chain the devices like so cable-cable box-pvr350-TV. I'll then need to set the pvr350 to channel 3 and change the channels on

Re: [ivtv-devel] ivtv: i2c client addr: 0x21 not found!

2004-12-26 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 12/13/2004 02:06 PM, Nicholas Gibson wrote: I'm getting so close to having this work :) I can now get video to output with the following command but I get an error in the syslog: ivtvctl -u 0x3000 ivtvctl -p 4 ivtvctl -f width=720,height=480 cat /dev/video0 /tmp/test_capture.mpg I get the

Re: [ivtv-devel] Tuning issue with new type 50 PVR-250 - help

2004-12-26 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 12/26/2004 10:00 PM, Peter Eacmen wrote: Does the module in 2.6.10 contain the same patch as on ckennnedy's site (for the type 50 tuners)? If so, I have already tried patching 2.6.9-1.681_FC3 - with the same results. Yes. The reason I'm recommending 2.6.10 is because it ships with support

Re: [ivtv-devel] Bad card?

2004-12-26 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 12/26/2004 01:20 PM, Brent Kilgore wrote: Well I officially give up. I believe my PVR-350 card is bad and the manufacturer not only will not honor the warranty, they are extremely rude in the process. I also have had very good experiences with Hauppauge. I decided to try some windows pvr

Re: [ivtv-devel] pvr-150 video, no audio or remote

2005-01-02 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/01/2005 10:24 PM, Gregory J. Haase wrote: This is really weird. We already know that Jim and I have different PVR150 cards... but in my lsmod, I see saa7115 and msp3400. Would these modules load themselves with no hardware present? It's Linux. It doesn't do anything by itself. :) They

Re: [ivtv-devel] Possibly unsupported tuner...

2005-01-07 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/03/2005 02:41 PM, Rasmus Larsen wrote: On Monday 03 January 2005 16:45, Greg Haase wrote: But I think i've got it working now with ivtv tuner=50, except i have to multiply the frequency by 16, is that correct behavior?! Yes--depending on what program you use to set the frequency. If

Re: [ivtv-devel] PVR-350 (tuner 38) signal problems

2005-01-07 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/03/2005 08:23 AM, Thomas Olsson wrote: The tuner image has always been mostly static, but certain frequencies do lock to a very noisy signal. I'm in Denmark ... tveeprom: tuner = Philips FM1216 ME MK3 (idx = 57, type = 38) ... ivtv: Tuner Type 38, Tuner formats 0x00400e17, Radio: yes, Model

Re: [ivtv-devel] question about msp3400.ko versions

2005-01-07 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/06/2005 04:47 PM, Simon Kenyon wrote: which version should i be using? the version that ivtv installs or the kernel version i'm using 2.9.10 from gentoo-dev-sources 2.6.10? ivtv works fine for me, but now i have a nexus-s (working) and a frame grabber card (which does not - all i get is

Re: [ivtv-devel] 0.3.2b: tuner-ivtv.ko and broken kernel 2.4 support

2005-01-07 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/07/2005 09:15 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: while packaging ivtv 0.3.x I found two things: a) the required tuner.ko modle (for PVR 150/500) will conflict with v4l's tuner module. Just like for msp3400 I renamed it for the rpms to tuner-ivtv.ko. So you need alias tuner tuner-ivtv in your

Re: [ivtv-devel] pvr-250 problem:loading ivtv modules works with model 980, but fails with 975 (mce)

2005-01-14 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/10/05 07:52, Joe Briggs wrote: Can anyone help me out with this subtle problem. I am running Debian Woody with 2.4.26 SMP, and 1.9 ICTV. I'm guessing you mean 0.1.9 IvyTV (a.k.a. ivtv). It builds and installs ok. With the model 980 (no FM tuner, 1/8 stereo audio jack), the modules load fine

Re: [ivtv-devel] msp3400.c

2005-01-14 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/08/2005 06:32 PM, D. Hageman wrote: Well, I guess good things come to those who wait. The msp3400 distributed with kernel 2.6.10 works perfectly with the ivtv driver 0.3.2b on my PVR-350. Out of curiosity, are you using simple or simpler mode? (I.e. are you specifying an option

Re: [ivtv-devel] Encoder Screen Size Settings

2005-01-14 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/08/2005 11:33 PM, Julian Tyler wrote: On 09/01/2005, at 11:04 AM, Paul Curtis wrote: Julian Tyler wrote: I've look on the web and search threw the mailing list but haven't found a fix, i get this slight black boarder around all things i capture, about 1-4 pixels, i wondering how i can crop

Re: [ivtv-devel] VBI revisited

2005-01-14 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/10/2005 09:23 AM, SpEnT wrote: Just curious how far along vbi support is on PVR-250/350 cards is. I've checked the archives and sometimes it sounds like it's working and sometmies it sounds like it's still in dev and not working at all. Pretty good summary of the status. ;) I've followed

Re: [ivtv-devel] PVR-150, no output

2005-01-14 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/08/2005 11:52 AM, Peter Martens wrote: Hi, I am trying to install an PVR-150MCE in a box where i 've got a PVR-350 running. The PVR-150 seems to initialise well but I am unable to get any output from it. When running cat /dev/video1 test.mpg I get a 0kb file. Someone has an idea what is

Re: [ivtv-devel] 0.2.0-rc3c and WinTV-PVR 350

2005-01-14 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/09/2005 10:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You missed a crumb... http://ivtv.no-ip.com/new_tuners Thanks for pointing that out! You're welcome. Linux 2.6.9 contains a broken definition for the LG TAPE tuner. Easiest fix is to upgrade to Linux 2.6.10. Otherwise, apply the patch as

[ivtv-devel] Re: ivtv TCL 2002N volunteer

2005-01-23 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/22/05 16:47, Ben Dash wrote: Success... sort of... I appreciate the help so far though! I still see just a black mpg when I cat /dev/video0 test.mpg. But at least now I have the right msp3400 module loaded: Good. I was compiling Device Drivers-Mulimedia Devices-Video for Linux-BT848 and

Re: [ivtv-devel] [UNKNOWN CARD] WinTV PVR-250 model 980 V1.3

2005-01-23 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/23/05 05:53, Simon Kenyon wrote: On Saturday 22 January 2005 17:43, Michael T. Dean wrote: On 01/19/05 12:23, Charles Waddell wrote: here is the ivtv section of dmesg: Actually, just a partial... As explained in Jarod's guide, you should get the ivtv initialization

Re: [ivtv-devel] Hardware Issues - Constant Crashes - Addendum

2005-01-23 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/23/05 12:00, David Bosiljevac wrote: --- /etc/modutils/ivtv --- options ivtv ivtv_debug=255 ivtv_std=1 options msp3400 once=0 simpler=1 simple=0 add below ivtv msp3300 saa7115 tuner saa7127 With version 0.2.0 (rc3b), you should not have any of these lines in your configuration files.

Re: [ivtv-devel] PVR-250MCE Question/Problem

2005-01-30 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/25/05 17:58, Alan Gonzalez wrote: You're kernel module for tuner.o doesn't have support for tuner type 47: tuner: tuner type not set There are patches for specific kernels on the ivtv.noip site Or upgrade to 2.6.10. Mike --- This SF.Net

Re: [ivtv-devel] Problems with PAL-N PAL-M

2005-01-30 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 01/25/05 15:45, Pedro Sigwald wrote: i'm havin' some problems tryin' to capture both PAL-N n' PAL-M via de composite/s-video inputs. i have a pvr250 and pvr350. this is what i'm doing: 1- swith from NTSC to PAL (the dmesg shows that both card start in NTSC) with ivtvctl -u 0xff 2- change imput

Re: [ivtv-devel] IVTV hangs with IRQ/DMA errors?

2005-02-06 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 02/05/05 21:19, Brent Kilgore wrote: So what is the max bandwidth of a typical system bus now a days anyway? And... what brand 120gb HD would you recommend. I would like to get 2 for less than $150. Unreasonable? Also, would a 5400rpm be ok or do I need the 7200 to stream the video properly.

Re: [ivtv-devel] tuner 50 issue

2005-02-11 Thread Michael T. Dean
On 02/08/05 15:44, Pedro Sigwald wrote: hello everyone i'm tryin to deal with this thing of the tuner 50. im using a pvr-250 rev. B185 and chris kennedy's ivtv 0.3.2. this is my dmesg. im using the hack of the tuner=39 and the tuner works but i see all blured and noise. theres any chance to get

Re: [ivtv-devel] Tuner (type 47) not loading - WinTV PVR350

2005-02-25 Thread Michael T. Dean
Jeremy Huddleston wrote: Ok, I solved the tuner problem by using: I updated to 2.6.11-rc4 + http://dl.bytesex.org/patches/2.6.11-rc4-2/ and http://dl.bytesex.org/cvs-snapshots/video4linux-20050218-161823.tar.gz Also to fix the green svideo out, I did: ivtvctl -j reg=0x6c,val=0xfa -d /dev/video16

Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: [ivtv-devel] Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED)

2005-02-25 Thread Michael T. Dean
David Cain wrote: ... I've now accomplished what I set out to do and have UHF channels (albeit not channel 69, but since that's UPN here it's no great loss... ;) ... OK, I'm going to go to bed and dream of amplifiers for my poor OTA TV signal... Just thought I'd chime in here with some info

Re: [ivtv-devel] Re: Amplifiers, filters, cable, and PVR-x50's (was Re: [ivtv-devel] Gotta buy a vowel: compiling patched tuner.c - RESOLVED)

2005-02-27 Thread Michael T. Dean
Cory Papenfuss wrote: My only question is: 3.5 dB whats? dBm, dBW, dBuV, dBarbitrary_cable_number? | \ / cable from (+3.5dB in) cable co -- 2-way splitter -- cable modem (+3.5dB | (0 dB) measured) |

Re: [ivtv-devel] Tuner (type 47) not loading - WinTV PVR350

2005-02-27 Thread Michael T. Dean
Jarod Wilson wrote: I patched support for 47 back into the 0.3.x tuner module along with support for the tuner on my PVR-500, so both my PVR-150MCE and 500MCE work with the 0.3.2e+megapatch+500tveeprom patches recently posted to the list. The stuff for the 500 has been submitted upstream, will

Re: [ivtv-devel] tuner.c patches

2005-03-06 Thread Michael T. Dean
trev wrote: Hi all I don't know how to create one of those patch files, but the tuner on my card (and I also believe the MPG600, MPG160 and M179 cards) have their tuner at address 0x60. The line: static unsigned short normal_i2c_range[] = {0x61,0x6f,I2C_CLIENT_END}; needs changing to: static

Re: [ivtv-devel] Hauppauge PVR 350 Tuner Type 47 All Channels Static

2005-03-06 Thread Michael T. Dean
Jeffrey Zellman wrote: Brian, Ive tried ivtv-0.2.0-rc3f, ivtv-0.2.0-rc3d, and ivtv-0.3.2d, none seem to work. Im currently using ivtv-0.2.0-rc3f. Also I'm not sure if i am using the tuner module provided with ivtv. I have just been doing make make install in the driver directory. Ive