This is a generic JDK bug (well, it will also occur on Solaris - the behavior might be
different
on the Windows JDKs). The problem is to do with Java's broken Calendar classes and has
something
to do with your timezone. The behaviour will be different depending on what time zone
you are in
- in
Gerald de Jong wrote:
> correct me if i'm wrong, but i can't help but conclude that it's in Sun's best
> interest to have Java run extremely well on Solaris and on any other operating
> system that represents the _client_ side of the story (ie. unable to
> effectively invade server space, like NT)
Niels Hilbrink writes:
> I have been fiddling unsuccessfully with the Drag and Drop (dnd)
> features in Java.
Me too. No fix here, but a simpler test case that points to a problem
with Swing. The code below only works if class Source extends TextArea,
but not JTextArea (search for "blows"). T
> ---On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT), Jeffrey Radick said
> > If a Java app exchanges data with data from a non-Java program
> > then it must face platform-specific endianness issues.
> > Does a program fail to be 100% Pure Java if it exchanges
> > data with a non-Java program? (I'm ask
Hi,
> > 3. as a result of (2) there is nothing a 100% java app can do to determine
> > the endianness of the platform it's being run on.
> If a Java app exchanges data with data from a non-Java program
> then it must face platform-specific endianness issues.
> Does a program fail to be 100% Pur
Gerald de Jong wrote:
>
> forgive me for musing. this is not intended as any sort of flame
> for anyone.
[kersnip Re: Sun's intentions for Java along market lines]
Interesting analysis.
I've always found it pretty suspicious that Java technology,
an architecture that c
---On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT), Jeffrey Radick said
> If a Java app exchanges data with data from a non-Java program
> then it must face platform-specific endianness issues.
> Does a program fail to be 100% Pure Java if it exchanges
> data with a non-Java program? (I'm asking, I'm
> ...
> > Can someone help me clarify the following:
> >
> > Java is Big-Endian, correct?
Yes, the language and JVM are defined this way.
> > Intel Linux is Little-Endian, correct?
Yes, this is a property of the CPU that Linux and all
other OSes on Intel CPUs must live with. On other
CPUs Lin
On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Dustin Lang wrote:
> > Can someone help me clarify the following:
> >
> > Java is Big-Endian, correct?
> > Intel Linux is Little-Endian, correct?
>
> Corrrect me if I'm wrong, but here's my understanding of the endianness:
> 1. the java classes (such as DataInputStream) do t
forgive me for musing. this is not intended as any sort of flame for anyone.
Sun is of course intent upon having their own Solaris operating system be the
ultimate environment upon which to run the Java2 platform. for a JVM to work
optimally it has to be woven deeply into the native code operat
Hi,
> Can someone help me clarify the following:
>
> Java is Big-Endian, correct?
> Intel Linux is Little-Endian, correct?
Corrrect me if I'm wrong, but here's my understanding of the endianness:
1. the java classes (such as DataInputStream) do things big-endianedly
2. the jvm is responsible f
What's up?
Can someone help me clarify the following:
Java is Big-Endian, correct?
Intel Linux is Little-Endian, correct?
Thanks,
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Apr 21, 9:55am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Subject: RE: ...
> Well stated. I congratulate you on your directness
> and your level-headedness.
> ...
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Abbey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Directness, sure, but level-headedness?
It seemed to me only slig
Hi,
I was running jdk1.17v1a successfully, with libc.so.6 pointing to
libc-2.0.7.so Then I had to upgrade to libc-2.1.1.so, for other
programs, and Java has stopped working.
I now get:
/usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/../bin/i686/green_threads/java: error in loading shared libraries:
/usr/lib/jdk1.1/bin/.
Wes Biggs wrote:
> > All your arguments are factually right. But pyschology is at work here, and
> > especially in an extremely important project like JDK porting (from my
> > perspective, it is the second most important project after the kernel and at
> > times more important), you have to acco
I think the more relevant (and pragmatic) question is: What can we do to
make the Blackdown team status more visible? Clearly many questions and
concerns would be eliminated if the web pages had a regular status update --
this would help you to fend off flames and persistent questions as well.
I
On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 10:18:36 -0700, Wes Biggs wrote:
> [...] they've [Sun]
>*increased* Blackdown's time-to-market by requiring JCK compatibility (I'm not
>arguing that this should be eliminated, just that this is the effect it has had).
That is not really true - Yes, passing the JCK is extra wo
> All your arguments are factually right. But pyschology is at work here, and
> especially in an extremely important project like JDK porting (from my
> perspective, it is the second most important project after the kernel and at
> times more important), you have to account for psychology, whethe
On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, TC Lin wrote:
>
> I finally make it work.
> Only put "." in my CLASSPATH wouldn't do it.
> I unzip "classes.zip" in the mic1 directory.
> After that, everything seems fine.
I've noticed this problem (and solution) at least once, although I haven't
followed it up.
Nichol
> "Constantin" == Constantin Teodorescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Constantin> Hello all, I have discovered a bug (?) in jdk
Constantin> 1.1.7-v1a-glibc I am running a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux
Constantin> with 2.2.5 kernel on a K6II-350 MHz/64 Mb RAM
The program works fine here.
Well stated. I congratulate you on your directness
and your level-headedness.
Vann
--
Vann Hasty
Evans & Sutherland
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Abbey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 1999 10:13 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ...
>
>
> At 03:01 PM
Hello all,
I have discovered a bug (?) in jdk 1.1.7-v1a-glibc
I am running a RedHat 5.2 i386 Linux with 2.2.5 kernel on a K6II-350
MHz/64 Mb RAM
I am setting a new SimpleDateFormat with "-MM-dd" parsing format and
I'm trying to parse and use some dates.
Curiously, the ONLY date that doesn't
> Joao Carlos Costa writes:
Joao> Is there any timeframe for the JDK 1.1.8 port for linux? Is it
Joao> expectable ?
We don't have the source code yet.
Juergen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Return Receipt Notification
---
Hi,
Is there any timeframe for the JDK 1.1.8 port for linux? Is it
expectable ?
Thanks and keep up the good work,
Joao
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I finally make it work.
Only put "." in my CLASSPATH wouldn't do it.
I unzip "classes.zip" in the mic1 directory.
After that, everything seems fine.
Still don't know what happens. I download exactly
the same package and install in a RS/6000 machine
and it runs fine.
Thanks for all the inputs.
>Linux doesn't look at
>all like OS/2 (which is a pity), so it might be just as hard -- if not
>harder -- to port IBM's JVM to Linux as it is to port Sun's.
Let's not forget AIX, VM/ESA, and OS/390's unix services! All three
are much closer to Linux
Has the libjdwp library been ported to Linux?
And if it hasn't, is it in the near future plans?
Thx.
Hernan
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
Hi,
Is there any timeframe for the JDK 1.1.8 port for linux? Is it
expectable ?
Thanks and keep up the good work,
Joao
--
===
Joao Carlos Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab. de Sistemas Evolutivos Phone: +351-1-8418277
e
Chris Abbey wrote:
> How so? You're multi-billion dollar international corporation is staking
> it's bottom line on java2 for Linux? You were asssigned a project and sold
> your prof on the idea of doing it on Linux and in Java, but absolutely
> _have_ to have the latest and greatest whiz-bang fe
Hi!
I´m studying media technology at Linköping University of Sweden and I´m
on a Java 3D project that will be finished within one month. We would
like to run a game server written in Java1.2 and Java3D on a Linux box.
My question is: Do you think JDK 1.2 and Java 3D for Linux will be
finished fo
> What would be the chance on getting
> IBM's code ported to Linux or is this the wrong forum to be bringing
> this up in.
I missed the previous discussion on this topic, so I don't know if this
was mentioned. IBM has committed itself to supporting OS/2 by keeping
its Java implementation up-to-d
Hi !
I've seen a link on plugin product homepage on javasoft site to you, but I
was unable to find the page they're referring on. I'm interested in java
plugin for linux.
Regards,
Massimiliano Bigatti
-
Omnia Data S.r.l. Tel: 02.2
32 matches
Mail list logo
