$
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- * @version $Revision: 1.17 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.17.2.1 $
* @sinceJDK 1.3
*/
public class EJBVerifier20 extends AbstractVerifier
/04/14 01:12:05 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.17 2002/04/14 12:00:07 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- * @version $Revision: 1.16 $
+ * @version
- * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.15 2002/04/12 03:38:32 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.16 2002/04/14 01:12:05 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/13 18:12:05
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/verifier DefaultMessages.properties
Log:
Entity bean verification is working a bit better, it's now all turned on.
Revision ChangesPath
1.14 +2 -4
- * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.13 2002/04/09 04:27:25 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.14 2002/04/11 10:17:42 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED
])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- * @version $Revision: 1.14 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.15 $
* @sinceJDK 1.3
*/
public class EJBVerifier20 extends AbstractVerifier {
@@ -110,8 +110,6 @@
public void checkEntity(EntityMetaData entity)
{
boolean
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/11 20:38:34
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/verifier DefaultMessages.properties
Log:
Entity home and local home interface are now working, rest of
entity verification is still commented out pending some test.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13
The EJB 2.0 verifier is in process. Next time I work on it I'll try to
remove all the code generating spurious messages. Many things have
changed between EJB 1.1 and EJB 2.0, and I didn't catch them all in the
process of moving the code over.
Cheers
Dave Smith wrote:
I am getting these
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/07 19:35:02
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/verifier DefaultMessages.properties
Log:
First pass at EJB 2.0 Verifier. Handles session beans, though not all
messages are in the properties file yet. Most entity bean code is in,
but not turned on until
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:06:39
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/ejbconf/beans/ejb ReadOnlyBean.java
Log:
Updated verifier to do simple entity bean verification for EJB 2.0.
Updated some of the tests so the beans are in compliance with EJB 2.0.
Revision Changes
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:06:38
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/verifier DefaultMessages.properties
Log:
Updated verifier to do simple entity bean verification for EJB 2.0.
Updated some of the tests so the beans are in compliance with EJB 2.0.
Revision Changes
jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.12 2002/04/09 04:06:37 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- * @version $Revision: 1.11 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.12
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:06:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/ejbselect ABean.java BBean.java
Log:
Updated verifier to do simple entity bean verification for EJB 2.0.
Updated some of the tests so the beans are in compliance with EJB 2.0.
Revision Changes
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:06:38
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/readonly BookBean.java
PublisherBean.java
Log:
Updated verifier to do simple entity bean verification for EJB 2.0.
Updated some of the tests so the beans are in compliance with
at www.jboss.org
- * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.12 2002/04/09 04:06:37 jwalters Exp $
+ * $Id: EJBVerifier20.java,v 1.13 2002/04/09 04:27:25 jwalters Exp $
*/
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
*
* @author Juha Lindfors ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* @author Jay Walters ([EMAIL PROTECTED
User: jwalters
Date: 02/04/08 21:27:25
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/cmp2/readonly BookBean.java
PublisherBean.java
Log:
Managed to checkin and break the testsuite... runs properly on my machine now.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -0
Sorry to post this to dev, but what is the RMI port listed under the Naming
MBean? Does JBoss have an RMI registry? We are trying to deploy some
simple RMI objects as MBeans for management purposes and we're wondering if
we can avoid the use of JNDI or not?
Are there any issues with using
Is anybody working on this? It seems to just be stubs in the head right
now.
Cheers
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: jwalters
Date: 02/03/12 21:13:20
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb StatelessSessionContainer.java
Log:
Added patch 520631 which puts the missing method into the exception message.
Revision ChangesPath
1.34 +26 -2
User: jwalters
Date: 02/02/04 19:30:14
Modified:src/xdocs/howto howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Log:
Updated to JBoss 2.4 (somehow previous update was lost).
Revision ChangesPath
3.2 +30 -28manual/src/xdocs/howto/howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Index:
User: jwalters
Date: 01/12/07 19:54:47
Modified:src/xdocs/howto howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Log:
Updated email address
Revision ChangesPath
3.1 +1 -1 manual/src/xdocs/howto/howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Index: howtonetbeansdebug.xml
User: jwalters
Date: 01/12/07 20:02:52
Modified:src/xdocs/howto Tag: Branch_2_4 howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Log:
Updated email address
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
2.0.4.1 +1 -1
Definitely a much simpler idea to just build the new stack and replace the
old one atomically than to try and build a database for the MBeans.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Rickard Öberg
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10/2/01 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX service architecture:
NetBeans appears to have quite a rich interface after a quick read of the
link you provided. But it's an IDE so it has a need for all of that.
How rich an interface does JBoss need, I have been just sort of following
the emails and not thinking too hard. Did this need start with a desire to
Another problem is getting the ordering right, it is not a simple problem to
write the SQL to get the correct next row for every database for arbitrary
queries, but for a fixed query in a finder this might not be so much of an
obstacle. Also during the intervening time other transactions could
they
fix them :)
http://sdt.cern.ch/Objecteering/
http://www.softeam.fr/us/pser_telechargement.htm
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Jay
Walters
Enviado el: viernes, 21 de septiembre de 2001 1:05
Para: '[EMAIL PROTECTED] '
Asunto: RE: [JBoss
Sorry to post this on the list but I can't get to the site to read
instructions... First let me say the new build process is very nice (I've
avoided it during it's teething pains!) How does one run the test suite? I
tried build test in the test directory but they all keep failing with what
It was me. It sure helped to start the server up before I ran the tests the
second time! Sorry to post first and troubleshoot second...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Jay Walters
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 9/21/01 10:17 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Tests and new build suite
Sorry
Objecteering personal edition is another lowend UML modeller I've used for
sometime. It only runs on Windoze, and oddly enough 12 years after the
WIndows look and feel guidelines it has a very unique UI. It is stableand
free however.
Argo/UML and Poseidon (from same code base) are both good
Looks like port 5000 from your command, but check the how-to for debugging
jboss with netbeans and there should be some info there on the setup of the
jvm...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Colin Daly
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/30/01 8:47 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] remote debugging from
Not to be too much in oracle's defense, but their proprietary outer join
syntax is much more concise. I think you will need to do mapping onto the
various vendor's syntax...
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:11 PM
To:
Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 3:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JDBC SQL Extensions
consice does not equal understandable
for example
a?b:c
-dain
- Original Message -
From: Jay Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED
I would think you would want to use the EXISTS operator for the reason you
specified - portability - as well as I believe that vendors often optimize
it somewhat for performance.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 4:32
If you have a foreign key on the field which is in the parent table and you
do not have an index on the field in the parent table (naughty naughty) then
it will lock the entire parent table whenever it needs to check the
referential integrity constraint.
The fix is to index all fields which are
User: jwalters
Date: 01/08/06 20:24:34
Modified:src/docs Tag: Branch_2_4 howtonetbeansdebug.xml
Log:
Updated list of jar files to 2.4 - jboss-j2ee,jboss-jdbc_ext.jar.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
Oops - sounds like an oversite on (perhaps my part). These jar files just
go too many places and it's all by hand.
I'm several days behind in my e-mail has anybody fixed this since it was
posted? I think there might also be some issues with the JBossCX versions
of the j2ee jar files.
Cheers
Sorry, should have said started us down the road to pfd2. I did enough to
get the j2ee tutorial connector working.
I've taken these three patches and I'll apply them to CVS. Thanks for your
work...
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Skutnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday,
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:36:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource RARMetaData.java
Log:
Completed update to pfd2, more changes to DTD.
Thanks to Tomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +3 -3
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:38:23
Modified:src/resources/jdbc-rar/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -3
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:14
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/jms/ra/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -3
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:13
Modified:src/etc/deploy jbosspool-jdbc.rar
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +40 -50
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/18 07:40:15
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata connector_1_0.dtd
Log:
Completed update of jbosscx to Connector 1.0 pfd2 spec.
Thanks to Thomasz Skutnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the patches
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +13 -13
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:05:12
Modified:src/main/javax/resource/cci ConnectionFactory.java
Log:
Removed methods from ConnectionFactory which were removed in the PFD2 doc.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +0 -28
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:09:33
Modified:src/lib jboss-j2ee.jar
Log:
Updated jboss-j2ee.jar file to Connector PFD2.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +126 -126 jbosscx/src/lib/jboss-j2ee.jar
Binary file
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:52:40
Modified:src/resources/jdbc-rar/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Updated rar deployment descriptor to PFD2 transaction-support element,
and jbosscx.jar to have proper error message if bad transaction-suppport
element supplied by RAR developer.
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 19:52:39
Modified:lib jbosscx.jar
Log:
Updated rar deployment descriptor to PFD2 transaction-support element,
and jbosscx.jar to have proper error message if bad transaction-suppport
element supplied by RAR developer.
Revision Changes
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:01:52
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/jms/ra/META-INF ra.xml
Log:
Updated Connector related jar/rar files to pfd2 transaction-supports
element in the deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +2 -2
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:01:52
Modified:src/lib jbosscx.jar jbosspool.jar
Log:
Updated Connector related jar/rar files to pfd2 transaction-supports
element in the deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +60 -123 jboss/src/lib/jbosscx.jar
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:01:52
Modified:src/etc/deploy jbosspool-jdbc.rar
Log:
Updated Connector related jar/rar files to pfd2 transaction-supports
element in the deployment descriptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +57 -59
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:04:47
Modified:src/lib jboss-j2ee.jar jboss-jdbc_ext.jar
Log:
Updated j2ee jar files with latest connector pfd2
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +126 -126 jbossmq/src/lib/jboss-j2ee.jar
Binary file
1.4 +17 -17
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:10:09
Modified:src/client jboss-j2ee.jar
Log:
Updated jboss-j2ee.jar in the client directory as well
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +126 -126 jboss/src/client/jboss-j2ee.jar
Binary file
User: jwalters
Date: 01/07/17 20:20:58
Modified:src/lib jboss-j2ee.jar jboss-jdbc_ext.jar
Log:
Updated j2ee jar files for connector pfd2
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +126 -126 jbosstest/src/lib/jboss-j2ee.jar
Binary file
1.3 +17 -17
How about whacking him on the head! By the way maybe until then we can
avoid using more than 2 ! or x/X characters in the subject of any e-mails.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
It isn't working for me either... I get an ssh error
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Hell---o RE: [JBoss-dev] cvs down this morning?
anyone out there?
I am alone on this
The bean developer uses the home/remote interfaces, Dain is building the
plumbing that makes it transparent to the bean developer. For example if
the bean developer adds an object to a 1:n CMR under the covers the
container/persistence manager/CMP beans need to get data into the bean and
the
, informix, etc (maybe payed?).
thanks and have fun, CC
--- Jay Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding of firebird is that it's a fraction
of the entire interbase
product missing many important features and tools.
(though it has XA
support?)
On another note, I agree
I would think you'd want to be out of the guts too, that just seems a bit
too closely coupled with JBoss for the persistence manager. Shouldn't the
CMP persistence manager be some type of layer on top (well almost on top)
with a well defined interface? This should clearly tie in to take
); JBossCMP was executed
by the container via the persistence store interface. I'm going to have to
think about this.
Thanks for helping to clarify my bad feeling,
-dain
-Original Message-
From: Jay Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 2:01 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED
My understanding of firebird is that it's a fraction of the entire interbase
product missing many important features and tools. (though it has XA
support?)
On another note, I agree that Postgres is the only other open source
database with XA support. I spent a bunch of time poking around open
In order to listen on port 80 with tomcat does one need to run Jboss as
root? Does this present a security hazard - does Tomcat have any odd
backdoors. Is jetty any different?
Cheers
Jay
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
access
critical
system resources, like your password files.
This has nothing to do with Tomcat. Its standard practice not to allow a
server process to run as root. You can use IP chaines to let Tomcat, not
running as root, to listen on port 80.
Jim
--On Thursday, June 28, 2001 1:36 PM -0400 Jay
I think the pool hands out connections associated with a transaction,
doesn't it? Unless JAWS uses a different API than everybody else does, then
you can't set the isolation level in JAWS, it has to be done by the pooling
software prior to assigning the connection to a transaction. If JAWS set
-
From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 10:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)
on 1-06-26 15.13, Jay Walters at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You guys wouldn't want to hear my stories... suffice
:35 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Jay Walters wrote:
I don't edit my xml by hand or by tool, I generate it!
That's not always realistic. It works great if you're writing new
code for JBoss only
That is standard locking, you should see that everywhere unless you can set
some bit to not wait for locks and just abort the statement. SQL*Plus and
JDBC both look the same to the server.
Of course with Oracle it won't block readers, with some other databases you
will block readers in the
What if I've got CMP and BMP beans mixed...
-Original Message-
From: danch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 12:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization(read-ahead) phase 3
Bill Burke wrote:
Can you explain this again in
Ignore me - I went onto jboss-user over the weekend and all the traffic left
me a bit dizzy
It is great to see so much traffic over there though.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Jay Walters
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: 6/25/01 8:15 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] finder optimization
netbeans is another possibility...
-Original Message-
From: Peter Fagerlund [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The next generation GUI (was : Re: [JBoss-dev] EJX and XML)
on 1-06-25 19.30, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These are in theory complete re-implementations of the spec, clearly not the
best - hey I did some of them myself.
Marc and the board asked for this so that we could avoid any issues about
distributing the sun jarfiles (some have licenses that don't allow people
like jboss.org to distribute
Ah, the real bug shows it's ugly head. We'll get that one!
Thanks Scott.
-Original Message-
From: Scott M Stark
To: JBoss Dev
Sent: 6/21/01 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] lib/jboss-j2ee.jar vs. client/jboss-j2ee.jar
This was an effort initiated by Marc due to some legal concerns.
-434227 ] ejbStore delay can lead
to DB corruption
Hi Gentlemen,
Jay Walters wrote:
Seems like an application requiring a CMP Persistence Manager and EJB
container to execute SQL in a specific order might be asking a
bit much to
me...
and Bill Burke replied:
You'd have the same type
-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-434227 ] ejbStore delay can lead
toDB corruption
Duh!Soyy
You could probably do the same with CMP/JAWS, correct?
bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
Walters
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 9:55 AM
Seems like an application requiring a CMP Persistence Manager and EJB
container to execute SQL in a specific order might be asking a bit much to
me...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 12:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/18/01 4:34 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-434227 ] ejbStore delay can lead toDB
corruption
You'd have the same type of problems with BMP, wouldn't you?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
-dev] JBoss on JBoss
|
|
|I seem to agree with Jay. The web server in Tomcat sucks. It is very slow!
|
|Vinay
|- Original Message -
|From: Jay Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To: 'Schaefer, Andreas ' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 1:34 AM
|Subject: RE: [JBoss
: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
Off Topic,
Is Jetty better? We're using Jetty and were considering moving to Tomcat
because it seemed the user base was higher.
Let me know,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
Walters
Sent
Hey, looks good and runs good.
One sore spot, tried the search documentation feature looking for db2 and
oracle and got a 404 error back both times.
Great work Marc. Now we can eat our down dogfood...
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Sorry. Ok so I'll read a little slower next time.
Now that you've explained it, how would it work to use database RI
underneath an EJB application. If the bean is in memory but disappears from
the database that isn't all that good. If he's using commit option C, then
next client to reference
I am wondering how many people are using declarative RI and entity beans? I
am sure the DBAs like the RI stuff in the database, but EJB seems to like to
be the only game in town - for example leaving it up to the container to
issue the SQL in whatever order it wants.
Cheers
-Original
Well I am hoping I am just confused and have misunderstood you.
It appeared that you said JDBC connections and Sql*plus ones were different,
and that a if I perform an insert inside a transaction using JDBC that
within the same transaction I would not be able to read the row inserted.
If in
Actually Oracle will do this, are you using Oracle? You can change the
constraint checking to be deferred until commit.
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 3:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ejbStore() delay
Why the decision to remove apache and serve everything from tomcat?
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:50 AM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss
an interactive Survey which
must store the info in a DB.
Mad Andy
-Original Message-
From: Jay Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:05 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss on JBoss
Why the decision to remove apache and serve
Applied to the mainline jboss-j2ee module ...
Cheers
Jay
-Original Message-
From: Jesper Pedersen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/12/01 6:49 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] First small patch for jboss-j2ee
Mhmm I'm resending this just in case ...
---
Hi.
Here is my first small patch for
What is the current state of things with regards to branch vs main for 2.3/4
vs rabbit hole? Seems like some emails I just saw said we'll branch 2.3/4
and the mainline will be rabbit hole? (That way makes better sense than
branching new development I think.)
Cheers
Not from the point of view of how things work. Interfaces are always
abstract. I am pretty sure that is the way sun declares them which is why
we did them that way first time.
Javadoc certainly won't hurt.
By he way Marc F, Jesper did the first pass of EJB 2.0 support for the
jboss-j2ee
You're right. I can't find the javadoc on my machine that had the abstract
methods in interfaces, but the only files I actually did myself were the
Connector API ones and I don't seem to have that Javadoc right now. Maybe
it was in the O'Reilly book appendix? I remember thinking it was odd
Why do you think the rowid won't be immediately available?
-Original Message-
From: K.V. Vinay Menon
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 6/9/01 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fast Updates Based on Row ID
Georg, Dan
Alright. First of all do we really want to modify the insert sql to
return
I suppose it would get us out of the problem of being certified as J2EE
compliant as well...
-Original Message-
From: K.V. Vinay Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Avoiding Locks for READ-ONLY Beans
Use insert ... returning rowid into ?
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fast Updates Based on Row ID
Hi,
I may be wrong about oracle rowid changing on row update, it's
benefit [like loads of other Oracle
users] from these changes. Remember they are there as an option. If you
choose not to use them JAWS will work as usual.
Vinay
- Original Message -
From: Jay Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 6:18 PM
Subject: RE
If you do this then maybe you can extend the patch to include the
insert...returning construct Just say you need Oracle8 to use this
feature.
Maybe you could also modify the SQL to not change the primary key field.
I'll bet if you use a lot of referential integrity constraints this will
Is there any documentation on how to understand the output from the test
module? I have a hard time making sense out of the output, things like
tests numbered 90-105 or something and then it'll print out 9 tests 0
failures 2 errors. What does this mean? Other than perhaps I broke
something and
opengroup.org - looks to be $35 USD.
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Christian Riege [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss pool (former Minerva) transaction bug?
hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:05:10PM
Andreas, EJBDoclet fans, what tool do you use to generate the persistence
code, or do you use CMP?
Cheers
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
of template engines, esp. those driven
by
XML models. Can you provide links to any of these opensource
offerings?
thanks,
jim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jay
Walters
-snip
At this point I would say XSLT probably isn't the way I would do
This is clearly feasible. I have been working on it for my company for the
last 8 months or so. We generate an entire wire frame application from a
high level UML class diagram using XMI XSLT. We generate EJBs, dependent
objects, database scripts, session facades, proxies (Sun Service Locator
Is anybody else getting 10 copies/day of ths email or is it just me who is
so lucky?
cheers
-Original Message-
From: K.V. Vinay Menon
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 5/11/01 6:24 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Option D - Take Two!
Marc,
What do we call the class? Do we want to put the
The
second call is ejbLoad() not ejbFindByPrimaryKey(). This is also known as
the n+1 query problem.
As to
the fat key pattern on the server side, I'm not sure if it works with Jboss or
not. I believe there was some discussion at some point that it wouldn't,
but I could be mistaken.I
Maybe I understand less than I think. Are you all saying that the actual
scenario is
ejbFindByXXX
ejbFindByPrimaryKey
ejbLoad
when the bean needs to be loaded from disk (2N+1) and
ejbFindByXXX
ejbFindByPrimaryKey
(N+1) when the N objects are all already in the app servers cache?
Cheers
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
