00:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I don't think we can support J2EE 1.4 for the DR1 release unless
someone gets in and makes whatever changes are required to get our
metadata classes to support the XML schemas used in J2EE 1.4.
Besides meta
) and the tighter integration of the Axis and
Jboss
invocation stacks then after JB4DR1.
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. April 2003 00:28
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
Guys,
We are thinking a lot about the forthcoming JB4 release. It is a truly
exciting step for us as we believe we will bring a programming style,
whose time has come, to a mass audience.
AOP as Bill says is a clear wave for system level services on par with
OOP. On top of it and also as a
I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready for JavaOne.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 02:47 PM, marc fleury wrote:
Guys,
We are thinking a lot about the forthcoming JB4 release. It is a truly
exciting step for us as we believe we will bring a programming style,
whose
There's already a lot we can release.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I think you are delusional if you
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready
] Behalf Of
Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready for JavaOne.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 02:47 PM, marc fleury wrote:
Guys,
We are thinking a lot
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready for JavaOne.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 02:47 PM, marc fleury wrote:
Guys,
We are thinking a lot about the forthcoming JB4 release. It is a truly
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready for JavaOne.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003
] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
Guys,
We are thinking a lot about the forthcoming JB4 release. It
is a truly
exciting step for us as we believe we will bring a programming style,
whose time has come, to a mass audience.
AOP as Bill says is a clear wave for system level services on par with
OOP
4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
Ok then there are 4 weeks to get the new stuff done?
Marc, Bill, sure we could do a release but what difference would it
make if the new features are not in it. Is this a release just to show
off AOP
1.3 Some 1.4 stuff will probably sneek in though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Igor
Fedorenko
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
What J2EE specification
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
There's already a lot we can release.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dain
Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
Guys,
We are thinking a lot about the forthcoming JB4 release. It
is a truly
exciting step for us as we believe we will bring a programming style,
whose time has come, to a mass audience.
AOP as Bill says is a clear wave
: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
Ok then there are 4 weeks to get the new stuff done?
Marc, Bill, sure we could do a release but what difference would it
make if the new features are not in it. Is this a release just to
show
1.3 with ongoing development for 1.4
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Igor Fedorenko
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
What J2EE specification
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Nathan Phelps
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I agree that there is some great stuff in there already. However, being
that the AOP
Bill Burke wrote:
I'm ok with JMS. I didn't think you could rewrite in such short of time.
Especially with Remoting and AOP just now becoming stable. I think this
email thread is good because it will allow us to determine whether or
not we
can release. I still think there is enough
, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Nathan Phelps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 2:48 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I agree that there is some great stuff in there already. However, being
that the AOP
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 05:26 PM, Bela Ban wrote:
3. [Jeremy, Dain] Integration of the cache into the
PersistenceManager. The first version will have the
PersistenceManager use the Cache as a replicated in-memory cache.
Our use case will initially be shared DB, so all
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our need for caching is very different from what the
other two, so I don't think that it can be done in
parallel as it requires some very
things in the implementation. I'm still not
convinced that we don't
need a completely different cache
.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Nathan Phelps
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I agree that there is some great stuff in there already. However
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
Haynie
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 8:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
Jboss Remoting callbacks are in - I wil commit in the next day or so
when tom and I finish testing
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
Did you guys end up doing it in such a way so that you can use one
protocol one way and another protocol the other way like you had
mentioned?
Secondly, what is really going to be cool when we expose this via AOP
remoting
then after JB4DR1.
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 4. April 2003 00:28
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
JBoss Remoting
AOP + tx, security, versioning, remoting, clustering, txlock, caching
25 matches
Mail list logo
