Hi,
Should be possible - I will look into it.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 7:50 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 18-May-2002
Can we get direct links
Can we get direct links to the servers build and run logs in this mail too?
--jason
On Saturday 18 May 2002 01:37 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Number of tests run: 607
Successful tests: 530
Errors:73
Failures:
Hi,
--- danch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This report says 142 errors, but the HTML report it links to says
11.
What gives? The dates don't match, but is that because this email
is
GMT and the HTML is server time?
Nope - the test was sending the email before setting up the directory
with
These summary statistics do not match those seen if you
follow the report link. Why is that? The report lists the
following:
Number of tests run: 757
Successful tests: 740
Errors:3
Failures: 14
This report says 142 errors, but the HTML report it links to says 11.
What gives? The dates don't match, but is that because this email is
GMT and the HTML is server time?
-danch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Number of tests run: 757
Quoting David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's a milestone, but ...
1. There are more bugs
2. this is only one jvm.
3. I think the testsuite should run twice with no errors (see bug 549775)
We should make sure that the state of the container is the same before and
after a test runs... I
Holly molly
|Number of tests run: 585
|
|
|
|Successful tests: 582
|Errors:1
|Failures: 2
|
|
we are almost there, kudos to Mr Stark for this push.
marcf
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results:
28-April-2002
Holly molly
|Number of tests run: 585
|
|
|
|Successful tests: 582
|Errors:1
|Failures: 2
I'm pleased to say that after my latest fixes to the jca stuff i get, for
Branch_3_0:
Tests Failures Errors Success rate Time
582 00 100.00% 1348.885
on my linux jdk 1.4 setup.
david jencks
On 2002.04.28 13:54:00 -0400 marc fleury wrote:
Holly molly
|Number of
]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
|Jencks
|Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:20 PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results:
|28-April-2002
|
|
|I'm pleased to say that after my latest fixes to the jca stuff i get
:20 PM
|To: marc fleury
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results:
|28-April-2002
|
|
|I'm pleased to say that after my latest fixes to the jca stuff i get,
for
|Branch_3_0:
|
|Tests Failures Errors Success rate Time
|582
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:32 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 28-April-2002
Hooray!
Then 3.0RC1 has graduated. Time to FINAL. ( I believe Scott wants to do a
RC2 for at least a week).
Time
-
|From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:32 PM
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 28-April-2002
|
|
| Hooray!
|
| Then 3.0RC1 has graduated. Time to FINAL. ( I believe
Thanks Chris!
--jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Number of tests run: 556
Successful tests: 498
Errors:53
Failures: 5
[time of test: 13 April 2002 1:15 GMT]
How about returning a link to the junit results page for the run?
--jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 567
Successful tests: 505
Errors:56
Failures: 6
This was caused by both versions of defaultds configuration
(hsqldb-default-service.xml and newhsqldb-default-service.xml) being copied
to deploy. I've fixed it in cvs... we'll see how the next run goes.
david jencks
On 2002.03.24 19:39:39 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test
huh?
since i didn't do any testing before i left i didn't expect this to report
so many succesful tests
are we sure that this suite is working properly?
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Friday,
Hi,
--- marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
are we sure that this suite is working properly?
Looks good to me - the cvs update bit patched some files - so the
latest code should be there.
Everything looks fairly ok...
Chris
=
Need somewhere to Live in London? - Then go to
RedHat 7.2 with Sun JDK 1.3.1_02 is what is working for me:
[starksm@banshee testsuite]$ uname -a
Linux banshee.starkinternational.com 2.4.9-13 #1 Tue Oct 30 20:11:04 EST
2001 i686 unknown
[starksm@banshee testsuite]$ java -version
java version 1.3.1_02
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard
Hi,
--- Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RedHat 7.2 with Sun JDK 1.3.1_02 is what is working for me:
Thanks for that - I've just installed that on the server too - so we
will get 5 messages per day.
I think the problem is solved - the latest jboss re-org had moved the
location of the
Wow... a unique subject line... nice. Forums will like this too...
--jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 503
Successful tests: 494
Errors:4
Failures: 5
Hi,
The test host looks hosed as there are numerous JNDI lookup
failures of the JNDI service.
javax.naming.CommunicationException: Receive timed out. Root exception is
java.io.InterruptedIOException: Receive timed out
at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(Native Method)
at
Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Hi,
The test host looks hosed
Hi,
Thanks - just ran the job again with updated CVS and it still failed.
I can't see any obvious problems in the server log - HA JNDI seems to
start up ok.
I don't suppose there are alternate configs now and the default one
is not the one to be used for testing - perhaps?
I am now doing a
Hi,
I still get problems, even with a clean checkout - but if I run it
manually - it works - AAARGH!
I am going to have to spend some more time on this...
Chris
=
Need somewhere to Live in London? - Then go to http://freeflats.com
YO
we got a problem
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 7:41 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results: 1-March-2002
|
|
|
|
|JBoss
ONE OF THE PATCHES OF TODAY,
just broke half the tests... !
please revert your patches so we find the culprit.
I did it myself, so really it's ok but we need to solve this
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Look before you leap, marc. I just ran the testsuite and there are 7
errors, just like yesterday. I think maybe chris's setup doesnt cope well
with build failures.
david jencks
On 2002.03.01 03:11:21 -0500 marc fleury wrote:
ONE OF THE PATCHES OF TODAY,
just broke half the tests... !
bull
-
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 12:11 AM
Subject: PLEASE READ!RE: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite
Results: 1-March-2002
ONE OF THE PATCHES OF TODAY,
just broke half the tests... !
please revert your patches
ok I get it,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 11:18 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: PLEASE READ!RE: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss
|Testsuite Results: 1-March-2002
The test host looks hosed as there are numerous JNDI lookup
failures of the JNDI service.
javax.naming.CommunicationException: Receive timed out. Root exception is
java.io.InterruptedIOException: Receive timed out
at java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.receive(Native Method)
at
Hi,
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am gonna need you to perform a full checkout from cvs again.
Its in progress...
Chris
=
Need somewhere to Live in London? - Then go to http://freeflats.com
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports -
I am gonna need you to perform a full checkout from cvs again.
--jason
On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 20:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 493
Successful tests: 485
Errors:
Why doesn't this show 201 tests?
--jason
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 127
Successful tests: 127
Errors:0
Failures: 0
On 2001.12.13 15:31:27 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
Why doesn't this show 201 tests?
--jason
I think something got stuck, lots of tests failed completely (no xml output
at all, so they aren't in this summary), and finally shutdown didn't work,
generating the other message you love so much. ;-)
Why doesn't this show 201 tests?
I think something got stuck, lots of tests failed completely (no xml output
at all, so they aren't in this summary), and finally shutdown didn't work,
generating the other message you love so much. ;-) (I will stop when all
the tests run every time, I
On 2001.12.13 16:49:49 -0500 David Jencks wrote:
On 2001.12.13 15:31:27 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
Why doesn't this show 201 tests?
--jason
I think something got stuck, lots of tests failed completely (no xml
output
at all, so they aren't in this summary), and finally shutdown didn't
Hi,
Why doesn't this show 201 tests?
Don't you just love Java's portability...
;-)
Chris
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
On 2001.12.13 17:10:34 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
Why doesn't this show 201 tests?
I think something got stuck, lots of tests failed completely (no xml
output
at all, so they aren't in this summary), and finally shutdown didn't
work,
generating the other message you love so much.
I created a bug report on this on 2001-07-07 20:51
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2499
Can we get it fixed so that it will show us that these tests failed?
That would be nice, I don't have time right now. I think the problem is
with tests that timeout, they generate no
Tag that build!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
I am impressed by the fact that green threeds now runs all tests and the
others run 36 lesser tests - it used to be the other way around not to long
ago ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Errors:1
Failures: 2
Yes - out of 162 We have a 100% success rate - the above test stat
is
missing that XA is not a valid test *now* (Error) therefore it
should be
removed - and if javac is in the classpath the other 2 is cleared
as well
...
Hi,
PPS Come on people - there were a few days back in
July 2001 when we had ZERO tests failing!
dude tell your script to stop biotching X-( I will take a plane to
the UK just to kick his binary ass
...the template for this email is in CVS - so feel free to change it
yourself...
...the template for this email is in CVS - so feel
free to change it
yourself... power to the people...
A taste of my own medicine? You are making progress.
What we really need to remove is the XA test that throws Error as a standard result
?:| and
on 1-12-08 11.29, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
javac is in the classpath - is there something I can change in my
config to correct this? I believe I have an empty CLASSPATH when
starting the jboss tests - so it should just be what jboss/ant
adds...
I think Julian is looking at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Errors:1
Failures: 2
missing that XA is not a valid test *now* (Error) therefore it
should be
removed - and if javac is in the classpath the other 2 is cleared
as well
javac is in the classpath - is there something I can change in my
why not just do it in build.xml?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 1-12-08 11.29, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Julian is looking at adding the javac to the classpath
programatically instead of forcing all of us to copy tools.jar to
/lib/ext/ or maybe we could ask buildmagic to
- Original Message -
From: Allen Fogleson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 9:04 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
javac is in the classpath - is there something I can change in my
config
Ohh yeah stupid me... I forgot about OS X. The one OS I cant test it on
:) Ahh well I said it was so simple there had to be a reason it wasnt
done before.
Because this depends on which JVM your are using and the setting your
proposing does not work in general. On OS X the javac compiler is in
on 1-12-08 18.04, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in my build script i changed
/jboss-all/server/src/etc/conf/default/jboss-service.xml by adding
tools.jar to the classpath element. then in my build script in the
_module-j2ee-most I added the following:
!-- copy the tools.jar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 1-12-08 18.04, Allen Fogleson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please do as an interim solution ...
actually scott pointed out that it wont work for OS X
For some reason tools.jar wasnt in my classpath when I tested before. it
does work if it is... so I think Chris
Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Allen Fogleson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite
Hi,
--- Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Point JAVA_HOME to a JDK distribution that is compatible with the
Sun
layout(has javac in lib/tools.jar) and this is included in the
system
classpath
by the run.bat and run.sh start scripts.
...but I am using the sun, ibm and blackdown jdks
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 162
Successful tests: 159
Errors:1
Failures: 2
we are almost there it seems
PPS Come on people - there were a few days back in
July
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 162
Successful tests: 159
Errors:1
Failures: 2
we are almost there it seems
Yes - out of 162 We have a 100% success rate - the above test
Hi,
right now sars and service.xml files need to be explicitly
undeployed and
redeployed. This will be fixed when the undeploy responsibility
goes to
AutoDeployer where it belongs.
Does this mean that the tests will fail until then - or is there
another problem on my Testsuite run?
I
David,
I did a small hack to DeployerMBeanSupport that calls
undeploy instead of sending the message.
My motivation was laziness when redeploying modified
SARs.
This seems to work fine in my tests, including
suspending dependent services, except...
The classloader in the SarDeployerInfo is
On 2001.12.06 07:12:48 -0500 Chris Kimpton wrote:
Hi,
right now sars and service.xml files need to be explicitly
undeployed and
redeployed. This will be fixed when the undeploy responsibility
goes to
AutoDeployer where it belongs.
Does this mean that the tests will fail
on 1-12-06 13.12, Chris Kimpton at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean that the tests will fail until then - or is there
another problem on my Testsuite run?
No i do not think so ... that behaivior has been there some time ... but the
new log4j.RollingFileAppender might need a bigger
The problems are caused by the build scripts. jboss-xa.rar and jboss-jdbc.rar are
missing from deploy/lib.
View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=4926
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
chris,
I am looking at the results right now, I got a bit rusty on the latest build.xml test
so I am swimming upstream, it seems on cursory look that NOTHING is deployed at all, I
mean the log is full of not found not found something is very wrong in the
setup.
I assume you do a
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 186
Successful tests: 73
Errors:105
Failures: 8
pfff, I am done compiling the server, of course nothing runs but if the
Hrm... I did not actually test the testsuite with new build system... could
be my fault...
--jason
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, marc fleury wrote:
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 186
Successful tests: 73
Errors:
I just tried the testsuite (ala ./build/build.sh run-basic-testsuite with a
./build/build.sh run-jboss instance) and I am seeing errors about DefaultDS not bound.
I just checked JNDIView and I don't see it anywhere.
I tried touching hsqldb-default-service.xml, and got a very unhelpful log
Ok time to clean,
the core build doesn't work when I run due to the service.xml pointing to a thousand
things in classpath,but tonight I am going to bed and I will work on this tomorrow,
JBoss Forums: JBoss Development
View: http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66thread=4926
Reply:
on 1-12-06 06.29, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is up with DefaultDS?
lubega.com is not writing out its server log in full -for the last test's
-so i do not know ...
hth
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL
I tried touching hsqldb-default-service.xml, and got
a very unhelpful log message:
21:40:35,854 INFO [AutoDeployer] Auto deploy of
file:/nfs/home/jason/ws/jboss/jboss-all/build/output/j
oss-3.0.0alpha/deploy/hsqldb-default-service.xml
21:40:35,855 INFO [ServiceDeployer] not deploying
On 2001.12.06 00:29:28 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote:
I just tried the testsuite (ala ./build/build.sh run-basic-testsuite with
a ./build/build.sh run-jboss instance) and I am seeing errors about
DefaultDS not bound.
I just checked JNDIView and I don't see it anywhere.
I tried touching
OK let's make this work bit by bit
|Number of tests run: 130
|
|
|
|Successful tests: 121
|
|Errors:4
|
|Failures: 5
|
|
|DETAILS OF ERRORS
|
|[details not shown - as this
In the testsuite directory,
./build.sh tests-unit
The build scripts aren't quite as complicated as they look at first ;-)
david jencks
On 2001.10.30 20:48:49 -0500 marc fleury wrote:
OK let's make this work bit by bit
|Number of tests run: 130
|
on 1-10-26 06.30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 130
Successful tests: 121
Errors:4
Failures: 5
Hi,
How come We run 130 with green ??? ...
A bit of a non-answer ... I don't know - presumably something to do
with some tests failing to start properly with the green thread
model... but it should be the same ;-)
Chris
=
Need somewhere to Live in London? - Then go to
Hi,
--- Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So should I change my default?? I need to good port numbers for
JBossMQ??
Scott, Any ideas??
I've changed my test webserver to use port 8030 - so feel free to
leave it at 8090/8091 as far as I am concerned.
Chris
On Mon, Oct 22,
I just looked up why JBossMQ is failing for the lubega system. Since I just
added the feature that lets an app connect to MQ without needing JNDI, I had
to pin down the port that the OIL and UIL listen to.
I picked ports 8090 and 8091. Seems like something allready has 8090 bound
on the
So should I change my default?? I need to good port numbers for JBossMQ??
Scott, Any ideas??
Regards,
Hiram
From: Neale Swinnerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 13:57:31 +0100
If I
Tests that timeout generate no testcase xml results and are (I think) not
counted. This happens on my local machine, I don't know if it is causing
these count differences.
david jencks
On 2001.09.30 00:06:15 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote:
Why does the number of tests run vary from vm to vm?
Is there any easy way to track how mant tests there are outside of this? I
don't really know how many tests there are. It would be good to know what
coverage we arte getting and what we are missing due to tool errors or
timeouts.
--jason
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001, David Jencks wrote:
Tests that
Why does the number of tests run vary from vm to vm?
--jason
On Sun, 30 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 113
Successful tests: 92
Errors:19
Failures:
Hi,
From: Sacha Labourey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:24:43 +0200
Hello Chris,
Are you sure the system is correctly running?
I am sure it is not running correctly ;-)
It seems I need to be more
|When I go on lubega.com web page, many links are not reachable = I
|cannot see what are the problems with the current build.
|
|The archives are the main place to find the old results - because of
|the above problems the job is still running - 8hours and still going
|- so the current reports are
] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:24:43 +0200
Hello Chris,
Are you sure the system is correctly running?
I am sure it is not running correctly ;-)
It seems I need to be more aggressive at ensuring the previous jboss
run finished ok - this seems to be the main
Hi,
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I imagine you already know this, I have found that if jboss hangs
on
shutdown sending it SIGABRT kills it without leaving all the ports
it is
using permanently disabled.
What I am doing in the tests is to try shutting it down with
what is great about it is that if we wait a bit it gets better :)
the more days go by the more tests we run... I really try to get them to 111
soon
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Monday, September 24,
Hi,
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having these tests back is wonderful but...
WHATS GOING ON?
the test script appears to be assuming every class whose name begins with
Test is a test-- does this mean I have to rewrite my tests to rename the
ejbs and mbeans that I happened to name e.g.
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Hi,
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having these tests back is wonderful but...
WHATS GOING ON?
the test script appears to be assuming every class whose name
AllJUnitTests.class
- Original Message -
From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Hi,
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having these tests back is wonderful
*TestCase is fine with me.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Can we rename, so that all test end
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss Testsuite Results
Can we rename, so that all test end with *Test.class, or *TestCase.class?
I was looking into some of the errors yesterday, but did not really have
89 matches
Mail list logo
