[EMAIL PROTECTED];
|Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge.
|Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:22 PM
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
| mr trawick james,
|
| suck my dick
|
| marcf
Does it really matter that the wiki be j2ee? What about one just based on servlets?
I expect that we will want to run a Java based system too... though that is kind of a
shame, since there are lots of PHP apps out there which could complement JBoss.org.
Anyways, I just took a quick look at
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Trawick, James
|Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:33 PM
|To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
|Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
|Not unfounded, personally proven.
|
|In any case
]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
mr trawick james,
suck my dick
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Trawick, James
|Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 12:33 PM
: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:52 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
|What would it take to get a wiki up and running? I think that is a very
|good idea. It is worth experimenting with, anyway. Something like that
|is incremental and if the right
] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|real, because we've already sold at least a 100 copies of the clustering
468
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
, 2002 12:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
I think it would take someone locating or writing a j2ee based wiki that
works fine on jboss/jetty, demonstrating it somewhere, and getting marc
to say that looks good, lets do it
I played
Hi,
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 06:29, David Jencks wrote:
I think it would take someone locating or writing a j2ee based wiki that
works fine on jboss/jetty, demonstrating it somewhere, and getting marc to
say that looks good, lets do it
http://www.webmacro.org/AboutThisSite
Seems to work rather
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
I think it would take someone locating or writing a j2ee based wiki that
works fine on jboss/jetty, demonstrating it somewhere, and getting marc
to say that looks good, lets do it
I played with veryquickwiki for a little while
Of marc
fleury
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 6:27 AM
To: Jeff Tulley; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
yes,
david pitched it at boston, and i already said that this would be
interesting as part of the jboss professional forums. andreas is
working
: David Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:42 PM
To: Mac Rinehart
Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
It doesn't always lag - sometimes it's too eager
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Ummm
In your previous post you wrote
I've seen a lot of
complaints
in the forums regarding the same issues
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Ummm
In your previous post you wrote
I've seen a lot of
complaints
in the forums regarding
David Jencks wrote:
...
In order to support the development of JBoss and ensure that the
documentation remains up to date, we offer a PDF version of the JBoss book
to be published by SAMS publishing.
Following the link also brings you to the Comperehensive Documentation
Subscription at
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Ummm
In your previous post you wrote
I've seen a lot of
complaints
in the forums
Trawick, James wrote:
Will the final release actually include documentation?
JBossCMP will and already does.
(btw, whoever you went with to sell your JBoss 3 docs should be shot. i
went through their process several times, they said they had problems and
would get back to me. they
Will the final release actually include documentation?
JBossCMP will and already does.
Thank you JBossCMP. I'm asking about the all new stuff, like clustering and
distributed containers and all the other stuff I read about on the site in
Marc's interview. Until there's some sort of
Clustering docs are available for purchase.
http://www.flashline.com/components/productsbyvendor.jsp?vendorid=1376affi
liateid=260343
I've also written an article on clustering JBoss 2.4.x
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2001/09/18/jboss.html
Clustering features in JBoss beta:
HA-JNDI,
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:10 PM
To: Trawick, James
Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Clustering docs are available for purchase.
http://www.flashline.com/components
I'm in agreement with James on the issue of documentation. Whether for sale
or for free, the documentation process seems to be pretty informal with
JBoss software. The free user documentation is only moderately useful, and
lags behind development on a number of issues. I've seen a lot of
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:33 PM
To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Not unfounded, personally proven.
In any case there needs to be some sort of kickstart and executive
It doesn't always lag - sometimes it's too eager! Example: I had a
gripe that 2.4 documentation started disappering off the web site, being
replaced with 3.0 documentation when 3.0 was only alpha. I think that
the 2.4 docs should stay available online - at least until 3.x goes final.
Mac
Very true - the online doc right now says it's for 3.0, but hasn't been
completely updated yet. Meanwhile it isn't right for 2.4.x anymore
either. Core team members have said that 2.4.x is going to be around for
a long time, I think it would behoove us to keep the documentation
available, at
.
Sourceforge. Net
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
It doesn't always lag - sometimes it's too eager! Example: I had a
gripe that 2.4 documentation started disappering off the web site, being
replaced with 3.0 documentation when 3.0 was only alpha. I think that
the 2.4 docs
|real, because we've already sold at least a 100 copies of the clustering
468
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
|Not unfounded, personally proven.
|
|In any case there needs to be some sort of kickstart and executive summary
|for the new JBoss features. If it means that I'll finally get the answers
|I'm looking for without holding for three hours and/or putting up
-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net;
|Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
|Very true - the online doc right now says it's for 3.0, but hasn't been
|completely updated yet. Meanwhile it isn't right for 2.4.x anymore
|either. Core team members have
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
David
Jencks
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
Ummm
In your previous post you wrote
I've seen a lot of
complaints
in the forums regarding
Rinehart; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net;
|Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] JBOSS 3.x FINAL
|
|
|Very true - the online doc right now says it's for 3.0, but hasn't been
|completely updated yet. Meanwhile it isn't right for 2.4.x anymore
29 matches
Mail list logo
