Versioning -->
Versioning can be done by Byte code manipulation. Instead of maintaining
the state as a proxy, you can maintain the state in a list in the
manipulated class.
Remoting -->
has to be done through proxy, but abstract the user by the Inteceptor
sending the proxy based on the com
Hi bill,
The versioning of POJO is very good. I have some issues here. If I
version a object, then I have to maintain all the state in the same POJO
which is not the general case and will bloat the code. The states are
maintained in the helper classes. Also defining each POJO as versioned is
mea
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 09:29 PM, Victor Langelo wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use
Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements
(you learn something new every day). It specifically excludes
inherited methods, so we
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff
> Haynie
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:51 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
>
>
>
> >JBoss Remoting is much more fabulous. We need
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill
> Burke
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL
>JBoss Remoting is much more fabulous. We need to get the word out on
it...
I need to write some darn docs.. Too busy trying to get a new release
out on our side. Not enough hours in a day.
> I totally agree. And yes, a constructor pointcut is the way to go.
The only downside of constructor p
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff
> Haynie
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
>
>
> Bill,
>
> This is fabulous stuff. Good job.
>
JB
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Andrew C. Oliver
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
>
>
> > "Pope Paul V ordered Bellarmine to have th
"Pope Paul V ordered Bellarmine to have the Sacred Congregation of the Index
decide on the Copernican theory. The cardinals of the Inquisition met on 24
February 1616 and took evidence from theological experts. They condemned the
teachings of Copernicus, and Bellarmine conveyed their decision to Ga
Bill,
This is fabulous stuff. Good job.
Is there a way we might be able to use the AOP xml to dynamically do
your example below (as well as the clustered and remoting) for POJOs
during construction time? In other words, could you not have an
interceptor on a constructor pointcut that would do th
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave
> Smith
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
>
>
> Too bad that the whole world is more intretsed whet
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use
Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements
(you learn something new every day). It specifically excludes
inherited methods, so we can use it to verify if a primary key has
actually implemented h
Dave,
Think about this. If we wait for the spec to implement the kind of stuff
dot net is doing, J2EE is dead anyhow. At 10K per CPU J2EE is dead as well.
We are moving to a commodity based infrastructure, dot net can play so can
open source and IBM. Not sure too many others can join the ride.
:rotfl .. a Frenchman wanting action
This is hot shit. Plain and simple. Take the J2EE spec and piss all over
it. When you wrote it your mind was small and feeble, we have seen the
light.
The question is how long before the world realizes it or does J2EE
implode and we all are paying homag
The story about the flees was pretty good though, but kind of irrelevant
:)
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of marc fleury
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:29 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versio
> So in the quest to impove J2EE have you killed it?
bla bla bla bla
> marc fleury wrote:
>
> >do you motherfuckers realize how BIG this is?
obviously some of you don't get it, give it time, it will become very
obvious
enough wasted time in the U.N. Time for some good ol' action
marcf
---
Too bad that the whole world is more intretsed whether or not JBOSS will
become J2EE certified.
I was reading an article about Unintended Consequences that made me
think of the current J2EE cerification vs. JBOSS 4.0 with AOP.
In 1349 the black plague was spreading around Europe. In castles
After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use
Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements (you
learn something new every day). It specifically excludes inherited
methods, so we can use it to verify if a primary key has actually
implemented hashCode and equals.
Si
second revolution,
I just can't say how excited I am.
We are doing magic, critical mass.
Julien goes "I got a silly idea.."
bill makes it real, there is war..
we are doing RAW stuff, and rarely
was I that excited about it all...
you ain't seen nothing yet wankers
PLgC
marcf
> -O
do you motherfuckers realize how BIG this is?
no?
there is close to NOTHING in 20,000 pages of J2EE about this.
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:09 PM
> To: Jboss-Dev
> Subje
I just want to give credit to Julien Viet as well who pitched that idea
when he was in ATL,
kudos Bill, you are in orbit, the pings in your head, the code in CVS,
let them fight, let's move
marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf O
I have implemented a new AOP service for Serializable POJOs, Versioned
Objects. You can transactionally version an object. If you modify the
object within a transaction, this modification is not seen by other
transactions. If the tx commits, the changes seen, if a rollback happens
the changes ar
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=710396&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to: Scott M
Just a word of caution: the SUN server vm had a lot of stability issues
in the past, which was one of the reasons for BEA to use JRockit. I
stopped using the server vm because of frequent crashes under load as
well; this might have been fixed, however.
The -server setting has high thresholds unt
Bugs item #707730, was opened at 2003-03-21 20:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=707730&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Hobot (hobot)
Assi
Bugs item #710204, was opened at 2003-03-26 10:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=710204&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Han Ming ONG (hanming)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Igor
> Fedorenko
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 12:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Trying out AOP
>
>
> > You have read/write correct?
> I guess that was exactly what I wan
> You have read/write correct?
I guess that was exactly what I wanted to know ;-)
> Javassist may not be creating the correct
> throws clauses. Can you add a test for this under the
> testsuite and under
> aop/? I will look at it after I finish my other aop work I'm doing.
Done. Added .../aop
Bugs item #710149, was opened at 2003-03-26 16:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=710149&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anon
Bugs item #710149, was opened at 2003-03-26 16:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=710149&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anon
Hi,
.cvsignore file were recently removed from HEAD and replaced with global
$CVSROOT/cvsignore file. Unfortunately, Eclipse does not read $CVSROOT/cvsignore and
shows all /output directories as outgoing changes. Will anybody mind if I put
.cvsignore files back?
Igor Fedorenko
Think smart. Thi
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=709559&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anony
I just posted a reply in the tracker, and bounced him to you for
RussianDoll issues - tag :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:02 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-d
I guess this is a question for Jeremy Boynes. Nevertheless, I think to
remember that being able to have this would also mean fixing some
classloading behaviour in Jasper.
Cheers,
Sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
You have read/write correct? Javassist may not be creating the correct
throws clauses. Can you add a test for this under the testsuite and under
aop/? I will look at it after I finish my other aop work I'm doing.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
Feature Requests item #710007, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=710007&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Igor A. Karpov (ikar)
Assigned to
Hi,
Yep - tried with and without... but you'd think it would be
consistent if that was the problem - ant would either have enough
memory or not...
Thanks,
Chris
--- Stephen Coy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried the equivalent of this sort of thing in your script?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=709559&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anony
ONLY One-time $99.
State-of-the-art Business and Computer Training.
Personalized Marketing System.
Outstanding Multiple Income Stream Pay Plans Assure You
Unlimited Income.
This Program Supports Any Opportunity, Or Can Be Used as
Your Only Business.
Plus Everyone who joins gets a FREE Rewards
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=709559&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anony
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=709559&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anony
41 matches
Mail list logo