User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/22 13:21:31
Added: src/docs/pictures oreilly_logo.gif
Log:
Updates: updated modules on training page, took NEW superscripts out
of navigation, added oreilly link and logo to index page, and removed
JBoss/Sun licensing from index page
Revision C
User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/22 13:21:30
Modified:src/docs index.jsp navigation.jsp schedule.jsp
Log:
Updates: updated modules on training page, took NEW superscripts out
of navigation, added oreilly link and logo to index page, and removed
JBoss/Sun licensing from index page
esn't say don't do deploy and update... .in
fact we will use MEJB for that.
Claudio used it as such, IT WAS THE RIGHT WAY, don't even get there, it is
silly
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Andreas Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:26 A
thanks that is pretty good, can you add it to the sourceforge patches
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Marcus Redeker
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:08 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] JMXHtmlAdaptor with Authent
|> DO NOT DO THAT IN FACT I WANT MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS TO BE TRANSACTIONAL,
|
|Ok, then I will set it to "Required".
|
|Andy
SUPPORTS is good enough, if you need transactional operations you code a
facade bean that updates the 3 beans at once (datasource and a service and a
connector all at once)
|I'll send the patch to Dain...
Appreciate it,
thanks
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Hey andreas,
actually (ok you are right he was looking in the wrong place) I think that
using the MEJB for JMX access... well... why not?
dude it will become the standard JMX access in a secure and transaction
fashion. Claudio got the secure part right... he missed the transactional
part and was
|Sorry for this, but I have thought that the MEJB can be a SECURE way to
|manage jboss.
Actually you are right :)
But the straight EJB connector is good as well.
Look bottom line is that you are right on using the MEJB for that and there
is a bug in the CMP initialization, not the MEJB.
|If th
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:11 AM
|To: 'Andreas Schaefer'
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|Yes!
|
|I want to deploy a ear (which
OTECTED]
|> > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|> > > >
|> > > > I think the tx attributes on MEJB need to be NOT SUPPORTED
|> > > >
|> > > > I think what is happening is that MEJB is creating a tx context
|I will add "NotSupported" transaction attribute to the MEJB
|to increase performance but I DON'T SEE YOUR PROBLEM.
DO NOT DO THAT IN FACT I WANT MANAGEMENT OPERATIONS TO BE TRANSACTIONAL,
afaict he has another problem in his configuration, he is talking to another
bean it seems, with the persis
; deployment does not include setting a tx context.
|> >
|> > Either that or we make deployment explicitly a transactional operation
|> --
|> > a
|> > good idea but not for today perhaps.
|> >
|> > david jencks
|> >
|> > On 2002.03.22 10:14:17 -0500
t;
|> Either that or we make deployment explicitly a transactional operation --
|> a
|> good idea but not for today perhaps.
|>
|> david jencks
|>
|> On 2002.03.22 10:14:17 -0500 marc fleury wrote:
|> >
|> >
|> > |-Original Message-
|> > |From: [EMAIL PROT
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 6:52 AM
|To: 'marc fleury'
|Cc: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] MEJB transactions (invoke deploy)
|
|
|Ehm...
|
|when
|same JNDI name. What I'm saying is that I think beans need to be able to
|control what JNDI names are bound to what transport.
This is exactly what I am saying as well.
Look you are the one implementing (supposedly) so just go ahead and do what
you want.
This is "bla bla" on my part.
marcf
a user
|client "ejb invocation".
|
|I checked the jsr-77 and I don't see restriction to set the transaction of
|MEJB to "Bean" managed.
|
| Claudio
|
|> -Original Message-
|> From:marc fleury [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|> Sent:Friday, Ma
My problem is not with the JSR77 spec ( I help write it ) my problem is with
the CMP engine making transactional decisions.
Is this the new CMP 2.0 engine? or the standard CMP 1.1 engine?
Is the MEJB container a custom container? (jboss.xml overwritting of
interceptors?)
|I remember you that my
Before I disconnect...
|The container have a transaction active because, I think, I have deployed
|the entity with MEJB SSB and the method "invoke" of this ejb have a
|transaction defined in the transaction assembly part of ejb-jar.xml, more
|there is not definitions and so the defaults are appl
|I believe we are ready to integrate JBoss and JBossMX.
MBoss here we come.
|There are only three objections I can think of.
|1) Until the jmx1.1 spec comes out (long overrdue)
|we aren't serialverid compatible (it's not defined in
|jmx1.0)
if its not there don't worry about it.
|2) jmx is cor
the container/bean story does not sound right
why does the CMP engine START a new transaction? that is not it's place what
persistence engine are you using?
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Friday, Marc
|A proxy factory is tied to an invoker. See?
no, only IIOP,
only IIOP because IIOP doesnt generate java clients but IORs... the PF I
talk about generate java clients with abstracted invokers. In fact one per
available invoker.
These can generate JRMP/ClusteredJRMP/WebServices/JMS/ enabled invok
lf Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 6:52 PM
|To: Francisco Reverbel
|Cc: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
|
|
||But we don't have an "abstract" EJB/ProxyFactory...
|
|my point is that we could... at least for t
ation to invocation and must be passed along
|> |with the invocation. The container does not know any of its proxy
|> |factories. Nor does it know any of its invokers.
|> |
|> |Does this stuff make sense to you guys?
|> |
|> |Cheers,
|> |
|> |Francisco
|> |
|> |On Thu
o you guys?
|
|Cheers,
|
|Francisco
|
|On Thu, 21 Mar 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
|
|>
|>
|> > -Original Message-
|> > From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|> > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 7:02 PM
|> > To: Bill Burke; Jboss-Dev
|> > Subject: RE: [JB
This is the last piece of the puzzle,
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 2:59 PM
|To: Jboss-Dev
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] ProxyFactory/JRMPInvoker needs redesign?
|
|
|Hey,
|
|Jason made a good po
no close it,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Sachin Pandey
|Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:42 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Calling ejbStore before ejb
|
|
|Hi,
|
| The problem that i had with the ejbSt
Girl,
Funny that,
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jules
|Gosnell
|Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:59 PM
|To: Jan Bartel
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] WebIntegration TestSuite, JSPs and
|ClassLoaders
|
|
|So,
User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/20 19:34:21
Modified:src/docs index.jsp schedule.jsp
Log:
Added Mallorca training dates to main page and info to training page,
fixed error in Montreal Training on the training page
Revision ChangesPath
1.49 +1 -1 newsite/src/docs/i
2002 03:04:22 - 1.21
+++ training.jsp 21 Mar 2002 03:34:21 - 1.22
@@ -41,20 +41,48 @@
http://www.monaco-sf.com/";>Hotel Monaco
near Union Square. Featuring Marc Fleury.
-PRICE: $2500 for those who pay by April 15 2002, after that date
$2750.
+JBo
.. be part of the first 100, get your tshirt, your signed copy of the
book and talk about it to your collegues at work and your grandchildren...
"did I tell you little punks about the revolution?"...
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Joe Hung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wed
check it out...
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/03/20/jboss_interview.html
he he he
marcf
bang! bang! bang!
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|The OMG-blessed term is "IOR profile". There is also a thing called "IIOP
|context", which is a per-message stuff. An IIOP request to some target IOR
|carries some of the data stuffed into the target IOR (the object key,
|which includes the object id field), plus zero or more IIOP contexts (data
|down. I could hack njar further, to unpack everything, but then it
|would not be
|njar anymore. So I shall wait for Marc and you to resolve the situation.
uh yeah, well you are putting your sorry ass on a plane on Saturday to come
to JBoss One to talk :) so there is no rush, we will wait until 1
jacOrb is gerald bose, information is on the website :)
ping me directly
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:35 PM
|To: Francisco Reverbel
|Cc: marc fleury; Scott M Stark; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev
It is somethign like 50 boxes it is all at the thirsty bear in SF
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Sacha Labourey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:39 AM
|To: marc fleury; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|Cc: Jboss-User@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
| 2 - Marc's code allows multiple invokers per container. The JRMP stuff
| is all there, but there is still some work to be done to enable
| multiple homes. There is also some work to be done on the IIOP stuff
| (IIOP invocations are not going through JMX today).
that's the first thi
KILLER STUFF
JUST KILLER STUFF
Everyone is coming, people wrote left and write asking to reserve seats
cause they are coming from France just for this (;-) and so on and so forth.
Come and get up early, come and read code, come and read the source, come
and meet your peers, just come!
And d
KILLER STUFF
JUST KILLER STUFF
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
|2. I thought marc had an idea of separating the container and interceptor
|stack from the invoker, so many invokers could use the same
|container/stack/ejb. I think this is a more promising way to go -- you can
|say "all my ejbs should be invokable from JRMP and IIOP" or one or the
|other indivi
|Since njar unpacks locally into files anyway, I don't see how it is
|relevant to running jboss w/o a filesystem-- at least we need temp files.
|It does encapsulate the unpacking step in a fairly replaceable way, but
|basically I don't care. I'd rather not spend the time to remove it before
|jbos
|Just want to make it clear that we already have a "mixed mode" in some
|sense. Right now you can deploy an EJB jar into an JRMP container and
|another one into an IIOP container. Both at the same time and on the
|same running server.
|
|But the EJB jars must be different, of course!
no no no, th
oh good point, but that doesn't require "top level" configuration, just drop
the iiop and jrmp and webservices and bla bla bla and it is all invocable,
it won't require configuration...
good point, missed my own vision :)
in other words francisco the 3.0 implementation of detached invokers
super
clearly then
|I already said that the njar protocol doesn't work well with a security
|manager and no one has tried to fix this. Drop the njar usage.
|
|
|Scott Stark
|Chief Technology Officer
|JBoss Group, LLC
|
__
I should add,
I am under the impression it serves in the "embedded mode" and nothing more.
We should really make this part as "peasant code" as we can, simple, to the
point, if not downright ugly, will work in 99,999% cases
marcf
|Even if it does or doesn't, does the njar serve an additional pu
|I believe that is what the code snippet I included does. You supply an
|njar url, and it gives you back the file for the local unpacked copy. What
| functionality other than what it has do you need? Does it not work?
Even if it does or doesn't, does the njar serve an additional purpose? If
no
Sachin,
put this in sourceforge, here it will get lost in the noise, thanks for
taking the time, make sure to put everything you find in there, FYI this is
really fixed as you saw in 2.4.x so make sure it is a real bug by making the
test as simple as you can,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|
|NJars are problematic, since the resource referenced is not
|directly available to
|me. At the moment a JSP requiring a class referenced in an njar
|will not compile,
|because there is no way to get that file onto it's classpath.
Ok all URLs will point to a real file thing and we are done with t
|I didn't test it, and I'm not 100%sure of what you want/need, but is this
|close? Do you want njar to unpack down to the level of jsp files? Right
|now it stops with the final jar.
David, I don't know what the compilation needs but if you feel up to doing
this (or Jason if he is up and clear to
Francisco
we already support the multiple configuration thing by passing the directory
as an argument
run jetty runs with the jetty configuration
run tomcat runs with the tomcat conf
what we change are the jboss.jcml (in 2.4) and the standardjboss.xml, this
is what they are they for (congrats o
|I have tried adding another method to return the list
|of all URLs available in the UCLs namespace and making
|up my JSP classpath using this.
good
marcf
|
|The Webby part of the testsuite now runs OK.
|
|There ARE njars in the list of URLs I am getting back
|and I shall work out what to do wit
Yeah it shouldn't be, the truth is that I don't want to run 20 buildmagic
scripts.
The bottom line is this:
you want your DTD on the website ? you put it in jboss-website when you
update it.
Put your dtd exactly where you want it, it won't be automated for now.
marcf
|-Original Message---
User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/18 20:35:15
Modified:src/docs schedule.jsp
Log:
Update: trying something on the schedule page to make it render
properly on Netscape, as per Dain's suggestion.
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +2 -2 newsite/src/docs/schedule.jsp
Index
They will come around to it, we are making sure they get the message from
us, we want to collaborate and make sure there is a credible alternative.
And no, it doesn't include Apache/Jakarta and all that non-sense, all born
right, free...
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
This is a 77 problem as far as I can tell,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:20 AM
|To: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Subject: [JBoss-dev] Ordering part 2 :-)
|
|
|Hi alls!
|
|I thin
please remove the exceptions on 77,
if you try a service and redeploy we get a nasty instance found ... I say it
because I saw it in london, please take care of the redeploy problems with
the 77 stuff,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Beha
|obviously has to have customers, and those customers deserve respect.
Customers pay,
My comments stand
marcf
|
|Sincerely,
|
|Brian Sondergaard
|
|P.S. I'll buy you a pitcher (or two) next week in SF.
|
|- Original Message -
|From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECT
yes,
david pitched it at boston, and i already said that this would be
interesting as part of the jboss professional forums. andreas is working on
these, it weeds out the non professional people with a small fee that makes
sure you are not just cruising by and sending your 'i can't get my bean t
danch,
get wit the program,
the 10 bucks doco is 2.4 only and the book as well
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan
|Christopherson
|Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:16 PM
|To: David Ward
|Cc: Mac Rinehart; Jboss-Development
|> -Original Message-
|> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|> Trawick, James
|> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:28 PM
|> To: 'David Ward'
|> Cc: 'marc fleury'; Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net;
|> Jboss
|real, because we've already sold at least a 100 copies of the clustering
468
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/14 19:04:22
Modified:src/docs/jbossgroup services.jsp training.jsp
Log:
Updated main page on developers and main sites, "support" (services.jsp)
page, added a blurb to the training page. New logo for the schedule
page and new Java World (took out some
User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/14 19:04:22
Modified:src/docs/pictures jwLogo.gif techLogo.gif
Log:
Updated main page on developers and main sites, "support" (services.jsp)
page, added a blurb to the training page. New logo for the schedule
page and new Java World (took out some exce
becomes your job as JBoss massively crosses
over into the mainstream IT sphere.
Feel free to use the JBoss powerpoint presentation we have prepared for you.
Play your part, educate your businessmen about the advantages of the JBoss solution
and the superior
TCO you can achieve with JBoss an
ision 1.48
diff -u -r1.47 -r1.48
--- index.jsp 12 Mar 2002 03:13:19 - 1.47
+++ index.jsp 15 Mar 2002 03:04:21 - 1.48
@@ -7,25 +7,17 @@
- NewJBOSS LONDON OPEN HOUSE WEDNESDAY
MARCH 13
-Come meet Marc Fleury and Sacha Labourey a
jboss one is end of march, and we will shoot for mid april for the final
release. this gives us 4 weeks
gentlemen put your final touches,
4-3-2...
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listin
so i ran the idea by the class,
deploy1/2/3 zero votes
000-999mywathever.xar:11 votes
deploy.order: 9 votes
some just don't give a hoot
ok the deploy.order was a good idea given by a sweedish guy sitting at the
back of the class, it goes like this, put a deploy.order that specifies the
order in
|I like this "I'll ask the class". How many other software
|projects have the
|actual developers talking to the user base?
you moron, our user base of today will spawn our developers of tomorrow. it
is our best recruitment ground.
you should see the class, the jboss boot-camp for developers, th
antly be
|changing filenames and will create headaches for everyone. Directoy
|ordering and should be good enough for the implicit and explicit
|ordering you need, no?
|
|Bill
|
|> -Original Message-
|> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|&g
-
|From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: "Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net"
|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 7:47 AM
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|
|
|>
|> - Original Message -
|> From: "
|This is using Ant as the deployment language. If the sar depends on the
|war because it is adapting a legacy protocol to soap for example, you
|would then need to repackage the above to:
|
|jar/
|---war/
|--sar
|--jar2
that is correct,
|
|I would rather see an ear as the standalone dep
|/etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S10network will start before /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S80sendmail
|because 10 commes before 80.
whatever,
stuff in rc2 is started before stuff in rc3
also the S10network before the S80sendmail is a convention that is actually
great, it is an explicit ordering of deployments and is maybe
|Why doesn't depends handle this?
because
marcf
|
|--jason
|
|
|
|___
|Jboss-development mailing list
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
___
Jboss-development
27;ll code it if a certain someone
doesn't.
rc1-rc6 has been in Unix for 20 years, so let's stop fucking around
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:26 AM
|To: marc fleury;
be on the lookout for an article from us on OReilly onjava with our new
position on certification and SUN...
marcf
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
oh,
i didn't remember you had rw... he he
ta
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: Vesco Claudio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:42 AM
|To: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Cc: 'marc fleury'
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] User TX bug
|
|
|Ahem, I ha
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|fleury
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 12:19 AM
|To: David Jencks
|Cc: Jboss-Development @ Lists . Sourceforge . Net
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] ordering proposal
|
|
||This can be done today
yes we should resume, put it as a bug through sourceforge and put the patch
when you can
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vesco
|Claudio
|Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 2:00 AM
|To: Jboss Dev (Posta elettronica)
|Subject: [JBoss-
|This can be done today simply by including the list of 3 or whatever
|directories in the URLDeploymentScanner. Jason just needs to sort each
|directory separately when he puts the sorting back in.
right, let's just do that, it is simple and will cover 99% cases.
we need to
1- document the depl
ok,
the packaging ordering/nesting is clearly defined in the current deployer
(at least until jason removed ordering on his own).
clearly inner packages are deployed before outer.
and there was an order at the same level xml>sar>rar>ear>war>ejb or
something like this.
btw jason, we really need
ok, it is 3 am in london and i drank a bit too much beer with jules and
sacha
however,
can't we simply do a
deploy/first/
deploy/second/
deploy/third/
a la 'init.d/rc1-2-3'
and we first deploy the stuff from 'first' then 'second' then 'third'
so we can **simply expl
rvice=invoker,type=jrmp
|,socketType=CompressionSocketFactory
|at
|org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory.setupInvokers(ProxyFactory.java:188)
|
|
|- Original Message -
|From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
|<[EM
t; java.lang.RuntimeException: homeInvoker is null:
|> jboss:service=invoker,type=jrmp
|> ,socketType=CompressionSocketFactory
|> at
|> org.jboss.proxy.ejb.ProxyFactory.setupInvokers(ProxyFactory.java:188)
|>
|>
|> - Original Message -
|> From: "marc fleury" <
|Basically, my EARs are getting deployed before my data sources... but then
h, if the ears and sars are in the same directory then the sar should
deploy before the ear.
sar > ear, look at the ordering in the deployer.
___
Jboss-development mail
|One testcase that is now failing is
|org.jboss.test.jrmp.test.CustomSocketsUnitTestCase.
|See bug #529006. The testcase deploys a sar with a custom JRMPInvoker
|configuration and the sar includes the testcase ejbs that need the
|customized
|invoker. This also fails if deployed as an ear that incl
CHANGE OF VENUE: JBOSS LONDON OPEN HOUSE WEDNESDAY MARCH 13
Come meet Marc Fleury and Sacha Labourey at The Selfridge Hotel (link to
http://www.thistlehotels.com/main/hotel/theselfridge/index.xml), in the
Cleveland Room at 7PM. We previously announced the venue as the London
Marriott Grosvenor
|The DeploymentInfo only knows about the local copy of exactly the package
|we started with. Everything else is njar urls. The njar handler conceals
the njar feels like a hack at this point but again i haven't looked into it.
remember when we were talking of unpacking everyone (or at least the
i haven't really delved into the njar stuff but at this point it seems we
are complicating the problem with it.
can't we just unjar all the jars that arrive with web stuff and be done with
problem?
yes it will break the jsp if you don't have a filesystem but let's face it
running a webserver wit
um level sponsers:
http://www.altoweb.com/";>
http://www.gemstone.com";>
Gold level sponser:
http://www.samswebsite.com/";>
TUESDAY MARCH 26th
9AM-10AM: "JBoss, the de facto development standard," Marc Fleury,
Ph.D
will hold a San Francisco training at the
+http://www.monaco-sf.com/";>Hotel Monaco
+near Union Square. Featuring Marc Fleury.
-This intensive high-level and in-depth course is targeted at medium
to advanced
- enterprise java developers, architects, technical leads,
User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/10 19:11:53
Modified:src/docs/common picabanner.jsp
Log:
Update: new stuff on index page, new stuff on training page
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +3 -3 newsite/src/docs/common/picabanner.jsp
Index: picabanner.jsp
=
Marc Fleury and Sacha Labourey at thehttp://www.marriotthotels.com/dpp/PropertyPage.asp?MarshaCode=LONDT&checked=True&Marriott_BD={760241E9-F56E-4B58-AE08-5B06DCDB3408";>
London Marriott Hotel Grosvenor Square, in the Grosvenor Suite at 7PM.
- NewJBoss @ JavaOne : MEE
User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/10 19:11:00
Added: src/docs/pictures banner-z.gif jbossLogo.gif schAWLogo.png
schGemLogo.gif schSamsLogo.jpg
Log:
Update: New Banner and logos for schedules
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 newsite/src/docs/pi
david,
methinks we should really make move on this dependency problem and i believe
you've got the right approach.
i am even growing warmer to you skipping some steps re: service.xml unified
xml
p, there i said it...
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAI
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jan
|Bartel
|Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 1:21 PM
|To: David Jencks
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jasper problems - Eureka !
|
|
|Actually, it is exactly the internally unpacked tmp fi
|Fix JBoss getCompileClasspath()v ResourceBasedCompilerAdaptor
| small effort:sufficient rewardvbig effort:sufficient reward
damn someone has been to my training and is applying our own principles to
XP development and we get to pay the price
you guys are smart... too smart.
marc
huh?
since i didn't do any testing before i left i didn't expect this to report
so many succesful tests
are we sure that this suite is working properly?
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Friday, Marc
only the compilation needs the clustering
i couldn't compile since i don't have the cluster compile yet so i removed
everything because i needed to catch a plane and given what happened in
boston i didn't want to fuck with the 'it doesnt build' situation again, so
i made sure it compiled
marcf
(UK), Greg Wilkins (Australia), Juha
Lindfors (Finland),
Dain Sundstrom (USA), Scott Stark (USA), Hiram Chirino (USA), Andreas Schaefer
(USA),
and Marc Fleury (the moon). We will feature guest
-speakers from our platinum partners AltoWeb and GemStone, to be announced soon. On
the
User: mnf999
Date: 02/03/07 11:04:08
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
REMOVED JETTY UNTIL CLUSTER IS FIXED.
THE BAD NEWS IS JULES WILL BE AT THE LONDON TRAINING, SO SOMEONE FROM CLUSTER NEEDS
TO FIX THAT OR SOMEONE FROM JETTY. SACHA WILL BE AT THE TRAINING ALSO.
SO IT
+++ MarshalledInvocation.java 7 Mar 2002 18:59:52 - 1.7
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
*
* @see
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
-* @version $Revision: 1.6 $
+* @version $Revision: 1.7 $
* Revisions:
*
* Revisions:
@@ -53,14 +53,14 @@
*
*/
501 - 600 of 2487 matches
Mail list logo
