Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

See the previous message: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jenkinsci-dev/FM8_kG1kdw8/sIOvRmEeBQAJ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

Hi all, Could you please tell me if is there a decision about next LTS? Thanks in advance Bea > El 29 ago 2019, a las 11:46, Oleg Nenashev escribió: > > Hi Oliver, > > Could you please let us know what is your decision about the LTS baseline? > > Thanks in advance, > Oleg > > On

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

Thank you folks (and Gabriel, especially), I am taking the 2.190 as the next LTS baseline. On 29/08/2019 11.46, Oleg Nenashev wrote: Hi Oliver, Could you please let us know what is your decision about the LTS baseline? Thanks in advance, Oleg On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 1:59:11 PM

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

Hi Oliver, Could you please let us know what is your decision about the LTS baseline? Thanks in advance, Oleg On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 1:59:11 PM UTC+2, Mark Waite wrote: > > +1 from me to choose 2.190 as the baseline. > > On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 7:39:31 AM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

+1 from me to choose 2.190 as the baseline. On Wednesday, August 28, 2019 at 7:39:31 AM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > Great to see the fix! https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4176 can > be trivially backported, so I think we can go ahead with 2.190 as a > baseline. > > BR, Oleg > > >

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

Great to see the fix! https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4176 can be trivially backported, so I think we can go ahead with 2.190 as a baseline. BR, Oleg On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:54 PM Mark Waite wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 6:00:13 AM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote: >> >>

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

On Tuesday, August 27, 2019 at 6:00:13 AM UTC-4, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > For me 2.187 is a default pick. If somebody investigates JENKINS-58912 > > /

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

That's in 2.189 from https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/pull/4124 On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:17 AM Mark Waite wrote: > > Matt, > > Which Jenkins weekly is the first version that includes plugin install > batching? > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:11 AM Matt Sicker wrote: >> >> I'd really love

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

Matt, Which Jenkins weekly is the first version that includes plugin install batching? On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:11 AM Matt Sicker wrote: > I'd really love to see the plugin install batching feature integrated > into LTS as that comes up a _lot_ during local testing, especially > whenever I

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

I'd really love to see the plugin install batching feature integrated into LTS as that comes up a _lot_ during local testing, especially whenever I work on security fixes for Jenkins as we use LTS branches for development there. On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 6:09 AM Mark Waite wrote: > > I hope to

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

I hope to spend some hours investigating those two after work today ( JENKINS-58938 and JENKINS-58912 ). I'm traveling so have less access to my environment, but will spend some time trying to

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

For me 2.187 is a default pick. If somebody investigates JENKINS-58912 / JENKINS-58938 and clarifies impact/possibility of a fix for .1, then I am fine with 190. Cannot commit to

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

So I guess that eliminates 2.191 as a choice for LTS. I do not feel that strong choosing between 2.190 and 2.187, and it appears Oleg and Mark leans that way. Any other inputs? On 27/08/2019 11.15, Oleg Nenashev wrote: There is a confirmed regression in Jenkins 2.191 / Remoting 3.34

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

There is a confirmed regression in Jenkins 2.191 / Remoting 3.34 https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-59094 I think it a serious obstacle for this version or for the tomorrow's security fix as a baseline. BR, Oleg On Monday, August 26, 2019 at 1:37:18 PM UTC+2, Mark Waite wrote: > >

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

I've started testing 2.190 late Friday. I did not find any immediate reasons to reject it as the LTS. The security release scheduled for Wednesday seems to me like a good reason to prefer choosing 2.190 as a baseline, then update to the security release as the baseline after it is delivered. I

Re: Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

I would vote for 2.187 as a baseline. FTR https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/oQ8PD1hgYBE for the mailing list selection process proposal. For the anticipated absence of a government meeting, we will be > selecting next LTS candidate here, on the mailing list. The conclusion

Next LTS line selection open. Due 2019-08-27

For the anticipated absence of a government meeting, we will be selecting next LTS candidate here, on the mailing list. The conclusion will be wrapped up no longer than Tuesday 27th COB UTC time. Feel free to share your thoughts here. --- I believe we affectively only have 2 candidates[1],