Re: Future of the Charm Review Queue

d where we want to get to and decided that >> a much more lightweight process is the way forward. >> >> The biggest change is actually the sunsetting of the charm review queue. >> The reality is the process as it stands cannot keep up with the demand for >> reviews. We’ve decide

Re: Future of the Charm Review Queue

vel namespace of the charm store. We’ve taken a look >> at what’s happened in the past and where we want to get to and decided that >> a much more lightweight process is the way forward. >> >> The biggest change is actually the sunsetting of the charm review queue. >> The

Re: Future of the Charm Review Queue

note about some changes in the way we handle charm > reviews and the top-level namespace of the charm store. We’ve taken a look > at what’s happened in the past and where we want to get to and decided that > a much more lightweight process is the way forward. > > The biggest change is

Future of the Charm Review Queue

change is actually the sunsetting of the charm review queue. The reality is the process as it stands cannot keep up with the demand for reviews. We’ve decided to take a community curation approach. A charm review is no longer a prerequisite for promulgation to the top-level namespace of the charm

Re: [Review Queue]: elasticsearch (v5!) and general cleanup

pent some time in the review queue today: > > >- > >Cleanup >- > > Moved reviews that were awaiting author feedback into “Needs Fixing” > - > >Elasticsearch >- > > https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/103?revisi

[Review Queue]: elasticsearch (v5!) and general cleanup

Hey Juju, I spent some time in the review queue today: - Cleanup - Moved reviews that were awaiting author feedback into “Needs Fixing” - Elasticsearch - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/103?revision=270 - Minor README suggestions

[Review Queue] ibm-was-nd-dm, ibm-was-nd-node, autoscaler, spectrum-scale-client

Yesterday, Cory, Kevin and I took a trip through the review queue. Here's what we did: April 13, 2017: Cory, Kevin, Pete - Ibm-was-nd-dm - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/68?revision=153 - Charm code review looks good, with a minor exception

[Review Queue] landscape-dense, charmscaler, k8s-*, ibm-*

Hi folks, Konstantinos, Pete, Cory and I had some time in the queue today: - Landscape-dense - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/113?revision=307 - Previous issue of insufficient machine constraints has been resolved. - This bundle does not include

[Review Queue] landscape-scalable, landscape-dense, ibm-was-base, ibm-was-nd, kubernetes, mongodb, ibm-spectrum-scale-manager

Greetings, Kevin, Pete, and I took a stab at the review queue today. March 30, 2017: Kevin, Pete, Cory - Landscape-scalable - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/112 - Looks good, promulgated to: - https://jujucharms.com/landscape-scalable

[Review Queue] ibm-was-nd, ganglia, ganglia-node, ibm-was-base, ibm-was-nd-node, ibm-dsm-base, ibm-platform-ac, ibm-cinder-storwize-svc

Hi All, Konstantinos, Kevin, Cory and I took a trip through the review queue yesterday. Here's what we did: - Ibm-was-nd - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/40?revision=277 - I was able to deploy this successfully, but I’m not sure if that was a good idea

[Review Queue] apache2

I spent some time reviewing the changes to enable xenial for the apache2 charm by user ack. The charm is still original and needs to be updated to reactive but the author didn't make any changes to the code, just the metadata. Also this charm needs a new maintainer as the existing one has moved

Re: [Review Queue] Elastisys Charmscaler Promulgated!

PS: The in-page links in your README don't work in the charm store because of this bug: https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/issues/2650 If you want' add a :+1: to that bug so they know I'm not the only one using such links ;) PPS: I saw *"By using the Elastisys CharmScaler, you agree to its license

Re: [Review Queue] Elastisys Charmscaler Promulgated!

The issue I see here is that there is much more momentum behind stuff like Nagios. It would be great if you could just plug this into existing monitoring/metrics solutions. I see the Charm has some Nagios-related config options and relations, is there some documentation about how this charm

Re: [Review Queue] Elastisys Charmscaler Promulgated!

On 21 March 2017 at 13:00, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Awesome stuff! > > Would it make sense to expose the autoscaling options over an > interface/relationship? So that you can connect the autoscaler to a charm > and the charm tells the autoscaler how it should be

Re: [Review Queue] Elastisys Charmscaler Promulgated!

The question there is how different businesses will have different rules. I think it makes sense for a relation to describe what the charm author thinks is useful parameters/etc and maybe some default scaling config but I think that different folks will have different tastes to this. Especially as

Re: [Review Queue] Elastisys Charmscaler Promulgated!

Awesome stuff! Would it make sense to expose the autoscaling options over an interface/relationship? So that you can connect the autoscaler to a charm and the charm tells the autoscaler how it should be scaled 2017-03-20 21:54 GMT+01:00 Simon Kollberg : > > >

Re: [Review Queue] Elastisys Charmscaler Promulgated!

On 20 March 2017 at 18:13, Charles Butler wrote: > Greetings, > > I realized last week I had completed a review and failed to send an update > to the mailing list. As some of you may have heard on the Juju Show that > Elastisys released their Charm Scaler to the

[Review Queue] Elastisys Charmscaler Promulgated!

Greetings, I realized last week I had completed a review and failed to send an update to the mailing list. As some of you may have heard on the Juju Show that Elastisys released their Charm Scaler to the promulgated channel. This was an easy +1 from me, with comprehensive test suites, and

[Review Queue] kubernetes-*, flannel, ibm-mobilefirst-server, Ibm-websphere-liberty and more

that the review queue can see it. - Ibm-dsm-enterprise - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/57 - Marked as “needs fixing”, per the comments on the review. - Ibm-was-nd - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/40?revision=245

[Review Queue]: giraph, ibm-*, mongodb, odoo, ntp

Hi friends! Cory, Kostas, Pete, and I have 2 weeks worth of reviews to note: Feb 23, 2017: - giraph - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/82 - This has been on our radar for a few review cycles now. We added a proper giraph interface so this charm no

[Review Queue]: openvpn, interface-ibm-mq, canonical-livepatch, Eclipse Che, Pgbouncer

Hi everyone, Cory, Kevin and I spent some time reviewing charm. Here is what we got: - openvpn - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/58 - Promulgated! - interface-ibm-mq - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1636120 - Raised

Re: [Review Queue]: websphere liberty, canonical-livepatch, ganglia-node, gluster, openvpn

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Thanks Cory and team! > > > I didn't test my Charm on a public cloud, which meant I had a code path that > wasn't executed before. I fixed it and used my Charm Developer Program > Credentials® verify on AWS.

Re: [Review Queue]: websphere liberty, canonical-livepatch, ganglia-node, gluster, openvpn

Thanks Cory and team! I didn't test my Charm on a public cloud, which meant I had a code path that wasn't executed before. I fixed it and used my Charm Developer Program Credentials® verify on AWS. Mentioning it because those are very useful! :) I uploaded the next version to the Charm Store;

[Review Queue]: websphere liberty, canonical-livepatch, ganglia-node, gluster, openvpn

Greetings! Kevin, Konstantinos, Pete, and I worked on the queue yesterday. Got a new promulgation, and some feedback. Thanks to the charming community! Feb 2, 2017: Cory, Kevin, Kostas, Pete - Websphere Liberty - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/48 -

[Review Queue] ODOO, ZNC, Dokkuwiki, ibm-platform-symphony-master, ibm-http

Greetings! The ~containers team took a stroll through the review queue today and reviewed several submissions. We had some findings and the full report can be found below: ZNC Charm Review: (Disapprove Vote) By @cynerva Had a look through the ZNC charm submitted by adam-stokes. The charm looks

[Review Queue] giraph, dokuwiki, znc, kubernetes-master

Hi everyone, Kevin, Pete, and me went through the queue. Here is what we worked on: Jan 12, 2017: Konstantinos, Kevin, Pete - giraph - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/82 - Did initial code pass, but the charm submitted for review (https://

[Review Queue]: ghost, znc, IBM-*

Hi Juju, Cory, Kostas, Pete, and I waded through https://review.jujucharms.com/ this week. Here's what we found: - ghost - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/62 - Ghost is a simple, powerful publishing platform. - The charm is in a good shape (24th

[Review Queue] dokuwiki, telegraph, websphere liberty, odoo, nrpe and lsf server

Hi everyone, Cory, Kevin, Pete, and I went through the queue. Here is what we worked on: - dokuwiki - https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/22?revision=113 - The author addressed many of the comments we had in the previous review cycle - The

Re: Charm Review Queue & Charm Testing

Nicely done, all. Glad to see the source of the review queue mechanism published, too. Mark On 06/12/16 08:15, Tim Van Steenburgh wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > To follow up on ideas discussed at the past Juju Charmer summit, we've > been working to improve the Juju Charm review q

Charm Review Queue & Charm Testing

Hi everyone, To follow up on ideas discussed at the past Juju Charmer summit, we've been working to improve the Juju Charm review queue experience. The Juju Charm Store is no longer tied to Launchpad, and thus we no longer rely on branch merges and auto-ingestion to get reviewed items

[Review Queue] IBM WAS Base, IBM Websphere Liberty, MySQL, Squid Reverse Proxy, Bip IRC Proxy, Ghost

Hi All, The Big Data team (Konstantinos, Kevin, Cory and Pete) took a trip through the review queue today, with a focus on wrapping things up in the old queue, and preparing to move things to the new queue. Here's what we did: - IBM WAS Base - https://review.jujucharms.com

[Review Queue] ibm-platform-lsf-master

I spent some time reviewing charms from our IBM partners. The ibm-platform-lsf-master passed my tests and I promoted it to recommended status. https://jujucharms.com/ibm-platform-lsf-master/ Congratulations and great job to the IBM charmers who made this possible. Cheers! - Matt Bruzek

[Review Queue] ntp, ntpmaster, nagios, ibm-http, ghost, ibm-spectrum-symphony-master

Greetings, all. Kevin, Konstantinos, Pete, and I reviewed some charms in the new review queue this week and last week, which I forgot to send out an email for. Nov 17, 2016: Cory, Konstantinos, Kevin - IBM HTTP Server - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1612535

[Review Queue] MySQL, IBM Platform Application Center

Hi All, I took a trip through the review queue is week. Here's what I did: Oct 27, 2016: Pete - MySQL - https://code.launchpad.net/~jillrouleau/charms/trusty/mysql/raise-max-conns-lp1382386/+merge/303638 - I believe that the codebase for this charm has moved

[Review Queue] IBM Platform RTM, LSF, Symphony, and Websphere Base

://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/15 - Finished a read-through of code, and checked off most of the boxes in our new review queue. - Rebuilt the charm locally and re-ran the tests. Am still seeing linter errors (though there are fewer, now that the storage layer has been

[Review Queue]: IBM NFS Storage and IBM Platform Master interfaces

Matt and I took a look at the following interfaces from IBM today: - IBM NFSStorage interface - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1578166 - +1 from us after lint fixes - IBM PlatformMaster interface -

[Review Queue] IBM Http Server, LSF Master, LSF Server, DB2, Symphony Master

Hi everyone, Cory, Kevin, Pete and me got together to do some charm reviewing. Here is the summary: Oct 13, 2016: Pete, Kevin, Cory, Kostas - IBM HTTP Server - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1612535 - This new subordinate charm deploys IBM Http Server

[Review Queue] ibm-http, gluster, docker, ntpmaster, bip, mongodb, lsf, ibm spectrum symphony

Hi All, This week, Kevin, Kostas, Cory and I reviewed the following: - ibm-http - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1612535 - - gluster - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1469213 - Promulgated! - Docker -

[Review Queue] IBM IM, Pubphoto, Wordpress, Bip

Last week, Kostas, Pete, and I reviewed the following: - IBM Installation Manager - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1575746 - Good example of a charm utilizing Resources and Terms. - Deployed with trusty and xenial and successfully exercised

[Review Queue] Ubuntu-repository-cache

Greetings, I spent some time today reviewing charm submissions and here are the results: - https://code.launchpad.net/~daniel-thewatkins/charms/trusty/ubuntu-repository-cache/error-message-fix/+merge/292622 - The submission looks fine, however the charm fails deployment in

[Review Queue] nagios, pubphoto, apache2, nrpe-external-master, couchbase, kibana, big data conjure-up spells

Greetings. Konstantinos, Pete, and I reviewed some items from the RQ today. We also forgot to send out notification of some reviews we did the week before last. Aug 4, 2016: Cory/Konstantinos/Pete - Nagios - cross platform support (centos) -

[Review Queue] collectd, and prometheus

I reviewed the collectd and prometheus charms today. The reactive code is very well written and both charms deployed correctly. The charms still had the basic auto-generated tests, and the readme files were VERY minimal. Both charms would fail the lint step on bundletester (our automated testing

[Review Queue] Nexenta Edge Suite

Greetings Anton, I took a moment to take a look today and they were +1 LGTM and have pushed your proposed changes to the nexenta edge charms. The following is the result of the review/publication cycle: url: cs:~nexenta-charmers/trusty/nexentaedge-iscsi-gw-4 channel: stable url:

[Review Queue] Abot, ubuntu-repo-cache, IBM, mongodb, haproxy, wordpress, squid

Hi all, Here is the work the BigData team was doing on the review queue in the past weeks: July 14, 2016: Cory/Kevin/Kostas/Pete - squid (centos) - https://code.launchpad.net/~dbuliga/charms/trusty/squid-reverseproxy/centos/+merge/287481 - This merge request

[Review Queue] ibm-mq and ibm-pac designs

Hello, Kevin and I spent some time reviewing the design documents for IBM MQ and the IBM Platform Application Center (PAC). ibm-mq: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C2Rlo1hwTcHljO1NacsQKfcBMki7wKI9WgAPUuv0Yy0/edit ibm-pac:

Re: [Review Queue] multiple IBM designs

Yes, it's great to see this shift towards up-front professional design for charms. The new reactive framework has really made it essential to think of charms as full-blown open source code with reusable aspects that are shared across the ops community. Mark On 06/07/16 15:22, Kevin Monroe

[Review Queue] multiple IBM designs

Hi folks, the IBM Charmers have adjusted several of their in-flight designs to use Juju 2.0 features (specifically, Terms and Resources). Matt and I took a look at the following: - IBM Installation Manager : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qBzMO_Zgy35ty6NCBfdI5Utn7B4I4sTX3_FtPs3UndY/pub -

Re: [Review Queue] rlec, nrpe-external, nagios, squid-reverseproxy, ubuntu-repository-cache, ibm-im

Could you expand on the resource-get inefficiencies? The resource-get docs say this: If "resource-get" for a resource has not been run before (for the unit) > > then the resource is downloaded from the controller at the revision > > associated with the unit's application. That file is stored in

[Review Queue] Auditd

Tim Kuhlman needed a hot review for auditd. This was a good looking submission, primarily a sync of lower layers and some minor top layer edits. Approved has been pushed to: cs:trusty/auditd-1 All the best, Charles -- Juju Charmer Canonical Group Ltd. Ubuntu - Linux for human beings |

[Review Queue] Abot, Rabbitmq-server, IBM, and npm-app

Hi everyone, The big data team (Kevin, Pete, Andrew and me) got together to do some reviews: June 16, 2016: Kevin/Kostas/Pete/Andrew - Abot - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1582176 - The initial version of the Test Automation Framework charm -

[Review Queue] ibm-spectrum-scale and ibm-ucd

Kevin and I spent some time reviewing design documents for IBM Spectrum Scale (formerly gpfs), and UrbanCode Deploy (UCD). The IBM Spectrum Scale design felt like a bundle already because it had a client to manager relationship. We had some comments about using terms and resources but feel this

[Review Queue] MariaDB

Greetings, Today I took some time to peruse the MariaDB Charm submission by dbart https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1587641 +1 - merged and published as cs:trusty/mariadb-3 https://jujucharms.com/mariadb/ All the best, Charles -- Juju Charmer Canonical Group Ltd. Ubuntu - Linux for human

[Review Queue] diaspora, npm-app, pubphoto, ELK stack, MongoDB, saiku, IBM Installation Manager

Hi Everyone, Cory, Konstantinos, Kevin, Andrew and I took a trip through the review queue this week. Here is what we did: - diaspora - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1553534 - All items from previous review were addressed - This has been

[Review Queue] cassandra (x2), openjdk, logstash, ganglia-node

Hi folks, Cory, Kostas, new guy Pete, and myself took a trip down the queue today. Here's what we found: - cassandra (fix disk checks) - https://code.launchpad.net/~stub/charms/trusty/cassandra/fix-diskchecks/+merge/283760 - +1, merged - cassandra (wait

[Review Queue] autotest, ibm-java, interface:ibm-db2, ibm-db2, rsyslog, rsyslog-forwarder-ha

Last week, the big data team, myself, Kevin, Konstantios, and Andrew, reviewed several charms, and an interface layer: - Autotest - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1516654 - The propose of this Charm is to provide the autotest framework to execute

[Review Queue] ibm-java

Matt and I took a look at the ibm-java charm today. We had trouble deploying this as it requires a 3rd party to host the installer (something which will be a thing of the past with juju resources!). We sorted our issues and were able to verify this charm deployed and worked successfully.

[Review Queue] ibm-xCAT, ibm-was-nd

Matt and I spent some time reviewing the design documents for the ibm-xCAT and ibm-was-nd layered charms today: xCAT: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DgK79jsP2mnxfu_5uHWDSgMriy1VN3kYUK2On2OCSU8/edit# WAS ND: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Uh_EghiBKZiDf8ZiM6T-VQzVfoTj4gOlwTl9oieBwc/edit

[Review Queue] ibm-was-base, ibm-http-server

Kevin and I spent some time reviewing the design documents for the IBM layers ibm-was-base and ibm-http-server today. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O7J_SLDdCD-D7J8xG7k_9hAGTo8j7BcfCXbA3iTtkR8/edit https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PQjZofa9aK4s9m2yKcvMkqsLT_esgZ2iJVf-DnVdNEU/edit These

[Review Queue] ubuntu-devel, Openjdk, OpenAirInterface LTE eNB-UE simulator, ELK and more...

Hi all, Here is what the big data team has been reviewing the past weeks. April 7, 2016: Cory/Kevin/Kostas - Bird lint fixes - https://code.launchpad.net/~johnsca/charms/trusty/bird/lint/+merge/287962 - Fixes lint errors - Merged - haproxy

[Review Queue] ubuntu, mongodb, ntpmaster, cassandra, rsyslog, rsyslog-forwarder-ha, auditd

*ubuntu* Update the charm proof command to be backwards-compatible. +1, merged. https://code.launchpad.net/~1chb1n/charms/trusty/ubuntu/update-charm-proof/+merge/290196 *mongodb* Update the charm proof command to be backwards-compatible and update the maintainers list. +1, merged.

[Review Queue] minecraft, rsyslog-fowarder-ha, zulu8, rlec, haproxy, apache2 (x2), fiche, midonet-gateway, collectd

Hey Juju, Andrew, Kostas, Cory, and I made our way through a slew of reviews. It went something like this: - minecraft - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1523896 - This is a rewrite of the precise minecraft charm, now using layers and targeting trusty.

[Review Queue] fiche

*fiche* This is a new layered charm submission, "for a Netcat-based command line pastebin". The layer itself looks solid. There is one bug in the amulet tests, though, and I'd like to see one update to the README to clarify the default port in use in the example code. The author responded

[Review Queue] haproxy

*haproxy - trusty* I fixed a lint error[1] in trunk in order to unblock lp: 285937 - liberty support[2]. Note: there is currently a bug in jujucharms.com where the latest revision isn't reflected on the charm page, i.e., https://jujucharms.com/haproxy/trusty/#revisions does not show the latest

[Review Queue]

Memcached I reviewed two memcached-related proposals today, the former unblocking the latter. Allow memcached connections from non-related units: https://code.launchpad.net/~freyes/charms/trusty/memcached/lp1525026/+merge/287213 Add support for local-monitor interface. My only note here is

[Review Queue] apache2, cassandra, haproxy, ibm-java-sdk, midonet-gateway

Hello all. The Big Data Team (myself, Kevin, Andrew, and Kostas) spent some time last week on the review queue: Feb 25, 2016: Andrew/Cory/Kevin/Kostas - apache2 (add apt config options) - https://code.launchpad.net/~evarlast/charms/trusty/apache2/trunk/+merge/278220

[Review Queue] collectd, mysqltest, apache2 (x2)

Hi folks, Kostas, Cory, and I had some RQ time last week. Here's what we found - collectd - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1538573 - The author addressed the comments we had on the previous review round. - A few minor issues still remain. We

[Review Queue] neutron-openvswitch, ceph, ceph-osd, nova-compute, heat, neutron-api and nova-cloud-controller

Tidy of package selection code. https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/charms/trusty/neutron-openvswitch/optmize-headers/+merge/282931 Expose journal dio option in ceph charms to support deployments using LXD containers, backed by ZFS volumes.

[Review Queue] lis-test-charm, etcd

I reviewed the HyperV lis-test-charm today that had a few boilerplate files left inside the charm that should be removed before it passes review: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1513612 I also reviewed a change to the etcd charm. I pushed this charm to the charm store using the new charm2

[Review Queue] apache2, IBM XL C/C++, IBM Java SDK, collectd, tomcat-webapp

Hi everyone, Here are our notes from reviewing charms on the 11th of Feb. Many thanks to Cory, Kevin and Andrew. - apache2 - https://code.launchpad.net/~evarlast/charms/trusty/apache2/trunk/+merge/278220 - Multiple tests still failing (though maybe unrelated to

Review Queue: midonet-api, midonet-agent, neutron-agents-midonet

Hi All I've spent most of the last two days working with Toni from Midonet to review and test their proposed charms to support deployment of the Midonet SDN as part of the OpenStack charms. Alongside reviewing the actual charm code (they are all services framework integrated with puppet modules

[Review Queue]

Jenkins While sprinting, I did an out of band review of a merge against the jenkins charm, which allows for executor customization, updates the jenkin plugins url, and allows the installation of remote .debs The change raises a couple of minor points, neither of which were blockers in this

[Review Queue] Tomcat, SpagoBi, xl c/c++, Minecraft, postgresql, ibm-db2

Hello! Yesterday, Corry, Kevin, Konstantinos and I had our combined review queue session, and here are the notes: - tomcat - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+source/tomcat/+bug/1538715 - Community request to have a webapp-container subordinate relation

[Review Queue] bird, neutron-calico, openbook, plumgrid-gateway

Greetings, This past Friday, Andrew, Konstantinos, and I spent some time on the review queue. We'd like to thank the fine folks at MetaSwitch for their work on the bird and neutron-calico charms, which add Project Calico and its virtual networking support to OpenStack. - bird

Re: [Review Queue] bird, neutron-calico, openbook, plumgrid-gateway

: http://jujucharms.com On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > This past Friday, Andrew, Konstantinos, and I spent some time on the > review queue. > > We'd like to thank the fine folks at MetaSwitch for their work on the bi

[Review Queue] nfs, zulu8, saiku, nuage, quobyte, apache2

Happy 2016 folks! The Big Data team has been rocking the queue this year, and I had the pleasure of announcing our RQ time last week. Unfortunately, I didn't get the note sent out, so I got the chance to cover this week's RQ time as well! Here's what we found: Jan 14, 2016: - nfs -

[Review Queue] ibm-was-base

I reviewed the ibm-was-base charm today. The charm has made some significant improvement in the code quality, and now uses a sftp transfer protocol. This brings up an interesting topic. Does the use of sftp eliminate the need to check the sha1sum for downloaded packages. The charm had some

[Review Queue] nova-cloud-controller keystone ceph-radosgw rabbitmq-server

Fix upgrades from old versions of the charm https://code.launchpad.net/~hopem/charms/trusty/nova-cloud-controller/lp1519035/+merge/281991 Configure keystone to always create and sync ssl certs https://code.launchpad.net/~hopem/charms/trusty/keystone/lp1520339/+merge/279005 Configure rados

Re: [Review Queue] IBM XL Fortran, IBM DB2

Oops. The link to the IBM DB2 bug is: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1477057 Cheers, -- Adam Israel - Software Engineer Canonical Ltd. http://juju.ubuntu.com/ - Automate your Cloud Infrastructure > On Jan 8, 2016, at 6:13 PM, Adam Israel

[Review Queue] heat

Make instance_user configurable for Heat https://code.launchpad.net/~macgreagoir/charms/trusty/heat/instance_user/+merge/276499 Needs fixing: Enable integration with hacluster. Looks good but needs some tweaks to unit and functional tests.

Re: Review Queue - midonet-api

On 17 December 2015 at 20:10, James Page wrote: > datastax and midonet repositories and some DNS hijacking (I'll write that up I'd be interested in knowing what would be required of the Cassandra charm for it to be used, rather than having Cassandra embedded. -- Stuart

Review Queue - midonet-api

Hi Folks I spent my morning reviewing the Midonet charms proposed under: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1453678 I set myself a challenge of managing to run the amulet tests in our egress limited QA cloud; managed to get most of that working with local mirrors of datastax and midonet

[Review Queue] - kafka, kibana, apache2 x2, mariadb, memcached

It's that time again; the Big Data team had a go at the review queue, and here's what we came up with: - kafka - https://code.launchpad.net/~merlijn-sebrechts/charms/trusty/apache-kafka/trunk/+merge/276647 - New actions and upstart job work as expected

[Review Queue] ubuntu, plumgrid-edge,

Ubuntu - https://code.launchpad.net/~1chb1n/charms/trusty/ubuntu/amulet-sentry-unit-array/+merge/276712 +1 LGTM Plumgrid Edge - https://code.launchpad.net/~bbaqar/charms/trusty/plumgrid-edge/charmstore/+merge/277507 +1 LGTM Plumgrid-Gateway -

Re: [Review Queue] zulu8, mysql, bird, calico, apache2, postgresql, and ethercalc

at this point. At least the charm tests should be passing Thanks On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 11:20 PM, Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> wrote: > Greetings! > > The big data team, including myself, Kevin, Andrew, and Konstantinos, hit > the Review Queue today: >

Re: [Review Queue] zulu8, mysql, bird, calico, apache2, postgresql, and ethercalc

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:21 PM Cory Johns <cory.jo...@canonical.com> wrote: > Greetings! > > The big data team, including myself, Kevin, Andrew, and Konstantinos, hit > the Review Queue today: > > >- > >zulu8 >- > > http

[Review Queue] zulu8, mysql, bird, calico, apache2, postgresql, and ethercalc

Greetings! The big data team, including myself, Kevin, Andrew, and Konstantinos, hit the Review Queue today: - zulu8 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1519858 - Refactor to use java interface - https://github.com/juju-solutions/interface-java

[Review Queue] ibm-platform-symphony

I took some time to review the ibm-platform-symphony charm today. This charm requires the IBM software to be downloaded (all 4.8 GB of it!) and manually hosted on an HTTP server before the deploy will succeed. This charm did not pass my review and you can read more about the specifics here:

[Review Queue] wordpress, mysqltest, mediawiki, haproxy

Hi! The Juju Big Data team had some time in the review queue today. It was especially exciting as this was our first review session with our newest team member, Konstantinos! Here's what we found: - wordpress - https://code.launchpad.net/~tvansteenburgh/charms/trusty

[Review Queue] - Nuage VSRG

I took some time to look at the Nuage VSRG charm today, it is a solid first round submissino but needs additional work. -1 for now but i'm confident it will be ready soon https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1510672 Charles Butler - Juju Charmer Come see the

Re: [Review Queue] postgresql

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Antonio Rosales < antonio.rosa...@canonical.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Matt Bruzek > wrote: > > I reviewed the rewrite of the postgresql charm today. It is finally > passing > > tests in the automated test runner

[Review Queue] postgresql

I reviewed the rewrite of the postgresql charm today. It is finally passing tests in the automated test runner but I also ran bundletester on a local KVM provider where it too a REALLY long time but all 12 tests passed! +1 LGTM so I merged it today. You can read more about the proposal here:

Re: [Review Queue] postgresql

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Matt Bruzek wrote: > I reviewed the rewrite of the postgresql charm today. It is finally passing > tests in the automated test runner but I also ran bundletester on a local > KVM provider where it too a REALLY long time but all 12

[Review Queue] etcd, apache2, kibana, neutron-calico, bird

Greetings. The big data team (myself, Kevin, and Andrew) spent some time on the review queue yesterday and worked on the following reviews: - etcd - https://code.launchpad.net/~kubernetes/charms/trusty/etcd/trunk/+merge/275768 - This is a fairly simple update

[Review Queue] MariaDB, Midonet, MongoDB, MediaWiki, Ubuntu-repository-cache, Kibana

MariaDB - MariaDB has updated their product delivery mechanism to fetching a bin from behind a tokenized paywall. These changes are +1'd - but have not been officially proposed for the charm store http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~dbart/charms/trusty/mariadb/trunk Midonet - Still running into

[Review Queue] galera-cluster, mysql

galera-cluster This MP adds a new configuration option for specifying a repository to use for installing galera-cluster. +1, merged https://code.launchpad.net/~lmic/charms/trusty/galera-cluster/galera-cluster+source-galera-config-option/+merge/270714

[Review Queue] apache-kafka

I spent some time reviewing the apache-kafka charm today. Apache Kafka is a message broker that can be used in some big-data solutions. After a few iterations with the author we got the charm passing tests and I promulgated it to the charm store! You can read more about it here:

[Review Queue] :: openbook :: ethercalc :: cassandra :: apache2

Its that time again - the Big Data team had the opportunity to review some of the items in the review queue... *openbook* https://code.launchpad.net/~talligent/charms/trusty/openbook/trunk/+merge/267885 This one went very smoothly - passed all tests the first time. I was then able to log

[Review Queue] Hectane

I had a chance to review the Hectane charm today from Nathan Osman, its a GoLang based API that aim at being a simple email service (similar to mandrill). The charm was a great first submission, and well formed. It's been +1'd and promulgated. https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1504375

[Review Queue] kibana, ibm java sdk, jenkins-bundle

Your friendly Big Data team managed to get some quality review queue time yesterday. Below are the results! *kibana* https://code.launchpad.net/~chris.macnaughton/charms/trusty/kibana/version_bump/+merge/274029 This review was for a version bump from 3 to 4 - The charm itself looks good

[Review Queue] apache2

I reviewed a merge proposal for the apache2 charm today. The proposal added a new configuration option but a description was not added to the readme so I really didn't understand how to use it. The charm failed automated testing and I was unable to merge this proposal. I would really like to see

  1   2   3   >