"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>The jury deadlocked after three days of deliberations, in all likelihood
>there will be a retrial. Full update tomorrow.
>--
>Kathy E
This was readily predictable given that race again likely reared its ugly
head in the jury room, just as I predicted l
Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The jury deadlocked after three days of deliberations, in all likelihood
there will be a retrial. Full update tomorrow.
--
Kathy E
"I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
isn't looking too good for you either"
http://members.de
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
One of the guys from that foundation that was backing her said the other
day that if she does appeal they would back her financially.
I don't see her appealing though.
Sue
>
> HI Sue,
>
> You're right on with this information, IMO. And I'm
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
I honestly don't see guns disappearing completely, but I do see laws
being enacted, and existing laws being enforced to the point where it is
going to be very difficult to own guns. And the people who do commit
crimes with guns are going to rea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
For one thing the USDA probably doesn't have any authority when it comes
to guns and/or narcotics. But more importantly I don't think the states
or the feds want to set up a precedent that could develop into something
that would be like b
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GOP Weighs Possible Starr Testimony
> WASHINGTON (AP) -- House Republicans are weighing a
> plan to have Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr testify
> before Congress if he files a report outlining evidence
> of pot
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Armed Student in Idaho Surrenders
> POCATELLO, Idaho (AP) -- A 14-year-old student at a
> school for troubled youths pulled a gun on the
> principal today, and then holed up inside for five
> hours before surrender
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Judge Allows Internet Smut Suit
> ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) -- A federal judge has allowed a
> lawsuit to go forward that challenges restrictions at a
> public library to accessing obscene Internet sites.
>
> In a ruli
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Starr To Probe Hale Allegations
> WASHINGTON (AP) -- Brushing aside possible conflicts of
> interest, the Justice Department gave Whitewater
> prosecutor Kenneth Starr the go-ahead Thursday to
> investigate allegat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998 15:38:47 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-04-08 22:06:49 EDT, you write:
>
><< I think it's a bit much myself. Who cares? It DOES seem strange
>that
> he'd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 9 Apr 1998 15:38:49 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-04-08 22:21:19 EDT, you write:
>
><< It takes all
> kinds I guess.
> >>
>I've heard that before, Bill. Has anyone e
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TALLAHASSEE, Fla., April 9 (UPI) _ A veteran Florida broadcast
journalist is challenging a state
rule that prohibits television cameras at executions.
Later this month, an administrative judge will consider Mike Vasilinda's
argument that Florida
taxpaye
Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill :)
They are keeping pretty quiet about what the lewd act was, yet there is
only so much one person can do alone that would be considered a lewd
act. Looking at this from the legal point of view, he was in a public
rest room, public is the key word, he
Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Very Funny Mac! LOL Y'all are giving TX a bad name, btw if you look
Florida is the one that has been "chair" happy lately, not TX.
Yet in the publics eye it's TX that is the number one state for
executions even though the true facts show it isn't. CA sentenc
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
WASHINGTON, April 9 (UPI) _ The New York Times says (Thursday) former
Sen. Bob
Packwood, (R-Ore.), who was forced to resign under a cloud of sexual
misconduct allegations, is
testing the political waters again. Packwood, now a Washington lobbyist,
is sett
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-04-09 15:55:03 EDT, you write:
<< Yes it could be that, I guess. But do they need probable cause to
search a car at a border check? >>
I don't know. Ed???
Doc
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the mes
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-04-09 14:53:59 EDT, you write:
<< Still think that since they have these cars stopped anyway they could
also look for guns and narcotics. But I guess they have their reasons
why they don't. At least they do ask. :)
Sue >>
"Probab
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Doc:
Yes it could be that, I guess. But do they need probable cause to
search a car at a border check?
Sue
>
> "Probable cause" maybe? I think that would be required.
> Doc
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Su
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-04-08 22:21:19 EDT, you write:
<< It takes all
kinds I guess.
>>
I've heard that before, Bill. Has anyone ever explained why?
Doc
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscri
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-04-09 02:27:11 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Well Doc it sounds to me like he was doing what Pee Wee Herman did,
masturbating in public, and I do think the law says it's considered lewd
to do that in public. >>
Probably. But Pee W
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-04-08 22:06:49 EDT, you write:
<< I think it's a bit much myself. Who cares? It DOES seem strange that
he'd be doing this in a public area. Makes me wonder if there might be
more to it. Like solicitation or something.
Bil >>
Wel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Kathy,
LOL...not only do you drag me into a discussion where I'm not commenting
about anything you misstate the facts. I never said anything about
"that's still a lot of executions." You must be thinking of someone
else.
As I've stated befor
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
Makes sense. There certainly isn't anything out there except catus, so
I guess the fly wouldn't survive to get to it's host if it tried to fly
in.
I can see what could happen to the California economy if it did get in.
:(
Still think that s
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
I put the whole story on last night. From what I gathered today on the
news, a plain clothes cop walked in on him while he was doing his thing,
and observed this and arrested him. He gave his real name, and the cop
didn't know who he was until
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
I really don't know what he was doing in there, and to tell you the
truth I'm really not all that interested. LOL
As far as I can see it, he was alone, and if that is how he gets his
jollies, who am I to say anything. Now if he had of had a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Because the fruit fly or any other pest needs the fruit/vegetable/plant
in order to live and reproduce. If there are no target crops between
point A and point B then the pest will not make it to point B. BUT, if
someone has a target crop
Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Vi :)
I remember the case you brought up, I think what one should also
consider with that case is the background. Yes it is a sad custom in
Japan, if a women is shamed as she was that the women will sometimes
take extreme actions and kill her children than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 09 Apr 1998 04:50:44 -0500 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>William J. Foristal wrote:
>
>> Hi Doc,
>>
>> I think it's a bit much myself. Who cares? It DOES seem strange
>th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Vi,
Of course it's all speculation. All we know is the scant details
reported so far. He could have been performing a vasectomy on himself.
He could have been checking for melanoma. To read anything like him
being high on coke or heroin at
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Kathy: Yes you called it right down the line.
All the other story transcripts from that show are on there (eggs,
school buses, etc) but not that one. I sent an email to them asking for
it, maybe they will send me one. I hope.
If this thing goes to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Kathy,
Do you or anyone know the details about this? From what I could see
based only on what's been reported, he was in a public rest room (in a
stall?) and he was alone. IMO, that's a big difference from what Pee Wee
Herman did since ol' Pee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
LOL.I've never really known any guys hanging around public restrooms
masturbating together, if that is what you are referring to.
However, I HAVE heard a lot about homosexual men hanging around public
parks and rest rooms looking to h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Imagine Starr finds the smoking gun in the Whitewater swindle.
I can just picture it all now. The star witness (no pun intended) is
revealed for the first time to be a 55-year-old accountant who found
the line in the ledgers where the President cheated. The flashbulb
Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I agree with both of you, I expect a conviction on this case.
moonshine wrote:
>
> moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DocCec wrote:
>
> > DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > In a message dated 98-04-07 22:46:05 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HIya Kaysie!!!
LMAO at this one. Ooops is right. Sort of like the defendant who, when
a witness identified him as the perp, blurted out he's lying I was
wearing a mask! :)
How's things in Gahjuhh?
Bill
On Wed, 08 Apr 1998 10:13:35 -0400 Kaye
moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi Mac,
> >It seems like there is more than meets the eye and when you look at as a
> whole >there appears to be a machine fueling the allegations. This makes me
> suspicious >of the accuser and of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 08 Apr 1998 12:09:37 -0400 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>William J. Foristal wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>>
>>
>> HI Mac,
>>
>> LOL...glad it's not jus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 16:24:54 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>Hi Mac,
>
>>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Ronald Helm wrote:
>>
>>> "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>>> >ASSAULT? I didn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 10:51:18 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>ASSAULT? I didn't know you were a witness to any assault! Strong
>words from
>a weak mind.
>
>Watch it Mac. Where is Ed
moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >
> >Afternoon Ron, I don't think he has much choice. He's still down from
> hurtin' jackie put
> >on him.
> >...Mac
>
> Jackie said she didn't want to hear my opinion any more. I respected her
>
Title: Yahoo! - News : George Michael Arrested For 'Lewd Conduct'
Write to Us | Search | Info
Sections:
Front Page
|
Top Stories
|
World
|
Business
|
Financial
|
European
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
Terry is wrong again. That guy who wrote the article for Spectator
magazine that first mentioned a woman named "Paula" gave a very sincere
apology to Clinton and to the public because he fell for the right wing
conspirators' line of bull
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Ron,
LOL...all of this is old news and does not seem to contain any smoking
gun. If the REPUBLICANS are distancing themselves from Starr and his
witch hunt, surely you don't think there is much of a chance for an
impeachment do you?
BTW, thos
moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If one doesn't know that this is purely political has their head up
> >the elephant's ass.
> >
> Hi Mac,
>
> Of course it's political. I bet the Clinton bashers aren't going to
> assume that Armey was guilty of anything just because he's being accused
"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I agree with both of you, I expect a conviction on this case.
>
>moonshine wrote:
>>
I predict a hung jury in this case, but it depends on the racial makeup of
the jury which I have never heard. Not a big deal was made of it during the
trial, but the
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeez, Bill
You will turn my head!! I just was so excited about all the stuff I got in
the mail yesterday I wanted to share it with you all. Even though my week
started out pretty awful, the last two days have made up for it. Good stuff
in the mail y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Hi Mac,
>> >It seems like there is more than meets the eye and when you look at as a
>> whole >there appears to be a machine fueling the allegations. This mak
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Steve:
They still haven't said what he was doing, but they did say it was
definately lewd. And that he was alone. It was also a misdomenor and
all that he could get out of it is at the very most a thousand dollar
fine, and/or a year in jail.
Sue
>
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DocCec wrote:
> DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> In a message dated 98-04-07 21:32:22 EDT, you write:
>
> << The case under appeal is a hearing on Miranda rights. The state is
> wanting the lower court's decision to suppress the confession be
Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
I forgot about that guy. You are right one of them did apologize. He
was even on television defending his apology. Go figure.
Sue
>
> Hi Sue,
>
> Terry is wrong again. That guy who wrote the article for Spectator
> magazine that first me
"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>They still haven't said what he was doing, but they did say it was
>definately lewd. And that he was alone. It was also a misdomenor and
>all that he could get out of it is at the very most a thousand dollar
>fine, and/or a year in jail.
>
>Sue
Lewd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >Afternoon Ron, I don't think he has much choice. He's still down from
>> hurtin' jackie put
>> >on him.
>> >...Mac
>>
>> Jackie said she didn't want to hear my opinion any more. I respected her
>> wishes. It's a te
Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Born in 1885, by age 40 Martha Wise was an impoverished widow, living
alone on a farm near Medina, Ohio. She fell in love with Walter Johns, a
man much younger than herself, but members of her family were blunt in
their denunciation of the May-October romance,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano) writes:
Hi Ron,
You, a ohysician , "Joe Six-pack"? I don't think so! Clit was talking
about a blue-collar guy. :)
Vi
__
You wrote:
I don't
know about the rest of you, but this a pretty demeaning comment about the
peop
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Terry
Sorry to disappoint you--I said I did not want to discuss something with someone
who only negates, rather than examines and critique everything that does not fit
within that person's version of what is accurate. When you have an opinion that
can
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
William J. Foristal wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 1998 16:24:54 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> >
> >Hi Mac,
> >
> >>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>R
moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> I don't ordinarily go back to old posts to show something but you edited out
> what is most material and you asked. This was the critical portion:
>
>
Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gosh, Terry
Wrong again!! You are certainly batting zero when it come to knowing anything
about this poster. I just figured others on the list were getting tired of me
"playing with your mind." You were getting quite funny though with your
attempts
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-04-08 18:32:27 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< They had been on a routine patrol in the family park when they allegedly
saw Michael engaging in "a lewd act", he added, confirming that the singer was
alone at the time of his arrest. >>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Mac,
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> You said, like others, you are "reserving judgment" and then you turn around
>> and say "there appears to be a machine fueling the allegations." You have
>> obviously bought the line about t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Jackie,
If you want to discuss anything I have an interest in I will be glad to. If
I am boring or annoying the group I can take a hint. If you just wish to
make statements about me feel free.
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Gosh, Terry
>
>Wrong
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-04-08 18:38:58 EDT, you write:
<< They still haven't said what he was doing, but they did say it was
definately lewd. And that he was alone. >>
Jacking off in the john -- what else could it have been?
Doc (who can contain her shock, re
DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-04-08 18:56:09 EDT, you write:
<<
Lewd conduct and he was alone. Use your collective imaginations folks, one
way or another he was exposing his unit :-) Ron
>>
If that's all it was, every guy who uses a urinal could be arrested.
moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ronald Helm wrote:
> "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rumor has it that Monica was sighted leaving the area, just before George
> Michael was arrested :-) Ron
>
Mornin' Ron,
Naw that was Newt Gingrich in a wig and some sexy black nighti
64 matches
Mail list logo
