On 09.11.2017 11:12, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
We are busy creating this framework.
Great. From the previous messages I got the impression it would be
depreciated.
But Rome wasn't built in a day.
Obviously. I am not trying to hurry anybody. I am very happy with what
Lazarus and
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 08.11.2017 16:39, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
.. I believe that you should embrace the platforms you're using. That
means: browser as client, webserver as server, and HTTP or websocket as the
transport layer.
This depends on who is "you" :) .
On 08.11.2017 16:39, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
.. I believe that you should embrace the platforms you're using. That
means: browser as client, webserver as server, and HTTP or websocket
as the transport layer.
This depends on who is "you" :) .
I've already been doing some " Lazarus
Am 08.11.2017 16:29 schrieb "Michael Schnell via Lazarus" <
lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org>:
On 08.11.2017 14:15, Sven Barth via Lazarus wrote:
>
> Nope, WebAssembly and what pas2js does are two different things even if in
> the end both run in the browser's JavaScript engine.
>
Of course I do
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
On 08.11.2017 13:12, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
ExtPascal way (or UniGUI for that matter) is the wrong way to do
things. Interesting as a toy, but not suitable for
a) Large, scalable websites
b) serveless applications.
On 08.11.2017 14:15, Sven Barth via Lazarus wrote:
Nope, WebAssembly and what pas2js does are two different things even
if in the end both run in the browser's JavaScript engine.
Of course I do know this.
But AFAIK WebAssembly has been invented with JS in mind, so it might
follow some
On 08.11.2017 13:12, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
ExtPascal way (or UniGUI for that matter) is the wrong way to do
things. Interesting as a toy, but not suitable for
a) Large, scalable websites
b) serveless applications.
Agreed ! But if doing a server based application (ore one that
El 08/11/17 a las 04:57, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus escribió:
There is.
Normally, early december a RC version of pas2js will be released.
pasjs currently is more or less at the level of D7 compatibility (minus
interfaces and
pointers). There is a web-based compiler (i.e. you can do 'hot
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
On 08.11.2017 12:28, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
It is the basic building block.
I do agree that it is a very viable building block, but theoretically
for "Rich internet Applications" there are alternatives:
- WebAssembly
On 08.11.2017 12:28, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
It is the basic building block.
I do agree that it is a very viable building block, but theoretically
for "Rich internet Applications" there are alternatives:
- WebAssembly (which as far as I understand is considered for fpc, and
I
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
On 08.11.2017 08:57, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
Normally, early december a RC version of pas2js will be released.
I understand that the issue of this thread is using Lazarus to do a
server based "Rich Internet" application
On 08.11.2017 11:14, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
A server is not needed. You can write standalone browser applications that work
offline too.
OK. Great ! Stand alone browser based applications might be one
desirable type of application, but AFAIK, the more commonly required
type of
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 10:25:48 +0100
Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
> On 08.11.2017 08:57, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
> > Normally, early december a RC version of pas2js will be released.
> I understand that the issue of this thread is using Lazarus
On Wed, 8 Nov 2017, Marcello via Lazarus wrote:
On 30/04/2017 21:42, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus wrote:
I'm afraid that the world is still waiting for a good GUI designer for
web.
We will deliver it :)
Can you share with us when? :)
Current tentative schedule is september. But
On 2017-04-19 10:21, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
On 2017-04-19 15:58, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
Lazarus would b able to seamlessly create such programs (even more up
to
date, versatile and fast: using WebAssembly compiled from Pascal
instead
of hand crafted Java Script).
Sorry, didn't watch the video yet, but, wasn't Morfik something similar?
Or that was mostly offline apps?
Then there was also the intraweb for delphi, but AFAIR the Indy authors.
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
On 20.04.2017 11:11, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
Yes, many times.
There obviously are lots of alternate GUI design tools (e.g. mse,
FireMonkey, WXPython (Poenix), ...) . But for Lazarus users, it of
course would be beneficial to be able to use the GUI designer already
perfectly
On 20.04.2017 09:54, Santiago A. via Lazarus wrote:
That is what RAD and GUI designers were created for ;-)
Obviously it's not easy to do a (compatible) GUI designer for a
Browser-(remote)-GUI. Otherwise I suppose Lazarus would have it.
With WebAssembly, maybe there is a new chance...
On 19.04.2017 17:21, Graeme Geldenhuys via Lazarus wrote:
I believe that is what Michael van Canneyt is working on.
It seems like, which to me is great news !
Of course we would need first a Pascal->WebAssembly compiler and then a
new WidgetType in Lazarus. Same maybe could be derived from
On 2017-04-20 08:54, Santiago A. via Lazarus wrote:
> Of course, GUIs are massive time consuming. Have you ever create a form
> by hand in runtime?
Yes, many times. If you want to see the real ease of that (without
needing a GUI Designer), then take a look at Java's MiGLayout layout
engine.
On Thu, 20 Apr 2017, Santiago A. via Lazarus wrote:
El 19/04/2017 a las 17:09, Anthony Walter via Lazarus escribió:
Thank you all for the feedback and discussion. From me, the
implementer and designer, I can say the most difficult part of
creating this project, and in most projects, is not
El 19/04/2017 a las 17:09, Anthony Walter via Lazarus escribió:
> Thank you all for the feedback and discussion. From me, the
> implementer and designer, I can say the most difficult part of
> creating this project, and in most projects, is not the actual
> programming. It's the creation of the
On 2017-04-19 15:58, Michael Schnell via Lazarus wrote:
> Lazarus would b able to seamlessly create such programs (even more up to
> date, versatile and fast: using WebAssembly compiled from Pascal instead
> of hand crafted Java Script).
I believe that is what Michael van Canneyt is working
Thank you all for the feedback and discussion. From me, the implementer and
designer, I can say the most difficult part of creating this project, and
in most projects, is not the actual programming. It's the creation of the
user interface design. Choosing and creating a layout, and deciding on css
El 19/04/17 a las 11:14, Michael Van Canneyt via Lazarus escribió:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Anthony Walter via Lazarus wrote:
This isn't a free pascal or lazarus project, but something I wrote using
typescript quite a while ago.
http://cache.getlazarus.org/videos/cloud-files.mp4
Soon, you'll
On 2017-04-19 14:54, Anthony Walter via Lazarus wrote:
> This isn't a free pascal or lazarus project, but something I wrote using
> typescript quite a while ago.
That's very impressive. I'm still amazed at what is actually possible
via a web browser - other than just viewing web pages. Thanks for
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Anthony Walter via Lazarus wrote:
This isn't a free pascal or lazarus project, but something I wrote using
typescript quite a while ago.
http://cache.getlazarus.org/videos/cloud-files.mp4
Soon, you'll be able to write this app in Free Pascal.
Michael.
--
27 matches
Mail list logo