On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 23:10 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> on 22.05.2012 18:14, davidMbrooke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've noticed that we sometimes get conflicting updates to
> > conf/sources.cfg - especially when different developers add new Packages
> >
Hi all,
I've noticed that we sometimes get conflicting updates to
conf/sources.cfg - especially when different developers add new Packages
at roughly the same time.
One option to reduce this problem would be to change buildtool.pl to
automatically "include" every .cfg file in a specific directory
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 23:32 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 16.05.2012 23:21, schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 23:03 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> >> Hi David,
> >>
> >> sorry, a misunderstanding on which side ever... I meant to add
>
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 23:03 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> sorry, a misunderstanding on which side ever... I meant to add
> "Linux Embedded Appliance Framework" below the logo.
>
>
> kp
As in:
**
LOGO
**
Linux
Embedded
Appliance
Framework
?
da
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 22:05 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 15.05.2012 23:05, schrieb davidMbrooke:
> >
> > As a comparison I have updated the Wiki sidebar logo with just the
> > graphic, which seems a little "bare" by comparison to the version with
> >
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 22:25 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 15.05.2012 21:20, schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 12:12 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> >> No response from Rich (yet) so I've kicked off a project at
> >> freelancer.co.uk and I'll pic
On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 12:12 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> No response from Rich (yet) so I've kicked off a project at
> freelancer.co.uk and I'll pick one of the bidders to see what they come
> up with.
>
> david
My commission for a new logo at freelancer.co.uk has be
On Tue, 2012-05-08 at 18:35 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi;
>
> I see a problem with hostapd and ipv6 addresses.
> (To summarize: hostapd started from /etc/init.d/ destroys ipv6 addresses
> from managed interfaces - the bug has been reported in 2010 to hostapd,
> and is (also) described also h
Hi kp,
TRAC doesn't currently let users report issues with anything newer than
4.1. Could you please add entries for 4.2, 4.2.1-rc1, 4.2.1.
Maybe we should include this in the Wiki page on creating a Release?
Thanks,
david
---
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 19:41 +0100, david M brooke wrote:
> On 26 Apr 2012, at 16:07, Mike Noyes wrote:
>
> > On 04/26/2012 07:26 AM, Mike Noyes wrote:
> >> On 04/22/2012 04:45 AM, davidMbrooke wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 17:21 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> Hi all.
> I noticed that there are manually applied software updates into both
> next and 4.2 branch, which will cause merge conflicts in future merging
> of branches. It'll be not a big trouble, but it'll be better done by
> usual merge (git me
Hi all,
I've added a Software Infobox to our Wikipedia page
(https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/LEAF_Project).
I was going to upload the LEAF Project Logo but Wikipedia asks *lots* of
questions about Copyright for image uploads and I'm not clear about
where our current logo came from a
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 09:58 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Samba Patch: Linux Users Should Apply Immediately
> http://www.informationweek.com/news/security/app-security/232900201
Hi Mike,
Thanks for the heads-up.
We're WAY out of date on Samba versions - currently shipping 2.0.10 and
2.2.12. Must be
Thanks guys. Glad you like it :-}
As always, kudos to Andrew for leading the way.
"It's LEAF, Jim, but not as we know it"
as someone on Star Trek once said (nearly)
david
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 15:02 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
>
>
> Awesome work!
>
> On 4/6/2012 2:50 PM, Mike Noyes wro
Hi all,
I *finally* got my ARM toolchain to compile! Seems there are some issues
with NPTL on ARM (both for uClibc 0.9.32.1 and 0.9.33) so I have
reverted to the "new" pthread implementation for now (only for armv6;
i486 still uses NPTL). A couple of minor fixes were required in
toolchain/buildtoo
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 13:02 +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> Hi david, i know i never happy
>
> perhaps we can change
>
> Logfile = log/buildtoollog
> to
> Logfile = log/$GNU_TARGET_NAME/buildtoollog
>
> in conf/buildtool.conf
Hi Yves,
I know you are right... I did consider making that change ini
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:50 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
> On 03/20/2012 01:57 PM, davidMbrooke wrote:
> -snip-
> > I am also in the process of drafting some notes on building for other
> > platforms here:
> > http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 18:15 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 25.03.2012 14:51, schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am getting build errors for my highly experimental ARM11 toolchain - a
> > conflict between GCC and uClibc 0.9.32.1 NPTL code. Looks like there
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 13:41 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 10:42 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> >
> > My fault - forgot to commit a common.cfg which points to the correct file.
> >
> > Can you sow the error for shorewall6?
> >
> >
Hi all,
I am getting build errors for my highly experimental ARM11 toolchain - a
conflict between GCC and uClibc 0.9.32.1 NPTL code. Looks like there are
some relevant fixes included in uClibc 0.9.33 which was released 01 Feb
2012.
Could we upgrade uClibc? I have tried a quick test and I get a
*d
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 10:42 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> My fault - forgot to commit a common.cfg which points to the correct file.
>
> Can you sow the error for shorewall6?
>
> kp
Hi kp,
All is OK now - the same common.cfg error affected shorewall6.
I am currently rebuilding everything.
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 20:37 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> Another issue is shorewall.
> Latest version 4.5 "improved" install section for BUILD and HOST system.
> I'm not shure if I got it right. So can you pls do me a favour and chekc
> if works on a Fedora system? I tried with my latest comm
Hi all,
Following another batch of cross-compilation fixes (mawk, linux-atm,
dhcpd and radius) I am again seeing an "all green" report from
buildall.sh
My build platform is Fedora 15 x86_64, so this is a *slightly* better
test of cross-compilation than building on a 32-bit x86 platform.
Hopefull
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 00:40 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> Yes I'm still on 32-bit.
>
> kp
Hi kp,
OK, so that explains why it works for you but not for me.
I've realized that compiling for the build host rather than the target
host is *exactly* what $(BUILD_CC) is for and I've had some succe
On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 19:02 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 22.03.2012 21:36, schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 22:21 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
> > I do seem to have re-introduced a number of build failures (mawk,
> > linux-atm, dhcpd)
>
> Hi David;
&
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 20:36 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
>
> I do seem to have re-introduced a number of build failures (mawk,
> linux-atm, dhcpd) which is down to a *second* i486-unknown-linux-uclibc
> level in the directory structures in some places (specifically for the
> inclu
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 22:21 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
>
> By the way, I know that buildimage.pl is now broken because of these and
> my other changes. Maybe I can fix that tomorrow...
>
> david
buildimage.pl should now be fixed too - at least for i486 builds - and
also tools/bu
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 13:08 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> On 21/03/12 12:47, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> > One suggestion: it will be great to have a subdirectory in the /build/
> > directory with the name of the toolchain.
> > For example: build/i486-unknown-linux-uclibc so we can build multiple
> > versions
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 22:56 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 23:59 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> > 18.03.2012 19:44, davidMbrooke пишет:
> > >
> > > I'm also thinking about what the "ARCH" arguments to buildtool.pl and
> > > buildpa
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 23:59 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> 18.03.2012 19:44, davidMbrooke пишет:
> >
> > I'm also thinking about what the "ARCH" arguments to buildtool.pl and
> > buildpacket.pl should look like. Maybe we just use the GCC "target
> > triplet
Hi all,
I plan to start making changes to the Wiki pages for 'next', adding info
on cross-compiling and giving some more thought as to which pages are
common to all Bering-uClibc versions (maybe the Hints and Tips on Git
usage, for example?) and which are version-specific.
Before I create more pa
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 17:18 +0100, Yves Blusseau wrote:
> Really good news !
>
> Thanks a lot david an kp !
>
> When do you think you will merge the 'next' branch onto 'master' ?
>
> Yves
Hi Yves,
Personally I'd like to see us prove out cross-compiling for another
platform before we take the b
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand the valid values for our various "architecture"
variables in MasterInclude.mk (ARCH, KARCHS, GNU_ARCH, GNU_TUNE) in the
context of cross-compiled builds.
I'm OK with GNU_ARCH and GNU_TUNE because I can see those are driving
the setting of -march and -mtune for GCC
Hi all,
I believe I have fixed the build failure for dhcpcd on 'next'. It's the
usual story - several hours' work for just a couple of lines in
buildtool.mk :-)
I managed to turn up a reference to setting CC for Solaris (in
dhcp-4.2.2/README) which also works for us and enables the included copy
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 18:54 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 16.03.2012 18:43, schrieb davidMbrooke:
> >
> > kp: For djbdns I am getting an error that you also had on 28 Jan. Do you
> > have a fix identified for this error:
> >
> > ./compile socket_accept6
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 20:58 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am 13.03.2012 23:33, schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Now that Andrew and kp have done all the hard work on "next" I have
> > finally found time to try to build it. I'm getting a
Hi all,
Now that Andrew and kp have done all the hard work on "next" I have
finally found time to try to build it. I'm getting a few build errors
(on Fedora 15, x86_64).
>From previous mails to this list I can see that some of these errors are
"expected" but others are not. Some of the problems I
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 14:41 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 1:38 PM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Am Montag, 14. November 2011, 18:44:13 schrieb Charles
> > Steinkuehler:
> >> I got some screen captures forwarded to me by Rich Bowen of
> >> SourceForge.
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if a
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 22:25 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. November 2011, 18:50:47 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone has got a preferred approach for handling Perl
> > modules (.pm files) which are required for Perl-based
Hi,
Just wondering if anyone has got a preferred approach for handling Perl
modules (.pm files) which are required for Perl-based LRP Packages but
which are:
- Not included in the standard Perl distribution
- Available from CPAN (http://www.cpan.org/)
- Potentially used by several Package
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 15:36 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> 01.11.2011 21:34, davidMbrooke пишет:
> > On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 21:21 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> >> 01.11.2011 20:11, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >>> Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew:
> >
> >
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 21:21 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> 01.11.2011 20:11, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew:
> >
> > Not a proposal, just a quick idea: it might be easier longterm to fork
> > again from buildroot and adjust it to our needs, instead of hack
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 20:41 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 16. Oktober 2011, 10:38:08 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > Hi kp,
> >
> > Just wondering if we're planning to have a "4.1-fixes" branch in Git
> > like we did for 4.0, with the changes for
Hi kp,
Just wondering if we're planning to have a "4.1-fixes" branch in Git
like we did for 4.0, with the changes for 4.1.1 going into there as well
as the master?
dMb
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT i
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 18:11 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> I suggest that we freeze 4.1 for the rc1 and I'll try to accomplish that
> task over the weekend.
OK with me.
>
> David, there is one task open - license.lrp should be added to the images
> (leaf.cfg). I know we are not finished addi
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 14:00 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 18. September 2011, 13:38:27 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 11:42 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 17:41 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> > > > Kernel was taken from
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 11:42 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 17:41 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> > Kernel was taken from kernel.org because kernel.org was one of
> > constantly-available resources and because kernel is enough heavy - just
> > to make git/cvs
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 17:41 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 17.09.2011 16:43, davidMbrooke пишет:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to do a complete rebuild and "build buildenv" is failing
> > almost right away. In log/buildtoollog I get:
> > buildtool::Down
maintain our own copy?
Thanks,
davidMbrooke
--
BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2
___
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-dev
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 22:10 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote:
> Open Embedded: An alternative way to build embedded Linux distributions
> http://www.eetimes.com/design/embedded/4218490/Open-Embedded--An-alternative-way-to-build-embedded-Linux-distributions
>
Thanks Mike. Interesting. I have started lookin
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 01:39 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> David, do we need to wait for your work on isc-dhcp? I guess it can be
> done
> later...
Yes, no need to wait. The Package is almost ready but I need to do some
testing - with both DHCPv4 and DHCPv6...
dMb
---
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 21:55 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi David
>
> on 11.07.2011 21:15, davidMbrooke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking at updating dhcpd.lrp to add the option of IPv6 (i.e.
> > DHCPv6 Server) support. Right now we build dhcp.lrp from ISC DHCP
a but I am not sure about the
Debian patches. What do others think?
davidMbrooke
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application perfor
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 18:33 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> Hi David
>
> ok, done. 4.0.1 deleted, 4.0-fxies created.
> Please adjust your local git. You may need to delete 4.0.1 locally and add
> the
> tracking command for 4.0-fixes, don't know... Don't used any magic tricks as
> Andrew can
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 17:15 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> HI David;
>
> Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 14:32:38 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:53 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > > Anyway I'd like test a bit further, so if David can just a a change,
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:53 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Anyway I'd like test a bit further, so if David can just a a change, so that
> I
> can see what happens
>
> I will update the wiki once we have a stable layout.
>
> kp
Hi kp,
I have just pushed a commit to the 4.0.1 branch - a sm
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 12:23 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi KP
>
> on 24.06.2011 20:31, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > just created the remote branch 4.0.1
> >
> > This branch is intended to work fixes for 4.0.1.
> > I've currently only
> > - updated webconf to fix Trac tickets #50, #51
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 20:31 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi;
>
> just created the remote branch 4.0.1
>
> This branch is intended to work fixes for 4.0.1.
> I've currently only
> - updated webconf to fix Trac tickets #50, #51 and #52
> - fixed bug in hash shaper (crash on initialization mor
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:25 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 21.06.2011 21:43, Andrew пишет:
> > 21.06.2011 21:29, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >> Ok; created the repository leaf/bering-uclibc.
> >> git clone ssh://u...@leaf.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/leaf/bering-uclibc
> >>
> >> It's currently empty. Maybe som
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:47 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > hello gents;
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 22:40:55 schrieb Andrew:
> >> 14.06.2011 22:31, davidMbrooke пишет:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>&g
he Git HEAD
4.1-beta1 and then also release 4.0.1 as a "branch" release containing
just *minor* enhancements and bug fixes for 4.0.
Comments?
davidMbrooke
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technica
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 09:01 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi
>
> at 12.06.2011 21:59, Erich Titl wrote:
> > Hi David
> >
> > on 12.06.2011 15:55, davidMbrooke wrote:
> >> On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 14:21 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> >>> I will investig
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 15:57 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi kp,
> >
> > Sigh. No problem with radius for me...
> > Seems that radius decided not to build your LDAP integration module.
> > Did openldap build OK for you?
>
> openldap build is ok;
>
> > If so, what do you get in log/buildtooll
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 20:45 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:41 +0200, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> > Web interface hdsupp
> >
> >
> > Package Help Text
> >
> > HD support tools
> > 4. Copy the MBR to the drive using (assuming
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 14:21 +0100, davidMbrooke wrote:
> I will investigate haserl further.
My haserl build error is described here:
https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26091302
I am using make version 3.82 on Fedora 15.
Erich: The error is fixed in haserl version 0.9.27
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 14:49 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 12. Juni 2011, um 14:44:16 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting an error building haserl:
> >make -C haserl-0.9.25 all
> >make[1]: Entering directory
> > `/ho
Hi,
I'm getting an error building haserl:
make -C haserl-0.9.25 all
make[1]: Entering directory
`/home/leaf/leaf/bering-uclibc4/buildtool/source/haserl/haserl-0.9.25'
Making all in src
make[2]: Entering directory
`/home/leaf/leaf/bering-uclibc4/buildtool/source/haserl/haserl-0.9.25/src
Hi,
For the OpenLDAP Package (required for LDAP support in FreeRADIUS) I
need to add UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR=y to the uClibc .config.
I have been testing with this enabled for a while and it doesn't seem to
affect any other Packages (that I use :-) ) so I have just checked it
into Git.
All active devel
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 20:41 +0200, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> Web interface hdsupp
>
>
> Package Help Text
>
> HD support tools
> 4. Copy the MBR to the drive using (assuming your harddrive is /dev/hda)
> cat /usr/bin/mbr.bin > /dev/hda
>
> I can't find mbr.bin (find / -name mbr\*)
>
> /Per
Hi
On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 22:09 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hello;
>
>
> in the beginning the shorewall configuration files had an exhaustive
> documentation including examples.
>
> Later the documentation has been removed to improve support size-constrained
> distros like LEAF, and was only a
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 09:41 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi David
>
> at 16.05.2011 21:33, davidMbrooke wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:40 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> ...
>
> > Hi Erich,
> >
> > I have noticed the same behaviour. Some of the makefiles
Hi Andrew,
I'm getting an error building bind, at the "configure" step:
...
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking for OpenSSL library... not found
configure: error: OpenSSL was not found in any
of /usr /usr/local /usr/local/ssl /usr/pkg /usr/sfw; use
--with-ope
Mai 2011, um 15:08:12 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > > -snip-
> > >
> > > > > > > With specific reference to the Wiki, there is currently no
> > > > > > > statement about the license which applies to the Wiki text itself.
> > > >
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:40 +0200, Erich Titl wrote:
> Hi Folks
>
> It appears that the environment variables from buildtool.cfg are not
> passed to the makefile for the buildclean and srcclean operations. Could
> someone with insight in these modules please comment?
>
> Thanks
>
> Erich
Hi Er
Hi kp,
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 01:06 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi David;
>
> I've been afraid that some day this discussion will come up on the list :)
Sorry about that... :-)
>
> Am Freitag, 13. Mai 2011, um 20:31:58 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > Hi,
> >
&g
dia uses. However there is some text imported from the previous
DocBook documentation which may use a different license.
Is there already consensus on which license applies to LEAF and the
documentation? I have failed to find a
to match your LRP= list it still works OK.
To me it sounds like you have managed to lose some of the standard
modules from moddb.lrp
The ERROR message comes from /usr/share/shorewall/Shorewall/Config.pm,
line 2603, so I recommend you have a look at
l. It doesn't generate its own .lrp
file but instead gets installed as a component of another Package.
The message is correct - there is no "" entry in
haserl/buildtool.cfg
Do other Packages build OK for you? If not, what OS are you running on
your build host?
Note that we normally u
On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 19:42 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Gents;
>
> I propose to tag 4.0 until end of week and start release work.
>
> Currently there are no showstoppers, the number of reported bugs has only a
> few for rc1. And I think it's a good and stable final release after nearly a
>
to
support those. With "curl" you get the choice to use TFTP or something
else.
davidMbrooke
--
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation'
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 20:15 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting some strange failures running "tools/buildall.sh" on a clean
> git clone from the latest (2011-02-22) master repository.
>
> Specifically:
>- Building the Packages for "k
y view, correcting or expanding
existing pages is always OK. Adding new pages needs more thought, so
please "discuss" those here or on a Wiki Discussion page first.
It is also possible to raise a Trac ticket for Component =
Documentation, useful if a major topic needs to be added.
davidMbrook
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 17:14 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 6. März 2011, um 17:03:08 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> > On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 17:11 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> > > 06.03.2011 17:06, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 6. März 20
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 17:11 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> 06.03.2011 17:06, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am Sonntag, 6. März 2011, um 15:53:34 schrieb Andrew:
> >> 05.03.2011 16:12, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >>> Hi;
> >>>
> >>> can someone else pls have a look at trac ticket #18? I triied, but can't
> >>> fi
Hi,
For me, on a clean clone of the git repository, "make source" on the new
2.6.35.11 kernel prompts for some missing settings in .config. Looks
like we need to add:
CONFIG_NET_SCH_ESFQ=m
CONFIG_NET_SCH_ESFQ_NFCT=y
- assuming that we want those included.
dMb
-
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 15:12 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi;
>
> can someone else pls have a look at trac ticket #18? I triied, but can't find
> a
> solution...
>
> Ticket #9 and #13 can be moved to later IMHO.
>
> kp
Hi kp,
#9 is almost complete - docs are in place; I just need to be bra
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 09:06 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 01:46 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
> Hi kp,
>
> Thanks for the report. I thought I had tested that, but I did not try a
> complete re-build. I will fix now.
>
> dMb
So the change was eas
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 01:46 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi David;
>
> some of the latest commits broke buildimage.pl
>
> After a fresh and complete rebuild of my buildenv I tried to create a iso-
> image.
>
> I get the error:
> fakeroot ./buildimage.pl --image=Bering-uClibc_i486_isolinux_vga
is to
# CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is not set
seems to fix it for me.
I propose to do another clean build to check for any side-effects and if
all is successful commit the change to the kernel .config.
davidMbrooke
--
Fr
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 20:03 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi Andrew;
>
> Am Sonntag, 13. Februar 2011, um 22:45:13 schrieb Andrew:
> > P.S. I found that using of symlinks broke all packages with config files
> > into git (by default symlinks were copied) - now I fixed this (triveally
> > added -
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 22:19 +0100, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> On 2011-02-15 21:42, davidMbrooke wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 20:54 +0100, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> >> On 2011-02-15 20:45, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> >>> Anyone have experince with IPXE ?
> >>>
> >
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 20:54 +0100, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> On 2011-02-15 20:45, Per Sjoholm wrote:
> > Anyone have experince with IPXE ?
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPXE
> > While traditional PXE clients use TFTP to transfer data,
> > iPXE adds the ability to retrieve data through other prot
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 22:23 +1100, ads...@genis-x.com wrote:
> You might want to note that you have to run buildall.sh from within the
> buildtool directory not from the tools folder
That's why we always refer to it as "tools/buildall.sh" not
"./buildall.sh", and I claim the new Wiki page is *rel
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 15:05 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Gents;
>
> as you may have noted we do have at least two packages which requires
> ifconfig
> in addition to iproute2.
>
> A short term solution would be to enable the ifconfig in busybox (adds 3kb to
> busybox), long-term solution to
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 10:04 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
> It is not well documented in the Wiki - at least not yet.
> I feel a new Chapter coming on... :-)
Now written, although rather brief:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/leaf/index.php?title=Bering-uClibc_4.x_-_Developer_
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:58 +1100, ads...@genis-x.com wrote:
> Awesome,
>
> ./buildtool.pl build buildenv
> works a treat
> ./buildtool.pl build did the job perfectly (iscsi package failed, but as
> sources.cfg says it's in progress ;o).
>
> So far so good, the one thing I'm a little confused on
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 13:07 +1100, ads...@genis-x.com wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Now that all the packages are in git I figured I would clone the latest from
> there.
>
> Alas there are some issues..
>
>
>
> [leaf@leafbuilder buildtool]$ ./buildtool.pl build buildenv
>
> make the list of required
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 23:50 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> 09.02.2011 00:05, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am Sonntag, 6. Februar 2011, um 12:14:16 schrieb ads...@genis-x.com:
> >> Is anyone able to push all the contrib packages into git?
> > All package sources has been moved into git.
> >
kp: Thank you. I
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 12:32 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 07:07 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 23:08 +0200, Andrew wrote:
> > > This is quite easy: do git clone and set personal data (name/email);
> > > copy bering-uclibc/app
On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 12:17 +, davidMbrooke wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 22:14 +1100, ads...@genis-x.com wrote:
> > Is anyone able to push all the contrib packages into git?
>
> Hi Ad,
>
> Your messages aren't showing up in leaf-devel for some reason, even
> t
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
