Hi kp,
>> In short, replace "0.1.0" with "0.2.0":
>> (...)
>
> fixed in git.
From what I can see, only in "maint", but not in "master" (unless git
handles that automagically - which I wouldn't know about, since I'm
totally clueless when it comes to git...). Just to be sure that doesn't
come
Hi all,
it appears that the libmnl.lrp package is missing in all 6.0.1 tarballs
as well as the iso-images. Booting from one of the iso-images, I get
LINUXRC: Installing - root: /dev/sr0 (lots of other packages)
libmnl: libmnl(nf!)
Trying to build the package myself, I noticed that libmnl-1.0.4
Hi Erich,
you probably followed the the list, here still an update
I did - I just didn't have anything meaningful to add :-)
The main difference between my setting on BuC 3.x and 4.3 was the module
loading sequence, which, when automatized, is not deterministic. I could
have overcome the
Hi Erich,
are you sure you plugged the cables into the right network ports? At
least on the nexgate(s) I used in the past, we had to do some
trialerror to figure out which port was eth0, eth1 and so on.
Martin
Am 02.10.2012 10:10, schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi Folks
I am trying to get 4.3 running
Hi Erich,
I felt pretty sure, as I checked the set up more that once. BUt yes, you
are right, pulling down the interface shows that indeed the ethernet
numbering had nothing to do with the way I am used to.
Indeed - it was quite a surprise to me at the time too, since one
expects all kinds of
with
different NICs on 3.1 distro were loaded by 20-30% at comparable rates.
2.6 kernel works better with new hardware and uses more hardware
features (for ex., MSI/MSI-X), so it is reasonable that it has better
performance.
21.07.2011 22:46, Martin Hejl пишет:
Hi everybody,
just to get some
Hi everybody,
just to get some feedback, before I go on a wild goose chase:
we're running LEAF Bering-uClibc 4.0.1 as a firewall on a 100 Mbit
downstream/6 MBit upstream link. It's basically an out of the box setup,
with only a couple of additional shorewall rules (a couple of ports
being
Hi everybody,
since my old Wrap box was starting to die on me, I replaced it with an
Alix box, and in the process, gave Bering uClibc 4.0 Beta 3 a try.
I have to say, the installation was very smooth. The Find load
modules for hardware is _very_ nice, and took away the usual hassle of
wfdudley wrote:
I'm not sure what pulled all documentation from the up-stream config
files in favor of man pages means, but when I type man shorewall-rules
I get the helpful message man: not found, so that's a fail, in the current
parlance. I understand that's somebody else's problem, but
Hi Robert,
I see some emails from March of 2008 discussing some initial work on a 2.6
branch of Leaf. Can anyone tell me what came of that?
The status of that branch is the same as in March 2008 - apart from a
few updated packages (with were updated when the packages for the Bering
uClibc
Hi Juergen
I do not complain at all about a slow or not existing process of providing
recent drivers.
Sorry - I guess that came across more harsh than it was intended (I
probably shouldn't write emails in the middle of the night...)
Since the list of network cards is unmanageable, there
Hi Juergen,
it is just two postings ago, when I demonstrated, that there is a eager
demand for recent NIC drivers.
possibly - but it seems the demand is not big enough for somebody (who
has that need) to do anything about it.
As far as I can tell (as always, I can only speak for myself), none
Hi Juergen,
In the logfile i found something strage: I think it should not use my FC10
kernel-dir !!!???
indeed it shouldn't (at least, if it should run with Bering uClibc). But
since you didn't tell the makefile where the kernel sources reside, it
looked in the default location (where it
Hi Ken,
What are the *.ser files for and how do they fit into the picture? They
weren't in the original 3.0 system.
They contain the config for setups that use a serial console - they were
introduced with Bering uClibc 3.1 RC1 to make life easier for those of
us who run Bering uClibc on a
Dear Adam,
I think there is an issue with something in initrd.lrp and Hyper-V's
hardware emulation.
if you find out what exactly that is, I'm sure you'll make many people
happy. Nobody I know of has figured that out so far (with regard to
other VMs like qemu).
Then the VM just reboots, I'm
Hi Harry,
I am downloading it from the cvs
using
cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf login
cvs -z3 -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/leaf \
co src/The_UnNamed_One
Could u please inform whether the above link is the latest and the
status of the project ?
Yes, the
Vanja Milosevski wrote:
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
You're right. AFAIK the ipt_TTL module allowing you to ALTER the TTL
instead of just MATCH the TTL, as ipt_ttl does, is not available in
the 2.4 kernel versions.
So what do you suggest I do now?
It appears that you have two choices - either
Matt Westveld wrote:
I can't seem to get it to talk to the PicoLCD. LCD4Linux seems to be
missing the PicoLCD driver - is this the place to start?
Support for PicoLCD is not compiled into the lcd4linux lrp (most likely
due to dependency issues). You will have to compile your own to get
Jeremy Tourville wrote:
Can anyone point me to the archives Eric is referring to?
I guess Erich was referring to this thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net/msg23075.html
Martin
-
Sponsored
Adam Niedzwiedzki wrote:
checking LinuxThreads... Not found
configure: error: This is a linux system and Linuxthreads was not
found. On linux Linuxthreads should be used. Please install Linuxthreads
(or a new glibc) and try again. See the Installation chapter in the
Reference Manual for
Adam Niedzwiedzki wrote:
Hmm from what I've read mysql will look in /usr/include for pthread.h, how
do I tell it to look in $(BT_STAGING_DIR)/usr/include for the files for
LinuxThreads
by applying the patch I pointed at (or rather, the patch, if it works,
will prevent that braindead check
Tom Hendrickx wrote:
my leaf on ext2 partition was working perfectly .. Then I added some
extra packages which I needed , namely openvpn and a few others
Everything was still working .. till I read on a document of openvpn it
also needed some library modules ..
So I added
Hi Bob,
Thanks Martin Hejl and Sven Backhausen for your input.
I now have my new ALIX box running Bering 3.1.
It was totally painless.
thanks for reporting back (and helping others who might be undecided at
this point). I'm glad the box, as well as Bering uClibc works well for
your needs
Hi Tom,
- formatted the flash card (one fat partition (10mb) and one ext2 partition)
- installed syslinux on the first partition
- put the master boot record in order
- copied the files of the
image(:Bering-uClibc_3.1_img_bering-uclibc-1680.bin) to the flash disk
- altered the syslinux.cfg
Hi again,
Indeed, sorry I just forgot to mention it. I replaced it with the
initrd_ide.lrp file.
ok, that's what I thought - but of course, it would have been the simple
fix.
- altered the syslinux.cfg file, this is in it : display syslinux.dpy
timeout 5
append
Hi Tom,
hda: hda1 hda2
initrd(nf) root(nf) config(nf) etc(nf) modules(nf)
iptables(nf) dhcpcd(nf) keyboard shorwall(nf) ulogd(nf)
dnsmasq dropbear mhttpd(nf) openntpd webconf
configdb(nf) moddb(nf) - finished
hda: hda1 hda2
Starting periodic command scheduler: cron.
cron should be
Hi Tom,
2 more questions about the login prompt..
- I get there, but the keyboard isn't working .. It's a ps2 connection
inside the NexGate on which I connect a keyboard .. Still need some
drivers for that or that isn't the problem?
unless you removed something else that you haven't told us
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
I am currently running LEAF-Bering uClibc 3.0 beta 2 on a PC Engines
WRAP platform. I now have a requirement for a similar setup at work, to
handle Remote client access over OpenVPN.
Has anyone experience of moving to the new platform?
I suppose the network drivers are
Rick Sterling wrote:
I would like to get some more but don't know where to purchase them. I
came by mine on ebay but was hoping maybe someone on the list could tell
me where they have been purchasing them from.
I've ordered all the ones I use directly from Nexcom, but these days,
they
Jorn Eriksen wrote:
I got a few ALIX unit here and apart from the network drivers, all seams to
work. The Watchdog don't work as expected (ref to Eric post earlier).
I can confirm as well that the box works fine (minus the watchdog - no
surprise there).
I simply took an image that was made for
Hi Erich,
The watchdog reboot for the WRAP was just handy. I _believe_ one can
make reboot work by reboot=bios at startup, I never used it though.
correct (I just tried it to make sure). If you have append reboot=bios
in your syslinux.cfg file (which is in there by default), rebooting
works
Hi Erich,
Pascal Dornier from PC Engines says he will prepare some DOS sample code
- if someone wants to try to implement a watchdog for ALIX.
I doubt this would help much, it might be better to port back the 2.6 code.
Indeed it would, if somebody were willing to port the driver.
But in
Victor McAllister wrote:
Has anyone tried LEAF on the PC Engines ALIX board? If so, what are
your experiences? watchdog? It is cheaper and smaller than Soekris.
I don't have any experience yet, but a few ALIX boards will hopefully
arrive at my office in the next few days.
The units should
Hi Gordon,
lots of people have responded since you wrote that mail - so most of
what I was going to say has already been addressed - but I still feel
the need to respond to two things.
Gordon Bos wrote:
Whether it's stupid or not, that *is* what I'm doing at home.
Who said anything about stupid?
Muiz Motani wrote:
Can you tell us where we can order the Nexcom systems from and how much
they cost?
They have local distributors (which they are for your country should be
available on their website at www.nexcom.com - but beware, it seems this
is a IE only site - it seems to be utterly
Dear chaitanya arun deosthale,
reading through the mails you wrote in the recent days, it seems to be
obvious that you have a different idea of what LEAF should do for you,
than what the people using LEAF understand.
So how about if you tell us what exactly it is you want to get done by
using
Hi Paul,
I can confirm, at least under VMWare Server, that this configuration
works well.
That's a matter of opinion. Not everything that CAN be done, SHOULD
be done. ;-)
I guess I know what you're saying - but just to keep things straight for
the archives - LEAF runs just fine on VMWare,
Hi Victor,
A New Year
resolution is to try to help with documentation for LEAF. I would write
up my procedure (geared to a Windows user) and put it on the wiki if I
had access.
If you have a sourceforge account, it should be very easy to make you a
project member of the leaf project (and
oops, wrong list...
Martin Hejl wrote:
Hi Erich,
please keep replies on the list
Thanks for the info, I tried to diff the buildtool tree, only got my own
changes though.
cvs diff: Diffing . (...)
That's not how cvs diff works. From the man page:
The default action is to compare your
cpu memhd wrote:
Is there a technical reason for not supporting USB input?
Not as far as I know - it's simply because nobody has found time/energy
to do it so far (that's my understanding, I can't speak for everybody
who has commit permissions in CVS).
I'd like to request these modules be
Hi Eric,
I'll change the note in both files to reflect the fact that they're only
needed if one serves tftpd over a NATed interface
Please don't do that. ip_conntrack_tftp is most definitely needed for
*any* use of tftpd, according to my experiece and the shorewall docs.
Ok, I get it - one
Hi Ken,
I am using Bering uclibc 3.02 booting from an IDE CF card. The system
boots normally except that the last two modules in the LRP= list don't
load. depending on which modules are last I get a not found error (NF!)
on the first of the modules that don't load.
Please post your
Hi Ken,
I found the problem and the cause.
I'm glad you found the problem.
The reason that I found was that every line in the leaf.cfg file had a
period appended to it which caused several problems when rebooting the
system. Once the periods were removed the system booted normally
Hi Eric,
Eric (Spakman), I'd like to suggest that the need to download and
install ip_conntrack_tftp be added to the help message for tftpd.lrp.
And maybe that the module be added, commented out by default, to
/etc/modules. I'm used to opening shorewall ports when I install a
new service,
Hi Eric,
# Note that tftpd requires the module ip_conntrack_tftp. (If it is
# serving via a NAT'd interface it also requires ip_nat_tftp, which must
# be loaded second).
ok, just so I understand - you're running tftp via a NATed interface
(judging by your earlier messages, over an OpenVPN
Hi Erich,
thanks for the patch - but I'm confused. The patch only applies against
the mail script from Bering uClibc 3.0 or earlier - since Bering uClibc
3.0.1 already contains exactly those changes. See
Kwon wrote:
firewall# mail -s test [EMAIL PROTECTED] temp.txt
/usr/sbin/mail: /usr/sbin/mail: 6: Syntax error: Bad function name
My /usr/sbin/mail command didn't work neither! I thought it was just me! Is
there a man page?
well, going by the fact that
man something
results in
-sh: man: not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am faced with this problem
After ./buildtool.pl remove shorewall
and
./buildtool.pl source shorewall
to get it from CVS but for some reason it downloads some
page from sorceforge instead of buildtool.cfg
I don't know of any problems, but CVS access can be
Dear Aneesh,
please keep the discussion on the list - that way, others can help too.
When I run hostapd, I get an invalid argument error and it says it can't
connect to kernel driver.
Well, that might be the source of your problem - it would be interesting
to know what exactly hostapd was
Martin Hejl wrote:
One thing to try would be to set
logger_stdout=-1
logger_stdout_level=0
debug=4
oops, hit send too quickly.
Make that:
logger_syslog=-1
logger_syslog_level=0
debug=4
Martin
-
This SF.net email
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would appreciate any help regarding dansguardian compilation for our uClibc
buildtool env.
I' ve managed to reach installation but for some reason ( my buildtool.mk is
screwed ) it tries to install everything under / and not in staging.
Your buildtool.mk file
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was in a hurry and pressed reply ... you have made it up though,
No problem, happens all the time. It was just meant as a friendly reminder,
However
ldd shows
linux-gate.so.1 = (0xe000)
libz.so.1 = /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7f56000)
libstdc++.so.6 =
Aneesh Pande wrote:
I have a WLM 54G wireless card connected via minipci. I'm using Bering uClib
3x packages with Kernel driver 2.4.33. I wanted to configure it as an Access
Point and loaded the ath_hal, ath_rate and ath_pci, but it still doesn't
seem to work. What drivers do I need in order
Harry Lachanas wrote:
I Would like to connect 2 lans over NET with openvpn ... problem is that
both are using the same subnet Lan(a)=( 10.0.1.0/24 ) , Lan(b) = (
10.0.1.0/24 )
I am sure that I came across a package that can masq the two lans and
comunicate but I cant recall how or what it
groups, freeman wrote:
Well, on one hand one can propose that there is no more and no less a
good reason to assemble Samba 3 versus Samba 2 - whatever was the
impetus for Samba 2 can well apply to Samba 3.
Well, I'm assuming that building samba 3 will be more difficult than
building samba 2
Hi bino,
I see that it's not just me that see BuC is to hot to just positioned as
router/firewall
I see BuC as Platform that we can build anything on top of it.
one _can_ - but it doesn't mean that the people working of LEAF should
necessarily spend their time on working on things like that
Hi Mats,
since nobody else has spoken up so far, I'll give it a shot.
First of all, remember, I'm speaking for nobody but myself (seems like
in the past, statements of individual developers were misunderstood as
being the group's point of view).
Then, this kind of discussion is probably suited
Hi Oskar,
Oskar Separovic wrote:
Could somebody please be so kind to help with two broken links:
1. http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/buci-downmod3.html
Using Bering-uClibc with an IDE harddisk or CD-ROM drive
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/buci-ide3.html
2.
C.Dummy wrote:
Erich Titl wrote:
So your entire _internal_ network becomes inaccessible?
If so, can you check if this is due to excessive traffic or some
ethernet problem?
How can I check this?
The usual problem with top-posting - what exactly is the this you're
referring to? Whether the
Hi Erich,
You will see by yourself, this goes to the list too
I guess it did - but it seems the signature itself was still stripped
off. But at least the message made it through :-)
I suspect this will address Erich's problem. However, it leaves the list
open to nasty spam that's base64
Jim Ford wrote:
It would be convenient for me to be able to access my Linux machine on
the network at the school where I work, from my XP machine at home
through my Bering Leaf box. Without flogging through the many Openvpn
docs or joining the mailing list, I thought I'd ask the question
Hi Erich,
Thus you can most probably circumvent _unfriendly_
(aka professional) administrators. ( I did not tell you you should ;-) )
I am one of those unfriendly administrators - and anybody who tried to
pull that kind of thing without talking to me or somebody else who's in
charge first (and
Hi Erich,
Absolutely, I am one of those myself, but keeping information
undisclosed does not enhance security. I would, in any case, suggest to
have (if needed) a remote access policy which is supported by
management.
I agree. My main point really really was: don't try to work against the
Hi Eric,
Next problem: the tftp logs say the WRAP box is asking for wg.lrp rather
than wget.lrp. I've triple-checked that the string 'wg' doesn't occur
in /tftpbool except as a part of 'wget'. The problem's repeatable, so
it's not just randomly dropped data. wget.lrp is not being uploaded,
Hi Eric,
I have spent a while digging around in the documentation and the
archives and have yet to find the answer I am looking for. I have a
PCEngines WRAP with a EMP-8602 (wireless card) VPN1411 (VPN
Accelerator). I am using a 3.0GB microdrive. I am trying to replace my
Linksys
Hi Eric,
Eric wrote:
A ha getting there. It boots all the way up to the console. I
installed the new etc and modules lrps, but I still am unable to get the
eth controllers to come up. It gives me an error about eth0 not having
all the variables set, and says that eth1 is not found.
Hi Christian,
that's what I'm talking about. IMHO there must be all compiled/patched
modules for a full support of all features we can get from shorewall. making
this distro even more complete.
I'm not the one who makes the call about what is compiled in and what
isn't, but why _must_ all
On the other hand, one interesting phenomenon did turn
up from this: every entry in shorewall.log reporting
REJECT TCP (whatever) 37
has time stamp Jan 1 00:00:00, but every entry
before and after retain very plausable time stamps.
Is this to be expected?
This has come up
Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
I observed the other day that nmap 3.81 did not
recognize the fingerprint of the ssh-service delivered
by dropbear on Bering-uClibc beta3. Has the
organization
behind nmap been informed of a valid fingerprint?
Most likely not, but you'll have to ask Matt Johnston
Hi David,
your config looks fine, except for you not specifying a model - try to
add Model 'soekris' to your display section.
Also, your Layout looks a bit odd (but it might well be valid). Try if
changing it to
Layout Test {
Row1 {
Col1 'Test'
}
Row2 {
Col1 'Test'
Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
attached is a small file to accomplish some minor
cosmetic facelifting.
unfortunately, patches don't work on this list, unless they're posted
inline (which usually doesn't work well for anything that's not
extremely short).
If you have a sourceforge account,
Hi Doug,
firewall# more pkgpath.disks
/dev/hda1 msdos
firewall# mount -t msdos /dev/hda1 /mnt
mount: Mounting /dev/hda1 on /mnt failed: Invalid argument
very odd. Does mount dev/hda1 /mnt (without the -t msdos) give you
a different error message? Most likely not, but who knows.
Something
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The build-ca command gives me an error: can’t load library
‘libcrypto.so.0.9.7’ I didn’t expected that one :o(
in order to run openvpn, you need libcrpto.lrp and libssl.lrp as well
Each package has its dependencies listed on the packages page - see
Doug Sampson wrote:
firewall# mount dev/hda1 /mnt
/dev/root on / type tmpfs (rw)
/proc on /proc type proc (rw)
tmpfs on /tmp type tmpfs (rw)
tmpfs on /var/log type tmpfs (rw)
-sh: dev/hda1: Permission denied
[1] + Done mount
firewall#
Permission denied???
well,
Hi Doug,
Doug Sampson wrote:
When doing 'mount /dev/hda1 /mnt', /var/log/syslog reveals the following:
Nov 2 12:08:06 firewall kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 03:01 (hda),
sector 2
Nov 2 12:08:06 firewall kernel: MINIX-fs: unable to read superblock
Nov 2 12:08:06 firewall kernel:
Bob von Knobloch wrote:
I have been trying to set up buildtool becuase I want to customise a
couple of things. I have done a CVS checkout, set up the configs,
installed the PERL package Config::General, as detailed in the LEAF
Bering-uClibc Developer's Guide.
Hi Joep,
Joep Blom wrote:
Do you have any idea about the difference in size:
modules.lrp 118954 (from mounted .bin file)
My modules.lrp 123018
Using tar -c *| gzip -9 ../package.lrp : size 123007
Ok, so you're comparing gnu gzip with busybox gzip, right? (lrp from
Hi Joep,
perhaps be better to use bzip2 which is very efficient but a little
trial turned out that gzip -9 gives a better compression than bzip2 -9.
The results of bzip compression depend highly on the input - sometimes
it's a lot better than gzip, sometimes it fails big time. There's no
James VS wrote:
Bering-uClibc_2.4.1 using initrd_ide.lpr on WRAP system.
The WRAP system is completely headless no keyboard controller or video.
The console ends with getty can not open tty1 tty2 it is repeating this
continusly so I have no console.
One way is to extract /etc/inittab from
Marek Kříž wrote:
using ... Vfat.o
.LINUXRC: PKGPATH: /dev/hdc:vfat
LINUXRC: mounting /dev/hdc1 on /mnt1
This seems odd - if linuxrc thinks the pkgpath is /dev/hdc, it's not too
surprising the packages can't be found. Please double-check that you
_really_ have hdc1 in leaf.cfg
It _should_ look
Hi Thomas,
When changing my internet connection to DSL, I will get an AVM Fritz Box SL
from my Internet provider. It has a built-in firewall. Will it be useful to
run in addition also shorwall on my Leaf router?
What is your opinion?
I presume you need the AVM for DSL access (if I'm not
Hi scott,
In terms of LEAF as a non-shorewall router, etc I'd propose that since
the default LEAF distro includes shorewall that might tip the scales in
favour of recognizing that shorewall rules are the better, *single*
place for IP restrictions to be placed. Also, newbies (the people most
Hi Jonathan,
Does anyone know where I can get dhcpd3.lrp for a Bering v1.0-Stable
box. I know there used to be one because I found the docs. The links
for download are just broken now. Thanks in advance for the help...
if it used to be part of the Bering webpage, it's probably in the
Hi Ricardo,
It's great to know that lrp is simply a tgz. I never knew that! That
certainly helps.
just make sure you're root while unpacking, editing and re-packing the
package - otherwise, the ownerships of the files will get screwed up
(which could create problems).
Martin
H Lionel,
I am using lrpStat to graph CPU and bandwidth on my Access Point. I find
the java thing very helpfull, but I would like to graph more stuff:
bandwidth used by different trafic shaping classes (using tc -s -d) or
wireless activity. Is lrpStat available as script instead of a binary ?
Hi Eric and Tim,
I will ask Martin Hejl, but I think it can be disabled by default. If
that's the case it wil be removed or disabled in the next version of
Bering-uClibc.
Thanks for reporting.
I'm actually not sure why it is in there - I assume that we put it in to
make installation
Hi Roger and Ron,
Here is where it is going wrong.
Then syslinux -s /dev/hda1.
Don't syslinux the partition. You want to do this: syslinux -s /dev/hda.
I don't think so - at least, I've never done it that way (and it's
documented to use hdaX everywhere I checked). Since he installed
Hi Paul,
I'm not complaining, mind you, just reporting the facts:
gcc 4.0 will not build binutils 2.14 but does build 2.16.1 fine
gcc 4.0 will not build gcc 3.3 (have not investigated further)
This is going to be a bit of a support issue moving forward, so it would
be a good thing
sander wrote:
what I understand, /dev/tty1 and /dev/tty2 should be started anyway.
like leave ability use video card without change configuration.
I don't think that will work. But I don't think I've ever tried, since
having a console on the serial port is sufficient to me.
additional info
Hi Christoph,
after studying the LEAF-Bering Install and User Guides and analyzing
the /linuxrc script and the leaf.cfg structure I found out the most important
things. But the Bering-uClibc-2.3-beta5 is not covered in the mentioned
guides. These guides only speak of the 1680kB floppy,
Hi Troy,
I don't use Winscp (I prefer the command line stuff) and I doubt there's
a beta4 of Bering - so I'm assuming you're actually referring to Bering
uclibc, but usually, those kinds of problems result from having stuff
in /etc/profile or .profile of whatever user you're trying to log in as
Hi Chat,
This is what i get if i run ./buildtool.pl build buildenv
make the list of required source packages: nothing to do [0.K.]
make the list of required build packages: buildenv [0.K.]
build source/package: buildenv
calling 'make build' for buildenv make
Hi Richard,
I have no doubts that it would be fairly easy to
create enough value added for a premium service that anyone with $ could
not live without. The question is just how many of these people are
there?
Indeed, that seems to be the main question. And the way it looks right
now, the
Hi Troy,
Ok there is some progress. Now I can login with WSCP. But now all I see
is an empty / directory. I can't cd up to any other directories. It is
just empty...
Any other helpful wild guesses. I suspect I am missing something
obvious.
Hm, sounds like a permission problem (ok, that's
Hi Troy,
since you haven't received anything from any of the other core
developers yet (I don't really consider myself a core developer of
leaf, but my name is on the webpage...) I want to give you at least some
response to your valid concerns.
Question 1:
How do you handle security patches
Hi Richard,
Richard Amerman wrote:
I'm sure that this topic is not new but it is probably one that should
be brought up regularly incase there are new options as to how to
address the issue.
My company, and other companies I work with (and I'm very sure we are
not alone in this) would
Hi Richard,
I think that if you could justify going forward with your idea, or if
others came on board and something independent could be done, this would
be great. I think this is a situation where both the established free/OS
community side of LEAF and your business, and other similar
Hi Troy,
I followed this procedure to the letter pretty much but when I attempted
to boot off of the compact flash I get to the point when it is supposed
to be loading the IDE modules and then it dies with a kernel panic. (See
details below) Can anyone please tell me what I am missing here? It
Hi Richard,
Does anyone have lncurses.lrp for uClibc handy?
it's called ncurses.lrp, but I guess that's what you're looking for
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=pagemasterPAGE_user_op=view_pagePAGE_id=3MMN_position=3:3#PKG_77
It appears that I need it for lrpstat.
Hi Larry,
For those who are running linux how about a UML or Xen image?
Well, those who are already running linux don't rally have a problem,
since buildtool already runs on linux. So UML of Xen would not really
solve the problem that people want to have a build environment for leaf
despite
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
