Hi Martin,
First, thanks for your help.
I re-tried the lcd today, without success. I checked too all the
connections, not possible errors.
I just have the contrast (just 2 rows on 4) and backlights .
I read again your page, and I saw an important remark: Do not connect the
backlight pins to the
Hi David,
your config looks fine, except for you not specifying a model - try to
add Model 'soekris' to your display section.
Also, your Layout looks a bit odd (but it might well be valid). Try if
changing it to
Layout Test {
Row1 {
Col1 'Test'
}
Row2 {
Col1 'Test'
Sandro,
There isn't any particular reason, I guess it's just forgotten to add...
Regards,
Eric
Hi,
as in subject the qos-htb.lrp is missing in
Bering-uClibc_2.3_iso_bering-uclibc-iso.bin.
There are any reasons ? It's seem me that the
package is still running correctly (v.0.8.5) with 2.4.31
Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2005 16:20 schrieb Eric Spakman:
Sandro,
There isn't any particular reason, I guess it's just forgotten to add...
Regards,
Eric
Hi,
as in subject the qos-htb.lrp is missing in
Bering-uClibc_2.3_iso_bering-uclibc-iso.bin.
There are any reasons ? It's seem me
Tony wrote:
Good Morning,
I have the latest version of Bering UlibC with shorewall 1.4.5. I also
run a DMZ with an ftp server. The DNAT rule logs at the info level so I
can see who is accessing the server. I have blacklisted China and Korea
according to
Yup, did all that.
The actual file reads:
net eth0detect dhcp,routefilter,norfc1918,blacklist
loc eth1detect
dmz eth2detect
And the ip's are showing up in the shorewall status under the blacklist
column.
Thanks
Tony
Victor McAllister wrote:
Tony wrote:
Good Morning,
On Sunday 21 December 2003 06:00 am, Tony wrote:
But, my blacklist includes 210.82.0.0/15
Also, my shorewall log shows no hit which I didn't expect to, and the
counter in shorewall status shows one hit for that range.
My question is, did he get blocked or allowed access?
It looks as
OK, so what you're saying is the packet was logged up in the pre-routing
NAT section before it got dropped by the blacklisting filter at the
Forward section?
Thanks,
Tony
Tom Eastep wrote:
snip
No. Blacklist rules are enforced in the 'filter' table whereas DNAT is logged
out of the 'nat'
On Sunday 21 December 2003 08:36 am, Tony wrote:
OK, so what you're saying is the packet was logged up in the pre-routing
NAT section before it got dropped by the blacklisting filter at the
Forward section?
Yes.
If you want to log these connections out of the FORWARD chain, replace your
sigh RTFM rides again I found everything I needed in the DHCP man pages.
The deny unknown-hosts command was what I wanted.
It's up to the rest of the packages to reject traffic from unknown hosts that are
using a fixed IP that would otherwise be on the subnet.
-Original Message-
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:19, Raymond Page wrote:
To do traffic shaping, does shorewall require tc.lrp?
I'd like to do traffic shaping and thought I read shorewall did that, but it
didn't mention requiring tc,
Shorewall configures traffic shaping by running 'tc' -- it needs that
program
Le Mercredi 2 Juillet 2003 19:39, Tom Eastep a écrit :
On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 10:19, Raymond Page wrote:
To do traffic shaping, does shorewall require tc.lrp?
I'd like to do traffic shaping and thought I read shorewall did that, but
it didn't mention requiring tc,
Shorewall configures
Jay,
I have a question: I have written an extensive firewall script
using sh and iptables. I am now looking for a linux diskette
distribution which enables me to boot a machine from diskette
(with iptables
and pppoe enabled), then insert my diskette with my firewall.sh
and run it. I
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a confused what tinyproxy is able to do and couldn't find help at his
homepage. I saw other people asking about, but must have miss the answers.
The homepage is actually pretty informative.
The only proxy I know is squid that in my
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Dennis Christilaw wrote:
I have done fresh installs on both UNIX boxes but I cannot get them to
Ping outside the LAN regardless of the way I have networking set up on
them.
Even though I can ping the router's IP, if I run the following command
(in HP-UX) route
Also sprach Matt Schalit (Sat 01 Mar 02003 at 11:36:51AM -0800):
snip /
Dennis hasn't told us how he has Shorewall setup.
snip /
Probably, because he's running Dachstein without Shorewall?
--
Best Regards,
mds
mds resource
888.250.3987
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our
At 06:34 PM 2/28/2003 -0800, Dennis Christilaw wrote:
[...]
I have done fresh installs on both UNIX boxes but I cannot get them to
Ping outside the LAN regardless of the way I have networking set up on
them. I tried DHCP and Static IP assignment and configuration and cannot
get it to do it on
Dennis Christilaw wrote:
Ok... This is a little complicated, but simple so please bear with me.
I am running Dachstein LRP package (Floppy/CD-ROM) as my
Router/Firewall/DHCP/DNS Cashing.
I have 4 Windows Machines on my LAN all with Static IP's. I have a box
running Mandrake Linux 9 - Static IP. I
At 07:56 PM 2/28/2003 -0800, Dennis Christilaw wrote:
Netstat -rn is the same in Unix and so is netconf -a, but I think this
is more if a router issue than Unix due to having taken the box to a
house that has a Linksys Router set up and it working with the settings
as is. We changed his entire
should have done that first, but I just needed to vent... LOL!
Thanks!
Dennis Christilaw
-Original Message-
From: Ray Olszewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:19 PM
To: Dennis Christilaw; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Question running Dachstein
Le Mercredi 26 Février 2003 22:08, Jose Luis Abuelo Sebio a écrit :
Hi guys:
I'm trying to enable the vlan software in a linux
machine. There is a module called 8021q.o which I
already installed with the comand
insmod 8021q
but the problem is when I reboot the system all the
Jacques Nilo wrote:
but now I am working with Red
Hat 7.3 (kernel 2.4.18) and I don't find that file in
anywhere.
I question whether the fellow is even posting on the correct list -- If
he's running RH 7.3, I don't know why he's posting on the LEAF list with
this question.
Do any of you know
Read good documentation on line for Bering. As for the cable I'm not
with cable anymore, but if you are going to use the same NIC for
Internet connection like before once you load NIC's modules you should
be connected to internet via dhcp. If you are going to use different nic
to connect to
On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, Tony wrote:
Good Evening,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Dasch is compiled against glibc 2.0 correct?
And Bearing is against glibc 2.1?
Bering... not little balls, but a narrow geographical configuration
(route).
I am not a developer, so here is a stupid question.
Not
Are there any plans to update the Dachstein CD with IPSec 1.97? I've
got a need to use the X509 patch to connect some Win2k wireless
laptops and all the docs I can find say IPSec509 = 1.96 is needed.
I have no current plans to update IPSec.
I got to the point of updating the package on the
Hi
At 05:36 05.05.2002 -0700, you wrote:
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 17:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Desmond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] Question about Dynamic DNS
I just got myself an account on dyndns.org and, as I
wait for the FQDN to waft
Aanhalen Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Comments inline
I have not done this but why not just dig or nslookup for the FQDN
before
launching ez-ipupdate and then decide if it is needed?
something like
if (my_new_ip != nslookup(myhost.dyndns.org))
ez_ipupdate(my_new_ip);
That is
At 02:07 5/05/2002, John Desmond wrote:
I' ll tell you what I eventually did in a minute, but first I would like to
stress
that they are not to strict about their rule. That means they don't block your
account after 1 or even 5 identical updates. The rule is their so that you
don't write a
28 matches
Mail list logo
