Re: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-25 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 24/03/2012 04:31, Tami P. wrote: I’ve been working on my database for awhile now and have a question. How do you all decide to add to your databases? Do you add anyone with the surname your are searching or only those people with a confirmed link? Until now I’ve only been adding only

Re: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-24 Thread Tami P.
: Marg Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 10:24 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links? To keep this a Legacy topic - you can add unlinked or potentially linked people to your family file. I have added small 'islands

RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-24 Thread Michele Lewis
been able to hook up yet. Michele From: Tami P. [mailto:tamitr...@comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 12:31 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links? I’ve been working on my database for awhile now and have

Re: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-24 Thread Gail
I have worked on my family tree for about 30 years now, on different software products until I finally found Legacy - and yes, I'm a happy Legacy user. I started out doing this as a way to keep track of which kid belonged to which cousin and who that cousin married and when so and so died...

RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-24 Thread Bobby Johnson
[mailto:thomas.j.k...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 1:08 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links? Tami: It really depends on your goals. I document all people of my surname that lived in certain areas

RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-24 Thread David C Abernathy
24, 2012 4:47 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links? Oh, one more thing… The less common the surname, the more likely I will add them since there is a higher chance they are connected. michele From: Tami P

Re: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-24 Thread Howlanddavisii
@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Sat, Mar 24, 2012 12:52 am Subject: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links? I’ve been working on my database for awhile now and have a question. How do you all decide to add to your databases? Do you add anyone with the surname your are searching

RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-24 Thread Linda Hauley
...@schmeckabernathy.com] Sent: March 24, 2012 11:22 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links? NO, This is where DNA really pays off. There are several very large researched surname groups out there that I would like to find a proven

Re: [LegacyUG] Do you add everyone with surname or just confirmed links?

2012-03-23 Thread Tom Kemp
Tami: It really depends on your goals. I document all people of my surname that lived in certain areas. For example all Kemp families that lived in Ireland and for the surname: Garcelon or Starbird - I save everyone of them that I can find. Why? Like you say - I've found that sooner or later I