Rich,
I am hanging on in suspense!!
_
*New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
And the Fergusons of N.W. England
JLB wrote
Is there such a thing as empty RIN's? I thought they were entered in
order as you add people.
If you delete someone their RIN becomes unused until you add a new
individual, and only then if you have opted to re-use abandoned RINs.
--
Jenny M Benson
Legacy User Group guidelines:
Dick Davis wrote
In working with the Source Writer, I find that the ID of the individual
is not the first part of the detail in the source view. Is this
correct? If so, is this being changed at some point? By having multiple
people with just a volume and number type from a birth and death
When Sherry suggested restarting my computer these problems also self
resolved. Many things weren't working-- no .lcs files were displaying
(though I have them); no other family files were available (though I
have them)
A new morning, a fresh start and things are back to normal. Thanks.
Randy
This question can apply to labeling and/or to exporting. I am wondering
if it is already possible or if it must be considered as a new requested
feature for later versions of Legacy.
Basic idea : Nesting levels of focus groups (just like in subroutines in
scripts) that use the result of the
I agree for the first level. You can indeed tag the direct ancestors
in a first move.
In a second move you can export all the tagged persons + spouses +
children of tagged inidividuals + pranets of tagged individuals.
But i haven't found a way to do further expansions. Unless there is a
way to
Hi Robert,
I cannot think of a report that you need. However, if you wish to have
them with no gaps, you can export then import.
Regards,
Tim Rosenlof
Robert Carneal USA wrote:
Does anyone know of a way to get Legacy to generate a report listing
the RINs that are empty? Say I have:
...
4
On Wed, 19 May 2010 00:27:00 -0500, Robert Carneal USA
carnea...@roadrunner.com wrote:
Does anyone know of a way to get Legacy to generate a report listing
the RINs that are empty? Say I have:
...
4
5
6
8
9
10
...
Then the report tells me 7 is not used?
Robert (and others):
If you have Reuse
Hello,I am adding birth,marriage and death certificates and wondering where to
enter the source and document.Should I enter them on the individual persons
page by clicking the source icon and adding it to the preloaded birth,marriage
and death source or should I create and event and add the
wrote
I am adding birth,marriage and death certificates and wondering where
to enter the source and document.Should I enter them on the individual
persons page by clicking the source icon and adding it to the
preloaded birth,marriage and death source or should I create and event
and add the
Hi Brian,
Everyone probably has their own way. I use an event for BMD and Source
and cite each one. I do use SourceWriter for each.
Regards,
Tim Rosenlof
blr...@optonline.net wrote:
Hello,I am adding birth,marriage and death certificates and wondering where
to enter the source and
blr...@optonline.net wrote:
Hello,I am adding birth,marriage and death certificates and wondering
where to enter the source and document.Should I enter them on the
individual persons page by clicking the source icon and adding it to
the preloaded birth,marriage and death source or should I
Oops. I thought I had cancelled the whole message. I alway test before sending
and found my solution wasn't a fix. I try to walk throught any solution, so I
can use the exact description for clarity. I had done something in the past,
but could no re-create it, so my memory is fuzzy. Sorry.
Rich
That did it! Thanks...
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Dennis M. Kowallek kowal...@iglou.com wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010 13:57:54 -0400, Scott Hall seh0...@gmail.com
wrote:
How do you search for anything within a field? For example, I want to
search for any individual with any text in the
Scott,
Click on Search:
Click on: Detailed Search tab
Look for: Individual
Where to look: Notes-General
How to look: Not Equal To
What to look for: don't have ANYTHING showing in this box, it should
visually appear blank/empty
tick Clear List before this search
Click on Create List
This
That works also. Now I have options! :)
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Mary Fowler Leek ml...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
Scott,
Click on Search:
Click on: Detailed Search tab
Look for: Individual
Where to look: Notes-General
How to look: Not Equal To
What to look for: don't have ANYTHING
Rich,
IMO this may be of interest to some in the LUG, since the Legacy Detailed
Search tab uses the AND / OR functions of Boolean logic. Perhaps others will
have a different opinion.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES [mailto:fourpa...@verizon.net]
Sent: Wednesday,
Dick,
You wrote: By having multiple people with just a volume and number type
from a birth and death certificate makes this confusing.
Perhaps I have not understood, the entire thread, but, if you are
referring to the Detail Information, Item of Interest field, you can
type, entry for name of
I wrote a bunch on this a few years ago, and it is in the Archives, and it
should still be there. I am willing to help off list for extra help. That is
why I teach locally at the Suthern California Genealogical Society, and answer
to anyone who asks me. Did not want to keep repeating stuff. I
I don’t know the answer to your question, but this couple are first cousins.
Jennifer
From: T Bredin [mailto:tbredinl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 5:22 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] When a married couple have the same grandparents, how
highlight
I have just been reading through a report I created yesterday (after having
converted pdf to doc, edited - or so I thought - resaved as pdf, uploaded to
my newly created wiki!) and have noticed that I have the ubiquitous Fred
married someone Mary Jane BROWN. I thought this problem had been
I once had this happen to me. What I finally came up with to fix it was to
unlink the couple and then re-link them. I did this using the Marriage List.
Jennifer
From: Jan Roberts [mailto:poo...@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 20 May 2010 9:18 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
Subject:
Thanks for the replies everyone,So I guess its more common that people add
BMD sources and records by clicking the source icon to the right of the persons
last name and not creating an event to add to?My problem with that is to access
a birth record you have to go through and look for it in the
I wouldn't say necessarily next to the person's name. It depends what
you're using the source document for. If a birth certificate is the
source for the person's name then that's what the source is for. But it
would also be the source document for their birth date, the parents'
names, etc. You
You are saying, if I am translating this correctly, that the children of the
grandparents are full siblings to each other? In some cultures that is not
illegal nor immoral, but most societies frown on it. In other societies, third
cousins needed permission to marry from the 'leaders'.
What do
What you need to do is, edit the unknown person with a fake name, then merge
fake to real. And your signature is sent in hmtl, against the rules.
Rich in LA CA
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Jan Roberts poo...@ozemail.com.au wrote:
From: Jan Roberts poo...@ozemail.com.au
Subject: [LegacyUG] Married
My point was,To find a source document,if I create an event for birth,in the
event field,I just click on the event birth and it opens the edit event
screen then I click the source icon an it opens the assigned
sources,highlighting the birth entry and birth cert.If I don't create an event
Yes, Grandparents had children A and B.
A is parent of the male/female of the couple you mention and B is the parent of
the other.
I think the main reason it is frowned on is the possibility of the couple
having children with genetic problems because of the close relationship of the
parents.
Whoa! Support group? This was a very common practice in past centuries
because of the paucity of eligible marriage prospects. The royalty of Europe
intermarried so often that they had to pay for dispensations. That Henry VIII
couldn't buy one was so unusual that the course of history was
I think she is asking why the program doesn't correct its mistake. As one
gathers more information, there will always be spouses discovered. There needs
to be a string that automatically removes the someone when an actual name is
entered.
Correcting one marriage is not the issue. Correcting
If A and B are siblings, then that is the relationship that is closest, and
should be used. In my own family, I am my 3rd, 5th and 7th cousin to myself;
but I would not call my brother my 3rd cousin, or my sister my 5th cousin. It
is not inaccurate, but can be misleading. I agree the marriage
Since my situations of changing unknowns to knowns, were solved back in L5,
when I had to repair it myself. I didn't know L7 had fixed it. I in L5, removed
all my unknowns, because the program installed the word unknown (in the screen
only, not reports) which was what I had been wanting to have
32 matches
Mail list logo
