Re: Firefox-1.5.0.1 and HLFS-SVN-20060220 Segmentation Fault

Alan Lord wrote: Tor Olav Stava wrote: I've been struggling with Firefox for a few days now, and could really need some pointers. I've followed the instructions in BLFS, and the compile went fine without any errors, but when I'm trying to start Firefox it gives me this: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: jhalf 0.2 svn question

marco van der grient wrote: Hi there, My name is Marco and I am probaly switchinng from Slackware to lfs. There is just one problem using jhalf: it seeks for gcc 4.0.3, nut it does not exist on the server... Is this a typo? And shout it be 4.0.2? I'm using jhalf 0.2 from svn... Does anyone

Re: GHOST after complete chapter 5

JiMi VO wrote: hello world! im a newbie so please help. im using FC3, im having 5 partition on the same HDD, im buidling LFS on hda1 now end of ch5 i would like to ghost the hda1 onto hda2 so that i can go on ch6 and if anything wrong i can just return to hda2 (where end of ch5 is ghosted). i

Re: binutils pass 1

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've tried removing the binutils-build directory and unpacked the sources. Tried this a number of times, but still get the same error. System: Intel 233MMX 80Mb RAM 2.6Gb HDD Debian Sarge (Kernel: 2.6.8-2) Just an idea.. I once tried to build on a similar

Re: Fwd: ch 6 chroot na

daniel wrote: good day, i'd reached ch 6 aftet executing the chroot command string in that page, got result that chroot was not able to run the command /toos/bin/env. The chroot command string was run as root. I remember I've also got that error some time ago, and as far as my memory goes

Compiling OpenOffice 2.0.1

Just want to ask before I try this monster compile. Will this version compile with the same instructions and patches that's in the current SVN book? If I remember correctly, compiling OOo-2.0.0rc3 took about 16 hours, so it would be nice to know if it's a waste of time ;) Are there any plans

Re: Paco-ablfs-0.3 released

. Aside from that, thanks for the excellent work! I've been waiting for this, as it's very time consuming to edit all the profiles manually. ;) Tor Olav Stava -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: lfs history

have any critical production system running here, in which case I would definately not recommend any SVN version. Thanks, for any help or comments ! Your welcome :) Hope it helps, and good luck on you journey Tor Olav Stava -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ

Re: lfs history

it safe. I'm working on gaining that knowledge, so I guess I'll be ready in about ten years time.. ;) Tor Olav Stava -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: lfs history

friends and so forth.. :) May the source be with you. Tor Olav Stava -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Book Chap 5.7 Adjusting the Toolchail II

actually linked to. If that's me, and it don't give the correct output according to the instructions in LFS, I would definately start over again, and double check everything I've done.. So let's hope it's just the typo ;) Good luck! Tor Olav Stava -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: For 486s

Ian wrote: Hi, Hello :) I have a number of 486 machines. They have very little memory 16M or less. My interest is to make a version of Linux to run a few programs on these, particularly the mail program Mutt and Midnight Commander; no X stuff. I need to keep well below 100M drive space.

Re: gcc 3.4.3 make bootstrap error chapter 5

Matthew Burgess wrote: Henry Grefrath wrote: Hi Tony, I was hoping I could build a small system on this laptop. It has 32MB of RAM and I setup a 75MB swap partition. The rest of the hard disk 1.2GB is mounted as /mnt/lfs. I think you might struggle with that, I'm afraid. Building just

about the nfs-server script

On all my LFS/BLFS builds, the nfs-server script seems to be a little buggy. There's always an 80 second delay when shutting down, and it always return [FAIL] even if the nfsd processes are actually killed. I've tried a few solutions from the BLFS-dev list. in the stop section, I changed

Re: LFS SVN and Package Management using Package Users problem

Luca Dionisi wrote: Hi Tor Have anyone out there been using the More Control and Package Management using Package Users (v1.1) with the latest LFS-SVN's? I've got a _similar_ problem with list_package. I'm using LFS 6.1 Stable. At the beginning it was doing fine. From a certain

LFS SVN and Package Management using Package Users problem

Findutils or Man, but basically I have no idea, and haven't been able to sort anything useful out of the Changelogs. Some of the funtions in that list_package script is way above me, so if anyone have a fix for this problem I would be very grateful. Tor Olav Stava -- http

Re: Cross compile for an i586

to check the mentioned hint and Cross-LFS as I go, and do my best to incorporate the commands there. I would really appreciate if you could report on your success and/or failures on this subject. Sincerely Tor Olav Stava -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http

Re: Cross compile for an i586

Rainer Peter Feller wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 11:13 +0200, Tor Olav Stava wrote: Rainer Peter Feller wrote: what about the uname kernel hack? I have modyfied the old (2.4.x) source to work with 2.6.x (see arrachment) I've already started the build, just replacing

Re: Solved Re: shadow/su conflict (initgroups: Operation not permitted)

Good morning/noon/evening my fellow LFS'rs, Good morning to u too :) I was hoping that someone might be able to help me out wih the following problem: I was working on my second LFS installation (6.1) (the first one (5.x) went flawlessly) and have chosen to use the user package system.