LFS-6.1 build
I build a kernel (2.6.11.12) for my scratch built system and it populates
/dev with the wrong permissions, ie /dev/null with crw-rw permissions.
Non root users can not access it example: echo Cat shit /dev/null.
Fails with Permission denied. (because of 660 perms)
Why would
I get this error when I run find:
find Hard link count is wrong for /proc
filesystem driver may have bug
Anyone know anything about that?
Thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have completed upto chapter8
and have booted the LFS system,
But we cannot boot the Base system,
The base system we had used was RedhatEnterpriseLinux4
Our Menu.lst file reads
#LFS Entry
title LFS6.2
root(hd0,3)
kernel /boot/lfskernel-2.6.16.27 root=/dev/hda4
I started a build of LFS-6.2 under a LFS-6.2 host. I want to create a dual
boot system, one for a server and the second for a desktop system. I have
the first (server system) complete and had started on the desktop build. The
system only has a single LFS system on it presently. The build
On Sunday 15 July 2007 10:14 am, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 09:28:23AM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
At Chapter 6.9 Glibc-2.3.6 I get the following error when on the
configuring glibc step:
checking sizeof long double... configure: error: cannot compute sizeof
(long double), 77
On Sunday 15 July 2007 4:06 pm, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 02:09:51PM -0400, Baho Utot wrote:
It is hard to parse the config.log in glibc-build directory.
Yes, but it is essential. The last part of it is a dump of all the
variables, which you can probably ignore. Before
On Friday 31 August 2007 2:59 am, J. Greenlees wrote:
Yup, 18 hours and counting for 'make bootstrap' of gcc 4.1.2
host is lfs livecd r2032
target:
Dell inspiron 3000, a pentium-mmx @266 MHz (i586-linux-gnu)
ram 128 MB ( system reports 144 MB from onboard cache ram for bios and
video )
On Sunday 02 December 2007 6:31:46 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Working on my LFS for years now, I sometimes get stuck on a make where I
know what's wrong but I can't find the position in the makefiles where the
command that needs to be modified is set.
Is there a best way to track
I am working on a scripting build system to build LFS 6.3 from a subversion
repository.
I have successfully built all the chapters up to the end of 5.
I am starting on Chapter 6.
From Chapter 6.6. Creating Essential Files and Symlinks
To remove the “I have no name!” prompt, start a new
On Monday 21 January 2008 7:24:03 pm Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:06:17PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
To remove the “I have no name!” prompt, start a new shell. Since a full
Glibc was installed in Chapter 5 and the /etc/passwd and /etc/group files
have been created, user name
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 1:08:53 am Mark Olbert wrote:
This is probably a silly question, but I haven't been able to find an
answer in the mailing list archives.
If built on a dual-core system, does LFS take advantage of the dual cores?
- Mark
if you compile a smp kernel it will.
--
I am scripting a build of LFS 6.3 and I would like to be able to skip 6.59
Stripping Again by adding CFLAGS=-s to the bashrc environment, then building
all the packages.
Will this cause any error?
Or is there a better way to build the packages without the symbol info?
Thank you
--
On Tuesday 19 February 2008 4:20:32 pm Ken Moffat wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:45:17PM -0600, mark jones wrote:
I'm not at a Linux Box right now, so I can't test my theory. . . But
perhaps 'make' is objecting to being stripped while in action?
What would happen if you were to 'cp
On Monday 25 February 2008 2:47:12 pm Hugo Grauls wrote:
[putolin]
JH
Without the LiveCD I would never have been able to get LFS6.2 up and
running. Biggest worry is to have the right basic tools at hand to build
from scratch, i.e. the adequate releases of GCC, linker, header files
etc ...
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 10:46 -0700, Ben Feinberg wrote:
Sorry for being unclear, this error is occurring when I use the root
(hd1,3) command in section 8.4 to make the system bootable. I am
aware of the different naming scheme, lfs is on partition sdb4 which
(I think) corresponds to hd1,3,
How does LFS 6.3 handle USB pen drives?
I have connected a USB pen drive and I see it in /sys/bus/usb/devices
but it fails to make a device in the dev directory.
I find some devices in dev named usbdev3.1_ep00 and usbdev3.1_ep81 which
comes from inserting the device into a USB port.
Should the
Does LFS support mdraid?
I have an mdraid setup and I would like to run lfs from there, does LFS
install and boot from a mdraid?
I also use jfs as a filesystem, I think I would only have to build the
jfs utilities. Right/Wrong?
Thanks
--
I am getting the following error
lfs:~/linux-2.6.27.4$ make headers_check
CHK include/linux/version.h
UPD include/linux/version.h
HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
scripts/basic/fixdep.c: In function 'traps':
scripts/basic/fixdep.c:377: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer
will
On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 07:36 -0500, William Immendorf wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Baho Utotbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
scripts/unifdef.c:209: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
/usr/include/stdio.h:651: note: previous declaration of 'getline' was
Hmm... same issue as
I have a AMD Athlon X4 810 with 8GB of ram
I am want to build an i686 system followed by an x86_64 system
I would like to use these flags:
export CFLAGS=-march=i686 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe
export CXXFLAGS=-march=i686 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe
export MAKEFLAGS=-j3
Is it possible to use -j3 in
Compiling GMP on an Athlon Phenom II X810
using an i686 liveCD
This is not what I wanted as I wanted to build an i686 system.
What is in the book makes it compile like this:
with march=k8 and mtune=k8
export ABI=32
./configure --prefix=/usr --build=$CHOST --enable-cxx --enable-mpbsd
I am going
Sam Vivacqua wrote:
The problem is that when I type the comand In -sv $LFS/tools / I
get the output: -bash: In: comand not found
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com
mailto:ch...@beaker67.com wrote:
On 09/12/2009 02:26 PM, Sam Vivacqua
Rodolfo Perez wrote:
Hi
I could install lfs-6.4 on my laptop and I'm really happy about my new
lfs.
Now I would like to put it on my USB-Flash drive. I checked on lfs and
was googeling but could not find a really satisfiying answer.
I'd like to have a very small (max. 500Mb) lfs
Ken Moffat wrote:
2009/9/26 J.P.Kaper spaky...@xs4all.nl:
Maybe somebody else can find the right suggestion to let me solve my
problem.
Hans Kaper.
One of the problems with usb drives is that they can
take a long time to appear. I've never tried to boot
from usb, but ISTR that
J.P.Kaper wrote:
I am building LFS from book 6.4 on an ext3 logical partition of an
external USB harddisk.
My host system is SUSE 10.3 on one of my two internal harddisks.
Booting from the USB disk fails with
[4.410067] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount
root fs on
Hans Kaper wrote:
Op Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:19:29 +0200 schreef Baho Utot
baho-u...@columbus.rr.com:
J.P.Kaper wrote:
I am building LFS from book 6.4 on an ext3 logical partition of an
external USB harddisk.
My host system is SUSE 10.3 on one of my two internal harddisks.
Booting
linux fan wrote:
On 11/28/09, Baho Utot wrote:
make test | tee $CURRDIR/06.58.Check.log
make install | tee $CURRDIR/06.58.Install.log
Logging helps so much when things go wrong.
As already mentioned
Scripting an LFS build is *hard*
[putolin]
I only suggest this due
From Book version 1.1.0-x86_64-multilib
Section 6.4 GCC-4.2.4
Slackware 12.2 as the build system.
I am getting this error on compiling
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-c++ -shared -nostdlib
/tools/lib/../lib64/crti.o
/cross-tools/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.2.4/crtbeginS.o
Simon Geard wrote:
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 17:32 -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
Sorry for sending this here but I can not find the clfs support mailing
list,
Could someone point me to the correct place?
Under Mailing Lists, off the CLFS front page.
http://trac.cross-lfs.org/wiki/lists
The system is a AMD phenom II 820 X4 Quad core with 8 GB ram
Host is Slackware 12.2 - only sees 4 GB Ram non pae kernel
Is this ok?
gcc tst-cpuclock2.c -c -std=gnu99 -fgnu89-inline -O2 -O3 -Wall -Winline
-Wwrite-strings -fmerge-all-constants -g -march=i486 -mtune=native -pipe
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
The system is a AMD phenom II 820 X4 Quad core with 8 GB ram
Host is Slackware 12.2 - only sees 4 GB Ram non pae kernel
Is this ok?
/Build/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock2
/Build/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock2.out
make[4]: *** [/Build/glibc-build/rt
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
cat /mnt/lfs/Build/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock2.out
live thread clock fffdd58e resolution 0.1
live thread before sleep = 0.53078
self thread before sleep = 0.000169320
live thread after sleep = 0.501525776
self thread after
Yikes.my hand done builds and my now scripts/Makefile/Build system
worked so far!
On i686 or x86_64 platform..
I want to boot this from a USB thumb drive.
Any pointers on what I need to set?
Also is there a generic config file around for i686?
Just the basic minimal needed, so I can
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
brown wrap wrote:
I have been away from LFS for a few days, but now back to it. I did
confirm the system is up by by installing SSH and DHCP. I can bring
up the system, which has no keyboard access, but log into from
another machine. Below is the latest output of
Simon Geard wrote:
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:58:56 -0500, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
Yikes.my hand done builds and my now scripts/Makefile/Build system
worked so far!
On i686 or x86_64 platform..
I want to boot this from a USB thumb drive.
Any pointers on what I
Simon Geard wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 08:54:35 -0500, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com
wrote:
Ok thanks, I would have missed the SATA/IDE as modules, I did pickup on
that it is a good thing to have ext2/3 built in.
The key thing is that modules aren't available until the root
I have finished my LFS 6.5 build
I now want to boot it from USB thumb drive.
Here is what I did
fdisk usb drive changing the partition type to 83 (linux)
mkfs.ext2 /dev/sdd1 ---/dev/sdd1 is the usb drive
mount /dev/sdd1 /media/disk
rsync -var /mnt/lfs/ /media/disk/
changed the
I have finished my LFS 6.5 build
I now want to boot it from USB thumb drive.
Here is what I did
fdisk usb drive changing the partition type to 83 (linux)
mkfs.ext2 /dev/sdd1 ---/dev/sdd1 is the usb drive
mount /dev/sdd1 /media/disk
rsync -var /mnt/lfs/ /media/disk/
changed the
Hans_2 wrote:
title LFS USB
root (hd3,0)
kernel /boot/lfskernel-2.6.30.2 root=/dev/sdd1 ro
How about entering kerneloption rootdelay = 10? That solved my problem
with booting from my USB-harddisk.
Hans.
OK tahnks I will try that
--
I would like to boot LFS-6.5 on USB
I have it working except that when I change from my desktop computer
which has 3 drives to my laptop that only has one drive I must edit grub
and change the kernel line to point to the prober /dev/sdx drive
I would like to boot grub on the USB drive and have
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Hans Kaper wrote:
I am curious to know what the experts have to say about why the UUID- and
LABEL-options don't work.
I'm not sure about the LABEL, but I know that the UUID option has to be
handled in an initrd.
-- Bruce
I have since found out that
Hans Kaper wrote:
Op Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:23:58 +0100 schreef Baho Utot
baho-u...@columbus.rr.com:
I would like to boot LFS-6.5 on USB
I have it working except that when I change from my desktop computer
which has 3 drives to my laptop that only has one drive I must edit grub
Ken Moffat wrote:
On 25 February 2010 21:38, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have since found out that UUID and LABEL are a redhat twist. Â THey
require an initrd and nash.
nash mounts the drives ( does the dirty work and passes the info to the
kernel ).
Do you mean
Small flea on the MTA page.
/blfs-book-svn-html-2010-02-25/server/mail.html
There isn't any IMAP server (Courier-IMAP)
Mail Server Software
MTAs are the programs which transport mail from one machine to the
other. The traditional MTA is Sendmail, however there are several other
choices.
Andrew Benton wrote:
On 04/03/10 20:13, Mike McCarty wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
I use one partition for both /home and /boot. IE, /boot is a symbolic link
pointing at /home/boot
Why not just use an ordinary directory for /boot, then? Is
there something I don't know?
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Mike McCarty wrote:
I don't like a separate swap partition, because it's difficult to
resize, and the information I have is that with 2.6 kernels a swap file
is as fast as a separate partition, and much easier to resize.
Interesting. I've never had to resize a
Mike McCarty wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
[putolin]
I use a boot partition and this layout
$ ls /boot
LFS-6.5/ Slack-x86-crypt/ Slackware-13.0-x86/ grub/ lost+found/
If /boot is an ordinary directory under /, and not a mount point,
then one needs to modify the MBR to point to the place
cly...@clydew.org wrote:
Is it possible to build Linux from Scratch on a USB Flash Drive. I
did build it there but am having a time getting Grub to recognize it.
Yes I built LFS-6.5 on my desktop and transfered it to a USB drive with
rsync
Building directly on the usb drive is slow and not
Mike McCarty wrote:
ga ho wrote:
cly...@clydew.org wrote:
Is it possible to build Linux from Scratch on a USB Flash Drive. I
did build it there but am having a time getting Grub to recognize it.
Yes I built LFS-6.5 on my desktop and transfered it to a USB drive with
Mike McCarty wrote:
Hans Kaper wrote:
My grub entry for my LFS6.4 stick is:
title Linux From Scratch 6.4 Kernel 2.6.30.2
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/lfskernel-2.6.30.2 root=/dev/uba1
Omit the root=/dev/uba1-option. root (hd0,0) points already to the device
you want to boot
I would like to download the LFS-6.4 version of the book but it is
missing from the download section
http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs-museum/
Is it still available?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On 1 April 2010 00:17, Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I would like to download the LFS-6.4 version of the book but it is
missing from the download section
http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs-museum/
Is it still available?
You can read
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I would like to download the LFS-6.4 version of the book but it is
missing from the download section
http://archive.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs-museum/
Is it still available?
Just a minor permissions problem. Both 6.3 and 6.4 are accessible now
Trent Shea wrote:
On March 31, 2010 05:31:07 pm Ken Moffat wrote:
Quite why anyone would want to read it now, other than to compare
what has changed, is beyond me.
I agree with Ken. I see you fighting with KDE-3, but it's mainly because
you're building a version that's not
On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Paul Rogers wrote:
As seems
indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and
have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions
specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version of LFS does in fact
install
On 06/01/10 18:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 06/01/10 15:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Paul Rogers wrote:
As seems
indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and
have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions
specified in the HSR
On 06/01/10 19:05, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
The system I am using to compile this stuff is an AMD Phenom(tm) II X4
810 Processor that has 8G DDR3 memory. I use that system so I can make
mistakes really fast ;) ie things can go sour quickly and at a high rate
of speed. You usually
Neal Murphy wrote:
On Friday 02 July 2010 15:11:31 Face wrote:
well, thank you all, i will start over and see what will happen.
I am using a shell script to do the book if someone could take a look
at it, that would be nice .
Sincerely
Ah, you don't seem to have error detection
On 09/08/2010 05:56 AM, Martin Zajíc ZAJCA wrote:
[putolin]
So i've rewrite gcc pass2 with last svn and it's working.
I have another question about testing error.
I try to make LOG with '{} 21 | tee $BUILD_DIR/LOG_$PROGRAM.log'
but when I did it how can I test it for errors, becouse
On 11/02/10 07:21, Jannis Kafkoulas wrote:
Off topic for this listbut see below.
Hi,
well it's not exactly a lfs issue but a similar one in his structure.
I have a RedHat EL 5.5 installed on a HP Proliant DL 360 server.
I actually need the 5.0 version but it's missing (at least) the NIC
On Monday, December 13, 2010 06:27:26 am code.xiyou wrote:
Hello everyone,
Some errors happened like following when i compile LFS6.3. My
version is Ubuntu 9.04.
l...@jiawei-laptop:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$ sudo make install
[putolin]
/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/libc.so.6
On Sunday, December 19, 2010 06:07:04 pm Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:43:30PM +0100, pieter blomme wrote:
Hi,
I'm at section 6.23 of the book. I need to decompress this package, but
I have never encountered a .xz archive before. I've tried several
suggestions on the
On 01/03/2012 06:28 PM, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote:
I posted earlier, and I don't expect speedy response but I was hoping
someone would say yay or Nay.
compiling: coreutils-8.14 I get:
expr.c:54:18 fatal error : gmp.h: no such file or directory
Sounds kind of serious to me... has anyone
On Wednesday 11 January 2012 05:04:31 am Simon Geard wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 02:20 -0700, jasonps...@jegas.com wrote:
Well, I opend the previous untouchable RC file and tossed readline all
over it ... and when I booted .. GUESS WHAT? I was able to step through
the actual boot process
On Tuesday 17 January 2012 12:29:40 am Firerat wrote:
On Jan 17, 2012 5:21 AM, Uthayanan suthaya...@gmail.com wrote:
lfsuthayan@ubuntu:/$ ls -l /tools
total 48
drwxr-xr-x 2 lfsuthayan lfs 12288 Jan 16 11:22 bin
drwxr-xr-x 2 lfsuthayan lfs 4096 Jan 16 04:18 etc
drwxr-xr-x 4
I have been working on mpc.
I have noticed that the way it is built in the book it only builds the static
library.
If --enable-shared is passed to configure it look like that is ignored as it
still doesn't build the shared library.
If autoreconf is run before doing the configure it builds
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 10:07:33 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 08:49:37PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
I have been working on mpc.
I have noticed that the way it is built in the book it only builds the
static library.
If --enable-shared is passed
On Thursday 19 January 2012 06:14:10 am Andrew Benton wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:49:37 -0500
Baho Utot baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
I have been working on mpc.
I have noticed that the way it is built in the book it only builds the
static library.
If --enable-shared
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 09:16:27 pm Ken Moffat wrote:
[putolin]
I disagree with the first part. I don't have the book open in front
of me (just shutting down, but this looked important enough to take a
look).
I use ./configure --prefix=/usr and I also have 'unset CFLAGS'
before
On Thursday 19 January 2012 08:18:21 am Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 07:14:42AM -0500, Baho Utot wrote:
When I build on the host I get the same thing. Only when I add
autoreconf before the ./configure step do I get the shared library.
I wiull try building gcc today I have
On Thursday 19 January 2012 11:53:31 am Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I believe I may have found the problema
When I build it with the following
MAKEFLAGS=-j4
CFLAGS=-march=i686 -mtune=i686 -O2 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed
I have finished my LFS-7.0 build and I have successfully booted it aafter
solving some problems.
The symlink /bin/sh to /bin/bash was missing. I am looking into why that
happened, but I see in the chapter06 in the bash section that the link is not
created by hand. I believe it should have
On Friday 27 January 2012 11:57:57 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have finished my LFS-7.0 build and I have successfully booted it aafter
solving some problems.
The symlink /bin/sh to /bin/bash was missing. I am looking into why that
happened, but I see in the chapter06
On Saturday 28 January 2012 07:22:24 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:06:44 -0600
Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
There are three places /dev/pts is mentioned in the book:
6.2. Preparing Virtual Kernel File Systems
8.2. Creating the
On Sunday 29 January 2012 07:05:17 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
Am I correct in believeing that the root filesystem is mounted from
the /etc/rc./init.d/mountfs script?
No. It must be mounted in the initramfs or the kernel itself, usually
readonly.
That is working
On Sunday 29 January 2012 08:08:58 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
For me it is ever try to manage 16 regular partitions?
How about two regular partitions: / and /boot, and lvm for everything else.
And yes, I do manage 16 regular partitions:
$ sudo fdisk -l /dev/sda
Disk /dev
I believe I have solved my LVM booting problem with the kernel not finding the
root filesystem.
# Start the udev daemon to continually watch for, and act on,
# uevents
/sbin/udevd --daemon
# Now traverse /sys in order to coldplug devices that have
# already been
I have started on BLFS-SVNlast nite
Upon compiling openssl I got this error
Operating system: i686-whatever-linux2
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset),
LC_ALL = (unset),
LANG = en_US
Should
On Thursday 02 February 2012 06:42:15 pm Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have started on BLFS-SVNlast nite
Upon compiling openssl I got this error
Operating system: i686-whatever-linux2
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings
On 02/02/2012 06:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have started on BLFS-SVNlast nite
Upon compiling openssl I got this error
Operating system: i686-whatever-linux2
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset
On 07/16/2012 11:47 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Eleanore Boyd wrote:
The compilation process creates the hard links, so there is no need to
manually create links.
Correct.
If anything, creating links beforehand may cause
errors due to the links pointing nowhere.
LOL. You can't create a hard
On Monday, July 16, 2012 08:09:23 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
One could do this
echo test file test
ln test link1
ln test link2
ln link1 link3
ls -i
1333952 test 1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952 link3
rm test
ls -i
1333952 link1 1333952 link2 1333952
Some distributions are doing the following:
moving all the files in /bin to /usr/bin then symlinking /bin to /usr/bin
moving all the files in /sbin to /usr/bin then symlinking /sbin to /usr/sbin
moving all the files in /lib to /usr/lib then symlinking /lib to /usr/lib
moving all the files in
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 05:37:03 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
[putolin]
For the user, it doesn't make any difference. For the developers, they
don't have to worry about some things being in the / directories and
others in the /usr directories. It really doesn't make any sense
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 06:32:12 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
BTW this issue with udev in my opinion is to insure systemd control over
all linux distros.
The good thing about open source is that we can change things to be the
way we want. lfs-svn can build udev from
On 08/17/2012 02:04 PM, Richard Melville wrote:
Some help with this would be great -- I just can't understand it.
I ran the tests as root which ran OK. I've added the temporary group
and changed permissions but when I run:-
su nobody -s /bin/bash -c make RUN_EXPENSIVE_TESTS=yes -k check ||
I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
I am going to update that repository to versions 7.0 7.1 and 7.2.
The build system I use for the tool chain chapter 5
On 08/24/2012 11:50 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have successfully packaged LFS-6.8 using pacman from arch linux.
Here is the link if anyone is interested and wants to have a look.
https://github.com/baho-utot/LFS-pacman
I am going to update that repository to versions 7.0 7.1
On 08/24/2012 06:46 PM, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Feuerbacher, Alan wrote these words on 08/24/12 17:23 CST:
Bruce wrote:
Linux looks in /lib and /usr/lib by default. LD_LIBRARY_PATH just says
to add that to the search path. /etc/ld.so.conf can also add
directories to be searched.
So looking
On 08/28/2012 05:05 PM, Mike Johnston wrote:
Maybe I'm dense here, but the Util-Linux doesn't have a fsck.ext2 or
fsck.ext3 in it's list of programs installed. Which module installs
an fsck capable of ext2/3 filesystems?
When I built Util-linux I didn't get a fsck.ext2 or ext3. I only saw
On 08/28/2012 06:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[putolin]
What was wrong with ken.moffat?
LOL.I don't think anyone shoukd answer that.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 08/29/2012 11:23 AM, Mikie wrote:
William,
I did the same thing and had the same issue.
When you execute this line in a bash script:
exec /tools/bin/bash --login +h
exec /tools/bin/bash --login +h -c SomeScriptIWantTo Run.sh
[putolin]
--
Ineptocracy
(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a
On 08/29/2012 01:18 PM, Mikie wrote:
exec /tools/bin/bash --login +h -c SomeScriptIWantTo Run.sh
What does the -c do?
Thanks
man bash is your friend
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
On 08/29/2012 04:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Aydın Demirel wrote:
Hi;
29-08-2012 23:14 tarihinde, Bruce Dubbs yazdı:
Aydın Demirel wrote:
Hi;
I try to compiling lfs stable version (7.1). Currently, binutils package
gives an error while compiling:
checking for gmp.h... no
configure:
I have been looking at how the bootup is in LFS.
Am I correct to assume it goes something like this
grub--kernel--initd /etc/inittab -- rc S -- run levels?
When is the getty section run in the above sequence?
Also upon looking at the boot scripts I am a bit confused here:
cleanfs is suppose
On 08/30/2012 05:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[putolin]
I found the above because I didn't have the /run line in the fsatb and
bad things happened when it was missing...would not get to the login,
it would boot but hang at the whats on the usb phase of the bootup.
What can I say. Follow the
On 08/30/2012 08:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/30/2012 05:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[putolin]
I found the above because I didn't have the /run line in the fsatb and
bad things happened when it was missing...would not get to the login,
it would boot but hang at the whats
On 08/30/2012 09:19 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/30/2012 08:41 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
On 08/30/2012 05:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
/run was in place so the only thing missing, was it was on the root file
system on the ssd, it just was not mounted in tmpfs
On 08/31/2012 11:53 AM, Mikie wrote:
Another thing I see is that when I boot to a live CD and run fdisk I tried to
delete the 2nd partition (host system) to see if it was the issue.
Last build of LFS I was able to boot no problem and I had deleted /dev/sda2
at the end of chapter 9 ... but
On 09/02/2012 10:46 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
For some months now, I've had failures in BLFS when
/usr/libstdc++.la was found to be empty ('not a valid libtool
archive') : I know Armin removes these .la files, but I've found
that some things don't rebuild on updates if I do that - on x86_64
and
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
