Hi all
I've successully build an 64-bit lfs/blfs system that also runs very
nicely and leaves next to nothing desired.
Sadly, I'm getting to the point of having to use some binary-only stuff
like skype and printer drivers that only exist in 32-bit variants,
forcing me to have some sort of
On 08/22/2015 04:26 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Em 22-08-2015 15:39, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
Attached, you find a patch with the necessary fix, if you don't want to
modify in a non-standard way your system.
It is for 5.0.0, but will probably be OK with your version.
Never
mostafa yasin wrote:
Dear Colleagues, When i try to compile GCC-4.9.2 - Pass 2 using the
make command, i found the bellow error. Please how to solve this
issue.
The version of the book being used:- LFS-Book 7.7
The host distribution and version being used to create LF: Red Hat
Enterprise Linux
On Sun, August 23, 2015 21:35, Steve Crosby wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
wrote:
MD5 support appears optional. I've only downloaded the tar.gz direct
from github (latest release), but setting CRYPT, NETTLE and GCRYPT to
no in the Makefile (as well
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 11:38:25AM +0300, mostafa yasin wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
When i try to compile GCC-4.9.2 - Pass 2 using the make command, i found the
bellow error. Please how to solve this issue.
[ snipping to what is important ]
The version of the book being used:-
On 08/24/2015 08:27 AM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I've successully build an 64-bit lfs/blfs system that also runs very
nicely and leaves next to nothing desired.
Sadly, I'm getting to the point of having to use some binary-only stuff
like skype and printer drivers that only exist in 32-bit
On 24.08.2015 18:12, Chris Staub wrote:
On 08/24/2015 08:27 AM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I've successully build an 64-bit lfs/blfs system that also runs very
nicely and leaves next to nothing desired.
Sadly, I'm getting to the point of having to use some binary-only stuff
like skype and
On 24.08.2015 19:01, Chris Staub wrote:
On 08/24/2015 12:48 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 24.08.2015 18:12, Chris Staub wrote:
On 08/24/2015 08:27 AM, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I've successully build an 64-bit lfs/blfs system that also runs very
nicely and leaves next to nothing desired.
Tim Tassonis wrote:
On 24.08.2015 19:01, Chris Staub wrote:
Dynamic loader setup shouldn't be any different, just skip installation
of whatever 32-bit libraries you don't think you need and you should be
good.
Also, CLFS multilib only installs 32-bit *libraries* - any packages that
don't
Hi All,
I've just finished working through the LFS book, and am now in the
middle of BLFS. Thank you all for both books - they are extremely well
written.
I do have a few questions/comments, and I'll start with probably the
most controversial one first. Please note, however, that I'm just
On 23 August 2015 at 20:40, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
William Harrington wrote:
Also IPV6 targets add ping6, but it also needs gcrypt or crypto
support for MD5. So either openssl, gcrypt or both need to be
installed before iputils for ping6.
That's a deal breaker. The
Dear Colleagues,
When i try to compile GCC-4.9.2 - Pass 2 using the make command, i found the
bellow error. Please how to solve this issue.
The version of the book being used:- LFS-Book 7.7
The host
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:50:32PM +0200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi All,
I've just finished working through the LFS book, and am now in the middle of
BLFS. Thank you all for both books - they are extremely well written.
I do have a few questions/comments, and I'll start with probably the
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:50:32PM +0200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi All,
I've just finished working through the LFS book, and am now in the middle of
BLFS. Thank you all for both books - they are extremely well written.
I do have a few questions/comments, and I'll start with
Simon Kitching wrote:
Bruce: AIUI, the main reason for moving /bin/* into /usr/bin rather than
/usr/bin/* into /bin is that /etc usually needs to be writable by root,
ie the filesystem on which /etc really resides must be mounted
readwrite. But for clustered systems it is very desirable for the
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:52:31PM +0200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Ken: just one note. A unified usr works fine with /usr on a separate
filesystem. An initrd is necessary, but AIUI in simple cases it can consist
of two files: busybox + a 4-line shellscript.
Bloat ;-) [ busybox *and*
On Mon, August 24, 2015 16:50, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi All,
Have you considered using the unified-usr approach in LFS (as used by
Fedora 17+)? See:
* http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
If so, is there a
On 08/24/2015 09:57 PM, William Harrington wrote:
Have you considered using the unified-usr approach in LFS (as used by
Fedora 17+)? See:
* http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/TheCaseForTheUsrMerge
* http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsrMove
If so, is there a wiki page (or
On Mon, August 24, 2015 12:27, Tim Tassonis wrote:
Hi all
I've successully build an 64-bit lfs/blfs system that also runs very
nicely and leaves next to nothing desired.
Sadly, I'm getting to the point of having to use some binary-only stuff
like skype and printer drivers that only exist in
19 matches
Mail list logo
