Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-13 Thread Uncle Zzzen
2. Abandon all-singing all-dancing applications. They're enormous. They use massive code bases which in turn use massive libraries. And to borrow from the quoted passage above, they make it harder to peek under the hood. So: no GUI. Don't tell me it can't be done -- I've done it. Anyone

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-13 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:01:37AM +0100, Andreas Bader wrote: So why not create a own OS that is really small because of its security? Chrome OS is small because it's cheap. If you were right then Android was the most secure system. Aren't there any Android viruses? RedHat seems to have less

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-13 Thread Gregory Foster
Incidentally, NICTA are the same researchers hired by DARPA to make the U.S. drone fleet safe from hackers. Looks like there might be some open source tools emerging from the effort. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/19/nicta_develops_drone_protection/ gf On 2/13/13 6:54 AM, Eugen Leitl

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-13 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:22:39PM +0700, Uncle Zzzen wrote: Even if the average activist could master mutt (I use it regularly, and still feel like a noob :) ), it only applies to devices that have a keyboard. We've used to have chording keyboards like

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-12 Thread Andreas Bader
On 02/12/2013 12:46 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Andreas Bader wrote: Don't you think that e.g. DSL (Damn Small Linux) has less code than Android? I don't know. While I'm somewhat familiar with DSL, I don't use Android and know very little about it. I

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-12 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote: So why not create a own OS that is really small because of its security? http://dee.su/liberte-build -- Maxim Kammerer Liberté Linux: http://dee.su/liberte -- Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password at:

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-12 Thread Brian Conley
A good alternative for what use cases? The problem I find with flat statements such as something like that would be a good alternative to ChromeOS for activists is that it fails to address what uses its providing a good alternative for. IE you fail to demonstrate the threat model based on real

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-12 Thread Andreas Bader
On 02/12/2013 06:41 PM, Brian Conley wrote: A good alternative for what use cases? The problem I find with flat statements such as something like that would be a good alternative to ChromeOS for activists is that it fails to address what uses its providing a good alternative for. IE you fail

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-11 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:54:27AM +0700, Uncle Zzzen wrote: Obviously systems are too complex for most people to really figure out what's exactly running on their computer, and modern systems (from smart phones to unity) make it harder and harder for users (even power users) to peek under the

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-11 Thread Andreas Bader
On 02/11/2013 04:15 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:54:27AM +0700, Uncle Zzzen wrote: Obviously systems are too complex for most people to really figure out what's exactly running on their computer, and modern systems (from smart phones to unity) make it harder and harder

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-08 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Brian Conley: snip My point was for something off the shelf, I know of nothing better and as far as it goes... I'd say it's a step up for a lot people who should be using more secure IT technologies and methods than they are (such as some journalists), and they can take that step with

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-08 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Brian Conley: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: Brian Conley: Micah, Perhaps you can tell us the secret to convince all family members and colleagues to become Linux hackers able to be completely self-sufficient managing their own upgrades and

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread scarp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 micah anderson: I can't wait for the day when Google accidentally pushes an update out that actually bricks their devices, because when that happens, there is no way to simply reinstall the OS from scratch. -- Unsubscribe, change to digest,

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
Ali-Reza Anghaie a...@packetknife.com wrote: A VZW employee was nice enough to reach out off list - wanted to remain anonymous - says that the international SIMs they send for you to put in overseas Nexus devices won't tether. Ever. No matter what I'm told otherwise. Anyhow.. enough of

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Brian Conley: Micah, Perhaps you can tell us the secret to convince all family members and colleagues to become Linux hackers able to be completely self-sufficient managing their own upgrades and modifications indefinitely? Stop supporting the use of non-free software? We're all part of the

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
T N: The word Linux doesn't refer to anything, other than maybe the kernel. Chrome OS is linux. But it's a massively stripped down distribution that has a radical design, including the fact that it will ONLY run if all of the cryptographic checks are verified from the root of trust. That

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: Most of arguments I've heard here boil down to privileged wealthy people complaining that learning and mutual aid or solidarity is simply too hard. The worst is when people who train people in risky situations make

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: This is hilarious. I would *never* use a laptop that lacks a way to protect all your traffic (eg: VPN/Tor/SSH tunnel/etc) in a place with serious surveillance as an at risk person. Not only because the remote

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.netwrote: A persistent backdoor on your Chromebook is not actually impossible. As Nate (?) pointed out, hardware backdoors wouldn't be all that difficult to implement, especially for someone who travels a lot. A ten minute delay

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Griffin Boyce
Jake, you absolutely cannot equivocate your situation with most at-risk people for several reasons. Er, correction, I meant that you cannot treat the situations equally. And by jettison software, I meant jettison Hardware. Sorry, I can't brain today, I have the dumb. best, Griffin --

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Nadim Kobeissi: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: This is hilarious. I would *never* use a laptop that lacks a way to protect all your traffic (eg: VPN/Tor/SSH tunnel/etc) in a place with serious surveillance as an at risk person. Not only because

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Griffin Boyce: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.netwrote: A persistent backdoor on your Chromebook is not actually impossible. As Nate (?) pointed out, hardware backdoors wouldn't be all that difficult to implement, especially for someone who travels a

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread T N
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: It runs software that is in Debian, the GNU/Linux operating system. I know, I've written some of it (eg: tlsdate). They do a good job of locking things down but it is basically just another distribution of Linux. I

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread T N
The other things I meant to add: Most Linux distro's are not running with their executable code on a readonly filesystem, and it takes some effort to convert to a RO configuration. Also you can not login to a stock Chrome OS device as root. That account has logins disabled. You have to flip to

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Katrin Verclas
UAE - Etisalat, nexus 4 - tethering was easy once the data plan was procured. That, however, ain't simple - took time and some significant documentation. Only thing they did not ask for was my first-born son. On Feb 6, 2013, at 15:31, Brian Conley bri...@smallworldnews.tv wrote: What

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
T N: On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: It runs software that is in Debian, the GNU/Linux operating system. I know, I've written some of it (eg: tlsdate). They do a good job of locking things down but it is basically just another distribution of Linux.

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
T N: The other things I meant to add: Most Linux distro's are not running with their executable code on a readonly filesystem, and it takes some effort to convert to a RO configuration. If someone has root on the machine or physical access, I guess that it won't matter as much as we'd

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread micah anderson
Brian Conley bri...@smallworldnews.tv writes: Perhaps you can tell us the secret to convince all family members and colleagues to become Linux hackers able to be completely self-sufficient managing their own upgrades and modifications indefinitely? I never suggested that all family members

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Brian Conley
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Jacob Appelbaum ja...@appelbaum.net wrote: Brian Conley: Micah, Perhaps you can tell us the secret to convince all family members and colleagues to become Linux hackers able to be completely self-sufficient managing their own upgrades and modifications

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-07 Thread Brian Conley
snip My point was for something off the shelf, I know of nothing better and as far as it goes... I'd say it's a step up for a lot people who should be using more secure IT technologies and methods than they are (such as some journalists), and they can take that step with minimal

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Andreas Bader
On 02/06/2013 07:28 AM, Nathan of Guardian wrote: On 02/06/2013 01:22 PM, Ali-Reza Anghaie wrote: How can projects like Privly play into it? Carrying a Tor Router along with you or building one on-site. None of the operational matters will ever be squarely addressed by one platform but it all

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Tom Ritter
Nadim, I'm with you. I'm not sure it's the perfect solution for everyone, but like Nathan said, if you already trust Google, I think it's a good option. On 6 February 2013 07:12, Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote: Why don't you use an old thinkpad or something with Linux, you have the

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Andreas Bader
On 02/06/2013 04:24 PM, Tom Ritter wrote: Nadim, I'm with you. I'm not sure it's the perfect solution for everyone, but like Nathan said, if you already trust Google, I think it's a good option. On 6 February 2013 07:12, Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote: Why don't you use an old

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread micah anderson
Tom Ritter t...@ritter.vg writes: On 6 February 2013 07:12, Andreas Bader noergelpi...@hotmail.de wrote: Why don't you use an old thinkpad or something with Linux, you have the same price like a Chromebook but more control over the system. And you don't depend on the 3G and Wifi net. - The

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Michael Rogers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/02/13 15:52, Rich Kulawiec wrote: Many operating systems and applications and even application extensions (e.g., Firefox extensions) now attempt to discover the presence of updates for themselves either automatically or because a user

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Andreas Bader
We started with the notion of Linux, and we were attracted to Chromebooks for a bunch of reasons. Going back to Linux loses all the things we were attracted to. - ChromeOS's attack surface is infinitely smaller than with Linux - The architecture of ChromeOS is different from Linux -

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Tom Ritter
On 6 February 2013 10:52, micah anderson mi...@riseup.net wrote: Can you say what you mean here? What is SOP in this context? ChromeOS's 'Apps' are all extensions or webpages. One can't interact with any other do to the standard Same Origin Policy browsers enforce. It's what stops evilco.com

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread T N
Just FYI: Chrome OS devices are not subject to roll back attacks because the verified boot does not allow that. Google has extensive documentation on this, and you can review the implementation by viewing the source code. Rollback attacks were an attack vector they specifically designed to

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Brian Conley
Andreas, Plenty of Syrians do have internet access, and use it on a regular basis. Also, lack of appropriateness for one use-case doesn't necessitate lack of appropriateness across the board. Linux is a great solution for many use cases, but as has been elaborated, quite a terrible one for many

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
The biggest (and very important) difference between Linux and Chromebooks is the hugely smaller attack surface. NK On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Brian Conley bri...@smallworldnews.tvwrote: Andreas, Plenty of Syrians do have internet access, and use it on a regular basis. Also, lack of

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Griffin Boyce
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Nathan of Guardian nat...@guardianproject.info wrote: On 02/06/2013 01:22 PM, Ali-Reza Anghaie wrote: How can projects like Privly play into it? Carrying a Tor Router along with you or building one on-site. None of the operational matters will ever be

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
I'm glad people have had luck with tethering their Android phones internationally. I've had absolutely zero - I'll have to give it another run with a locally renter provider I suppose. Anyone try in the UAE recently? Provider, hardware? Egypt? Curious. -Ali On Feb 6, 2013 3:19 PM, Griffin Boyce

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Brian Conley
What Android OS are you using, Ali? It's a snap with Google Nexus running 4.0. Perhaps its an OS version or carrier-rolled OS that is the problem? Brian On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Ali-Reza Anghaie a...@packetknife.comwrote: I'm glad people have had luck with tethering their Android

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread T N
The word Linux doesn't refer to anything, other than maybe the kernel. Chrome OS is linux. But it's a massively stripped down distribution that has a radical design, including the fact that it will ONLY run if all of the cryptographic checks are verified from the root of trust. That root of

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
Always Nexus Verizon stock. My alternate ROMs don't travel with me. Verizon contacted ahead of time per their suggestions. Tethering in US and Canada fine. UK or elsewhere is no-joy. I gave up after a while and just carry my wipe'a'router and but use local WiFi. My advantage being I'm in tent

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
A VZW employee was nice enough to reach out off list - wanted to remain anonymous - says that the international SIMs they send for you to put in overseas Nexus devices won't tether. Ever. No matter what I'm told otherwise. Anyhow.. enough of that. Cheers, -Ali On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:52 PM,

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Andy Isaacson
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:52:23AM -0500, micah anderson wrote: - ChromeOS's update mechanism is automatic, transparent, and basically foolproof. Having bricked Ubuntu and Gentoo systems, the same is not true of Linux. I would be surprised if you actually 'bricked' these systems, since

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread micah anderson
T N trr...@gmail.com writes: The word Linux doesn't refer to anything, other than maybe the kernel. Chrome OS is linux. But it's a massively stripped down distribution that has a radical design, including the fact that it will ONLY run if all of the cryptographic checks are verified from

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread micah anderson
Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org writes: On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:52:23AM -0500, micah anderson wrote: - ChromeOS's update mechanism is automatic, transparent, and basically foolproof. Having bricked Ubuntu and Gentoo systems, the same is not true of Linux. I would be surprised if

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Brian Conley
Micah, Perhaps you can tell us the secret to convince all family members and colleagues to become Linux hackers able to be completely self-sufficient managing their own upgrades and modifications indefinitely? Otherwise what is your point? It seems like you are being needlessly confrontational

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-06 Thread Andreas Bader
On 02/06/2013 08:36 PM, Brian Conley wrote: Andreas, Plenty of Syrians do have internet access, and use it on a regular basis. Also, lack of appropriateness for one use-case doesn't necessitate lack of appropriateness across the board. Linux is a great solution for many use cases, but as

[liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-05 Thread Nadim Kobeissi
Dear LibTech, I'm frankly not sure about this idea, it may certainly be a bad one, but I've been using a Chromebook for almost a week now, and I've had some observations regarding this device. I'd like to discuss whether it's a good idea to hypothetically have Chromebooks used by activists,

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-05 Thread Nathan of Guardian
On 02/06/2013 10:29 AM, Nadim Kobeissi wrote: I'm frankly not sure about this idea, it may certainly be a bad one, but I've been using a Chromebook for almost a week now, and I've had some observations regarding this device. I'd like to discuss whether it's a good idea to hypothetically have

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-05 Thread Ali-Reza Anghaie
It's something we've explored as an option in the Executive Protection space - and paired with Google two-factor it's a marked improvement over anything most of these end-users were doing before. There is at least one 3G radio version too - more almost certainly coming at better price points. As

Re: [liberationtech] Chromebooks for Risky Situations?

2013-02-05 Thread Nathan of Guardian
On 02/06/2013 01:22 PM, Ali-Reza Anghaie wrote: How can projects like Privly play into it? Carrying a Tor Router along with you or building one on-site. None of the operational matters will ever be squarely addressed by one platform but it all can be decision-treed out nicely. You could