available to test on the
Win platform but I really don't want to use dev builds.
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Call-for-testing-Shutdown-problems-in-Windows-tp4204415p4204946.html
Sent fro
Hi Christian, all
LibreOffice 5.3.0.3 x64 (and x64 help files) was uploaded by mistake to
folder /pre-releases/win/x86/
The same version was uoploaded to folder /pre-releases/win/x86_64/ (but
this expected :) )
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
>> The same version was uploaded to folder /pre-releases/win/x86_64/ (but
>> this expected :) )
>
> oups, fixed. Thx for noticing :-)
Thank you for the fast fix.
I still need to update some XP Pro x86 machines
(once XP is no longer supported there is probably no reason
oundation.org
I assumed this would point to a test version but it seems to be a login
interface only... Am I missing something?
Is TDF hosting a free account version of LOO (not a nice acronym for British
English people ;) ) at least for testing purposes?
How is LibreOffice Online comp
the PortableApps releases
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/portable/
(maybe there is a more complete archive)
In any case you can install any regular version in parallel (so there is no
need to install/uninstall)
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel
HTH
Pedro
--
View
testing real documents!
Would it be possible to use the TDF login mentioned by Michael (Meeks) so
that there is no need for yet another registration?
> + online/TDF/LDAP accounts etc. (Michael)
> + https://user.documentfoundation.org
Thanks!
Pedro
--
View this message
carlo.strata wrote
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I confirm no Win64 builds here:
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/win/x86_64/
> for the 5.3.2.1 version...
>
> What's the trouble?
From
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-td4210895.html
Michael Meeks-5 wr
Hi Miguel Ángel
m.a.riosv wrote
> There is a Win_x64 on prebuilds, but not with the same version for x86 and
> x64
Thank you for updating!
This is really odd. I think it is better to wait for 5.3.2.2
Reporting bugs for a build with known problems is a waste of time ;)
Pedro
--
Vie
in the parametric compilation make the Windows compilation
> to fail?
This is expected. The Windows binaries take longer time to compile than for
the other OSes. Keep checking the Windows folders. The files should be there
in a day or two.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this mess
ally a problem with both Windows builds...
carlo.strata wrote
> p.s. The "src" subdirectory also need a clean since may 2016. ;-)
Yes, that would be nice too :)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Pre-released-5-3-2-1-no-Win-x64-
ed to releases 5.4Beta1 and 5.3.4.1 but
instead it contains 185 files (some as old as May 2016)
The same applies to the binaries folders.
I know this is not really high priority but cleaning up could be helpful for
new testers.
I volunteer to do the cleanup if needed.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this messa
Bump!
In case nobody noticed this email.
Pedro wrote
> Hi all
>
> The pre-releases folder is where testers get the latest version released
> for testing.
> It doesn't make sense that it accumulates old/outdated test
> versions/documents.
> As an examp
Hi Henri
mhenriday wrote
> Pedro, yours sounds like an excellent suggestion to me; but I'm just a
> (grateful) end user. Who has the authority to decide this sort of thing
> ?...
I have no idea.
But the good news is that someone already cleaned up all the folders.
Regards,
Pe
My graphics adapter is an ATI Radeon HD 3800 running on Windows 7 Pro x64
SP1
Has anyone seen this? I can't find any bug report on this on Bugzilla.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Incomplete-text-in-menus-and-dialogs-in-5-4-0-1-tp4217620.ht
or me :)
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Incomplete-text-in-menus-and-dialogs-in-5-4-0-1-tp4217620p4217640.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffic
s 10 and I don't
want to void the warranty)
V Stuart Foote wrote
> Sorry for that noise.
Trying to help never generates noise ;)
Thank you for the Segoe UI tip. It is easier to read than Tahoma!
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Inco
isect.
On the other hand the git command is bisect...
But it is clear now. I'm glad there is no need to compile anything!
I'm really curious to see how this works but I can't risk any problems on my
work machine.
Thanks!
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this m
I can test with an AMD during the weekend.
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Call-for-testing-LibreOffice-5-4-0-3-hotfix-tp4219064p4219144.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
)
is further truncated. This is not a new bug, it is just a further regression
of an apparently old issue (it goes at least as far back as 4.3.7 but it
doesn't happen in AOO).
So I would say the specific text bug is fixed but there are still issues.
Regards,
Pedro
--
Under Options, LibreOffice, Personalization there is a new setting:
Background Image
To which Background does this image apply?
I assumed it would be the application background (when a document is not
loaded)...
If it is, then it doesn't work under Windows
I'm running Version: 4.1.0.0.alpha0+
Hi all
1)
Under Options, LibreOffice, Personalization there is a new setting:
Background Image
To which Background does this image apply?
I assumed it would be the application background (when a document is not
loaded)...
If it is, then it doesn't work under Windows
2)
The About dialog is w
org/#/c/3280/)?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Web-Wizard-ported-to-python-tp4054801p4054808.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa ma
Norbert Thiebaud wrote
> The former is what I expect from a daily-build out of a given buildbot
> - since there can be multiple source for them for a given platform
>
> The later is what I expect out of 'release build' (alpha, beta, RC or
> GA) - since there is only 1 source for release build.
Ag
ssue would be in the past as soon as we moved
to 4.1 (because it couldn't be back ported to 4.0) and now it works on and
off :(
This is not a criticism in any way. Your unstoppable work is well
appreciated!
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.o
e Nabble page looks a mess
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/QA-f3613148.html
Can you please clean it up?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cleaning-up-QA-Nabble-and-Archive-folders-from-Spam-tp3675398p4055389.html
Sent from the QA mail
red can't be touched (it
prevents tampering with what people said they said ;) )
But you could improve on the Spam filters so that this type of messages
doesn't get to the mailing list at all
Florian Effenberger is the right person to help you on this one
Cheers,
Pedr
x27;s outside his scope and he can't fix it, then who can?
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cleaning-up-QA-Nabble-and-Archive-folders-from-Spam-tp3675398p4055416.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
t Text Slide
button is removed
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/4.1#Impress
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Test-the-Photo-Album-Creator-tp4055367p4055788.html
Sent from the Q
r inherent to the hacks needed to make the program parallel or portable)?
2) Which one is more realistic when comparing functionality?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Portable-vs-Parallel-which-one-is-better-tp4056781.html
Sent from the QA ma
tall
versus 220Mb for the portable version if you select the Remove Extra
Languages option (or 330Mb if you don't)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Portable-vs-Parallel-which-one-is-better-tp4056781p4056807.html
Sent from the QA mailing lis
re not comparable with final builds. They don't include all
dictionaries, all UI languages and all extensions included in the final
build ;)
Sorry to say but you are comparing apples with oranges :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Portable
Hi Steve, all
JorenDC wrote
> That would be a good way to let users participate in a voting process
> and have them contribute the craziest ideas without cluttering the bug
> tracker.
>
> Every 2 months or so QA could go over that ideas page and see what get's
> the most votes (let's not digr
Mirosław Zalewski wrote
> BTW: could developers agree that one feature from top ten on such page
> will be
> implemented for each major release? Or maybe should we go into
> crowdfunding?
They already said they couldn't/wouldn't compromise with such voting scheme.
In addition if the users have a
Hi Tommy, all
Tommy wrote
> you should check X-LibreOffice which is an alternative portable package
> from winPenPack.com
>
> IMHO X-LibreOffice is much better than the PortableApps package.
Thank you for the suggestion. Just downloaded and unpacked version 4.0.2
(for comparison)
It does ha
Hi Tommy
Tommy wrote
> hi Pedro, look at this link...
> all the X-LibO versions you asked for are available here:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/winpenpack/files/X-LibreOffice/releases/
I had already been in that folder but wrongly assumed the releases were
sorted by version
Hi Tommy
Tommy wrote
> I'll try asking about the 3.6.6
Thanks! ;)
Tommy wrote
> I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could be
> a valuable tool for QA guys.
It is indeed. Actually it seems that the developers of wPP are more in the
Open Source spirit than the gu
Hi Kieran
Kieran Peckett wrote
> Seeing as the Portable Version is hosted at LibreOffice rather than
> SourceForge, I assume LibO devs pack it up. If that is true, then can't
> someone, at least for future versions, if older versions can't be found in
> anyone's "Downloads" folder keep archives o
+ then you need to turn it on in the View menu ;-)
Thank you for the detailed instrcutions :) I do like this feature! I'm glad
some code is flowing between projects!
And yes, it's pretty unstable :) Clicking on any of the "More Options"
buttons in the Sidebar silently
the upcoming EOL of Windows XP, in less than a
year from now :)
(This should probably be CCed to the Dev list, but I don't know how to do it
on Nabble...)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-and-Windows-2000-tp4057523.html
Sent
tion still makes sense?
I would try your hack but since LO 4 doesn't provide any clues to which
files are missing, it seems like a difficult mission...
Thank you for your feedback!
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-and-W
ime of
> testing.
>
> Note, that properly triaged bug with a good instructions to reproduce
> will have increased chance to be fixed quickly.
Excellent idea!
I assume you are referring to Tinderbox #9 (aka Voreppe)?
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-1/Win-x86_9-Vor
4.1 it takes nearly 3 minutes (it takes only 12 seconds in
Excel 2010).
Unfortunately I can not share this file. But I can use it to test any
required build...
What do you mean big operations?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minu
Kieran Peckett wrote
>> > I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could
>> be
>> > a valuable tool for QA guys.
>
> Just out of interest... how?
Because, unlike PortableApps, they do keep all previous versions available.
This can be quite useful to find a regression.
TD
" button on the bottom right corner (and
maybe the main dialog needs an "Exit" button...). Closing a dialog by
pressing the close button usually means "Go away!" not "Save and Close" ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundat
I'm running daily builds of the 4.1 branch under Windows XP x86 and Win7 x64
(from tinderbox #9 and #6... Haven't figured out which one is better...)
Any specific tests/bugs you want to run/test?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/L
reate backup copy")
Before anyone asks, Yes, I have write permissions on the target folder.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-4-1-0beta2-no-possibility-to-save-a-modified-doc-tp4060073p4060147.html
sense
that the backup is on the same working folder as the original file (in case
you want to quickly revert to a previous version); 2) The Backup folder is
contained in the User Profile, which MANY users advise to DELETE when any
error occurs (which I also think is a BAD advice...)
Chee
the installer checks the OS first, as
requested here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65129
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LibreOffice-and-Windows-2000-tp4057523p4060240.html
Sent from the
Checked all the Wizards under Windows XP x86
Added Regression to Keywords on
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65510
Confirmed bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65330
Reported new bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65545
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this
Fridrich Strba-3 wrote
> To make it a bit easier to test the Windows versions of our upcoming 4.1
> release, we set a tinderbox that produces in principle every day a build
> of the libreoffice-4-1 branch in the release configuration with all
> supported languages and with all helppacks that are
Hi all QAers
A very interesting reading
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2013/06/the-power-of-brand-and-the-power-of-product-part-2.html
Kind regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive
V Stuart Foote wrote
> Not sure I'd exactly consider Rob's musings as unbiased.
I'm well aware of Rob's bias. However assuming the bias is in the analysis
and not in the values, there are some interesting results.
V Stuart Foote wrote
> In that time frame LibreOffice has issued I think 15 time
Another interesting reading
http://standardsandfreedom.net/index.php/2013/06/13/wasted-time/
This time about the new sidebar (and more, obviously)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338p4061428.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archiv
e same that happened with the Persona which is still an
unfinished job IMO)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Food-for-thought-tp4061338p4061530.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Hi Enervation
Enervation wrote
> I reported a bug, which is located at
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65571
>
> However, it is marked as NEW even though no one triaged it. Can someone
> resolve this?
This is the default now. Bugs are initially marked as NEW. If additional
inform
Hi Joel
jmadero wrote
> This is a general problem that I think we shoudl just talk a bit about. If
> we confirm a bug on 4.1 but it's fixed in 4.2 master - what status is
> appropriate? Usually WFM is good but it's hard to tell a user "so it'll be
> broken for the foreseeable future but by 4.2 re
Update:
Pedro wrote
> Reported new bug https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65545
Fixed in Version: 4.1.0.0.beta2+
Build ID: 5f58b80f7355f5947635d70b54b3e87a7421d8f
TinderBox: Win-x86_9-Voreppe, Branch:libreoffice-4-1, Time:
2013-06-15_06:47:45
The other two bugs persist.
--
V
,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Triage-Contest-tp4062244p4062249.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa
I fixed a formatting error on the wiki page but it is still missing a link to
the Top priority item.
Hopefully this message is not ignored as well...
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Triage-Contest-tp4062244p4063045.html
Sent from the QA mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66420)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Windows-crash-message-tp4064175.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing lis
Hi all
I believe that if regressions in MAB are fixed then the patch MUST be
included in the following release. Otherwise there is no point in having
Release Candidates.
Here is an example that will cause DATA LOSS for any user of 4.1.0 (it was
cherry picked to 4.1.1)
https://bugassistant.libreo
Andras Timar-3 wrote
> It is in the review queue for 4.1.0:
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/4738/
Excellent! But it would make sense to let people know about that in
Bugzilla?
In Bugzilla you only get Whiteboard: BSA target:4.2.0 target:4.1.1
In any case, that was an example. I meant this (
o make sure that ALL MAB
regressions that *were* fixed should be cherry picked to the nearest
release. I believe that is the reason there are 2 Release Candidates before
the final release...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/URGEN
Hi all
Two questions:
1) Tinderbox 6 stopped producing non-debug Windows daily builds for Master
branch. Is this deliberate?
2) There are 43 registered tinderboxes
(https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox) . Isn't it
possible that at least one of these uploads Windows daily bui
ther be ignored on the QA list (as usual) than
insulted on the Dev list ;)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4069800.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hi Jochen, all
I think this is a GREAT idea!
Jochen wrote
> 2) What benefits?
IMO the main advantage would be to remove another one or two layers of
obstacles for the user
1) Instead of having to select the project from a long list where
LibreOffice is somewhere in the middle
(https://bugs.fre
Christian Lohmaier-3 wrote
> The tag libreoffice-4.0.5.2 (AKA 4.0.5 RC2) has been created. This is
> the last scheduled RC.
This message was created on the 13th but files are already being uploaded
for RC2 and they are from the 14th, a little more than 24 hours later... I
hope all is ok because th
Hi Kendy, all
For some odd reason this message by ape hasn't been accepted.
I can confirm that build
master~2013-08-17_23.59.35_LibreOfficeDev_4.2.0.0.alpha0_Win_x86 from
tinderbox 39 fails to run on Windows XP x86 SP3 en_US because it misses some
MSVC dlls.
I can also confirm that the build
lib
like the first section of
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/stable/4.1.0/win/x86/LibreOffice_4.1.0_Win_x86.msi.mirrorlist
Or maybe on a separate file?
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p40
nderboxes 6 (not debug), 7 and 16 folders should be removed since they are
not producing any master builds.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070620.html
Sent from the QA mail
a debug build when there is a new one.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Non-debug-Windows-daily-builds-tp4069175p4070921.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libr
Thorsten Behrens wrote
> * Pending Action Items:
> + upgrade 3.6 users to 4.0.5 once that is out (Thorsten/Kendy)
Please make sure that you check OS version first.
See related bug report
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65128
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in c
added to 4.2?)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65129
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Minutes-of-the-ESC-call-2013-08-15-tp4070282p4070994.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Hi Kendy, Thorsten, all
Pedro wrote
> The debug master build from the 13th (Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
> Build ID: 73c02c20b19702dbe662fe0d80601049f015d8ac
> TinderBox: Win-x86@6-debug, Branch:master, Time: 2013-08-13_21:26:14)
>
> worked correctly so it won't help in solvi
the future ;)
Maybe reporting "ad nauseam" all the little quirks found helps get there
faster :)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Collaboration-with-People-using-MS-Office-tp4071133p40
s fail?
Cheers;
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-1-RC2-test-builds-available-tp4071184p4071237.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
List Name: Libre
p icon is always created even if the user performs a Custom install
and deliberately deselects that option. See
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65102
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-1-RC2-te
e
them to update? Of course Windows 2000 users will still be notified to
download version 4.0.6 but at least when they try to install it they will be
warned and install will nor proceed (which IMO is an excellent solution)
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfound
somehow contributed to it
http://www.winpenpack.com/en/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?57347
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-QA-Meeting-Minutes-2013-08-23-tp4071347p4072034.html
Sent from the QA mai
re convenient.
Not promoting syles: actually styles are much more accessible. Instead of
having a floating bar with styles you just have the second button (from top)
on the right of the sidebar to switch to the style list... So in fact I
think it's a step forward in promoting styles :)
Kind regard
Hi ape
I believe it must be related to the fact that many of the tinderboxes (e.g.
Tinderbox #6, the only one producing binaries for all Windows versions) were
run by Suse staff and Suse has dropped LO development
(https://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2013-09-03-collabora.html)
See list of tind
(even if they do
not work in Windows XP) so it must be doing something right :)
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Why-no-daily-master-builds-tp4073881p4073919.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
I made a similar request over a month ago but
nobody bothered to answer... I hope someone answers to you...
Regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-garbage-into-the-dev-builds-libreoffice-org-tp4074218p4074332.html
Sent from the QA mailing li
ected, obviously)
My point here is: if GPG verification does not guarantee file integrity can
TDF provide a Checksum (SHA1 or MD5) with the Pre-release files?
Thanks,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-2-RC2-test-builds-avai
tputs of both.
Yes, I have both copies and checking with GPG4Win reports the same for both
installers
<http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4074791/GPGcheck.png>
Maybe GPG4Win is not the right tool?
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Li
on
the Kleopatra button "Lookup Certificates on Server", type libreoffice in
the Find field, click on the Search button and then from the extensive list
choose LibreOffice Build Team (CODE SIGNING KEY) and click on Import.
Thanks!
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.
ified.png>
Absurdly, I still get exactly the same unclear message when I check the
corrupted installer...
Thanks!
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-2-RC2-test-builds-available-tp4074723p4074820.html
Se
empty there is no point in being listed.
I hope there are more builds available in the future...
Thanks!
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Hiding-of-thinderboxes-tp4074850p4074911.html
Sent from the QA mailing
V Stuart Foote wrote
> The same downloads will install on Wnidows 8 and on Windows 7 Enterprise
> sp1 64-bit system. But not on Windows XP where I get the same Error 1937
> for same component.
>
> So far it is just on one system for me. But is anyone else having this
> issue? Ideas about what c
Hi Florian
Don't try to get the Master builds if you demonstrate under Windows XP. You
will get a Server error because there is no build available.
Other than that all seems to be working correctly.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundatio
s why? What is the point of disabling XP suport? Is TDF
going to drop support for XP before Microsoft? Are the major changes being
carried out (like OpenCL) incompatible with Windows XP?
ape wrote
> Windows XP users have a rest from the tests.
Yep. No problem ;)
Pedr
istro)
>
> One of the goals of tinderboxes is to check compilation on many different
> build configurations after all.
Thank you for the clarification. Looking forward to new builds that work
under XP ;)
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentf
Michael Stahl-2 wrote
> where do you get the idea that support for XP would be dropped from
> release builds now? clearly the problem is just a badly configured
> tinderbox, perhaps it has the non-updated release VS 2012 installed that
> only has the 8.0 sdk.
Let's see: in August there were 3 tin
.org/file/n4075710/Similarity.png>
Notice the "half" button in front of Similarity.
But I just noticed that two options have been removed since version 4.1.1.2:
"Match character width" and "Sounds like (Japanese)" which also had an
"half" button. Maybe these funct
Hi Thomas
Thomas Hackert wrote
> Hello @ll,
> and another one ... :(
> 1. Open Calc
> 2. Enter some values like 1, 2, 3 in the first column and 2, 4, 6 in
> the second column.
> 3. Press
>
> +
>
> as long as all values are removed.
> 4. Press
>
> +
>
> to close the window.
> The "Save do
Alpha (at least in Version: 4.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: a8865e5df62b5f33aa769d459b9823eb5b110d4b
TinderBox: Win-x86@6-debug, Branch:master, Time: 2013-09-03_14:36:22 which
is the latest Master version available for Windows XP)
Pedro
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoff
Major regression found in 4.1.2.3 (I haven't teste 4.1.2.1 or 4.1.2.2 but it
is a regression from 4.1.1.2)
Reported here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70029
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-2-RC3-test-builds
Just installed 4.0.6.1
As I feared the bug reported for 4.1.2.3 was backported to 4.0.6.1
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-2-RC3-test-builds-available-tp4075690p4075992.html
It is a regression from version 4.0.5.2
--
View this message in context:
http:/
I have replied in Bugzilla.
It is not only Find and Replace that it is ruined in 4.1.2.3 and 4.0.6.1
The simple Find function is also ruined. Searching for the word "Santos" in
an extensive report also tagged the word "Matos"...
This is a MAJOR bug. Please don't dismiss it as a personal whim.
E
@Stuart
I already figured the problem was that the "Similarity" option was checked
(by mistake) from a previous session.
This shows that having advanced options hidden doesn't seem to be a good
idea from a UX point of vue...
Sorry for the noise.
Best regards,
Pedro
--
View
1 - 100 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
