On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 06:50:43PM -0400, Mark Richards wrote:
> than one ICQ/AIM and MSN account. I'd like to be able to group all of these
> users together and have a single consolidated history for all of them. This
> is a feature in Kopete that I think is really nice.
>
> Ideally the user
Hey guys,
I'm glad to see that activity is really picking up again for licq
development. One feature I'd really like to see in the new Licq is the
ability to have meta-contacts, that is, a contact in the contact list that
has multiple IM accounts. I have many people in my contact list
On 9/27/05, Marco Wertejuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maybe someone could create an option for this behaviour
> as probably a lot of people would like to send messages
> with enter (for me, I'm used to send with alt+s).
Yes, I think I'll break down and give this one an option after all.
Many peo
Philip,
maybe someone could create an option for this behaviour
as probably a lot of people would like to send messages
with enter (for me, I'm used to send with alt+s).
I cannot even remember one client which doesn't support
sending messages with enter and basically every feature
request is a goo
Tim Kaiser wrote:
> Hello,
> could you make licq support sending messages by pressing the enter key?
I *really* don't like this behaviour, it is totally broken. Since when
should the enter key do anything other than enter a newline? "Since
microsoft msn messenger does it!" I hear you cry. Well sor
Hello Tim,
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 16:29:42 +0200 Tim Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> could you make licq support sending messages by pressing the enter key?
> That would be great.
> Thank you!
FYI see how such request has been addressed (at least already filed):
http://sourceforge.n
> could you make licq support sending messages by pressing the enter
> key? That would be great.
Hey, _if_ anyone volunteers to do this, please make it configurable. I
am probably not the only one who prefers the ctrl-enter alternative.
Just my $.02.
Rudo.
Hello,
could you make licq support sending messages by pressing the enter key? That
would be great.
Thank you!
--
Tim Kaiser
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for
Hi all!
I'm user of enlightenment windowmanager and so i use trayer for systray
apps. i've been looking for a good ICQ client for quite a long time and
know them all meanwhile. Licq is the best one so far.
the only issue with it is that trayer/fbpanel isn't able to grab up the
tray icon. so i thin
Hello,
I'd like to have the possibility to save my auto response locally (by a
button or automatically), so it is not set to the one I had when I last
exited licq normally.
Mostly my licq is shut down because of some bugs(or has to be killed),
then my auto-response is set to the one I had on last
hi there ...
it would be nice when someone adds you to his contact list and licq says
that to you ... to have a info button fot that user so you can see more
detailed info for him.
for now when somebody adds me to their contact list i need to copy the
uin and use the search (by uin) to see more
Hi,
There's no need for this, there already exists a message to tell the
remote to open a connection to you called "reverse connect" in my
patch. No need for Licq to invent a new Licq specific message.
--- "O. Novy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Many users are behind firewall and/or NAT box and th
Hi,
I've got an idea how to improve secure channel functionality in LICQ.
Many users are behind firewall and/or NAT box and thus you can't open
secure channel to them. So i suggest adding a client-to-client message
telling the other side to open secure channel to us. I'm not behind a
firewall (
One suggestion.. Maybe use the "Scroll Lock" led for this purpose. I
have a sneaky suspicion that if "Number Lock" or "Caps Lock" are used you
will wreck havoc on the users, not to mention if they are laptop users.
On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Adam Nielsen wrote:
|> Don't hesitate to write this stuff i
> Don't hesitate to write this stuff if you like it :-)
Ok, I've had a few more positive responses so I've started work on a plugin.
I've got a basic version going, it turns a LED on when a message comes in and
turns it off when you open the message to read it.
I've just noticed that when I lo
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 09:22, Adam Nielsen wrote:
> > The easiest way to implement this would be writing a plugin for it. This
> > shouldn't be too hard.
>
> I thought about that, but is it possible to detect when the user has opened
> a message to read it?
Yes, qt-gui marks messages as read
> The easiest way to implement this would be writing a plugin for it. This
> shouldn't be too hard.
I thought about that, but is it possible to detect when the user has opened a
message to read it? I'm using the qt-gui plugin, so ideally I would like the
scroll lock LED to turn on when I hear t
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 11:02, Adam Nielsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was just wondering whether it'd be possible to get LICQ to illuminate one
> of the keyboard LEDs (like Scroll Lock, for instance) when there's an
> incoming message. That way you could see if there's a message waiting to
> be read even
Hi,
I was just wondering whether it'd be possible to get LICQ to illuminate one of
the keyboard LEDs (like Scroll Lock, for instance) when there's an incoming
message. That way you could see if there's a message waiting to be read even
if you didn't hear the sound for whatever reason.
I've so
Hello,
Is it possible to see user info when I get authorization request ?
Current implementation just show my own info.
Alexander Litvinov.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Po
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 09:00 am, Juan F. Codagnone wrote:
>
> what about Ignore New Users?
Nope. I wouldn't get messages from people I'd like to know. Licq needs to
auto-delete on exit users not _manually_ added to the contact list. That's
what I need.
Regards,
Norberto
pgp0.pgp
Descri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 18 March 2003 00:19, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> On Monday 17 March 2003 11:14 pm, Juan F. Codagnone wrote:
> > for a quick solucion backup your ~/licq (the usal disclamer)(this is 5
> > minutes script) and run rem.sh. the bad thing is that thi
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:18:24PM -0300, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> Is it possible to auto-delete those users who only talk to you once? I'm
> getting tired of manually delete ads
If someone sends you a spam then hold the control key while you close the
message window and they'll be gone.
imc
I don't know if this is a solution to your problem - but when I get spam
(I hardly ever get any nowadays, maybe one or two every month or so), i
just hold down ctrl when i hit close, it then asks if i want to delete
the user.
Philip
Norberto BENSA wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to auto-delete
On Monday 17 March 2003 11:14 pm, Juan F. Codagnone wrote:
> for a quick solucion backup your ~/licq (the usal disclamer)(this is 5
> minutes script) and run rem.sh. the bad thing is that this won't remove the
> users from the server contact list.
Heh... I was doing just that with a cronjob, but
On Monday 17 March 2003 22:18, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to auto-delete those users who only talk to you once? I'm
> getting tired of manually delete ads
>
> Regards,
> Norberto
for a quick solucion backup your ~/licq (the usal disclamer)(this is 5
minutes script) and
Hello,
Is it possible to auto-delete those users who only talk to you once? I'm
getting tired of manually delete ads
Regards,
Norberto
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 February 2003 06:22 am, Alexander Litvinov wrote:
> Does somebody knows how to add 'check spelling' feature to licq ?
There could be a few ways to do this.
> What do you think about this ?
I really don't have a need or want for this, ma
Hello,
Does somebody knows how to add 'check spelling' feature to licq ?
It seems it should be too hard to add this. I saw it in the large number of
KDE programs and think there is already libs for this purpose are done
already.
What do you think about this ?
Alexander Litvinov.
---
Am Don, 2001-12-20 um 23.43 schrieb Ryan Hayle:
> On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 15:35, Philipp Ruemmer wrote:
> > The patch for gtk+licq is much newer, and should work with some minor
> > modifications (I will have a look at it next week).
>
> Shouldn't any such modifications be done at the licq level, a
On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 15:35, Philipp Ruemmer wrote:
> The patch for gtk+licq is much newer, and should work with some minor
> modifications (I will have a look at it next week).
Shouldn't any such modifications be done at the licq level, and not the
GUI plugin? Just a thought...
Ryan
___
Am Don, 2001-12-20 um 09.46 schrieb Mattias Eriksson:
> There alreay exist a plugin for this, licqgpg.
> If you follow this URL you might find it:
>
> http://www.uni-karlsruhe.de/~us3k/
>
> if you already have a patch, you might want to merge those projects
> since the goals are the same. And I
There alreay exist a plugin for this, licqgpg.
If you follow this URL you might find it:
http://www.uni-karlsruhe.de/~us3k/
if you already have a patch, you might want to merge those projects
since the goals are the same. And I don't know if licqgpg is compatible
with the windows plugin.
//Sna
I don't see why GPG and PGP won't work. I use GPG quite often at work and
I know for a fact that the senders are using PGP.
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, David Mehrmann wrote:
|On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 17:37:36 +0200
|Just Marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> meowed:
|
| I second that! Plus, if it can be made comp
Hi,
First of all, thank you guys for working on Licq, and especially thank
you for fixing Licq to properly work in such hard times.
A freind wrote a patch for Licq which spawns GPG for every incoming/
outgoing message message, checks if the remote other party is in the key
ring
35 matches
Mail list logo
