First of all I'm not reinventing anything. I don't think that If
LocParam semantic is giving you the hidden functionality as well. User
type 2 should not even see the menus for user type 1, not only to not
be able to access those locations.
The way I see it this functionality should be totally
I think that focusing on the selling points is a good strategy, people
cannot and will not learn the code in the preso, so demonstrating _why_ Lift
is a good choice if you value the things that Lift brings to the table, and
then start lining up things on the table.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:09
marius d. marius.dan...@gmail.com writes:
First of all I'm not reinventing anything. I don't think that If
LocParam semantic is giving you the hidden functionality as well.
I haven't checked closely, but the scaladoc seem to indicate that it
does. And in my own menu snippets (which is based
Dave davidtgoldb...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Specifically, since both of my user types extend MegaProtoUser, I end
up with loggedIn_? function that tells if some user is logged in, but
is confused about which. So if a user of type 1 logs in and I call
UserType2.loggedIn_?, it will also
Hey Rick,
Thanks for your feedback - its often helpful to get an outsiders
perspective!
Making note about the session granularity is an interesting one - if
you had to give a simple message to someone else like yourself who was
coming to lift about this, what would you say to them?
Completly :-)
Thats why i just want to present a strong case of features and get
away from code on slides. I might do a few slides showing some code,
perhaps for things like template binding or comet. But generally id
like to think about features.
So, what might you suggest mate?
Cheers,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.euwrote:
Completly :-)
Thats why i just want to present a strong case of features and get
away from code on slides. I might do a few slides showing some code,
perhaps for things like template binding or comet. But
Hi all,
I don't know whether there is a mechanism that like the migration
of the Rails in the Liftweb, and how can we
extend the table, such as add a column desc into a table users (OR
user ?).
I add this code in the User model and restart the server, the table
don't change anything !
I've interpreted the demo as the code below. However, I get this
exception when I compile:
/snippet/TreeViewDemo.scala:14: error: not found: value JsObj
TreeView(example, JsObj(animated-90))
I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong I'd appreciate any help.
Here's the code:
package
I've spent some time and came up with this code:
http://github.com/ojow/Random-code/blob/master/Test.scala
I think it should allow all the needed stuff, it keeps meaning with
the bytes and also:
* its reusable/extensible in many directions, no static stuff
* i checked generated .class files and
Is User added to Schemefier in Boot.scala? It should look something
like: Schemifier.schemify(true, Log.infoF _, User)
Peter Robinett
On Oct 12, 11:22 am, Neil.Lv anim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I don't know whether there is a mechanism that like the migration
of the Rails in the
Just tested with paypal sandbox and it works, thanks.
On Oct 11, 5:59 pm, Timothy Perrett timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Ryan,
I have pushed the code to master so give it a couple of hours and
Hudson should automatically start pulling those changes into 1.1-
SNAPSHOT JARs for you.
It's a simple java.properties file. You should place it in src/main/
resources/props. There is a search order but, off the top of my head,
the last two options are the username running the app (e.g.
peter.props) and default.props.
My peter.props looks like this:
db.driver=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
Note that you can also intermix this with runtimes:
default.props
default.pilot.props
Doing something like that can let you automatically load different
properties based on the run mode lift is in (production vs dev etc)
Your code will still look like:
Props.get(some.key) //= Box[String]
Thanks for the information
On Oct 12, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Peter Robinett wrote:
It's a simple java.properties file. You should place it in src/main/
resources/props. There is a search order but, off the top of my head,
the last two options are the username running the app (e.g.
peter.props)
Hello guys,
How can I create a mapper with two or more fields as primary key?
For instance if we have a table of people with a Long primary key
called ID generated by IdPK, and also we have a table of addresses
also with a Long primary key called ID generated by IdPK. The idea
is to
I would put more emphasis on the benefits of Scala than you implied, mentioning
also the value of first class functions and partial functions and how lift ues
them. (And maybe that Map is a partial function which can be used e.g. in a
DispatchSnippet/StatefulSnippet.)
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:31 AM, opyate opy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I had a look at this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/a875258c5cccdf09/f6719565f6550513?lnk=gstq=plugin+modular#f6719565f6550513
I'm about to attempt the same. The base app (BASE)
Is the audience mostly Java based or from different other fields
including FP?
I would insist in how Lift leverages functional programming idioms
offered by Scala. Personally I believe this gives Lift a pretty unique
position.
Br's,
Marius
On Oct 12, 12:37 am, Timothy Perrett
To address the specific issue of CondHidden/IfHidden, if a Loc (menu
location) fails the If() or Unless() test, it will not be
displayed/rendered/visible to the user. So, there's no need for a IfHidden
or a CondHidden LocParam.
More broadly, SiteMap represents all the pages in your site and the
You have to include -DremoteRepositories=http://scala-tools.org/repo-*
snapshots* in the command line.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Neil.Lv anim...@gmail.com wrote:
I used this command to create my project and was successfully.
mvn archetype:generate -U -DarchetypeGroupId=net.liftweb -
If you've got a good way to do this, feel encouraged to develop it on a
branch.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
It would be nice if there could be a generalized way of specifying
optionality for fields.(The first though question is whether the
Well i don't think its a lot of complexity.
Yes its 4 declarations instead of 1 for each field. But 3 of those are
generatable by IDE same way as any Java IDE generates setters and
getters. All the rest is spring-style instantiations/injections. And
usage is even simplier and readable (i mean
Tim,
Two things I stress about Lift that tends to resonate well:
- Lift abstracts away the HTTP request/response cycle. You as the
developer do not need to worry about setting up something to receive form
posts, ajax events, or to do the whole Comet stuff. It's plumbing and
plumbing
On 13 окт, 00:08, naf g naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you have two classes, Model and Record? What are they and why are they
interdependent?
I thought about Model being a place for metainformation (like database
structure, options/properties etc), or maybe it can be described as
global
So Model represents the database connection?
2009/10/12 Oleg G. ojo...@gmail.com
On 13 окт, 00:08, naf g naftoli...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you have two classes, Model and Record? What are they and why are
they interdependent?
I thought about Model being a place for metainformation (like
Not offhand, maybe some discussion will generate an good plan.The easiest
and worst way would be to have a marker trait or a flag, and test in each
MappedXXX. Obviously not a good idea.
What may work is to delegate all the code that makes decisions which depend
on optionality to a method in
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Oleg G. ojo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well i don't think its a lot of complexity.
You asked for feedback, I gave you my opinion.
Yes its 4 declarations instead of 1 for each field. But 3 of those are
generatable by IDE same way as any Java IDE generates
Thanks again for your answers, David. I've got your point and it all
looks much more clear to me now.
On 13 окт, 01:19, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Oleg G. ojo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well i don't think its a lot of complexity.
You asked
I usually use FireBug or Safari Web Inspector to look at the Set-
Cookie / Cookie headers going back and forth, or use the browser's
built in cookie index (usually buried in preferences). You could also
use something like Wireshark or tcpdump to watch the headers go by if
you're using a
Firecookie (a Firebug extension) says the cookie's Expires is Session.
When I log in Firebug's Net panel shows the following response header
(I changed the cookie name):
Set-Cookie mycookiename=Z0GZIXFRBQMVTOITYSICI1XZN23ROYLN
My code in Boot looks like this:
User.autologinFunc = Full(()={
Hi. I'm sending an email using PlainMailBodyType that contains a URL.
Normally when a BlackBerry receives a plain text email it
automatically hyperlinks URLS and potential phone numbers. For some
reason this email is not being hyperlinked on the BlackBerry. Is it
possible that it's somehow not
setMaxAge is unfortunately named -- looking at the code it appears
that HTTPCookies are actually immutable, and what setMaxAge does is
returns you a new cookie with the new settings.
Try:
val cookie = net.liftweb.http.provider.HTTPCookie(cookieName, user.uniqueId.is
).setMaxAge(2 weeks)
Thanks. I actually looked at the source code of HTTPCookie but I
didn't put two and two together reading my code in Boot.
I think the reason I did the math manually is because I was trying to
minimize the number of imports. Do you think a lot of wildcard imports
increase compile time, or not
I don't know if it increases compile time but I avoid wildcard imports
like the plague because I think they're perhaps the most confusing
thing reading scala code. Thinking to yourself that two types don't
match, but you can't be sure if you're reading it wrong or if there's
an implicit
Please send some test email to an account you can access using Thunderbird.
Open the message and look at the message source. Is it really plain text?
What do the headers say it is?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi. I'm sending an email using
Hey guys,
I've been having a crazy problem all day (and now into the extremely
late night). Basically, Jetty is throwing this error:
jvm 1| java.lang.IllegalStateException: class
net.liftweb.http.LiftFilter is not a javax.servlet.Filter
jvm 1| at
My top-of-the-brain guess would be that you have two servlet JARs in
your classpath, and jetty is using one but your WAR is using another.
Really weird error though, for sure.
-Ross
On Oct 12, 2009, at 8:14 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
Hey guys,
I've been having a crazy problem all day
Hey Ross,
Thanks for the response - I'll just take a look; im using maven-shade
but thought id been careful about making sure i only had one
javax.servlet I'll just double check now.
Cheers, Tim
On Oct 13, 1:22 am, Ross Mellgren dri...@gmail.com wrote:
My top-of-the-brain guess would be
I recently started getting this warning my log, after I started using
more than one bind position in my default template. Looking at the
code, it looks like it will (erroneously?) warn any time there is more
than one bind point and you are in dev mode:
20:18:53,987 [http-0.0.0.0-28543-1]
Nope, I've certainly only got 1 javax.servlet in my CP.
Looking at the Jetty source:
http://jetty.mortbay.com/xref/org/mortbay/jetty/servlet/FilterHolder.html#86
It appears its using isAssignableFrom - the question is, that how can
it find the filter class usually, and be fine, but not when
Especially since it prints out the valid class name in the log message.
I suppose you can't post the WAR somewhere so I can have a poke?
-Ross
On Oct 12, 2009, at 8:41 PM, Timothy Perrett wrote:
Nope, I've certainly only got 1 javax.servlet in my CP.
Looking at the Jetty source:
I cant really post the war im afraid, as its calling all manner of
services on some internal systems.
The strange thing with all of this is that it works when you execute:
java -jar myapp.war
Here's what you should need to just make a similar demo project:
Wouldn't know, but have you tried looking up the source code that
throws the exception? Is Jetty trying to do anything unusual?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Timothy Perrett
timo...@getintheloop.eu wrote:
Hey guys,
I've been having a crazy problem all day (and now into the extremely
late
Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original
Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id d11cs12302fgd;
Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:28:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.19.149 with SMTP id a21mr391667qcb.29.1254943736364;
Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:28:56 -0700
Before I go barking up the wrong tree, by JWS you mean Java Web Start
or Java Web Services?
I must confess, Im running a fairly specific config.
Essentially I
have an executable WAR file that has a jetty launcher class
inside -
its pretty sweet, and it works from the command line doing:
Yeah, I have add this code in the Boot.scala.
###
Schemifier.schemify(true, Log.infoF _, User)
###
But i want to add a column into the user table (extend the user table)
now, and how can i achieve this purpose.
Ex:
### Original user table like this
idemail first_name last_name
That looks to be plain text, although it's using multipart encoding
where it probably does not need to.
-Ross
On Oct 12, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim wrote:
Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original
Delivered-To: naftoli...@gmail.com
Received: by 10.86.30.11 with SMTP id
Yeah, it works now !
Thanks very much !
Cheers,
Neil
On Oct 13, 1:32 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
You have to include -DremoteRepositories=http://scala-tools.org/repo-*
snapshots* in the command line.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Neil.Lv
Just add the column to the User model. Schemifier will add the column to
the RDBMS.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Neil.Lv anim...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I have add this code in the Boot.scala.
###
Schemifier.schemify(true, Log.infoF _, User)
###
But i want to add a column into the
Yeah, I see it now, and it works !
1):
### I add a column in the User model, like this
class User extends MegaProtoUser[User] {
...
/* add column dos4 */
object dos4 extends MappedBoolean(this)
...
}
result: INFO - ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN do4 SMALLINT
###
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim naftoli...@gmail.comwrote:
Does this help? It's from GMail / Show original
GMail munges things, so I don't know if that's the original message.
You might want to figure out what the specs are for blackberry to convert
messages and see why
True, I may have to do that at some point, although I'm not super confident
I'll find such specs.
What do you say to Ross's comment? Why is it multipart?
-
David Pollakfeeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Naftoli Gugenheim
I've got a change on review board that will pick up vals and lazy vals that
are MappedFields. See http://reviewboard.liftweb.net/r/40/
However, until certain defects in the Scala compiler (
https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/2463 and
https://lampsvn.epfl.ch/trac/scala/ticket/1006) are
After reading Naftoli's post i checked the way inner object laziness
is implemented. And it appears to be not thread safe.
Following code:
class A { val a = 1 }
class B { object b extends A }
Generates getter for b as follows:
public final B$b$ b();
Code:
0: aload_0
1: getfield
55 matches
Mail list logo
