Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread David Bernard
Dirty solutions (If you already have maven installed and be able to build lift with maven) : 0. replace $HOME/.m2/repository/org/scala-lang/scala-compiler/2.8.0-SNAPSHOT/scala-compiler-2.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar by symlink to the directory with classes result from scalac scalac compilation 1. Or at the

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Kevin Wright
2009/12/22 David Bernard david.bernard...@gmail.com Dirty solutions (If you already have maven installed and be able to build lift with maven) : 0. replace $HOME/.m2/repository/org/scala-lang/scala-compiler/2.8.0-SNAPSHOT/scala-compiler-2.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar by symlink to the directory with

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread David Bernard
Kevin, maven-scala-plugin integrate a workaround (see note of previous mail) against the line-length limit : arguments of the main class are store in a file. /davidB On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 15:45, Kevin Wright kev.lee.wri...@googlemail.comwrote: 2009/12/22 David Bernard

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
Martin/Heiko, Great if this works. Alternately, you can also use maven ant plugin to complete avoid doing the Maven way. Here is the sequence: 1. Do mvn ant:ant at the top level. This should generate all the requisite files necessary for ant build. 2. Look for the pathelement entry in

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
Ok, this one works just fine, and involves least effort among the ones proposed. - Indrajit On 22/12/09 8:11 PM, Heiko Seeberger wrote: Martin, OK, now I got it working (almost) without Maven: 1. step: Check out 280_port branch from g...@github.com:dpp/liftweb.git 2. step: cd into

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
Thanks for all the help. I tried to do mvn clean mvn install After upgrading to maven 2.2.1, I got somewhere. It compiled a bunch of packages including lift-mapper, so it seems it did not in fact take RC6 as its compiler? But then it stopped due to a build error here. Any idea what I need to

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
I just verified that it did indeed use 2.7.7, because the generated classfiles still have version 4.1. My new strategy is to build with the last working RC3, and then recompile just the failing file with the current compiler and all lift classes on the classpath. That should work. But I need to

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
Martin, I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample. It should be: groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId artifactIdjetty/artifactId version[6.1.6,7.0)/version See if that works. Regards, Indrajit On 22/12/09 10:14 PM, martin odersky wrote:

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample. It should be:        groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId        artifactIdjetty/artifactId        version[6.1.6,7.0)/version See

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample. It should be:        groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId        artifactIdjetty/artifactId        version[6.1.6,7.0)/version ...

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Ross Mellgren
http://www.dridus.com/liftweb-compiled-280.tar.gz It is still uploading -- it totals 240,976,056 bytes and should be completely uploaded in 15 minutes. -Ross On Dec 22, 2009, at 11:45 AM, martin odersky wrote: I just verified that it did indeed use 2.7.7, because the generated classfiles

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
Must be effect of some scala.version property set somewhere. do mvn -Dscala.version=2.8.0.Beta1-RC5 to enforce a different version. - Indrajit On 22/12/09 10:43 PM, martin odersky wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, I think the

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: Martin, I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample. It should be: groupIdorg.mortbay.jetty/groupId

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com  wrote: Martin, I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample.

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying again now. -- Martin On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:48 PM, martin odersky martin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote: I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying again now. ... and it builds with RC3. Great! So now I have something to work with ... Cheers -- Martin -- You received this message because

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
On 22/12/09 11:06 PM, martin odersky wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.com wrote: On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri indraj...@gmail.comwrote: Martin, I think the jetty

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Indrajit Raychaudhuri
Finally! Onward ... - Indrajit On 22/12/09 11:29 PM, martin odersky wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:48 PM, martin oderskymartin.oder...@epfl.ch wrote: I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying again now. ... and it builds with RC3. Great! So now I have

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread Paul Phillips
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:45:52PM +0100, martin odersky wrote: But I need to know how to build lift with a 2.8.0 compiler. Or alternatively, if a kind soul can send me a lift 2.8.0 tarball with all the classfiles in there I can take it from there. FYI until you have git you can always

Re: [Lift] Re: [scala-internals] RC5 candidate for the first 2.8.0 beta

2009-12-22 Thread martin odersky
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Paul Phillips pa...@improving.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:45:52PM +0100, martin odersky wrote: But I need to know how to build lift with a 2.8.0 compiler. Or alternatively, if a kind soul can send me a lift 2.8.0 tarball with all the classfiles in