Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Nice! ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

RE: First steps in Lilypond

FoxFanFare, I set Chopin's Nocturne No. 12. Lilypond allowed me to arrange beams, fingerings, and dynamics to suit my reading. Mark -Original Message- From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org] On Behalf Of foxfanfare Sent: Friday, April 06, 2018

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Noeck writes: > Dear bug-squad, > > Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Noeck: >> #'tab vs. tab > >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags > > > Btw, is it worth to change the docs and suggest the #'-less syntax to >

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

2018-04-06 18:38 GMT+02:00 Larry Morandi : > I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I > include on my individual parts. I'm finding that I get extraneous partial > tab clefs and lines placed in my output whenever a "TabStaff.minimumFret" >

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Dear bug-squad, Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Noeck: > #'tab vs. tab > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags Btw, is it worth to change the docs and suggest the #'-less syntax to users or rather not? Joram

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Noeck writes: > Am 06.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb David Kastrup: >> Seriously? >> >> \removeWithTag tab \new Staff { \melody } > > Is that a remark to #'tab vs. tab Nope. > or is there a benefit of putting \removeWithTag before the \new Staff? If you worry about extraneous

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Am 06.04.2018 um 19:08 schrieb David Kastrup: > Seriously? > > \removeWithTag tab \new Staff { \melody } Is that a remark to #'tab vs. tab or is there a benefit of putting \removeWithTag before the \new Staff? In the first case: that’s how it is explained in the docs:

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Hi David, I am sorry, I still don’t get it. Am 06.04.2018 um 19:21 schrieb David Kastrup: > If you worry about extraneous contexts being created, don't create > extraneous contexts. There is no \new and no \context in Larry’s code. That’s what I thought is called an implicit context creation (I

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Thank you, I got it. (I would have replied to the list, but the only button that appeared on the page was to reply directly to you, and I only get digests, which are hard to reply to.) You are right it does work correctly. My fault. Larry M. On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:19 AM Noeck

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Dear Larry, please always reply to the list. Am 06.04.2018 um 19:14 schrieb Larry Morandi: > Thanks for your reply. You say that using tags works, but it doesn’t for me > using the current stable release, 2.18.2. The output look exactly the same > whether I use tags for not. Are you using

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Great solution. Thanks. Larry M. On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:23 AM Thomas Morley wrote: > 2018-04-06 18:38 GMT+02:00 Larry Morandi : > > I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I > > include on my individual parts.

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Noeck writes: > Dear Larry, > > tags seem to work here: The problem occurs where you set TabStaff > properties. This setting should be removed when you have no TabStaff. > > If you tag the line in melody: > > \tag #'tab \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #0 > > and remove the

Re: Corrected: Beaming in LilyPond

Filip May'r writes: > Notwithstanding I think it would be better to find a different > signature because it may send a wrong idea about the intent. Moreover, > we are made in the image of God who is upright and just and never does > harm, "made in the image of God" is

Re: Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

Dear Larry, tags seem to work here: The problem occurs where you set TabStaff properties. This setting should be removed when you have no TabStaff. If you tag the line in melody: \tag #'tab \set TabStaff.minimumFret = #0 and remove the tagged parts when using melody: \new Staff {

Extraneous TabStaff printing when I don't want tab output

I'm trying to print a score that does not include the TabStaff which I include on my individual parts. I'm finding that I get extraneous partial tab clefs and lines placed in my output whenever a "TabStaff.minimumFret" definition is found. So I'm looking for a way have this fixed, or to do

Re: Re-aligning instrument names

Thanks for this response.  I am ashamed to say that I spent several hours trying to figure this out, but somehow I never got the syntax quite right.  Perhaps I'm getting too old for this... David On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 16:09 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > David Sumbler writes:

Re: Corrected: Beaming in LilyPond

Am 06.04.2018 um 17:57 schrieb Filip May'r: Notwithstanding I think it would be better to find a different signature because it may send a wrong idea about the intent. Moreover, we are made in the image of God who is upright and just and never does harm, and we should seek to reflect that

Re: Corrected: Beaming in LilyPond

On 4/6/2018 10:57 AM, Filip May'r wrote: Notwithstanding I think it would be better to find a different signature because it may send a wrong idea about the intent. He's been signing that way for so long that I think it's become a Proverbs 22:28 ancient landmark. -- Karlin High Missouri, USA

Re: Corrected: Beaming in LilyPond

Hello, I understand that you may not like how the stem looks, but my goal was to preserve the organization of the notes in the manuscript which follows a harmonious and logical pattern. About Facebook and other social media, I could not agree more. I myself am not in those websites. Social

Re: First steps in Lilypond

Am 6. April 2018 12:51:07 MESZ schrieb foxfanfare : >All right! Thank you for all your encouraging comments. So I'll >continue my >efforts in learning this awesome but complex software. I have two weeks >of >vacations coming on, so more time to figure it out! >

Re: Re-aligning instrument names

David Sumbler writes: > I have spent a long time trying to find the answer to this, but without > success. > > I have a piece with strings divided often into several parts; sometimes > these may not be even divisions, for instance where a four-part section > has instruments 3

Re-aligning instrument names

I have spent a long time trying to find the answer to this, but without success. I have a piece with strings divided often into several parts; sometimes these may not be even divisions, for instance where a four-part section has instruments 3 and 4 playing the same music.  I therefore need to

Re: Corrected: Beaming in LilyPond

On April 5, 2018 at 7:46 PM Andrew Bernard wrote: I guess it's a bit like LilyJazz. Jazz people seem to want engraved scores to look like handwritten sheets done with a biro. But this always looks terribly 'faux' to me. Ha!  I've always felt like jazz fonts (in

Re: First steps in Lilypond

Hi foxfanfare, On 6 April 2018 at 20:51, foxfanfare wrote: > > BTW, does anyone have the answer to my question about this slur problem : > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/t5604/Brahms03.png For this, the convention is to post what is known as a Minimal Working

Re: Problem with a font

David Kastrup wrote > It may be that the "prescribed" music font here similarly is a > same-purpose clone of something saner in which case a replacement will > quite likely go unnoticed anyway. In this very special case there is an unparalleled mismatch between upper and lower case letters: The

Re: Problem with a font

Walter Garcia-Fontes writes: > * Simon Albrecht, simon.albre...@mail.de [06/04/18 10:53]: >> Why not use a similar, but better, font without telling them? Maybe >> they won’t notice, or if they will, maybe it will be a positive >> reaction, or if not, you have good

Re: Problem with a font

Walter Garcia-Fontes writes: > * Andrew Bernard, andrew.bern...@gmail.com [06/04/18 04:35]: >> >> If you need to find a proper fonts, I'd be very happy to assist you to >> locate something that is similar to the one you have to work with. Can you >> convince the customer

Re: First steps in Lilypond

All right! Thank you for all your encouraging comments. So I'll continue my efforts in learning this awesome but complex software. I have two weeks of vacations coming on, so more time to figure it out! Unfortunately, I have to start learning with this kind of piano piece because 95% of my work

Re: Problem with a font

Walter Garcia-Fontes wrote > [...] but her bosses are stubborn to use that one, which is used in > schools here in Spain, and so they are used to it. Hi Walter, Everything Andrew said is exactly how I feel about it. But I can see the point that Escolar is intended for didactic use (hence the

Re: Articulation sign in Haydn

Hello Lukas-Fabian, I use LilyDev 4 (Debian 8), on which LilyPond builds seamlessly off the shelf. It’s easy to copy your user configuration files to this version of Linux. HTH! JM > Le 5 avr. 2018 à 22:24, Karlin High a écrit : > > On 4/5/2018 1:48 PM, Lukas-Fabian

Re: Problem with a font

Hi Walter, 2018-04-06 9:49 GMT+02:00 Walter Garcia-Fontes : > * Torsten Hämmerle, torsten.haemme...@web.de [05/04/18 20:48]: >> A missing bold font can be emulated by printing the stencil several times >> (slightly shifted) - like in Don E. Knuth's "poor man's bold"

Re: Problem with a font

* Simon Albrecht, simon.albre...@mail.de [06/04/18 10:53]: > Why not use a similar, but better, font without telling them? Maybe they > won’t notice, or if they will, maybe it will be a positive reaction, or if > not, you have good arguments at hand for telling them why your alternative > is

Re: First steps in Lilypond

Am 6. April 2018 11:09:09 MESZ schrieb foxfanfare : >Thank you for your comments David. > >If I understand correctly what you are implying, maybe learning >lilypond in >order to engrave complex piano music isn't a such good idea after all? No, it *is* a good idea. What you

Re: First steps in Lilypond

Correction, latest is 2.19.81. On 6 April 2018 at 19:19, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > > Oh, and do use the latest development version (2.19.18), > ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: First steps in Lilypond

Hi foxfanfare, I agree with David about piano music. In my work, principally what I do is set very complex New Complexity School modernist scores for piano. It gets really difficult. Not a task for beginners by any means. But lilypond can be extended with functions and Scheme code and is so

Re: First steps in Lilypond

Don’t be scared! It’s not the easiest way to start learning LilyPond, but from what I’ve seen on this list, you got pretty far and all the remaining issues can be solved. Just be assured that other types of music (e.g. songs, violin parts or even choir scores) are usually easier. Cheers,# Joram

Re: Problem with a font

Hi Walter, If you must use that font for educational purposes in Spain, here is a page that has a normal version and a black (negra) of Escolar, which as far as I can see is the same font. http://www.edu.xunta.gal/centros/ceipfrions/es/node/101 You may want more black than this, but the

Re: First steps in Lilypond

Thank you for your comments David. If I understand correctly what you are implying, maybe learning lilypond in order to engrave complex piano music isn't a such good idea after all? -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html

Re: Corrected: Beaming in LilyPond

On 06.04.2018 01:46, Andrew Bernard wrote: Hi Simon and Filip, The Bach MS in question is a handwritten autograph - not an engraving. I’m certainly aware of that – it was just for brevity that I didn’t make it explicit. Best, Simon ___

Re: Problem with a font

On 06.04.2018 07:21, Walter Garcia-Fontes wrote: I already showed her different alternatives, that we found around for hand writing fonts, both free and commercial, but her bosses are stubborn to use that one, which is used in schools here in Spain, and so they are used to it. Why not use a

Re: Problem with a font

* Torsten Hämmerle, torsten.haemme...@web.de [05/04/18 20:48]: > A missing bold font can be emulated by printing the stencil several times > (slightly shifted) - like in Don E. Knuth's "poor man's bold" (TeX). > > If you get stuck, don't hesitate to ask. OK, here is an ugly solution (font

Non standard MusicXML tuplet question

Hello folks, In 23c-Tuplet-Display-NonStandard.xml, part of the unofficial LP MusicXML suite, there’s: C 5 136 1 eighth 3 2 breve