in a nutshell:
s2\> s4\!
instead of
s2.\> s\!
And I have yet another suggestion: It works as is, but LilyPond would
have more freedom to make good linebreaks if you insert \bar "" at
appropriate places in the introduction’s cadenza.
Hi, Simon
Better like this?
Alberto,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:25 AM, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n184280...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > in a nutshell:
> > s2\> s4\!
> > instead of
> > s2.\> s\!
> >
> > And I have yet another suggestion: It works as is, but LilyPond would
> > have more freedom to
On 30/11/15 14:08, tisimst wrote:
Now, that looks very nice. Great job! It will be a great addition to IMSLP.
Thank you for your help.
I will also contact Chris Sawyer, in case he wants to add these two
musics to Mutopia.
Best,
Alberto
___
Alberto,
On Sunday, November 29, 2015, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n184252...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 22/11/15 22:27, tisimst wrote:
> > I think there was a misunderstanding about the voicing in Valse 2. The
> > beamed groups should NOT be in \voiceOne. They should
On 29/11/15 21:49, tisimst wrote:
Alberto,
On Sunday, November 29, 2015, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] <[hidden
email] > wrote:
On 22/11/15 22:27, tisimst wrote:
> I think there was a misunderstanding about the voicing in Valse
2. The
> beamed groups should NOT be in
Hell, Simon
On 23/11/15 00:03, Simon Albrecht wrote:
The last measure of the Introduction actually has only two quarters (the
half note isn’t dotted), to be complemented by the immediately following
upbeat for Valse 1.
I need your help with this. Although I got it working for the upper
On 29.11.2015 22:45, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hell, Simon
On 23/11/15 00:03, Simon Albrecht wrote:
The last measure of the Introduction actually has only two quarters (the
half note isn’t dotted), to be complemented by the immediately following
upbeat for Valse 1.
I need your help with this.
On 22/11/15 22:27, tisimst wrote:
I think there was a misunderstanding about the voicing in Valse 2. The
beamed groups should NOT be in \voiceOne. They should be in \oneVoice.
That should clean up the space taken up by their respective slurs, too.
Hi, Abraham.
Fixed those issues now. I
Hi, Abraham,
On 22/11/2015 22:27, tisimst wrote:
I think there was a misunderstanding about the voicing in Valse 2. The
beamed groups should NOT be in \voiceOne. They should be in \oneVoice.
That should clean up the space taken up by their respective slurs, too.
Yep, I understood you were
Hi, Simon
On 23/11/2015 00:03, Simon Albrecht wrote:
The last measure of the Introduction actually has only two quarters
(the half note isn’t dotted), to be complemented by the immediately
following upbeat for Valse 1.
Damn. I though I had that correct, as I recall from when I was looking
On 23/11/2015 00:03, Simon Albrecht wrote:
It seems that you intentionally replaced -! by -. in Valse 1, however
the original uses them distinctly and I’d stick with that.
Ah, I see what you mean. Wasn't aware of that symbol... shame on me :-)
Thanks
Alberto
On 22.11.2015 22:41, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi all,
Final version here:
https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf
Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in case anybody
spots any critical issue.
The last measure of the Introduction actually has
Alberto,
On Sunday, November 22, 2015, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n183952...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Final version here:
>
> https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf
>
> Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in
On 22.11.2015 14:52, tisimst wrote:
One other thing I noticed in Valse 2, m. 42-43 - remove staccato from
tied end notes. They just don't make sense. I would guess the one in
the source engraving (m. 42) is a typo as it is omitted in the next
measure.
It is definitely not. There is perfect
On Sunday, November 22, 2015, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n183931...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> On 22.11.2015 14:52, tisimst wrote:
> > One other thing I noticed in Valse 2, m. 42-43 - remove staccato from
> > tied end notes. They just don't make sense. I would guess the one in
Hi
On 22/11/15 13:52, tisimst wrote:
Valse 1 looks great! There's a natural in the LH chord in m. 58 that
shouldn't be there. If so a double check on all accidentals just to be
sauté there aren't others that should or shouldn't be there.
Yep, still fixing slurs, only. I have a couple other
Alberto,
On Saturday, November 21, 2015, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n18391...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> On 21.11.2015 20:21, Alberto Simões wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 20/11/15 11:30, Alberto Simões wrote:
> >> Hey
> >>
> >> On 20/11/2015 05:49, Abraham Lee wrote:
> >>> That
On 12/11/15 17:53, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 12.11.2015 16:52, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hello, Simon!
On 12/11/15 11:21, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Two annotations:
– Sometimes it would be nice to have whiteout for DynamicTextSpanner
against SpanBar; I don’t quite know the best way to do it,
Hey,
On 11/11/15 19:22, tisimst wrote:
This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines
;-). I'll look at it in greater detail later, but here's one thing that
I immediately noticed quite a few instances of that you would get dinged
for: You should ALWAYS enclose a tied
Hi all,
Final version here:
https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf
Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in case anybody
spots any critical issue. I should say I am quite happy with it, and
will print it ASAP to play it :)
Thank you, again,
On 20/11/15 11:30, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hey
On 20/11/2015 05:49, Abraham Lee wrote:
That being said, since there appears to be arguments for doing it both
ways, I'd recommend that you pick one way and be consistent throughout
the entire work.
Can I ask what you like better? [1]
Valse 2,
On 21.11.2015 20:21, Alberto Simões wrote:
On 20/11/15 11:30, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hey
On 20/11/2015 05:49, Abraham Lee wrote:
That being said, since there appears to be arguments for doing it both
ways, I'd recommend that you pick one way and be consistent throughout
the entire work.
Hey
On 20/11/2015 05:49, Abraham Lee wrote:
That being said, since there appears to be arguments for doing it both
ways, I'd recommend that you pick one way and be consistent throughout
the entire work.
Yes, of course. I will try and check which one looks better.
If you have updated files
On 11/11/15 19:22, tisimst wrote:
[1] https://github.com/ambs/music/tree/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous
This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines
;-). I'll look at it in greater detail later, but here's one thing that
I immediately noticed quite a few instances
Alberto,
On Thursday, November 19, 2015, Alberto Simões <
al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/11/15 19:22, tisimst wrote:
>
>> [1] https://github.com/ambs/music/tree/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous
>>
>>
>> This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines
>>
That's about all for now. Hope that helps.
- Abraham
Thank you, Abraham
I will work the suggestions this weekend and let you all know when I
have it fixed.
Best,
Alberto
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Alberto,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n183480...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
On 12.11.2015 16:52, Alberto Simões wrote:
>
> > Hello, Simon!
> >
> > On 12/11/15 11:21, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> >>
> >> Two annotations:
> >> – Sometimes it would be
On 11.11.2015 15:39, Alberto Simões wrote:
Dear list,
Again, I am both pleased to announce the transcription of the Gounod
Suite of Valses, "Le Rendez Vous" [1] and asking for any correction
you might suggest.
Two annotations:
– Sometimes it would be nice to have whiteout for
Hello, Simon!
On 12/11/15 11:21, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Two annotations:
– Sometimes it would be nice to have whiteout for DynamicTextSpanner
against SpanBar; I don’t quite know the best way to do it, though.
Perhaps you could use \markup\whiteout-box on the individual text bits?
I didn't
On 12.11.2015 16:52, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hello, Simon!
On 12/11/15 11:21, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Two annotations:
– Sometimes it would be nice to have whiteout for DynamicTextSpanner
against SpanBar; I don’t quite know the best way to do it, though.
Perhaps you could use \markup\whiteout-box
Hi, Abraham
This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines
;-). I'll look at it in greater detail later, but here's one thing that
I immediately noticed quite a few instances of that you would get dinged
for: You should ALWAYS enclose a tied note within a slurred
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n183435...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Although not doubting your suggestion, I would be very interested to
> know if there is such a thing like a document describing a "best
> practices" for writing/engraving music.
Alberto,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n183419...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Again, I am both pleased to announce the transcription of the Gounod
> Suite of Valses, "Le Rendez Vous" [1] and asking for any correction you
> might
On 11/11/15 19:41, tisimst wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond]
<[hidden email] > wrote:
Although not doubting your suggestion, I would be very interested to
know if there is such a thing like a document describing a "best
practices" for
On 11.11.2015 20:29, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi, Abraham
This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines
;-). I'll look at it in greater detail later, but here's one thing that
I immediately noticed quite a few instances of that you would get dinged
for: You should
On Wed 11 Nov 2015 at 12:22:32 (-0700), tisimst wrote:
> This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines ;-).
> I'll look at it in greater detail later, but here's one thing that I
> immediately noticed quite a few instances of that you would get dinged for:
> You
> should
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:18 PM, David Wright [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n183444...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> On Wed 11 Nov 2015 at 12:22:32 (-0700), tisimst wrote:
>
> > This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines
> ;-).
> > I'll look at it in greater detail later,
On 11/11/15 21:16, David Wright wrote:
On Wed 11 Nov 2015 at 12:22:32 (-0700), tisimst wrote:
This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines ;-).
I'll look at it in greater detail later, but here's one thing that I
immediately noticed quite a few instances of that you
On 11/11/15 20:00, Simon Albrecht wrote:
I’d not keep slavishly to these, though; there has always been room for
disagreement and personal preference in this discipline.
Agreed :-)
I think that disagreement is always good. But to disagree I need to know
with which to disagree about :)
On Wed 11 Nov 2015 at 14:21:45 (-0700), tisimst wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 2:18 PM, David Wright [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> On Wed 11 Nov 2015 at 12:22:32 (-0700), tisimst wrote:
>
> > This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines ;
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
