On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:52:27PM -0700, Tim Pepper wrote:
> On Tue 21 May at 15:18:35 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] done said:
> >
> > Please test ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/s390/ and let us know
> > about any problems left. Please also note that the latest OCO modules from IBM
> >
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:34:40PM -0400, Dave Myers wrote:
> I tried installing the glibc-common-2.2.4-20.s390.rpm
> from the RH 7.2 updates FTP site.
>
> I get this if I use: rpm -Uvh glibc-common-2.2.4-20.s390.rpm
>
> error: failed dependencies:
> glibc-common = 2.2.4-19a is needed by
> >Others can tell you how to allow root to
> >telnet in, but I won't, cause I like you. :)
>
> I hold you in high esteem, also, but if I were to do something to cause
> you NOT to like me ... THEN would you tell me :) ? (Remember ... this
> is only a 'temporary' thing, right?). BTW, ARE you sa
Yes, I am logged in as root... the permissions:
drwxrwxrwt 3 root root 4096 May 24 07:50 tmp
- Tim -
"Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 23.05.2002 15:35:51
Bitte antworten an Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gesendet von: Linux on 390 Port <[EMAIL
> Forst, many thanks to those who responded earlier with all of the
> usefull information and URLs that helped me get the install completed to
> DASD (finally decided to rob from Notes390 to give to Linux390 and ended
> up reusing a mod 9 ... so plenty of room!).
>
> I have utilized the vast wisdo
What if it doesn't show the maintenance level? I received, applied and
built a new nucleus today, and after I ipled it still did not give me a
maintenance level when I issued the query vmlan command. I'm pretty sure
that is applied, I was able to find the symbol HCPLANML and display
storage, it sh
You haven't gotten to the scary part yet. That happens when you start
explaining things to others!
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: sysinfo.o: No such fil
Paul,
Now you're asking the right questions. Yes, create an account that has only
normal user privileges. Most distributions have either an "adduser" or
"useradd" command to do this. You should read the man page for yours to see
what additional command switches you need to specify so that the
I found the problem. Patch linux-2.4.7-s390-3.diff was applied with
?dry-run, which means it was not actually applied. This patch is the one
that creates the sysinfo.c.
I apologize for jumping the gun. The scary part is this stuff is starting
to make sense!
Thanks everyone.
Peter
Peter
>Telnet login by root is probably not allowed. It's not good security
>practice since telnet traffic passes in clear text. Something someone
in
>your job would know is not a good thing. :)
Touche, Mark! But if you had seen me cursing the HMC console using
'echo' to change parm files, you'd s
We applied IBM's patch linux-2.4.7-s390-3.diff through
linux-2.4.7-s390-7.diff to SuSE's 2.4.7 kernel. All appeared to go well
except the "make image" fails with "ld: cannot open sysinfo.o: No such
file or directory".
A find command cannot find sysinfo.o or sysinfo.c. This problem was
introdu
Paul,
Telnet login by root is probably not allowed. It's not good security
practice since telnet traffic passes in clear text. Something someone in
your job would know is not a good thing. :)
Use OpenSSH instead, and use either TeratermPro with the ttssh SSH add-on,
or PuTTY to access your sy
Forst, many thanks to those who responded earlier with all of the
usefull information and URLs that helped me get the install completed to
DASD (finally decided to rob from Notes390 to give to Linux390 and ended
up reusing a mod 9 ... so plenty of room!).
I have utilized the vast wisdom of the li
On Tue 21 May at 08:52:44 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] done said:
>
> this one had LINUX inside the fish! I had to look twice to convince myself!
>
w/ shark fin on top of the fish... :) Us zealots are coming for you. Was it
a honda civic? Might've been me or one of my friends.
--
I successfully upgraded to kernel 2.4.9-37 today, ran the zipl,
then rebooted.
Wow...I actually have a system with lcs working!!!
But...why do I get these errors and how do I eliminate them from the log??
I'm assuming that the lcs is now part of the 2.4.9-37 kernel? and that's why
it is working d
On Tue 21 May at 15:18:35 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] done said:
>
> Please test ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/rawhide/s390/ and let us know
> about any problems left. Please also note that the latest OCO modules from IBM
> for the Red Hat Linux kernel 2.4.9-37 contain a special "ocord.img" wh
Greg,
If I'm reading your CPU model correctly, this is a G3 machine? If so, you
might have to wait a while for the first messages to start showing up.
Also, double check whether the tape is SL or NL, as Hank suggested. If you
look closely at his JCL, you'll note he writes out multiple sets of t
The BOOTtape one is to be used during the installation process when not
running under VM. The other one is to be used when booting from DASD, when
not running under VM.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Dave Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:24 PM
To: [EMA
Anybody that has valid complaints should send them over to the Editor of
the publication. I have found that to be effective in the past.
While it is no crime to be opinionated, objectivity in the press is
something that is the basis for reviews. However, the American press
suffers from this all o
The kernel-tape-2.4.9-37.s390.rpm reads:
Summary : The Linux Kernel compiled for booting from tape
The kernel-BOOTtape-2.4.9-37.s390.rpm reads:
This package includes a kernel that has appropriate configuration
options enabled for booting from tape.
What is the difference between these t
> I tried installing the glibc-common-2.2.4-20.s390.rpm
> from the RH 7.2 updates FTP site.
>
> I get this if I use: rpm -Uvh glibc-common-2.2.4-20.s390.rpm
>
> error: failed dependencies:
> glibc-common = 2.2.4-19a is needed by glibc-2.2.4-19a
>
>
> AndI get this if I use: rpm -ivh
... and last I hope!
The really aggravating thing is that the guy quite
obviously doesn't know what he is talking/writing
about. In spite of the feedback he received he still
has an obvious "Don't bother me with facts. My mind is
made up!" attitute.
Good riddance!
"Jon R
I see Rudy couldn't resist flogging a dead horse. He put that silly
SETI@home comparison in there anyway. Oh well. Maybe he'd be interested in
how badly an old 4381 compares to a Intel 80486-33 system I have at home.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Jon R. Doyle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
http://www.linuxworld.com/site-stories/2002/0522.mainframelinux.html
Jon R. Doyle
Sendmail Inc.
6425 Christie Ave
Emeryville, Ca. 94608
(o_
(o_ (o_ //\
(/)_ (\)_ V_/_
Greg,
I'm using Turbo; this is the JCL I use to create the IPL tape. Are you sure
you are writing the 1st file of an NL tape?
Hank Calzaretta
//WCS0791X JOB (0),'TURBO-LINUX',CLASS=J,MSGCLASS=R,
// NOTIFY=&SYSUID,REGION=9M
//TOTAPE PROC LBL=NOSUCH,FILE=NOSUCH.FILE
//IEBGNR EXEC PGM=IEBGE
I have been trying to install TurboLinux 6.5 on our 9762-R35 box with no
success.
I made the IPL tape using the free distribution following the
documentation to the letter.
I wrote the 3 datasets LINUX390.IMAGE.TXT, LINUX390.PARM.LINE and
LINUX390.INITRD.TXT to a 3480 cartridge.
As far as I can t
I guess they didn't know (or more likely care) about "Blue Away" ;-)
http://www.esj.com/news/article.asp?EditorialsID=205
http://famulus.msnbc.com/famuluscom/businesswire05-23-040157.asp?sym=IBM
"CLEVELAND, May 23 - Sherwin-Williams
(NYSE:SHW) today announced it has chosen
IBM to provide the store technology
infrastructure for the company's more than 2,500
I tried installing the glibc-common-2.2.4-20.s390.rpm
from the RH 7.2 updates FTP site.
I get this if I use: rpm -Uvh glibc-common-2.2.4-20.s390.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
glibc-common = 2.2.4-19a is needed by glibc-2.2.4-19a
AndI get this if I use: rpm -ivh glibc-common-2.2
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 10:22:50AM -0400, Post, Mark K wrote:
> Florian,
>
> Thanks for the response. One area is still unanswered, though. How is this
> update going to be stored on the FTP server? What directories will it be
> in? The same ones as the original GA version, or somewhere else?
Mark,
You guys are awesome! You were right. Most of the executables in the
/java/bin directory on the WAS installation CD have zero length! I've got 2
copies of the CD with the same problem. Boy, talk about effective
compression ;o) !!
Thanks for your help,
Hank
-Original Message-
F
Hank,
The binfmt- message means you have a zero-length file somewhere that
someone/thing is trying to execute as a command/program. To help figure out
what that is, you could try doing an "strace -f -F javacommand" to see if
you can narrow it down.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From
Rich,
Yes, I'm running as root. Java is not yet installed on this machine. It
gets installed with WAS. To issue the "java -version" I made a copy of the
install.sh, which sets up CLASSPATH etc to point to the CD, and changed the
java invocation therein. I don't get anything back, except for t
Go to the directory where java is installed and try 'java -version' outside
of a shell script. You don't need a CLASSPATH for this.
On Thursday 23 May 2002 09:48 am, you wrote:
> Rich,
>
> Yes, I'm running as root. Java is not yet installed on this machine. It
> gets installed with WAS. To is
Motorola gave up :)
WBR, Sergey
Reesing
Gregory-O10511 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: rhsetup options
Sent by: Linux on
390 Port
Paul,
Resist that impulse. "Everything" is far too much to fit, and far more than
you'll have an opportunity to play with for a very long time. Go for the
"server" install and you'll be fine.
Basically, all the Linux/390 installs do the same thing. They format your
DASD with 4096 byte blocks.
I'm installing WAS 4.0.2 on a SuSE 2.2.16 system and the WAS install script
is getting the following message on a java invocation:
modprobe: Can't locate module binfmt-
Has anyone ever seen this before? Other folks have asked the question on
various discussion threads on the Web, bu
Are you installing as root? I think that is required. Can you check the
java version (java -version) and get a response back?
On Thursday 23 May 2002 09:16 am, you wrote:
> I'm installing WAS 4.0.2 on a SuSE 2.2.16 system and the WAS install script
> is getting the following message on a java i
Tim,
The SuSE distribution has a compress package:
cd1/suse/a1/compress.rpm
You can see what is in all the Linux/390 distributions by going to
http://linuxvm.org/Info/packages.html
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Tim-Chr. Hanschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23,
Please remove me from the mailing list
-Original Message-
From: paultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 7:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: rhsetup options
I finally got the RH7.2 downloads completed (I hope), and today I will
start my install (LPAR mode). I h
Hey Paul, if you haven't yet, check out "Red Hat Linux 7.2: The Official
Red Hat Linux for S/390 Installation Guide"
available at http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/linux/RHL-7.2-Manual/ in
a few formats. Sections 1.9-1.10.1 talk about requirements and
according to that it looks like an everythin
Florian,
Thanks for the response. One area is still unanswered, though. How is this
update going to be stored on the FTP server? What directories will it be
in? The same ones as the original GA version, or somewhere else? I ask
because I'd like to be able to very clearly explain to anyone wh
paultz wrote:
> I finally got the RH7.2 downloads completed (I hope), and today I will
> start my install (LPAR mode). I have the tape system IPLed, telneted in
> and started rhsetup. On the installation menu, one of the panels asks
> what type of installation you want to perform. My first impu
Sergey,
>From "man 8 fstab":
The sixth field, (fs_passno), is used by the fsck(8) program to determine
the order in which filesystem checks are done at reboot time. The root
filesystem should be specified with a fs_passno of 1, and other filesystems
should have a fs_passno of 2. Filesystems
I finally got the RH7.2 downloads completed (I hope), and today I will
start my install (LPAR mode). I have the tape system IPLed, telneted in
and started rhsetup. On the installation menu, one of the panels asks
what type of installation you want to perform. My first impulse is
"install everyt
Tim,
Are you doing this as root? What are the permissions on the /tmp directory?
ls -la /tmp
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Tim-Chr. Hanschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: patch problem
Hi,
I tried to patch kernel
on my RH system:
# rpm -qf /usr/bin/compress
ncompress-4.2.4-24
# rpm -ql ncompress
/usr/bin/compress
/usr/bin/uncompress
/usr/share/doc/ncompress-4.2.4
/usr/share/doc/ncompress-4.2.4/LZW.INFO
/usr/share/doc/ncompress-4.2.4/README
/usr/share/man/man1/compress.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/uncompress.1.
Hi,
a collegue of mine called my today, because he was looking for compress on
SuSE L390
Well, I told him to use gzip, but the problem is, that he has a lot of
scripts which use compress and he don't want to change all scripts, because
they are for other unix-systems as well.
My solution wa
About Apache.
Look at:
/etc/rc.config.d/apache.rc.config
#
# timeout during server startup (seconds)
# after this time, the start script decides wether the httpd process
started without error
# increase it if you use mod_ssl and your certificate is passphrase
protected
#
HTTPD_START_TIMEOUT=40
Hello, All.
If one disk from fstab can't be mount (power failure or something like it)
Linux won't boot to normal operations. But maybe this disk realy don't need
for system. Can I say to Linux, if you can't mount this disk, skeep it. Or
I don't have to define such disks in fstab?
WBR, Sergey
Thanks to Rob & Sergey, it's done now
regards,
Yoyok
:)You must add address of this volume to parmfile (dasd=...)
:)and run silo.
:)Then, reIPL, dasdfmt, mkfs, etc...
:)
:)WBR, Sergey
Hi Neale,
> Is this the same bit of logic in 2.4.7:
Indeed:
diff -urN linux-2.4.7/arch/s390/mm/fault.c linux-2.4.7-s390/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
--- linux-2.4.7/arch/s390/mm/fault.c Thu May 23 10:04:50 2002
+++ linux-2.4.7-s390/arch/s390/mm/fault.c Wed May 22 20:13:04 2002
@@ -163,6 +163,8 @@
52 matches
Mail list logo
