On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 11:35:03AM -0600, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> For example, the G40 uses software in your running operating system to
> tell you your battery life. Or at least it seems to. But the big deal
> is with Linux, my laptop overheats. On the XP side, there is a power
> management app
Things like network card (wireless even more) , winmodem (needs to be
disabled for modem connection), USB devices, CDROM can delay installation.
If you are prepared to run Linux as a guest under Windows, VMWare ($$)
bridges the LAN between Windows and Linux.
"Terrence W. Zellers" <[EMAIL PROT
Client on way out the door today showed me a linux SuSE SLES8
system. There is no login prompt at the 3270, putty/ssh works from
out in the network.
I have seen that this was a problem in SuSE7 under certain circumstances.
Anyone seen or experienced anything similar? Any fixes in SLES8?
Thanks,
According to RFC792 the type 11 record is a "Time Exceeded Message" record. This can
be a time to live exceeded, or a fragment reassembly time exceeded. My guess would be
the first. This message is generated by your router. You may be specifying the wrong
IP for your default gateway, or some
Each of my systems that report the message only give their own IP addr. In
fact, the first message comes when booting up and after the Binding to the
NIS domain message.
Is this just a nuisance message then? Should I suspress it in
/etc/sysctl.conf?
Betsie
- Original Message -
From: "Alan
On Llu, 2004-02-23 at 23:12, Betsie Spann wrote:
> Someone kindly responded to my first question on what might be causing the invalid
> ICMP type 11 records. He suggested that it may be a bad netmask. I have checked
> and rechecked my /etc/sysconfig/network and
> /etc/sysconfig/network-script
On Monday, 02/23/2004 at 02:35 CST, "McKown, John"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps what is really desired is for IBM to port the DIRECTXA program
to
> run under Linux?
Of far more interest (to me, anyway) is to integrate VM enterprise-wide
open, standards-based system management technologies.
On Monday, 02/23/2004 at 03:41 EST, Bruce Hayden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ref: Your note of Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:36:03 -0600 (attached)
>
> Well, there's always hcp send directxa user direct
> (with proper privs or SET SECUSER in effect.)
All of these async mechanisms do not provide ret
Someone kindly responded to my first question on what might be causing the invalid
ICMP type 11 records. He suggested that it may be a bad netmask. I have checked and
rechecked my /etc/sysconfig/network and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
files and cannot find a problem.
Any other
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 02:07:41PM -0800, Betsie Spann wrote:
> I can find compat-db-4.0.14-5.s390x.rpm
> compat-libstdc++-7.2-2.95.3.77.s390x.rpm
compat-libstdc++ is needed often as compat lib and it is actually
part of the gcc source code.
> compat-pwdb-0.62-3.s390x.rpm
> but nothing called c
I can find compat-db-4.0.14-5.s390x.rpm
compat-libstdc++-7.2-2.95.3.77.s390x.rpm
compat-pwdb-0.62-3.s390x.rpm
but nothing called compat-gcc
Betsie
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: RHEL3 f
On Llu, 2004-02-23 at 19:53, Betsie Spann wrote:
> RedHat has said that Rh 3.0 has gcc 2.95 compatibility libraries. I can't find
> them. Anyone know what they are called?
> Betsie
I'm not directly familiar with RHEL3 S/390 but the general naming policy
is compat-[something].
Correct. This change will reduce us to 4 Ficon channels from 16 Escon (resulting in
some CHPID changes) but the devices (and addresses) will remain the same.
Thanks Adam.
--Harold
-Original Message-
From: Adam Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 14:04
To:
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 13:07, Kubannek, Harold wrote:
> From the limited research I have done, it would appear we should be fine (no
> maintenance required).
I would anticipate no problems; I assume the device addresses are going
to stay the same?
Adam
Does the DIRMAINT server respond to SMSG commands? If it does then with
proper authorization an
"hcp SMSG DIRMAINT DIRECTXA ..." could work without bothering with the
SCIFed console.
/Thomas Kern
/301-903-2211
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Hayden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Mo
Ref: Your note of Mon, 23 Feb 2004 14:36:03 -0600 (attached)
Well, there's always hcp send directxa user direct
(with proper privs or SET SECUSER in effect.)
Bruce Hayden
IBM Global Services
- Note follows --
From: Dave Jones <[EMAI
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 2:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: overwrite user direct c from a linux guest
>
>
> Right, DIRECTXA is a CMS module and expects the SUER DIRECT file to be
> on a CMS file system (
Right, DIRECTXA is a CMS module and expects the SUER DIRECT file to be
on a CMS file system (either minidisk or SFS).
Adam Thornton wrote:
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 12:03, Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich wrote:
With cpint-1.1.6 its really easy to issue commands to z/vm, so thats not a
problem, i would try
Can you build your own gcc? I realize for an oracle customer, that is a
pain . . . but when you have to make do . . .
> -Original Message-
> From: Betsie Spann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 1:53 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RHEL3 for s390x gcc 2.95 c
Hi all,
I've searched the archives but haven't found anything. I'm looking for a
real live ftp-ssl client (not scp or ssh or any of the port 22 stuff) I
need to ftp-ssl client that uses port 990 by default.
Any idea where I can find one for linux/390?
Thanks - Brad Harris.
-Original Mess
RedHat has said that Rh 3.0 has gcc 2.95 compatibility libraries. I can't find them.
Anyone know what they are called?
Betsie
Hi,
we are scheduled to move from Escon (attaching our z900 to the ESS (shark) dasd) to
Ficon in the next few weeks. We are still "playing" with Linux in a single LPAR (no
z/VM involved). We run Redhat 7.2 with the Linux kernel at 2.4.21, with the IBM June
2003 stream applied (patched to linu
Excuse me, I have not considered that.
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Adam Thornton wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 12:03, Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich wrote:
> > With cpint-1.1.6 its really easy to issue commands to z/vm, so thats not a
> > problem, i would try nfs to update user direct.
>
> Well, not a pro
Also look at http://www.linux-laptop.net/
I'm also contemplating getting a Linux laptop...going to develop some free sw as I
travel around in my retirement freedom.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Monday, February 2
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 12:03, Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich wrote:
> With cpint-1.1.6 its really easy to issue commands to z/vm, so thats not a
> problem, i would try nfs to update user direct.
Well, not a problem except that you can't issue CMS commands, only CP
commands, and DIRECTXA is a CMS comman
With cpint-1.1.6 its really easy to issue commands to z/vm, so thats not a
problem, i would try nfs to update user direct.
Thanks
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Friday, 02/20/2004 at 06:54 CST, Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all, is there any way to
If you have a monolithic USER DIRECT and want to use it with DIRMAINT, just
change the name to USER INPUT and put it on DIRMAINT's 1DF disk and then
restart DIRMAINT. Upon start up DIRMAINT will convert it to its internal
form.
Any time later if you need the monolithic form again issue a DIRM BACK
It depends on how much you want to play.
I just got a Thinkpad G40. I used Partition Magic to reduce the size
of the XP partition and then loaded Suse 9.0 on it.
It works. I didn't get much futher then that. But.
Unlike my previous Thinkpad 770x, which had certain things done via
hardware
David's got a great point. Again.
I've had similarly positive experiences with the Thinkpad/SuSE
combination. I'm running an A41 Thinkpad dual-booted with SuSE 8.2 and
Windows 2000. I find that I spend most of my time using the Linux
persona. Everything works - no fuss, no muss, no bother, eve
> I hope this doesn't upset anybody. But I am considering
> getting a Laptop. Of
> course, I am only interested in one running Linux/Intel. But
> most vendors
> are "suggesting" Windows XP. I've only found a couple of Linux laptop
> vendors (ASA Computers and EmperorLinux). And their prices are in
www.linuxlaptops.org.
You'll probably be better off doing it yourself. Make sure the
hardware is supported under linux (stay away from centrino chipsets
until the drivers are out and tested). Have heard good things about
Linux on Dell laptops, some but less about HP's. Proba
Michael Coffin's gone through the technical reasons to like VM:Secure;
operationally, VM:Secure is a lot friendlier to humans. VM:Secure has (IMHO)
an exceptionally well thought out UI, both for human users and for program
integration (line-mode). It's easily possible to delegate directory
maintena
Is there any way to use Dirmaint with a monolithic directory structure?
- Jason Herne
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 16:46, Dennis Wicks wrote:
> Greetings;
>
> Yes, I use it and have been using it for about five years.
>
> What I like about it is that I can still use xedit & directxa
> as I have for year
I hope this doesn't upset anybody. But I am considering getting a Laptop. Of
course, I am only interested in one running Linux/Intel. But most vendors
are "suggesting" Windows XP. I've only found a couple of Linux laptop
vendors (ASA Computers and EmperorLinux). And their prices are in the
"premium
Greetings;
Yes, I use it and have been using it for about five years.
What I like about it is that I can still use xedit & directxa
as I have for years and use DRM for allocating mdisks.
The only problem I have with it is that the second & subsequent
PF12 (File+map+directxa) won't accept the ful
Hi Jason: DIRMAINT provides two valuable functions:
1. automated directory management
2. storage management primatives
In combination with DATAMOVE disks can be automatically formatted,
files copied on change of size, etc. With gerrymandering of a DATAMOVE
exit with some simple controls linux disk
The function some of us miss is automation.
SSH into and out from z/VM is vital for remote automatic operations.
-- R;
> To me that seems like a giant step backward in capability. You will
lose
> the 3270 capabilities of the system -- very similar to linemode
telnet.
Think of it first as a replacement for rexec than as a terminal
connection. It makes more sense that way. In this case, the remote
execution functio
Has anyone used DRM from the VM Downloads site?
Most of what I *really* want in a directory maintenance program is,
frankly, not having to manually calculate minidisk extents.
Adam
I have always used DIRMAINT even when we paid for VM/Secure as part of the
VM/Center package. We have never been such an active, volatile, complicated
site that VM/Secure does better than DIRMAINT. DIRMAINT is cheap enough for
my bosses to not want to get rid of yet. It does what little I need it t
VM:Secure is a Directory Maintenance program just like DIRMAINT. Unlike
DIRMAINT, it is also an External Security Manager (ESM). If you use
DIRMAINT, you would also need license IBM's RACF for VM (very expensive and
VERY unfriendly for VM systems, it's ported from z/OS).
DIRMAINT uses IUCV messa
What is VM:Secure, what kind of license, and why do you like it over
Dirmaint? Thanks.
- Jason Herne
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 14:12, Coffin Michael C wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> IMHO Dirmaint is, and always has been, a dog! I use VM:Secure, I've
> replaced DIRMAINT with VM:secure in more shops than I
Hi Jason,
IMHO Dirmaint is, and always has been, a dog! I use VM:Secure, I've
replaced DIRMAINT with VM:secure in more shops than I can count over the
past 20 years. :)
Michael Coffin, VM Systems Programmer
Internal Revenue Service - Room 6527
Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20
You still did not address my concerns or address why I would implement
CA-ACF2. Here are 6 reasons why I would not use CA-ACF2.
1. Solaris
2. Windows
3. Active Directory
4. HP/UX
5. Linux/IA32 and IA64
6. AIX
We have over 1500 servers that today use /etc/passwd or some other means
to authenticat
44 matches
Mail list logo
