I've grep'ed the kernel source (2.4.7-ac3 which I happened to have sitting
on my R/390) and found conmode= as a kernel parm
(/usr/src/linux/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c). I assume that support is there
in later kernels.
I think the last time we discussed this on the list the thoughts were to
have def
-
From: Post, Mark K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
> If I remember the debates from earlier in the year, if both 3215 and 3270
> console support is defined t
On Wednesday, 12/19/2001 at 02:19 EST, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I'm walking over to engineering right now to see
> > what we'll do
> > with our 2.4 beta (and upcoming GA's) in terms of switching
> > back to 3215
> > support.
> > Does anyone else on the list have
D]
Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
Chris - The only thing I could think of is that having 3270 support might
help when using something like the 3270 support module UTS Global offer
(see their HOWTO at ftp://ftp.utsglobal.com/pub/tub3270/oldstuff/HOWTO).
I'
> I'm walking over to engineering right now to see
> what we'll do
> with our 2.4 beta (and upcoming GA's) in terms of switching
> back to 3215
> support.
> Does anyone else on the list have comments about this?
My 2 sous (for a few more days, anyway...exchanged your currency fo
;From:Christopher Lowry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
>
>Mark
>
>Thanks for the help. I had to remove the 3270 support and add the 3215
>support. The 2.4.5 kernel is working with the 3215 console.
>After a review
L PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
> After a review of the 3270 documentation and doing some
> testing, I could
> see not see any advantage to the 3270.
The biggest plus to a 327
"Post, Mark K"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> com> cc:
> Sent by: Linux Subject: Re:
> Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
>
> After a review of the 3270 documentation and doing some testing, I could
> see not see any advantage to the 3270. Is there a 3270 style edit
program
> (like VM XEdit) that works with this driver ?
Try IPL'ing LINUX native on P/390 or R/390 and you'll instantly understand
why the 3270 support
XEdit) that works with this driver ?
Chris
"Post, Mark K"
cc:
Sent by: Linux Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the
Console is nolonger 3215
on 390 Port
Heij To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
> Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the
Console is nolonger 3215
Sent by: Linux
on 390 Port
"Post, Mark K" wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> You'll have to build a new kernel to change that. Unload the appropriate
> source, make sure all the patches are applied that Turbolinux uses. Copy
> what ever configuration file they use into the top-level kernel source
> directory as ".config". Do a "make
"Ferguson, Neale" wrote:
>
> The big advantage of the 3215 is the ability to use the Secondary user
> facility to manage it by another virtual machine like PROP or VM:Operator.
And the advantage of the 3270 is that you can use ncurses
based stuff?
The big advantage of the 3215 is the ability to use the Secondary user
facility to manage it by another virtual machine like PROP or VM:Operator.
> -Original Message-
> Chris - I've forwarded this thread on to our engineering. You
> may wish to
> communicate directly with our engineer and
>
>--
>
>>Date:Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:20:35 -0500
>>From: "Post, Mark K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Re: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
>>
>>Chris,
>>
>>You'll have to b
ost
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Lowry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and the Console is nolonger 3215
In the process of testing Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and find the console is a 3270
not a 3215. Can this b
In the process of testing Turbo 2.4.5 Beta and find the console is a 3270
not a 3215. Can this be changed ? With the 3270, I can not autolog the
guest or send commands via secuser.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Chris
17 matches
Mail list logo
