Holger,
you confuse me - we can deal with VM rejecting our SPID requests.
Worked fine with minidisk and dedicated disks in the past. Did
smth change ?
Best regards,
Ingo
**
Ingo Adlung,
Linux for zSeries - Strategy Design
My understanding is that the old, old, old, _real_ 3380 devices don't
support ECKD, which is necessary for support in Linux/390. If those are
indeed that type of device, then I believe you are out of luck.
If the 3380's are behind a 3990 Control Unit I suppose one could go
and remove all coded
I've never tried to use DHCPCD on Linux/390. Sounds a little bizarre to
me.
Still, you might try using a Linux DHCPD server and see if it handles
things
better.
If you're using an OSA in QDIO mode, virtual hipersockets in z/VM 4.2 or
CTC/IUCV links, DHCP (server or client) will not work. It
**
Ingo Adlung,
Linux for zSeries - Strategy Design
The box said, 'Requires Windows95 or better', ...so I installed LINUX.
David,
the way we envision we could operate PAV devices would work for
different storage attachment technologies than ESCON/FICON too ... :-)
Best regards,
Ingo
**
Ingo Adlung,
Linux for zSeries - Strategy Design
The box
instead. Depends on the
workload ...
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
Linux for zSeries - Strategy Design
The box said, 'Requires Windows95 or better', ...so I installed LINUX.
Barton Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on
25.04.2002 16:48:30
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL
--
Ingo Adlung,
Linux for zSeries - Strategy Design
The box said, 'Requires Windows95 or better', ...so I installed LINUX.
Sergey Korzhevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 25.05.2002
11:36:19
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL
It is not - I'll contact you offline, understanding your requirements.
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
Linux for zSeries - Strategy Design
The box said, 'Requires Windows95 or better', ...so I installed LINUX.
Sergey Korzhevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 25.05.2002
13:17:31
Please respond
We are aware of it and are already working with George Kraft
defining a LSB base for zSeries ... :-) Getting applications,
including IBM's embracing it is a different challenge, though,
and not unique to a particular platform.
Best regards,
Ingo
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on
you worry about...
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
Linux for zSeries - Architecture Design
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
understand those) but real
workload you folks run in your shops.
Thanks and best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
Linux for zSeries - Architecture Design
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
|-+
| | James Peddycord
contact me directly at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks in advance and best regards,
Ingo Adlung
--
Ingo Adlung,
zSeries Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe
BR setup that GDPS provides support for.
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
zSeries Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04.05.2005 16:36:30:
I
was thinking
to do a Sync and Drop process
. I simply maintain that it does not produce
reliable backups for a large class of users.
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
zSeries Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote
, however, it is this
connection that imposes your MTU limits - is OSA connected to a
network supporting jumbo frames and have you configured the VM OSA
TCP/IP definition accordingly? If yes you should be fine.
Best regards,
Ingo Adlung
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 09.06.2005
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 07.10.2005 17:35:05:
vmcp has a return value, which you can check in scripts.
e.g:
# vmcp some large query
# echo $?
0 stands for everything is fine, any other value for problems.
vmcp returns ENOBUFS (105) if the buffer was not
or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards,
Ingo Adlung
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO
and the service
level you were running back then it is hard to judge whether you unveiled
a possible bug, though. Did you involve IBM or distributor service at that
time?
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 19.02.2006 02:53:39:
Ingo Adlung wrote:
VM doesn't shield from Linux
Gruß / Best regards,
Ingo Adlung
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization
...
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 08.08.2006 18:57:51:
That looks like you don't have the zfcp kernel module on your system.
What does
with ourselves. If we could nail down
the problem Mike describes it could certainly become a nice add-on feature
:-)
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote
some light on that ...
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 08.08.2006 23:31:47:
Ah! I see what you meant.
Yes, he was using EDEV. Neat
, but currently this
anticipated support is limited to LPAR only, as z/VM doesn't provide
the required guest support, yet. STP will follow.
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390
face without!
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 11.10.2006 20:41:46:
On 10/11/06, Ingo Adlung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are working
be managed. That means there has to be a process in your networking
group
who assigns them.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
Best regards,
Ingo
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards,
Ingo Adlung
* * * Frohes Neues Jahr * * * Happy New Year * * * Feliz Año Nuevo * * *
Bonne Année * * *
--
Ingo Adlung,
STSM, System z Linux and Virtualization Architecture
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - phone: +49-7031-16-4263
/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
[attachment barton.vcf deleted by Ingo Adlung/Germany/IBM]
The tape support should be in place to my knowledge. What's missing is
the tape management piece.
Of course we could consider writing a driver that applies tape library
functions for VTS but without any tape management software on top it
would only be a piece of technology. I.e. if there is any
Bob,
could you please explain your pain points with GDPS/XRC in your Linux/VM
setup? While z/VM itself doesn't seem to timestamp its I/O Linux does and
z/VM would carry all Linux timestamps out to the storage control unit as it
re-issues the Linux I/O requests. Do you have problems with these
Bob,
AFAIK GDPS/XRC is a supported configuration except that only the Linux I/O
is timestamped and hence XRC eligible while I/O on VM's own behalf is not
(unless it changed recently). I.e. if this is acceptable for your setup you
should be able adding Linux volumes to your XRC configuration. Not
Bob David,
I understand and share your frustration in regard to this particular
issue. However, let me please assure this is not about stepchild'ing
the z/VM environment and/or not understanding the necessity for z/VM
being a critical part of an end-to-end managed structure. Instead it
is about
- sigh.
So also for Linux volumes that are GDPS/XRC managed through z/OS you
must currently not define data consistency groups passing LPAR
boundaries - z/VM or not. If you have an immediate need for it (or
already use it unaware of said limitations) please let me know!
Best regards
Ingo
-
Ingo
/ signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
http://www.marist.edu/htbin/wlvindex?LINUX-390
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards
Ingo Adlung
--
For LINUX-390
/linux_z_database_performance_2008_02_26.pdf
for more information about running Informix on Linux on z.
Best regards
Ingo Adlung
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 19.09.2008 16:38:54:
anyone doing this yet ?
We appear to be about to jump into this world and any advise is welcome.
We
the hosting environment more appropriate for
their very workload use patterns :-)
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards
Ingo Adlung
Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu wrote on 26.07.2012 17:17:19:
From: גדי בן אבי gad...@malam.com
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu,
Date: 26.07.2012 17:38
Subject: Re
completion status you know it ended up fine on
the device? i.e. verification only satisfying paranoia?
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards
Ingo Adlung
Ingo AdlungIBM Deutschland Research
to operate on are configured to it you can presumably safely turn
it off.
Best regards
Ingo
Ingo AdlungIBM Deutschland Research
IBM Distinguished Engineer Development GmbH
Hi Alan,
> This isn't how DIAGNOSE instructions work. Instead of worrying about
> converting user privclass to IBMCLASS and associating with the running
> DIAGNOSE, it's done in the more primitive hindbrain of CP.
> Architecturally, a DIAGNOSE is associated a SINGLE privilege class (or
>
and the concurrent,
aggregated CPU capacity needs exceed 64 cores (or 32 cores running SMT2
giving you 64 HW threads) you may need spilling over into an additional
z/VM instance anyhow ...
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards
Ingo Adlung
> For more information on Linux on System z, visit
> INVALID URI REMOVED
> u=http-3A__wiki.linuxvm.org_=DwIFaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg=jQ4IiHbzZ0l-wFKuUHMHvPIsi5vD8MZZCyI-
>
y49pWL0=JOdhBeHl39zHyMABaQdYX11GAkR60MQJSEE8fd4nBOU=Rl2aVlL8NmGJszDP
uUHMHvPIsi5vD8MZZCyI-
> y49pWL0=3v5chFeMYu7Ub0NTS60Umr6-wvkKPAaFM733Oocr1dw=cC1hSoq-
> qQNMuNRKx8GiNC-n3MST5jrWvqbze7D5Fjc=
>
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards
Ingo Adlung
Ingo Adlung
hat was the quick remedy :-) But in the end wanted to allow for as
many as the clients actually needed and/or desired ...
>
> Original message
> From: Ingo Adlung
> Date: 12/19/19 23:55 (GMT+10:00)
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Happy birthday
>
back from the 2.3 kernel to 2.2, still avoiding large memory allocations
when all a client wanted to operate where just a handful of devices ...
Mit freundlichem Gruß / Best regards
Ingo Adlung
Ingo Adlung
DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-
> siA1ZOg=jQ4IiHbzZ0l-wFKuUHMHvPIsi5vD8MZZCyI-
> y49pWL0=bbrzflMCZXsS7kt3_X3J_9yKrx2txiLNTiu5SNAwCKU=270I_rnjm-
> sbfNQzkWjRZSu_v1pXgJ59yrlnsUiUPAM=
>
Ingo Adlung
> For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@vm.marist.edu with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?
>
u=http-3A__www2.marist.edu_htbin_wlvindex-3FLINUX-2D
By which metrics do you think it suffered in its attractiveness?
Best regards
Ingo
Ingo AdlungIBM Deutschland Research &
IBM Distinguished Engineer Development
I may be wrong but I think the Guarded Page facility is about load
references. This could e.g. help Java to determine hot versus cold objects
without generating too much overhead. As such it could therewith also
assist determining the active working set ... but in the end the question
remains how
; Virtualization Development
>
-----------
> IBM Deutschland
> Schoenaicher Str. 220
> 71032 Boeblingen
> Phone: +49-7031-16-2177
> E-Mail: stefan.
I don't recall how an unsolicited DE is processed today, but I don't feel a
udev event would be the adequate action. Perhaps it could become an
informational log entry that could be filtered ...
Best regards
Ingo
Linux on 390 Port wrote on 21/05/2021 14:12:30:
> From: Dave Jones
> To:
50 matches
Mail list logo