The subject says it all. The -R switch is recursive, but ignores hidden
directories. And grep also ignores hidden files. Is there a way around this?
I couldn't find anything about this in man grep or on the net. In fact, aside
from my personal experience, I couldn't even find confirmation that
The subject says it all. The -R switch is recursive, but
ignores hidden
directories. And grep also ignores hidden files. Is there a
way around this?
I think the simplest solution is to supply grep with the filenames using
a pipe from ls -a
what about that new statistical spam filter(using bassian alg)
did anyone try it out?
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
Jerusalem Israel
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Amit Margalit wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
SpamAssassin is quite effective, indeed. I have no
shlomo solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The subject says it all. The -R switch is recursive, but ignores
hidden directories. And grep also ignores hidden files. Is there a
way around this? I couldn't find anything about this in man grep or
on the net. In fact, aside from my personal
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Alon Weinstein wrote:
The subject says it all. The -R switch is recursive, but
ignores hidden
directories. And grep also ignores hidden files. Is there a
way around this?
I think the simplest solution is to supply grep with the filenames using
a pipe from ls -a
ls
latly universaties went to use britanica's high learning system,
this system doesn't work with any other client rather than ie
and since it's about to be used as the main school system
it would limit the use of linux in universaties desktop and in
students home.
ie: here in huji's cs we don't
On Friday 24 January 2003 13:55, Ely Levy wrote:
latly universaties went to use britanica's high learning system,
this system doesn't work with any other client rather than ie
and since it's about to be used as the main school system
it would limit the use of linux in universaties desktop and
On Friday 24 January 2003 13:36, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
There is also a separate program called 'rgrep' (IIRC there is, or was,
such a redhat package)
It exists on Mandrake too. BTW, the rgrep man page (dated 1996) wrongly claims
that grep doesn't recurse.
FWIW, I used **time** to compare
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Alon Weinstein wrote:
can you show us tail of CUPS logs ?
Here's a more detailed tail of the error log (Log Level = debug), right
after trying to do:
lpr ps file
D [23/Jan/2003:14:44:39 +0200] [Job 17] /usr/lib/cups/filter/cupsomatic:
inserted option PS code:
D
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Daniel Vainsencher wrote:
I also use a bayesian spam filter, and am very happy with it. Also
google plan for spam/paul graham - the guy that recently revived the
interest in such filters.
I have also noticed quite a few spams recently that were made to pass such
filters:
On Friday 24 January 2003 04:15, Vadim Vygonets wrote:
Quoth Amit Margalit on Wed, Jan 22, 2003:
I use a combination of SpamAssassin and Razor. Very good.
SpamAssassin is quite effective, indeed. I have no experience
with Razor.
FWIW - I tried SpamAssassin and Razor, but the overhead
Hi,
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, shlomo solomon wrote:
FWIW - I tried SpamAssassin and Razor, but the overhead caused by Razor was
too much. Instead of downloading 50 e-mails in a minute or so, it took almost
an hour! I checked the headings added by SpamAssassin and discovered that
I don't know
On Friday 24 January 2003 11:49, Amit Margalit wrote:
I don't know when that was. Razor2 appears to be quite fast, unless you
set it up to automatically submit all caught spam to razor.
During the past month. And no, I didn't set it up to report spam to Razor.
As I said, this could be a case
I don't think emu is solution,
there are always glitchs
slow computers and many other problems especialy when home users would be
asked to use it.
anyhow it's time we stoped being ignored and tell them there are other
things beside ie in the world..
Ely Levy
System group
Hebrew University
EL what about that new statistical spam filter(using bassian alg)
EL did anyone try it out?
If you mean bayesian filters like bogofilter, I'm using it (bogofilter) at
home and at work and so do a number of my colleaugues and the results are
rather satisfying. The downside of the filter is that it
However, this kind of filter seems to be rather for personal use - because
if I would pass our sales/marketing communication through my database as
it is now, a lot of legitimate mails would end up in 'spam' bin, since
they talk exactly about the same things that many spams talk - prices,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 24 January 2003 13:16, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Vadim Vygonets [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Mailing lists should NOT add a Reply-To: header to its mail.
This is tangential to this thread, but I think that it is a good idea
to set Reply-To
On Friday 24 January 2003 13:22, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
shlomo solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The subject says it all. The -R switch is recursive, but ignores
hidden directories. And grep also ignores hidden files. Is there a
way around this? I couldn't find anything about this in man
I'd like to ask a related question: what about running a filer on the mail
server?
In the mail server I've set up, the only spam filter I put is denying by
connection address from black lists. This is because it requires
relatively little processing, and is done before the message hits the
queue
I use the following command for such things, which is good not only for
scanning ALL the files in a directory tree, but for any list of files:
(this example demonstrates how to find all the C files in the current
diretory and its sub directories that contain the word kuku):
find . -name
On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, Dan Armak wrote:
On Friday 24 January 2003 14:14, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Dan Armak [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not aware of List-* headers, and unless it is something
well-defined and standard there is no reason to add them just to help
KMail users.
Well in
Quoth Dan Armak on Fri, Jan 24, 2003:
On Friday 24 January 2003 14:14, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Well, I don't use KMail... From a very brief glance at its Manual this
seems to be specific to KMail, and will work only if all the mails
from the list go to a particular folder that KMail *knows*
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003, Tzafrir Cohen wrote about Re: spam mail filter:
I have also noticed quite a few spams recently that were made to pass such
filters:
Every suspicious keyword was cut in the middle (som of them: a number of
times) by html comments.
Something like:
MA!-- sdfsdf --KE
shlomo solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It exists on Mandrake too. BTW, the rgrep man page (dated 1996)
wrongly claims that grep doesn't recurse.
This was the case then, but grep (at least the GNU grep) added the
recursion capability since then. I would not be surprised if on some
systems
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 04:37:00PM +0200, Ely Levy wrote:
I don't think emu is solution,
there are always glitchs
slow computers and many other problems especialy when home users would be
asked to use it.
anyhow it's time we stoped being ignored and tell them there are other
things beside ie
I couldn't get the importance of the problem from your
post. Is it something that is already widely implemented or
is it some buzz words system that someone is trying to sell?
I know that TAU also uses this system, so I think it's safe to say it's
gaining momentum.
Hi,
I hate to ask the obvious things, but did you use 'razor-admin' to
register a user/pass pair with Razor2 ?
Can you run SpamAssassin with Razor with some extra logging options and
send the results? For example, call SpamAssassin from .procmailrc like
this:
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin -a -D
That's the beauty of bayesian filters - you don't declare anything in
particular as a spam indicator, you just tell the filter that's spam
when it is wrong. If you filter enough such emails as spam, and assuming
you don't get non-spam html comments, eventually !-- and --! will be
considered strong
This is a problem. It's a specific case of the rendering attack - in the
end, telling spam from information is a sort of turing test, and to even
try to make the decision, you have to judge the mail as it is rendered
(not at any of the lower levels at which it is transmitted). But so far,
I
DV you don't get non-spam html comments, eventually !-- and --! will be
DV considered strong indicators to spam, and that's it, they're filtered.
DV That the learning in the filter.
Here I have an example - a spam looking like:
M!--lvPVVE--y n!--lvPVVE--am!--lvPVVE--e i!--lvPVVE--s Rimma,BR
etc.
Oleg Goldshmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
See RFC2369 .
Yep. Learn something every day. I suppose it's time to ask on
gnu.emacs.gnus if there is a plan to implement these... ;-)
Hmm... There seems to be gnus-mailing-list-mode that does implement
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
DV you don't get non-spam html comments, eventually !-- and --! will be
DV considered strong indicators to spam, and that's it, they're filtered.
DV That the learning in the filter.
Here I have an example - a spam looking like:
M!--lvPVVE--y
Thanks everyone who replied, (it always gets me by a surprise that so many
people are kind enough to spend their time and answer)
OK, things are a little more difficult.
To begin, with I failed to describe my machine. It is an HP omnibook
laptop. It has network card built into it and a single
Are you kidding? this would -
1. Take too much time
2. Require knowing who the sender really is, which is not trivial
3. Run the risk of reporting an innocent, which has a far higher cost
than me personally losing one email.
OTOH, what we could do, is that after we confirm it's spam (my MUA
hi all, (and sorry for the cross posting)
we are developing a new feature for whatsup.org.il that will operate as a
screenshot gallery (send'm if you got'm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and as a Photo
album.
the purpose of the album will be to display pictures from events, lectures,
insta-parties and
Hi all,
Well I have WinXP RH8 on my HD.
I installed on my MBR GRUB with 2 entries
BUT !!! I wonted to clone the disk on a bigger one with guest 8 but some how when I
boot I only see the message 'GRUB' on my screen.
How can I reinstall GRUB ???
Thank you.
36 matches
Mail list logo
