On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Man Gregory wrote:
You can try to transliterate them into Hebrew.
Thanks for you help.
You can transliterate words like Firewalls, NAT, IDS, TCP/IP, IPX/SPX
so that other people can understand this?
Translating to Hebrew does not mean translating for a layperson. Those
On 10/7/05, Ira Abramov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The advice I gave Gregory though (off list) is to let the placement
agency translate and edit it for him. It's their job, damnit!
Maybe it's their job but from what I see they don't understand one bit
in technology and just do a (very fuzzy)
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Fri, 07 Oct:
Your other advice were very much to the point, and I have volunteered to
help Gregory edit/tanslate the resume, partly for the egotistical
reason of handing his resume to our HR staff at work :)
Good luck on that refferal bonus :)
Guys
We host software.co.il at http://www.johncompanies.com/ - they are
good, performance is fast, they are FOSS-friendly, i.e. give discounts
if you host an OSS project. For an economy-virtual server, imho, they
cannot be beat. OTOH, if you need the real thing, there is nothing like
rackspace prices are nightmare! specially when it comes to private
people or very small businesses..
I found that EV1 are much cheaper, and their connection to the world
is great (you can find some MRTG graphs there regarding their
connection).
Hetz
On 10/7/05, Danny Lieberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, 7 בOctober 2005 12:18, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
I found that EV1 are much cheaper,
Just a reminder: These were the people that jumped on the SCO
bandwagon and bought SCO licenses to use Linux:
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20040322133607169
The market has enough
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:14:08AM +0200, Michael Sternberg wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lior Kesos
I've reccommended http://www.rotmax.com in the past and I'm
still happy with their service - it's a mediuim size hosting
operation.
I've been hosting there for the past 3 years
Some managers are fools. I've been working with quite few stupid
managers in various jobs and places :)
Does this means EV1 service is bad? does this means any other
problems? I don't think so.
Their management goofed. Happened with almost ANY management in the
world (specially when you treat PR
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 02:48:07AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
[ regarding security ]
With some other web hosting + shell - you are really totally depend on
his security measures, and I have been an employee of some of the well
known ISP's in this country who's their security skills and
The important issue is the terms of the SCO Linux license which EV1
bought.
AFAIK, the terms of the SCO Linux license (which become binding once
the document is signed and becomes a contract from legal point of view)
are such that EV1 are permitted to use only a certain binary-only
version of
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Ira Abramov wrote:
Quoting Amos Shapira, from the post of Fri, 07 Oct:
First advise I got from all job agencies I worked with when looking for
jobs is Make it in Hebrew.
I think this is the main issue that seperates your advide from those
posted before - Placement
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Some managers are fools. I've been working with quite few stupid
managers in various jobs and places :)
Does this means EV1 service is bad? does this means any other
problems? I don't think so.
Their management goofed.
Hetz
rackspace pricing is obscene, BUT, their service is at a completely
different level - I have 2 clients using rackspace and all I can say is
you get what you pay for. Their packages
are NOT for small business, not unless the small business can fork out
$700/month for a dedicated server,
Well, allow me to update you :)
They made a mistake (actually their CEO did), and they appologized
publically and cancelled all the licensing issues with SCO - so the
story ends..
You CAN install anything you like in those machines. Just for the fun
I switched the machine I had there from RHEL 3
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:36 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Well, allow me to update you :)
They made a mistake (actually their CEO did), and they appologized
publically and cancelled all the licensing issues with SCO - so the
story ends..
Sounds too good to be true.
Do you have a citation for
Hi,
They bought SCOSource licenses for their Linux systems. That license
allows them to only use certain blessed versions of the Linux kernel
(binary only). Quite a severe limitation, IMHO.
And they cancelled the license deal with SCO. The press seems to
forget to publish such small things
I have 2 of their 5$ accounts and have shell access for both
domains.(which both lead to my user on the hositng machine - give you
a homey(~) feeling ...
On 10/7/05, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:14:08AM +0200, Michael Sternberg wrote:
-Original
I asked for a formal note from EV1. As soon as it hits my email box,
I'll publish it here.
Thanks,
Hetz
On 10/7/05, Omer Zak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 14:36 +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Well, allow me to update you :)
They made a mistake (actually their CEO did), and
On ה', 2005-10-06 at 21:09 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
On 10/6/05, Uri Even-Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, but we can't actually use the standard as long as the majority of
people can't read it. And they can't read it because they use MS
Office. You can't send a non-MS-Office-compatible
Here's the mail. their AUP and TOS don't mention any SCO btw.
Thanks,
Hetz
-- Forwarded message --
From: 01 - Headsurfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 7, 2005 5:15 PM
Subject: RE: regarding EV1 and SCO
To: Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Hetz Ben Hamo,
There is not really
And after a bit pushing - I got this:
-- Forwarded message --
From: 01 - Headsurfer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 7, 2005 5:24 PM
Subject: RE: regarding EV1 and SCO
To: Hetz Ben Hamo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are no license issues between EV1 and SCO. However, as I said, you are
Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 07:54:28AM +0300, Ira Abramov wrote:
The advice I gave Gregory though (off list) is to let the placement
agency translate and edit it for him. It's their job, damnit!
Holy freaking cow, are you seriously suggesting to let the placement
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 10:56:25AM +0200, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 10:05:56PM +0300, Uri Even-Chen wrote:
using some version of Windows. I wonder how come most people
companies prefer Windows - is it because they're already used to it, or
because they're afraid of
Today I upgraded my laptop from Debian Sarge to Debian Etch.
After editing the /etc/apt/sources.list file, I used:
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade
And then I ran few upgrade rounds through aptitude.
I encountered the following problems:
1. The udev package could not be upgraded, because
Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
If software freedom is meaningless to you, 95% of the time non-free
software gives you higher value (assuming you have the money :)
I think that's why most people prefer Windows, MS Office and other
non-free softwares. Most people don't care about software freedom,
Oded Shimon wrote:
It's much much more than that. People are scared of change, they are scared
and revoke anything that is different than the norm, you could make a
PERFECT windows clone in KDE somehow, and let people use that, telling em
it's windows and they'd be happy, give them the exact
On 10/8/05, Ilya Konstantinov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On ה', 2005-10-06 at 21:09 +1000, Amos Shapira wrote:
Which just gave me an idea for the OO people - taking a page
out of Firefox' book
Which page? If you're referring to IE View, you're talking about the
No, I was reffering to the
On 10/8/05, Uri Even-Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ilya Konstantinov wrote:
If software freedom is meaningless to you, 95% of the time non-free
software gives you higher value (assuming you have the money :)
I think that's why most people prefer Windows, MS Office and other
non-free
On 10/3/05, Oded Shimon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
quite a while without knowing it. it was fine for about a month, till at
And all this time without even installing the Firefox IE theme?
Wow. Good for you!
--Amos
To unsubscribe,
Dear list,
I was surprised to read about SCO's Linux License, and I decided to
search on Google. I search for linux license and got 10 websites - 8 of
them have the word SCO in the title (and all the first 5). At least the
2 first websites are of SCO itself. Here they are for your reference:
Uri Even-Chen wrote:
Dear list,
I was surprised to read about SCO's Linux License, and I decided to
search on Google. I search for linux license and got 10 websites - 8 of
them have the word SCO in the title (and all the first 5). At least the
2 first websites are of SCO itself. Here
31 matches
Mail list logo
